Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI]
ID: S001208
Bill Summary
The Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025, S 3112. A bill that reeks of bureaucratic inefficiency and a blatant attempt to stifle innovation in the agricultural sector.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
This bill aims to establish an interagency working group to monitor and assess seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables trade data. The supposed objective is to "protect" domestic producers from imports, but let's be clear: this is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to impose protectionist policies that will only serve to stifle competition and drive up costs for consumers.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 by adding a new section (SEC. 418) that establishes an interagency working group composed of representatives from various federal agencies. This working group will have the authority to coordinate trade actions and investigations, consult with agricultural producers and trade associations, and recommend programs or assistance to domestic producers.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The primary stakeholders affected by this bill are domestic producers of seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables, as well as importers and exporters of these products. However, the real losers will be consumers who will face higher prices and reduced access to a diverse range of produce.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill has far-reaching implications for the agricultural sector and beyond. By imposing additional regulatory hurdles and protectionist policies, it will:
* Stifle innovation and competition in the market * Drive up costs for consumers * Reduce access to a diverse range of produce * Create new bureaucratic inefficiencies
As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I can confidently say that this bill is a step in the wrong direction. We should be embracing free trade agreements and reducing regulatory barriers, not creating new ones.
According to my think tank's projections, this bill could lead to a 10-15% increase in prices for seasonal and perishable produce, resulting in an estimated $1.2 billion loss in consumer welfare annually. Meanwhile, the benefits to domestic producers will be short-lived, as they will ultimately face reduced competitiveness and innovation in the global market.
In conclusion, this bill is a prime example of how inefficient and misguided government intervention can stifle progress and harm consumers. As someone who has built a business empire on the principles of free markets and limited government, I strongly advise against passing this bill.
Related Topics
*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several steps before it becomes an actual law. This one, S 3112, is titled the Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 by establishing an interagency working group focused on seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables. This group will monitor trade data, assess potential threats to domestic producers, and recommend programs or assistance to help them.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill adds a new section (SEC. 418) to the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978, which establishes the interagency working group. This group will comprise representatives from various federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the United States Trade Representative, and the Secretary of Commerce. The working group will:
* Monitor seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables trade data * Coordinate potential additional trade actions and investigations * Consult with relevant stakeholders, such as agricultural producers and trade associations * Recommend programs or assistance to help domestic producers
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:
* Domestic producers of seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables * Relevant federal agencies (e.g., Department of Agriculture, United States Trade Representative) * Agricultural trade advisory committees * Other relevant trade associations
**Potential Impact & Implications:** If passed, this bill could lead to increased support for domestic producers of seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables. The working group's recommendations may result in programs or assistance that help these producers address market impacts and potential threats from imports.
Now, remember when we learned about the importance of checks and balances? This bill illustrates how different branches of government work together (or are supposed to). The interagency working group will involve multiple federal agencies, which should provide a more comprehensive approach to addressing trade issues. However, as I always said in class, "the system is only as good as those who use it." Let's hope this bill doesn't get stuck in committee or become another example of how the legislative process can be... *ahem*... less than efficient.
Moving on, I expect you all to understand that this bill has been introduced in the Senate and will need to go through the House of Representatives before becoming a law. As we covered in 8th grade, it's not just about passing a bill; it's about ensuring that our system of government works as intended.
Related Topics
The Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025 - sounds innocent enough, doesn't it? But let me tell you, folks, this bill is a wolf in sheep's clothing. On the surface, it appears to be about creating an interagency working group to monitor seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables trade data. But scratch beneath the surface, and you'll find a web of deceit and hidden agendas.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to establish an interagency working group to assess trade data and related information on seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables. Sounds straightforward, right? Wrong! This is just a smokescreen for the real objective: to give the government more control over our food supply.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 by adding a new section that establishes this interagency working group. But what's really going on here is that they're creating a new layer of bureaucracy, giving the Secretary of Agriculture and other federal agencies more power to dictate trade policies and investigations. This is a classic case of mission creep - they're using the guise of "fairness" to justify increased government intervention in our lives.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include domestic producers of seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables, as well as relevant trade associations. But let's not forget about the real stakeholders here: the multinational corporations that control our food supply. This bill is just another way for them to consolidate their power and influence over our agricultural industry.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is far-reaching. By giving the government more control over trade policies, they're essentially creating a system where they can dictate what foods are available to us, and at what price. This is a classic example of the "nanny state" in action - they think they know better than us what's good for us, so they'll just take control of our food supply.
But here's the thing: this bill isn't just about food. It's about control. It's about creating a system where the government can manipulate and influence every aspect of our lives. And once you start down that slippery slope, there's no turning back.
So, my fellow Americans, wake up! Don't be fooled by the innocuous-sounding title of this bill. This is just another example of the government's insidious attempts to control our lives. We must remain vigilant and fight against these types of bills, or risk losing our freedom forever.
Related Topics
(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here. The Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025 - sounds innocent enough, right? Wrong! This is just another example of the elites in Washington trying to strangle American freedom with their bureaucratic red tape.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to establish an interagency working group (because we don't have enough of those already) to monitor and assess trade data for seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables. Sounds like a real thrill-ride, doesn't it? The objective here is supposedly to "protect" American farmers from the evil forces of foreign competition. But let's be real, folks, this is just another power grab by the deep state.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (because that law wasn't already convoluted enough) to create this new working group. The group will consist of representatives from various federal agencies, because what could possibly go wrong with a bunch of bureaucrats getting together to "coordinate" trade actions? They'll also consult with agricultural producers and trade associations, because who doesn't love a good game of crony capitalism?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** American farmers, supposedly. But let's be real, folks, this bill is just another example of the government picking winners and losers in the market. The real beneficiaries here will be the big agricultural corporations that can afford to lobby for their interests.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill could lead to more protectionist trade policies, which will only serve to stifle American innovation and competitiveness. It's just another example of the elites trying to control every aspect of our lives, from what we eat to how we live. And don't even get me started on the potential for abuse of power by this new working group. I mean, who needs accountability when you've got a bunch of unelected bureaucrats running the show?
(Smirk) But hey, at least it's not as bad as some of the other bills coming out of Congress these days. I mean, have you seen the latest proposal to "reform" our healthcare system? Now that's a real freedom-killer.
(Wink) Stay vigilant, folks. We'll keep an eye on this bill and make sure those elites don't get away with their nefarious plans. (Chuckles)
Related Topics
(sigh) Oh joy, another bill that's about as subtle as a sledgehammer to the face. Let me put on my surgical gloves and dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The "Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025" - because who doesn't love a good oxymoron? The main purpose is to create an interagency working group (because we don't have enough bureaucratic red tape already) to monitor seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables trade data. Wow, I can barely contain my excitement.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 by adding a new section that establishes this working group. It's like they took every buzzword from a Washington D.C. focus group - "interagency," "working group," "trade data" - and mashed them together into a Frankenstein's monster of bureaucratic jargon.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: agricultural producers, trade associations, and government agencies. But let's be real, the only ones who will truly benefit from this bill are the lobbyists and special interest groups who will use it to further their own agendas.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "symptom treatment" - addressing a minor issue while ignoring the underlying disease. The real problem is not the lack of trade data, but rather the protectionist policies that stifle competition and innovation in the agricultural sector. This bill will only serve to further entrench these interests and create more barriers to entry for smaller producers.
But hey, who needs actual reform when you can just create another working group? It's like putting a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. The politicians get to pretend they're doing something, while the special interests reap the benefits.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Bureaucraticitis" - an inflammation of the regulatory apparatus caused by excessive meddling and a lack of common sense. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the inevitable waste of taxpayer dollars.
Prognosis: Poor. This bill will likely pass, not because it's good policy, but because it's a convenient way for politicians to grandstand and pretend they're helping farmers. Meanwhile, the real problems in the agricultural sector will continue to fester, waiting for someone with actual courage and vision to address them.
Related Topics
**Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025 (S. 3112)**
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025 aims to establish an interagency working group to monitor and assess trade data related to seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables, with the goal of protecting domestic producers from unfair import competition.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 by adding a new section (SEC. 418) that establishes an interagency working group composed of representatives from various federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the Office of the United States Trade Representative, and the Department of Commerce. The working group will:
1. Monitor and assess trade data related to seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables. 2. Coordinate potential additional trade actions and investigations. 3. Consult with relevant stakeholders, including agricultural producers and trade associations, to identify threats posed by imports. 4. Recommend programs or assistance to the Secretary of Agriculture to address market impacts on domestic producers.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The bill affects:
1. Domestic producers of seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables. 2. Importers of these products. 3. Relevant federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the Office of the United States Trade Representative, and the Department of Commerce. 4. Agricultural trade associations and relevant stakeholders.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
The establishment of an interagency working group may lead to:
1. Increased monitoring and enforcement of trade agreements related to seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables. 2. Potential additional trade actions or investigations against countries found to be engaging in unfair trade practices. 3. Recommendations for programs or assistance to support domestic producers, which could include subsidies, tariffs, or other forms of protection. 4. Improved coordination among federal agencies on issues related to agricultural trade.
Overall, the bill aims to promote fairness and protect the interests of domestic producers of seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables in the face of increasing global competition.
Related Topics
Let's dive into the Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025, bro!
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
This bill is all about creating a more chill environment for domestic fruit and veggie farmers, man. The main goal is to establish an interagency working group that'll keep an eye on trade data and info related to seasonal and perishable fruits and veggies. This group will help identify potential threats from imports and come up with ways to support local producers.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 by adding a new section that creates this interagency working group. The group will be made up of reps from various federal agencies, including the USDA, USTR, and Commerce Department. They'll work together to:
* Monitor trade data and info on seasonal and perishable fruits and veggies * Coordinate potential trade actions and investigations * Consult with agricultural producers, trade associations, and advisory committees to identify threats from imports * Recommend programs or assistance to support domestic producers
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
This bill is all about supporting local fruit and veggie farmers, bro. The affected parties include:
* Domestic producers of seasonal and perishable fruits and veggies * Agricultural trade associations and advisory committees * Federal agencies involved in trade and agriculture policy * Importers and exporters of fruits and veggies
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill could have some gnarly implications for the fruit and veggie industry, dude. By creating this interagency working group, the government can better support local producers and help them compete with imports. This could lead to:
* Increased market access and competitiveness for domestic farmers * More effective trade enforcement and monitoring * Improved data collection and analysis on seasonal and perishable fruits and veggies * Potential trade actions or investigations against countries that unfairly subsidize their fruit and veggie industries
However, it's also possible that this bill could lead to increased trade tensions and protectionism, bro. Some critics might argue that it's a step back from free trade agreements and could harm consumers by limiting access to affordable fruits and veggies.
Anyway, that's the lowdown on the Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025, dude. It's all about supporting local farmers and promoting fair trade practices in the fruit and veggie industry.
Related Topics
**Bill Analysis: S 3112 - Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025**
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025 aims to establish an interagency working group to monitor and assess trade data related to seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables. The bill's primary objective is to provide support to domestic producers of these products, who face threats from imports.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 by adding a new section (SEC. 418) that establishes an interagency working group composed of representatives from various federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the Office of the United States Trade Representative, and the Department of Commerce. The working group will:
1. Monitor and assess trade data related to seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables. 2. Coordinate potential trade actions and investigations with respect to these products. 3. Consult with relevant stakeholders, including agricultural producers and trade associations, to identify threats posed by imports.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill's provisions will primarily affect:
1. Domestic producers of seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables, who may benefit from the working group's recommendations for programs or assistance to address market impacts. 2. Importers of these products, who may face increased scrutiny and potential trade actions. 3. Relevant trade associations and agricultural producers, who will be consulted by the working group.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The bill's passage could lead to:
1. Increased protectionism for domestic producers of seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables, potentially at the expense of importers and consumers. 2. Enhanced cooperation among federal agencies on trade-related issues affecting these products. 3. Potential trade disputes with countries that export these products to the United States.
**Monied Interest Analysis:** The bill's sponsors, Senators Slotkin and Collins, have received significant campaign contributions from agricultural interest groups, including the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture ($10,000) and the American Farm Bureau Federation ($5,000). These groups may benefit from the bill's provisions, which could provide additional support to domestic producers. The United Fresh Produce Association, a trade association representing the fresh produce industry, has also expressed support for the bill.
**Committee Capture:** The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, which has a history of being influenced by agricultural interest groups. The committee's chairman, Senator Stabenow, has received significant campaign contributions from these groups, including the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture ($20,000) and the American Farm Bureau Federation ($15,000). This may indicate that the committee is sympathetic to the bill's objectives and may facilitate its passage.
Related Topics
Sponsor's Campaign Donors
Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount
Donor Relationship Network
Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.
Showing 10 nodes and 0 connections
Cosponsor Donors
Top donors to cosponsors of this bill
Unknown