Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/2587
Last Updated: July 11, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]

ID: C001047

Follow the money

The bill

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026

S. 2587, 119th Congress — read as touching Hospitals & Health Systems.

The sponsor

Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$107,400 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Agriculture" section, p. 353-355 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 140.

July 30, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another exercise in futility, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this appropriations bill, shall we?

**Total Funding Amounts and Budget Allocations**

The grand total for this monstrosity is $3,977,088,000. A staggering amount, no doubt, but let's not be fooled – it's just a drop in the ocean compared to the overall federal budget. The allocations are as follows:

* Employment and Training Administration: $2,919,332,000 (73% of total funding) + Adult employment and training activities: $875,649,000 + Youth activities: $948,130,000 + Dislocated worker employment and training activities: $1,095,553,000 * National programs: $1,057,756,000 (27% of total funding) + Dislocated workers assistance national reserve: $300,859,000 + Technical assistance and demonstration projects: $115,000,000

**Key Programs and Agencies Receiving Funds**

The usual suspects are getting their fair share of the loot:

* The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) is the big winner here, with a whopping $2.9 billion allocated for its various programs. * The National Apprenticeship Act gets a paltry $3.9 million, because who needs apprenticeships when you can have more bureaucrats?

**Notable Increases or Decreases from Previous Years**

I'll spare you the details, but rest assured that there are plenty of increases and decreases to go around. It's all just a shell game, folks.

* The WIOA funding is up by $100 million from last year, because apparently, we need more "workforce innovation" (read: bureaucratic busywork). * The dislocated workers assistance national reserve gets a boost of $50 million, because who doesn't love throwing money at problems without actually solving them?

**Riders or Policy Provisions Attached to Funding**

Oh boy, where do I even start? There are plenty of goodies hidden in this bill:

* A provision allowing outlying areas to submit consolidated grant applications for WIOA funds. Because, you know, it's not like they have better things to do than fill out paperwork. * A rider that allows the Secretary of Labor to reserve up to 10% of certain funds for "technical assistance and additional activities related to the transition to the WIOA." Translation: more bureaucratic slush fund.

**Fiscal Impact and Deficit Implications**

Don't worry about it, folks. This bill is just a tiny drop in the ocean of our national debt. The fiscal impact will be negligible... until we have to pay for it all, that is.

In conclusion, this appropriations bill is just another example of Congress's favorite game: "Let's throw money at problems and hope they go away!" It's a never-ending cycle of bureaucratic waste, pork-bar

Related Topics

Federal Budget & AppropriationsDefense Spending & Procurement
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$319,500
170 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$4,800
Committees
$0
Individuals
$314,700

No PAC contributions found

1
CHEROKEE NATION
1 transaction
$2,800
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$2,000

No committee contributions found

1
ARNOLD, JOHN MR.
2 transactions
$9,900
2
KAY, ALISON MS.
2 transactions
$9,900
3
MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE
2 transactions
$9,900
4
MANDELBLATT, ERIC
2 transactions
$9,900
5
MANOCHERIAN, GREG MR.
2 transactions
$9,900
6
MANOCHERIAN, JED MR.
2 transactions
$9,900
7
MANOCHERIAN, JENNIFER MS.
2 transactions
$9,900
8
MANOCHERIAN, KIM
2 transactions
$9,900
9
EASTER, ROBERT MR.
2 transactions
$6,700
10
HARRISON, CURTIS MR.
2 transactions
$6,700
11
NOVIK, RICHARD MR.
2 transactions
$6,700
12
OSGOOD, STEVEN MR.
2 transactions
$6,700
13
POOLE, DONNA MS.
2 transactions
$6,700
14
ARNOLD, LAURA MRS.
2 transactions
$6,600
15
MANOCHERIAN, FRAYDUN MR.
2 transactions
$6,600
16
MANOCHERIAN, JOHN D. MR.
2 transactions
$6,600
17
MANOCHERIAN, JUDITH D. MRS.
2 transactions
$6,600
18
RICKETTS, J PETER MR.
2 transactions
$6,600
19
SABIN, ANDREW MR.
2 transactions
$6,600
20
THOMAS, SUSAN MS.
2 transactions
$6,200
21
THOMAS, WILLIAM MR.
2 transactions
$6,200
22
BUFFALOE, STEPHAINE DR.
1 transaction
$5,000
23
DOMINGUEZ, JOSEPH MR.
1 transaction
$3,300
24
OLEJASZ, ROBERTA R. MS.
1 transaction
$3,300
25
REGAN, BRIAN MR.
1 transaction
$3,300
26
THOMAS, JILL MS.
1 transaction
$3,300
27
WU, ALBERT MR.
1 transaction
$3,300
28
HOBBS, DAVID MR.
3 transactions
$3,000
29
JACKSON, RYAN MR.
1 transaction
$2,800
30
BURGETT, WILLIAM MR.
1 transaction
$2,500
31
FAY, KEVIN MR.
1 transaction
$2,500
32
FOSTER, JEFF MR.
1 transaction
$2,500
33
JAWORSKI, CAROLE MS.
1 transaction
$2,500
34
JAWORSKI, DAN MR.
1 transaction
$2,500
35
POPP, MONICA
1 transaction
$2,500
36
JOHNSON, H. FISK MR.
1 transaction
$2,100
37
ROSEN, DEAN MR.
2 transactions
$2,000
38
ZALISZCZUK, MARY S. MS.
1 transaction
$2,000
39
PETERSON, MICHAEL A. MR.
1 transaction
$1,800
40
DEVIERNO, JOHN A. MR.
1 transaction
$1,500
41
LASS, CONRAD A. MR.
2 transactions
$1,500
42
MAURER, GREG MR.
1 transaction
$1,500
43
MCKEE, KAREN MS.
1 transaction
$1,500
44
ACEVEDO, JORGE MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
45
ANDERSON, S. MICKEY MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
46
ASKEW, WHITAKER MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
47
BARNETTE, JAMES MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
48
BARRON, KATHLEEN MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
49
BETTGER, RICHARD MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
50
BOZICH, FRANK MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
51
BRENDLEY, KEITH MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
52
BROCK, HEIDI MRS.
1 transaction
$1,000
53
BROWN, DAVID MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
54
CANTER, CAITLIN MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
55
CAUTHEN, KHARY
1 transaction
$1,000
56
COHEN, GREG MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
57
CORDLE, DEAN M. MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
58
DARDIS, DAVID MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
59
DESAI, SACHIN
1 transaction
$1,000
60
DIKE, CHIMA
1 transaction
$1,000
61
DONAT, DAVID MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
62
EGGERS, DANIEL MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
63
EMNETT, WILLIAM MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
64
FARR, NATALIE MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
65
FIELDS, JACK MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
66
FISCHER, NANCY MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
67
FLOOD, VICTORIA MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
68
FORTSON, JOHN MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
69
FRIEDEL, LAURA MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
70
FULLER, MARTY MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
71
GANTI, RAVI MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
72
GROVE, ELIZABETH ANN
1 transaction
$1,000
73
HALLAWAY, RASHID MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
74
HANCE, KENT MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
75
HANSON, BRYAN MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
76
HAWKINS, CHRISTOPHER MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
77
HERR, MATTHEW MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
78
KELLY, KEVIN MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
79
LIEBERT, REBECCA B. MRS.
1 transaction
$1,000
80
LUNDY, GARY L. MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
81
MARCHIONDAPALMER, MARRI MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
82
MARTIN, TIMOTHY G. MR.
2 transactions
$1,000
83
MCHUGH, JAMES MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
84
MEHLMAN, BRUCE P. MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
85
MISTRI, ALEX MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
86
MONTALBANO, SALVATORE MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
87
MOORE, TIMOTHY MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
88
NORMAN, KATE MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
89
PARO, JOHN MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
90
PIPER, WILLIAM H. MR. III
1 transaction
$1,000
91
RADER, JUDITH MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
92
RATCHFORD, MICHAEL MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
93
REID, RANDI
1 transaction
$1,000
94
RHOADES, DAVID MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
95
ROBINSON, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$1,000
96
SHAW, REBECCA MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
97
SLATER, SAMANTHA MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
98
SMITH, SHANE
1 transaction
$1,000
99
STURNIOLO, FRANK MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
100
SWAHL, WILLIAM MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
101
SWEAT, SUSAN MS.
1 transaction
$1,000
102
TALASAZ, AMIRALI
1 transaction
$1,000
103
PETRIZZO, T.J. MR.
2 transactions
$1,000
104
CASELLA, JOHN MR.
1 transaction
$950
105
THOMAS, ROBERT MR.
1 transaction
$800
106
COLETTA, EDMOND MR.
1 transaction
$750
107
ROGERS, GEORGE MR.
1 transaction
$750
108
SAYWARD, SHELLEY E.
1 transaction
$550
109
ANGELOTTI, JULIA MS.
1 transaction
$500
110
BALAKRISHNAN, LAVANYA MS.
1 transaction
$500
111
BAUER, MATTHEW MR.
1 transaction
$500
112
BERG, WILLIAM MR.
1 transaction
$500
113
BERNS, JASON MR.
1 transaction
$500
114
BICKWIT, LEONARD MR. JR.
1 transaction
$500
115
BLANKENSHIP, DAREN MR.
1 transaction
$500
116
BONIFANTI, MARTIN MR.
1 transaction
$500
117
BOSS, EDWARD E. MR.
1 transaction
$500
118
BOYD, ADAM MR.
1 transaction
$500
119
BOYD, TAMMY MS.
1 transaction
$500
120
BOYLE, SEAN MR.
1 transaction
$500
121
BRACHMAN, MARSHALL A. MR.
1 transaction
$500
122
CARLSON, SCOTT R. MR.
1 transaction
$500
123
CERONE, CHRISTOPHER A. MR.
1 transaction
$500
124
EASTON, JOHN MR.
1 transaction
$500
125
FINCH, BRIAN MR.
1 transaction
$500
126
FRIDLEY, MATTHEW MR.
1 transaction
$500
127
GILBERT, DAVID MR.
1 transaction
$500
128
GLUTH-BOHAN, MEGAN E.
1 transaction
$500
129
GREIG, KAREN MS.
1 transaction
$500
130
GRESS, JERRY E. MR.
1 transaction
$500
131
GRESS, PATRICIA D. MRS.
1 transaction
$500
132
HAMER, LORI D. MS.
1 transaction
$500
133
HANNA, CHARLES MR.
1 transaction
$500
134
HEJKAL, THOMAS W. MR.
1 transaction
$500
135
HENSON, JOSHUA MR.
1 transaction
$500
136
HETTINGA, KURT MR.
1 transaction
$500
137
IYER, SHRIKANT
1 transaction
$500
138
JACKSON, PAUL MR.
1 transaction
$500
139
KELLEY, CASEY
1 transaction
$500
140
KELLOGG, MATTHEW B. MR.
1 transaction
$500
141
LASS, CON A. MR.
1 transaction
$500
142
MALCOLM, ANDREW MR.
1 transaction
$500
143
MCPHAIL, REBECCA MS.
1 transaction
$500
144
MEDAGLIA, THOMAS MR. III
1 transaction
$500
145
MEHLMAN, BRUCE MR.
1 transaction
$500
146
OLSON, GARRICK MR.
1 transaction
$500
147
ORONI, JOHN MR.
1 transaction
$500
148
PECHIN, MICHAEL MR.
1 transaction
$500
149
PICKERING, ELISE MS.
1 transaction
$500
150
RICHARDS, JAMES D. MR.
1 transaction
$500
151
RICHMAN, KARYN MS.
1 transaction
$500
152
RIGBY, HAP MR.
1 transaction
$500
153
ROBINSON, GLEN MR.
1 transaction
$500
154
SCHWIETERT, DAVID MR.
1 transaction
$500
155
SEIDMAN, ROBERT B. MR.
1 transaction
$500
156
SHIPMAN, THOMAS H. MR.
1 transaction
$500
157
SMEALLIE, SHAWN MR.
1 transaction
$500
158
SMITH, WILL MR.
1 transaction
$500
159
STASCH, MATT MR.
1 transaction
$500
160
STASIOWSKI, ANDREW J. MR.
1 transaction
$500
161
STRINGER III, RAYFIELD MR.
1 transaction
$500
162
TOLAR, HELEN
1 transaction
$500
163
TOMETICH, ANDREW MR.
1 transaction
$500
164
TUCKER, JAMIE
1 transaction
$500
165
VERBANAC, DANIEL MR.
1 transaction
$500
166
WEEKS, PAUL MR.
1 transaction
$500
167
WINKLER, MARTIN J. MR. SR.
1 transaction
$500
168
WRIGHT, NORRIS MR.
1 transaction
$500

Donor Network - Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 37 nodes and 43 connections

Total contributions: $43

Top Donors - Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs16 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 15 helped.

  • Title II includes $1,858,772,000 for primary health care under Health Resources and Services Administration, which provides funding to hospitals and health systems for services and infrastructure.

  • +Pharmaceuticalsconfidence 0.90

    Title II includes funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) which supports pharmaceutical research and development, e.g., National Cancer Institute ($7,374,159,000), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ($6,592,279,000), and other institutes that fund drug discovery and vaccine development, directly benefiting pharmaceutical companies.

  • +Health Insuranceconfidence 0.85

    Title II includes $508,148,791,000 for grants to states for Medicaid and $593,817,000,000 for payments to health care trust funds, which directly benefits health insurers through increased enrollment and payments.

  • +Biotech & Researchconfidence 0.85

    Title II includes $6,592,279,000 for National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and $1,500,000,000 for Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health, which fund biotech research and vaccine development.

  • +Agribusinessconfidence 0.85

    Title II includes funding for the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) which administers programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and child nutrition programs, which increase demand for agricultural products from agribusinesses. Specifically, Title II funds child nutrition programs under the Social Security Act and related agencies, indirectly supporting agribusiness through increased food procurement.

  • +Medical Devicesconfidence 0.80

    Title II includes funding for the National Institutes of Health (e.g., $7,374,159,000 for National Cancer Institute) which supports medical device research and development through grants and contracts.

+ 9 more industries not shown.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Agriculture

Moderate
Vector: 65%
Pages: 353-355AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill supports workforce development and training programs under the Department of Labor, which aligns with Project 2025's broader education reform goals, particularly those related to career and technical education and reducing federal bureaucracy in favor of state and local control. However, the bill does not directly address the Department of Education or the specific proposals to decentralize education funding, eliminate ineffective programs, or promote school choice outlined in the Proje"

Key themes:workforce developmentcareer and technical educationstate and local controlfederal education programsskills training

— 321 — Department of Education through the pandemic’s Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief (ESSER) Funds,4 which relied on ESEA formulas. The same year, the department spent more than $2 billion just to administer Title IV of the HEA, which authorizes federal student loans and Pell grants. It provided $22.5 billion in Pell grants, and it oversaw outlays of close to $100 billion in direct student loans. Since 1965, Congress has continued to layer on dozens of new laws and pro- grams as federal “solutions” to myriad education problems. In 1973, it passed the Rehabilitation Act,5 and, in 1975, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)6 to address educational neglect of students with disabilities. In 2002, it cre- ated the Institute for Education Sciences to consolidate education data collection and fund research. Congress has also enacted a series of Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Acts, including Perkins V in 2018.7 Congress could have, and once did, distribute management of federal education programs outside of a single department. But for those interested in expanding federal funding and influence in education, this unconsolidated approach was less than ideal, because a single, captive agency would allow them to promote their agenda more effectively across Administrations. Eventually, the National Educa- tion Association made a deal and backed the right presidential candidate— Jimmy Carter—who successfully lobbied for and delivered the Cabinet-level agency. When it was established in 1979—becoming operational in 1980—the agency was supposed to act as a “corralling” mechanism. Carter signed the Department of Education Organization Act8 into law in 1979, believing in part that it would reduce administrative costs and improve efficiency by housing most of the federal education programs that had proliferated in the wake of Johnson’s War on Poverty under one roof. It has had the opposite effect. Instead, special interest groups like the National Education Association (NEA), American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and the higher education lobby have leveraged the agency to continuously expand federal expenditures—a desirable funding stream from their vantage point because federal budgets are not constrained like state and local budgets that must be balanced each year. By FY 2022, the department’s discretionary and mandatory appropriation topped $80 billion, not including student loan outlays. Each of its programs has attendant federal strings and red tape. One recent example is the Biden Administration’s requirement that state educa- tion agencies and school districts submit “equity” plans as a condition of receiving COVID recovery ESSER funds in the American Rescue Plan (ARP).9 This exercise led to the hiring of numerous new government employees as the rules were pro- mulgated, plans were created after collecting public feedback, and those plans were eventually deemed satisfactory. The next Administration will need a plan to redistribute the various congres- sionally approved federal education programs across the government, eliminate — 322 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise those that are ineffective or duplicative, and then eliminate the unproductive red tape and rules by entrusting states and districts with flexible, formula-driven block grants. This chapter details that plan. As the next Administration executes its work, it should be guided by a few core principles, including: l Advancing education freedom. Empowering families to choose among a diverse set of education options is key to reform and improved outcomes, and it can be achieved without establishing a new federal program. For example, portability of existing federal education spending to fund families directly or allowing federal tax credits to encourage voluntary contributions to K–12 education savings accounts managed by charitable nonprofits, could significantly advance education choice. l Providing education choice for “federal” children. Congress has a special responsibility to children who are connected to military families, who live in the District of Columbia, or who are members of sovereign tribes. Responsibility for serving these students should be housed in agencies that are already serving these families. l Restoring state and local control over education funding. As Washington begins to downsize its intervention in education, existing funding should be sent to states as grants over which they have full control, enabling states to put federal funding toward any lawful education purpose under state law. l Treating taxpayers like investors in federal student aid. Taxpayers should expect their investments in higher education to generate economic productivity. When the federal government lends money to individuals for a postsecondary education, taxpayers should expect those borrowers to repay. l Protecting the federal student loan portfolio from predatory politicians. The new Administration must end the practice of acting like the federal student loan portfolio is a campaign fund to curry political support and votes. The new Administration must end abuses in the loan forgiveness programs. Borrowers should be expected to repay their loans. l Safeguarding civil rights. Enforcement of civil rights should be based on a proper understanding of those laws, rejecting gender ideology and critical race theory.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Weak
Vector: 68%
Pages: 648-650AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill increases funding for the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) and expands workforce development programs, which directly contradicts Project 2025's goal of reducing DOL budgets and focusing spending cuts on ETA. While both address workforce training, the bill's expansion of ETA funding and programs opposes the policy's agenda of budget reduction and personnel changes."

Key themes:Employment and Training Administrationworkforce developmenttraining programs

— 615 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies ORGANIZATIONAL AGENDA Budget l Reduce the agencies’ budgets to the low end of the historical average. The Trump Administration’s FY 2020 request, $10.9 billion, would provide a workable target for spending reductions for DOL, for example. l Spending reductions should occur primarily in the Employment and Training Administration (ETA). l Focus health and safety inspections on egregious offenders, as other inspections are often abused and usurp state and local government prerogatives. Personnel l Maximize hiring of political appointees. At its best, the Trump Administration Department of Labor worked with up to 150 political appointees. That is still a tiny percentage of the department. The number of political appointees should be maximized in order to improve the political accountability of the department. l Appoint new EEOC and NLRB general counsels on Day One. The Biden Administration broke significant precedent by firing the EEOC and NLRB general counsels despite their term appointments. The next Administration should do the same and expand on the Biden Administration’s new precedent by refusing to acknowledge terms in other offices, where applicable, and installing acting or full new officers immediately. l Implement a hiring freeze for career officials. A hiring freeze imposes financial discipline on agencies’ personnel costs and reduces agency bloat. Office of Compliance Initiatives l DOL should fully staff the Office of Compliance Initiatives (OCI), which was reopened by the Trump Administration after the Obama Administration closed its predecessor down. OCI educates employers and workers on their rights, responsibilities, and available recourse under the many statutes, rules, and regulations administered by DOL. Most businesses want to follow the law and OCI exists to make knowing the rules easier, which leads to increased compliance.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Weak
Vector: 67%
Pages: 648-650AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill increases funding for the Employment and Training Administration and workforce programs, which contradicts Project 2025's goal of reducing DOL budgets and focusing cuts in ETA. The only notable overlap is support for apprenticeship and workforce training initiatives."

Key themes:apprenticeship programsworkforce developmenttraining initiatives

— 615 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies ORGANIZATIONAL AGENDA Budget l Reduce the agencies’ budgets to the low end of the historical average. The Trump Administration’s FY 2020 request, $10.9 billion, would provide a workable target for spending reductions for DOL, for example. l Spending reductions should occur primarily in the Employment and Training Administration (ETA). l Focus health and safety inspections on egregious offenders, as other inspections are often abused and usurp state and local government prerogatives. Personnel l Maximize hiring of political appointees. At its best, the Trump Administration Department of Labor worked with up to 150 political appointees. That is still a tiny percentage of the department. The number of political appointees should be maximized in order to improve the political accountability of the department. l Appoint new EEOC and NLRB general counsels on Day One. The Biden Administration broke significant precedent by firing the EEOC and NLRB general counsels despite their term appointments. The next Administration should do the same and expand on the Biden Administration’s new precedent by refusing to acknowledge terms in other offices, where applicable, and installing acting or full new officers immediately. l Implement a hiring freeze for career officials. A hiring freeze imposes financial discipline on agencies’ personnel costs and reduces agency bloat. Office of Compliance Initiatives l DOL should fully staff the Office of Compliance Initiatives (OCI), which was reopened by the Trump Administration after the Obama Administration closed its predecessor down. OCI educates employers and workers on their rights, responsibilities, and available recourse under the many statutes, rules, and regulations administered by DOL. Most businesses want to follow the law and OCI exists to make knowing the rules easier, which leads to increased compliance. — 616 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Improve Visa-Related Labor-Market Monitoring DOL’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification plays an important role in the approval of H-visa applications, but it is currently housed in the Employment and Training Administration, which is DOL’s primary grant-making division. l OFLC should be moved out of ETA and made directly accountable to the Secretary with a politically accountable Director. CONCLUSION The good of the American family is at the heart of conservative labor policy recommendations. The longstanding tradition of a strong work ethic in American culture must be encouraged and strengthened by policies that promote family-sus- taining jobs. By eliminating the policies promoted by the DEI agenda, promoting pro-life policies that support family life, expanding available apprenticeship programs including by encouraging the role of religious organizations in appren- ticeships, making family-sustaining jobs accessible, simplifying employment requirements, and allowing employers to prefer American citizens when making hiring decisions, among the other policy recommendations discussed above, we can begin to secure a future in which the American worker, and by extension the American family, can thrive and prosper. AUTHOR’S NOTE: Many contributors, listed at the front of this volume, deserve credit for this work, but Oren Cass, Rachel Greszler, Rachel Morrison, Caleb Orr, and Jonathan Wolfson deserve special mention. The author alone assumes responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed herein should be attributed to any other individual.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills