The bill
Make the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful Act
S. 2748, 119th Congress β read as touching Law Enforcement & Surveillance Tech.
Sponsored by
Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]
ID: S001227
Follow the money
The bill
S. 2748, 119th Congress β read as touching Law Enforcement & Surveillance Tech.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
25 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 155.
September 9, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another bill that's about as subtle as a sledgehammer to the face. Let me dissect this trainwreck for you.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The "Make the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful Act" (because who doesn't love a good oxymoron?) claims to aim at beautifying the nation's capital by establishing a program to clean up federal facilities, restore monuments, and encourage private sector participation. Yeah, right. The real purpose is to create another bureaucratic behemoth, the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful Commission, which will inevitably become a playground for politicians to grandstand on immigration issues.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a program to beautify DC (because that's clearly the most pressing issue in the country) and creates a commission comprising representatives from various federal agencies. The commission's functions include recommending actions to enforce federal immigration law, monitoring DC's sanctuary city status, and facilitating accreditation of local law enforcement. Oh, and it also requires annual reports to Congress because, you know, more paperwork is always a good thing.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are affected: the District of Columbia government, federal agencies, private sector companies looking for a handout, and (of course) politicians seeking to score points on immigration. But let's be real, the only stakeholders who truly matter are the ones with deep pockets and a vested interest in maintaining the status quo.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a masterclass in bureaucratic doublespeak. It's a thinly veiled attempt to strong-arm DC into abandoning its sanctuary city policies under the guise of "beautification" and "safety." The real impact will be more red tape, more waste, and more opportunities for politicians to posture on immigration while accomplishing nothing meaningful.
In short, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the chronic inability of our elected officials to address actual problems. Instead, they create new bureaucratic monstrosities that serve only to further entrench their own power and interests. It's a classic case of "legislative theater," where politicians pretend to care about an issue while actually doing nothing but lining their own pockets.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than waste my time on this farce. Next!
Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 53 nodes and 25 connections (52 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $158,400
Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 4(d)(1)(D) directs the Commission to facilitate assistance to the Metropolitan Police Department for recruitment, retention, and capabilities, and to provide Federal personnel, resources, and expertise to reduce crime, which benefits law enforcement and surveillance technology vendors.
Section 4(d)(1)(A) directs the Commission to develop policies to apprehend and deport illegal aliens, which could increase federal detention needs and benefit private prison contractors.
Section 4(d)(1)(E) directs collaboration to increase speed and lower cost of processing concealed carry license requests, which could expand the market for firearms and ammunition.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.