Outdoor Americans with Disabilities Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/2968
Last Updated: March 23, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

ID: L000577

Follow the money

The bill

Outdoor Americans with Disabilities Act

S. 2968, 119th Congress β€” read as touching Construction & Engineering.

The sponsor

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$179,700 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.

February 11, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

πŸ“ Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

πŸ—³οΈ

Floor Action

βœ…

Passed Senate

πŸ›οΈ

House Review

πŸŽ‰

Passed Congress

πŸ–ŠοΈ

Presidential Action

βš–οΈ

Became Law

πŸ“š How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Outdoor Americans with Disabilities Act (OADA) claims to ensure access to certain public land for people with disabilities. How noble. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to appease off-road vehicle enthusiasts and the industries that cater to them.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

* The bill prioritizes updating travel management plans and motor vehicle use plans to accommodate more off-road vehicles on public land. * It requires the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to account for the total length of traversable roads in each square mile of public land, ensuring that at least 2.5 miles of authorized road are accessible to motorized vehicles or off-road vehicles. * The bill prohibits closing roads that would result in a net decrease of authorized road access, unless it's deemed necessary for health or safety reasons.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* Off-road vehicle enthusiasts and industries (e.g., ATV manufacturers, tour operators) * Disability advocacy groups (who will likely be placated with token gestures while the real beneficiaries reap the rewards) * Environmental organizations (who will probably be ignored or steamrolled by the off-road lobby) * Local communities and indigenous tribes (whose concerns about land use and resource management will likely be disregarded)

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

* Increased environmental degradation due to expanded off-road vehicle access * Potential harm to public health and safety, as more roads are opened to motorized vehicles in areas with sensitive ecosystems or wildlife habitats * Token gestures towards disability accessibility, while the real focus remains on catering to off-road enthusiasts * Further erosion of public land management principles, prioritizing special interests over responsible stewardship

In conclusion, this bill is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. It's a Trojan horse for off-road vehicle enthusiasts, wrapped in a veneer of concern for disability accessibility. The real disease here is the corruption and cowardice that allows politicians to prioritize special interests over the public good. And we're all just along for the ride – or should I say, the off-road adventure?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

πŸ’° Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Congress 119 β€’ 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$179,700
17 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$0
Committees
$0
Individuals
$179,700

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

1
METZGER, WILLIAM
2 transactions
$17,400
2
RICHARDSON, CHERYL
2 transactions
$17,400
3
DONADIO, RICHARD
2 transactions
$17,400
4
MACRICOSTAS, GEORGE
1 transaction
$13,200
5
PFAUTCH, ROY
1 transaction
$9,900
6
NICOLAISEN, JAMES E
1 transaction
$8,700
7
S., TINA
1 transaction
$8,700
8
DE CARLI, JAMES
1 transaction
$8,700
9
EDWARDS, ZELLA
1 transaction
$8,700
10
ZALL, MARGIE
1 transaction
$8,700
11
PLEW, JEAN
1 transaction
$8,700
12
JONES, MELBERTA
1 transaction
$8,700
13
YAVELAK, MARY
1 transaction
$8,700
14
BARNHILL, JANIS
1 transaction
$8,700
15
SCULLY, JOSEPH
1 transaction
$8,700
16
DOWNING, DORRIS
1 transaction
$8,700
17
DIDGET, LAUREL
1 transaction
$8,700

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]

ID: C001114

Top Contributors

10

1
KELLER INVESTMENTS PROPERTIES
OrganizationCENTERVILLE, UT
$29,800
Dec 31, 2023
2
SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
OrganizationSUQUAMISH, WA
$1,000
Aug 14, 2024
3
TENNIS & SUN LC
OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT
$1,000
Jun 10, 2024
4
BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Mar 25, 2024
5
FUGAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES INC
OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT
$1,000
Sep 13, 2023
6
STEEL, SHAWN
STEEL & EISNER, LLP β€’ ATTORNEY
IndividualSURFSIDE, CA
$10,000
Mar 25, 2024
7
STEEL, SHAWN
STEEL & EISNER, LLP β€’ ATTORNEY
IndividualSURFSIDE, CA
$10,000
Mar 25, 2024
8
BAKER, PAUL
RETIRED β€’ RETIRED
IndividualTUCSON, AZ
$6,600
Jun 5, 2024
9
BAKER, PAUL
RETIRED β€’ RETIRED
IndividualTUCSON, AZ
$6,600
Jun 5, 2024
10
BERKLEY, WILLIAM
WRBC β€’ CHAIRMAN
IndividualKEY LARGO, FL
$6,600
Jun 7, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 40 nodes and 23 connections (53 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $211,500

Top Donors - Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Showing top 17 donors by contribution amount

17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.

  • Section 3 requires updating travel management plans and motor vehicle use plans, and Section 4(a)(3) prioritizes inclusion and approval of roads for recreation, which will likely increase road construction and maintenance activities benefiting construction and engineering firms.

  • The bill focuses on road access and motor vehicle use on public lands, which could support infrastructure related to energy transportation (e.g., access for maintenance of pipelines or energy facilities), though the connection is indirect; Section 4(a)(1) and (3) emphasize road traversability and approval for motorized vehicles, which may benefit energy infrastructure operators needing access.

  • +Automotive (Legacy)confidence 0.70

    Section 4(a)(3) prioritizes roads for motorized vehicles and off-road vehicles, including electric bicycles and over-snow vehicles, which could increase demand for vehicles used on public lands, benefiting automotive manufacturers.

  • Section 4(a)(3) explicitly includes electric bicycles in the list of motorized vehicles for which road access is prioritized, which may support light electric vehicle use, though the impact on broader EV industry is limited.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β€” they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Related Bills