Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/3112
Last Updated: November 8, 2025

Sponsored by

Sen. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI]

ID: S001208

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

(sigh) Oh joy, another bill that's about as subtle as a sledgehammer to the face. Let me put on my surgical gloves and dissect this mess.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The "Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025" - because who doesn't love a good oxymoron? The main purpose is to create an interagency working group (because we don't have enough bureaucratic red tape already) to monitor seasonal and perishable fruits and vegetables trade data. Wow, I can barely contain my excitement.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 by adding a new section that establishes this working group. It's like they took every buzzword from a Washington D.C. focus group - "interagency," "working group," "trade data" - and mashed them together into a Frankenstein's monster of bureaucratic jargon.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: agricultural producers, trade associations, and government agencies. But let's be real, the only ones who will truly benefit from this bill are the lobbyists and special interest groups who will use it to further their own agendas.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "symptom treatment" - addressing a minor issue while ignoring the underlying disease. The real problem is not the lack of trade data, but rather the protectionist policies that stifle competition and innovation in the agricultural sector. This bill will only serve to further entrench these interests and create more barriers to entry for smaller producers.

But hey, who needs actual reform when you can just create another working group? It's like putting a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. The politicians get to pretend they're doing something, while the special interests reap the benefits.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Bureaucraticitis" - an inflammation of the regulatory apparatus caused by excessive meddling and a lack of common sense. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the inevitable waste of taxpayer dollars.

Prognosis: Poor. This bill will likely pass, not because it's good policy, but because it's a convenient way for politicians to grandstand and pretend they're helping farmers. Meanwhile, the real problems in the agricultural sector will continue to fester, waiting for someone with actual courage and vision to address them.

Related Topics

Civil Rights & Liberties State & Local Government Affairs Transportation & Infrastructure Small Business & Entrepreneurship Government Operations & Accountability National Security & Intelligence Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Federal Budget & Appropriations Congressional Rules & Procedures
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$145,300
25 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$42,100
Committees
$0
Individuals
$103,200

No PAC contributions found

1
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
2
THE CHICKASAW NATION
2 transactions
$6,600
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
4 transactions
$6,600
4
SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
5
CHEROKEE NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
6
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
7
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
1 transaction
$3,300
8
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
1 transaction
$3,300
9
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI
1 transaction
$3,300
10
SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IA
1 transaction
$2,500

No committee contributions found

1
DAVIS, BONNIE M.
1 transaction
$11,600
2
ABDEY, JULIAN
1 transaction
$6,600
3
ARONSON, BERNARD W.
1 transaction
$6,600
4
ARONSON, FELICIA
1 transaction
$6,600
5
CHUN, EUNU
1 transaction
$6,600
6
COLEMAN, TIM
1 transaction
$6,600
7
KLARMAN, SETH A
1 transaction
$6,600
8
LAUFER, ERIC
1 transaction
$6,600
9
MOYLE, SABRINA
1 transaction
$6,600
10
SCHULER, MARY JO
1 transaction
$6,600
11
SCHULER, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$6,600
12
TRONE, DAVID J
1 transaction
$6,600
13
TRONE, JUNE S
1 transaction
$6,600
14
WALSH, JOHN F III
1 transaction
$6,600
15
KIRK, CLAY KENAN
1 transaction
$5,800

Donor Network - Sen. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 26 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $145,300

Top Donors - Sen. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

10 Orgs15 Individuals