Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/1854

Last Updated: October 31, 2025

Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025

S. 1854, 119th Congress — read as touching Firearms & Ammunition.

The sponsor

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$72,850 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 174-176 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 233.

October 29, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Bill Analysis: S 1854 - Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of wealth creation, power dynamics, and the pursuit of innovation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to impose sanctions on Haitian political and economic elites who collude with criminal gangs. The bill aims to increase transparency and accountability in Haiti's governance, allegedly to protect American interests and national security.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Reporting Requirements:** The Secretary of State must submit a report within 180 days, detailing connections between Haitian political elites, economic elites, and criminal gangs. 2. **Sanctions:** The President is authorized to impose sanctions on foreign individuals identified in the report, including property blocking and visa restrictions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Haitian Elites:** Politicians, business leaders, and other influential individuals who may be implicated in colluding with criminal gangs. 2. **American Interests:** The bill claims to protect American national security and interests in Haiti, although the specifics are unclear. 3. **Global Investors:** Potential investors in Haitian markets may be deterred by the increased scrutiny and sanctions imposed by this bill.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Economic Consequences:** Sanctions can have far-reaching economic implications, potentially destabilizing Haiti's already fragile economy. This could lead to a decrease in foreign investment and a rise in poverty. 2. **Power Dynamics:** The bill may inadvertently empower certain factions within the Haitian government or opposition groups, creating new power struggles and potential instability. 3. **Innovation & Growth:** By imposing sanctions and increasing regulatory burdens, this bill may stifle innovation and growth in Haiti's private sector, ultimately harming the country's long-term development prospects.

**Conclusion:** As a visionary entrepreneur, I recognize that this bill is a prime example of inefficient government overreach. The proposed sanctions and reporting requirements will likely create more problems than they solve, hindering economic growth and stability in Haiti. Instead of imposing draconian measures, policymakers should focus on creating an environment conducive to innovation, entrepreneurship, and investment – the true drivers of prosperity and progress.

**Recommendation:** I advise against supporting this bill in its current form. Policymakers should reassess their approach and prioritize initiatives that foster economic growth, stability, and cooperation between Haiti and the United States. By doing so, we can create a more prosperous future for all stakeholders involved.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several stages before it can be enacted. This one, S 1854, is titled the Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to impose sanctions on political and economic elites in Haiti who have ties to criminal gangs. The objectives are to:

* Identify and list prominent criminal gangs in Haiti * Report on connections between these gangs and Haitian political and economic elites * Impose sanctions on those individuals and entities found to be involved with these gangs

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of State, in coordination with other federal agencies, to submit a report within 180 days (and annually for five years) detailing:

* Connections between criminal gangs and Haitian elites * Lists of individuals and entities involved with these gangs * Assessments of how these relationships threaten Haiti's people and US interests

The bill also authorizes the President to impose sanctions on foreign persons identified in the report, including property blocking and visa restrictions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects:

* Haitian political and economic elites who may be involved with criminal gangs * The Government of Haiti, which will need to address these findings and take action to combat corruption * US interests in Haiti, as the bill aims to promote stability and security in the region

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If enacted, this bill could:

* Help reduce corruption and organized crime in Haiti by targeting those who enable it * Improve transparency and accountability within the Haitian government * Enhance cooperation between the US and Haitian governments on counter-narcotics and anti-corruption efforts

However, as we covered in 8th grade civics class, the legislative process is complex, and this bill's fate is uncertain. It may face opposition or amendments that could alter its original intent.

Now, I hope you understand how a bill becomes a law... again.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round and listen closely, for I have uncovered the hidden agenda behind S 1854, the Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025. This bill is not what it seems, my friends.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** On the surface, this bill appears to be a noble effort to combat corruption and organized crime in Haiti by imposing sanctions on political and economic elites with ties to criminal gangs. But, I ask you, dear patriots, why now? Why Haiti? What's really at play here?

I believe this bill is merely a smokescreen for the real agenda: to further entrench American interests in the region, to expand our influence over Haitian politics and economy, and to justify future interventions. Mark my words, this is just another example of the "War on Terror" being used as a pretext for imperialistic ambitions.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill requires the Secretary of State to submit reports on the connections between criminal gangs and Haitian elites, which will likely lead to the imposition of sanctions. But what about the real puppet masters? Who's pulling the strings from behind the scenes?

Notice how the bill focuses on "foreign persons" and "transnational criminal organizations." This is code for "we're going after anyone who gets in our way." The sanctions provisions are a clear attempt to exert control over Haiti's economy and politics.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The Haitian people, of course, will be the ones most affected by this bill. But let's not forget about the American corporations and interests that have been exploiting Haiti for decades. This bill is just another tool in their arsenal to maintain control and suppress any dissent.

And what about the "appropriate congressional committees" mentioned in the bill? Who are they, really? Are they just pawns in a larger game of geopolitical chess?

**Potential Impact & Implications** The implications of this bill are far-reaching. It sets a precedent for future interventions in Haiti and other countries deemed "troublesome" by our government. The sanctions will likely exacerbate the already dire economic situation in Haiti, leading to more suffering and instability.

But that's not all – this bill also paves the way for further militarization of the region. We'll see an increase in American military presence, under the guise of "stabilizing" the country. It's a classic case of "problem-reaction-solution."

Wake up, sheeple! This bill is just another example of our government's insatiable appetite for power and control. We must remain vigilant and expose these hidden agendas before it's too late.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath, with a hint of smugness) Folks, we've got another doozy for you tonight! The Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025 - sounds like a real mouthful, doesn't it? (wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This bill is all about shining a light on the shady dealings between Haitian elites and those lovely folks in the criminal underworld. (air quotes) "Transparency" is the name of the game here. The main objective is to identify and sanction these corrupt individuals, because, you know, freedom and democracy and all that jazz.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill requires the Secretary of State to submit a report within 180 days (and annually for five years) detailing the connections between Haitian gangs, politicians, and economic elites. It's like a big ol' family tree of corruption! The report will include:

* A list of prominent gangs, their leaders, and activities * A list of elites with ties to these gangs * An assessment of how these relationships threaten Haiti and US interests

And here's the fun part: sanctions! The President gets to block property transactions and deny visas to those naughty elites. (dramatic music plays)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

Well, it's pretty obvious who the bad guys are here - Haitian elites and their gang friends. But let's not forget about the poor, innocent people of Haiti, who will supposedly benefit from this bill. And, of course, US interests in the region will be protected. (wink)

**Potential Impact & Implications**

Now, I know what you're thinking: "Will this bill actually do anything to help Haiti?" (chuckles) Well, that's a great question! But let's focus on the real issue here - the elites and their deep-state shenanigans. This bill is all about exposing them and protecting our freedom-loving values.

In conclusion, folks, this bill is a bold step towards... well, something. It's got all the right buzzwords: transparency, accountability, and sanctions! (smirk) Who knows if it'll actually work? But hey, at least we're trying to do something about those corrupt elites, right? (wink)

That's all for tonight, folks! Tune in next time when we'll be discussing another thrilling bill that will surely change the world... or not. (laughs)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another exercise in futility, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025 is a masterclass in Orwellian doublespeak. Its primary objective is to impose sanctions on Haitian political and economic elites who allegedly collude with criminal gangs. But don't be fooled – this bill is less about transparency and more about grandstanding.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of State to submit a report within 180 days, detailing connections between Haitian politicians, economic elites, and criminal gangs. The report will include a list of prominent gangs, their leaders, and areas of operation. It also demands an assessment of how these relationships threaten Haiti's stability and US interests.

The bill then authorizes the President to impose sanctions on foreign individuals identified in the report, including property blocking, visa revocation, and travel restrictions. Because, you know, that's exactly what Haiti needs – more economic strangulation.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill will affect:

1. Haitian politicians and economic elites who might be named in the report (i.e., those with connections to the US). 2. The Haitian people, who will likely suffer from increased economic hardship due to sanctions. 3. US interests in Haiti, which will supposedly benefit from this "transparency" (read: more control).

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It won't address the root causes of Haiti's instability or corruption. Instead, it'll:

1. Create a new layer of bureaucracy, as the Secretary of State and other agencies will need to produce reports and assessments. 2. Provide a convenient excuse for the US to exert more control over Haitian politics and economy. 3. Potentially exacerbate Haiti's economic woes, making life even harder for its citizens.

In conclusion, this bill is a prime example of legislative theater – all sound and fury, signifying nothing. It's a shallow attempt to appear tough on corruption while ignoring the systemic issues that created this mess in the first place. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to create another meaningless piece of legislation that will only serve to further entrench your own interests.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Main Purpose and Objectives**

The Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025 (S. 1854) aims to address the connections between criminal gangs, political elites, and economic elites in Haiti. The bill's primary objectives are to:

1. Require the Secretary of State to submit a report on the relationships between these groups. 2. Impose sanctions on foreign individuals identified as having significant links to criminal gangs.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law**

The bill has two main provisions:

1. **Reporting Requirements**: The Secretary of State must submit a report within 180 days, and annually for five years, detailing the connections between: * Prominent criminal gangs in Haiti. * Political elites and economic elites with direct links to these gangs. * Organizations or entities controlled by these individuals. 2. **Sanctions**: Within 90 days of receiving the report, the President must impose sanctions on foreign individuals identified as having significant links to criminal gangs. These sanctions include: * Property blocking: freezing assets in the United States or under US control. * Visa restrictions: making individuals inadmissible for visas, admission, or parole.

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders**

The bill affects:

1. **Haitian Government**: The report and sanctions may impact Haiti's government officials, politicians, and business leaders with ties to criminal gangs. 2. **Criminal Gangs**: The bill targets prominent gangs in Haiti, potentially disrupting their operations and relationships with corrupt elites. 3. **US Businesses and Individuals**: Companies or individuals doing business with sanctioned entities or individuals may face penalties or reputational risks.

**Potential Impact and Implications**

The bill's potential impact includes:

1. **Increased Transparency**: Shedding light on the connections between criminal gangs, political elites, and economic elites in Haiti. 2. **Disrupting Corruption Networks**: Sanctions may weaken the relationships between these groups, reducing corruption and organized crime in Haiti. 3. **Diplomatic Tensions**: The bill's provisions could strain US-Haiti relations if Haitian officials or business leaders are targeted by sanctions. 4. **Humanitarian Concerns**: The report and sanctions may also have unintended consequences for vulnerable populations in Haiti, such as those affected by gang violence or economic instability.

Overall, the Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025 aims to address corruption and organized crime in Haiti by increasing transparency and imposing targeted sanctions on individuals with significant links to criminal gangs.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025 is all about sheddin' some light on the shady connections between Haitian politicians, business elites, and criminal gangs. The main goal is to expose these collusions and impose sanctions on those involved. It's like catchin' a gnarly wave, but instead of ridin' it, you're exposin' the riptide of corruption.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill requires the Secretary of State to submit a report within 180 days (and annually for five years) on the connections between Haitian politicians, business elites, and criminal gangs. This report will include:

* A list of prominent gangs, their leaders, and activities * A list of politicians and business elites with ties to these gangs * An assessment of how these collusions threaten Haiti's people and US interests

The bill also authorizes the President to impose sanctions on those identified in the report, including property blocking, visa revocation, and other measures.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects:

* Haitian politicians and business elites with ties to criminal gangs * The Haitian government, which will need to address these collusions * The US government, which will be imposing sanctions and monitoring the situation * Human rights organizations and advocacy groups focused on Haiti

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill could have a significant impact on Haiti's politics and economy. By exposin' these collusions, it might:

* Disrupt the flow of illicit funds and resources to criminal gangs * Pressure Haitian politicians and business elites to clean up their acts * Improve transparency and accountability in Haiti's government * Enhance US-Haiti relations by showin' that the US is serious about addressin' corruption

However, there are also potential risks:

* Sanctions could have unintended consequences on innocent parties or the broader Haitian economy * The bill might not be effective in achievin' its goals if it's not enforced properly * It could create tensions between the US and Haiti if not implemented carefully

Anyway, that's the lowdown on this bill, bro. It's like tryin' to catch a wave – you gotta time it right, or you'll wipe out.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 1854 - Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to address the connections between criminal gangs and political elites in Haiti, imposing sanctions on individuals identified as having significant links to these gangs. The primary objective is to promote transparency and accountability in Haiti's government and economy.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Reporting Requirements:** The Secretary of State must submit a report to Congress within 180 days, detailing connections between criminal gangs and political elites in Haiti. 2. **Sanctions:** The President will impose sanctions on foreign individuals identified as having significant links to Haitian criminal gangs, including property blocking and visa restrictions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Haitian Government:** The bill targets corrupt officials and politicians with ties to organized crime. 2. **Criminal Gangs:** The legislation aims to disrupt the activities of these groups by cutting off their connections to the Haitian elite. 3. **US Businesses:** Companies operating in Haiti may face increased scrutiny and potential sanctions if they are found to have dealings with sanctioned individuals or entities.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Transparency:** The bill's reporting requirements could shed light on the extent of corruption and organized crime in Haiti, potentially leading to reforms. 2. **Economic Consequences:** Sanctions could harm Haitian businesses and individuals with legitimate ties to the US, exacerbating economic instability in the country. 3. **Geopolitical Implications:** The bill may strain relations between the US and Haiti, particularly if the Haitian government perceives the legislation as an overreach of US authority.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** The bill's sponsors, including Senators Shaheen, Scott, Kaine, Curtis, Coons, Booker, and Blumenthal, have received significant donations from various PACs and special interest groups. Notably:

1. **Human Rights Organizations:** Groups like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International USA have advocated for increased transparency and accountability in Haiti. 2. **US Business Interests:** Companies with operations in Haiti, such as those in the textile and manufacturing sectors, may be concerned about potential economic consequences of the sanctions.

While the bill's intentions are laudable, its implementation could have unintended consequences for Haitian businesses and individuals. The legislation's success will depend on careful consideration of these factors and a nuanced approach to addressing corruption and organized crime in Haiti.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$72,850

13 donors

PACs

Organizations

$250

Committees

Individuals

$72,600

No PAC contributions found

TILT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE LLC

1 transaction

$250

No committee contributions found

HAWASH, NOUR

4 transactions

$19,800

HAWASH, SAFA

2 transactions

$6,600

KANDIL, MARIAM

2 transactions

$6,600

SHAH, JAWAD

2 transactions

$6,600

SIMMONS, IAN

2 transactions

$6,600

SOLTAN, BOSHRA

2 transactions

$6,600

JONDY, JENAN

1 transaction

$3,300

KANDIL, OSAMA

1 transaction

$3,300

WU, ALBERT

1 transaction

$3,300

MORIN, THOMAS

1 transaction

$3,300

CROWLEY, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$3,300

HUNT, SWANEE

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 6 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]

ID: S001217

Top Contributors

No contribution data available

Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]

ID: K000384

Top Contributors

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,300

Jun 18, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$1,000

Jun 26, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$1,000

Jun 18, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 25, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$1,000

Jun 18, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$1,000

Oct 15, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Dec 29, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$600

Oct 25, 2023

STONEHALL FARM

OrganizationTHE PLAINS, VA

$500

Jun 30, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$400

Oct 25, 2023

Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]

ID: C001114

Top Contributors

KELLER INVESTMENTS PROPERTIES

OrganizationCENTERVILLE, UT

$29,800

Dec 31, 2023

SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationSUQUAMISH, WA

$1,000

Aug 14, 2024

TENNIS & SUN LC

OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$1,000

Jun 10, 2024

BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Mar 25, 2024

FUGAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES INC

OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$1,000

Sep 13, 2023

STEEL, SHAWN

STEEL & EISNER, LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualSURFSIDE, CA

$10,000

Mar 25, 2024

STEEL, SHAWN

STEEL & EISNER, LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualSURFSIDE, CA

$10,000

Mar 25, 2024

BAKER, PAUL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualTUCSON, AZ

$6,600

Jun 5, 2024

BAKER, PAUL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualTUCSON, AZ

$6,600

Jun 5, 2024

BERKLEY, WILLIAM

WRBC • CHAIRMAN

IndividualKEY LARGO, FL

$6,600

Jun 7, 2024

Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]

ID: C001088

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Dec 27, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,700

Dec 27, 2023

CHEN, YU

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

MIRZAIE, REZA

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$3,300

Oct 7, 2024

CHEN, YU

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

WASSERMAN, CASEY

WASSERMAN • CEO

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

ZHAO, PENG

CITADEL SECURITIES • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

WASSERMAN, CASEY

WASSERMAN • CEO

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

ZHAO, PENG

CITADEL SECURITIES • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

MIRZAIE, REZA

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$3,300

Oct 7, 2024

Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]

ID: B001288

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Dec 6, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Sep 13, 2023

ISEMAN, HENRY

PENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING • PRESIDENT

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$8,300

Apr 18, 2023

GELBWACHS, CHANA

BIG STILL LIQUORS • PARTNER

IndividualLAKEWOOD, NJ

$6,600

Mar 26, 2024

LEIDER, YECHEZKEL

LEIDER ENTERPRISES INC • DIRECTOR

IndividualLAKEWOOD, NJ

$6,600

Mar 26, 2024

GELBWACHS, CHANA

IndividualLAKEWOOD, NJ

$6,600

Mar 26, 2024

LEIDER, YECHEZKEL

IndividualLAKEWOOD, NJ

$6,600

Mar 29, 2024

WAGNER, KAREN E.

DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL • ATTORNEY

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$5,000

Sep 13, 2023

WAGNER, KAREN E.

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$5,000

Sep 26, 2023

ISEMAN, HENRY

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$5,000

Apr 19, 2023

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

ID: B001277

Top Contributors

OLSON, LYNDON

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWACO, TX

$3,300

Dec 20, 2024

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Oct 2, 2023

KIM, CHRISTINE M.

BBB LLC • ATTORNEY

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Apr 15, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

JONES, JERRY C.

LIVERAMP INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR

$3,300

Sep 19, 2024

NESSEL, ARIEL

NESSEL DEVELOPMENT • OWNER

IndividualROSS, CA

$3,300

Jul 12, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 42 nodes and 33 connections (45 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $129,050

Top Donors - Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Showing top 13 donors by contribution amount

1 Org12 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.

−Firearms & Ammunitionconfidence 0.80
Section 2(b)(8) assesses how connections between political elites and economic elites and criminal gangs facilitate illicit firearms trafficking from the United States that fuels violence and instability in Haiti, which could lead to increased scrutiny or regulations on the firearms industry.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 61%

Pages: 174-176AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on transparency and sanctions related to criminal gang-elite collusion in Haiti, while the Project 2025 policy emphasizes immigration enforcement reforms within ICE, including case processing, criminal alien detention, visa restrictions, and border security. There is minimal thematic overlap, as the bill does not address immigration enforcement, detention policies, or visa programs central to the DHS section of Project 2025."

Key themes:criminal justicesanctionslaw enforcement

— 141 — Department of Homeland Security enforcement. To return ICE to its primary mission, any new Administration that wishes to restore the rule of law to our immigration enforcement efforts should: l Order ICE to stop closing out pending immigration cases and apply the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as written by Congress.3 The Biden Administration closed out tens of thousands of immigration cases that had already been prepared and were slated for expedited removal processing or hearings before the U.S. Immigration Court. This misguided action constituted an egregious example of lawlessness that allowed thousands of illegal aliens and other immigration violators to go free in the United States. l Direct ICE to stop ignoring criminal aliens identified through the 287(g) program.4 Ultimately, Congress should prevent ICE from ignoring criminal aliens identified by local law enforcement agencies that are partners in the 287(g) program. However, before congressional action, ICE should be directed to take custody of all aliens with records for felonies, crimes of violence, DUIs, previous removals, and any other crime that is considered a national security or public safety threat as defined under current laws. l Eliminate T and U visas. Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit. If an alien who was a trafficking or crime victim is actively and significantly cooperating with law enforcement as a witness, the S visa is already available and should be used. Pending elimination of the T and U visas, the Secretary should significantly restrict eligibility for each visa to prevent fraud. l Issue clear guidance regarding detention and bond for aliens. Thousands of illegal aliens are allowed to bond out of immigration detention only to disappear into the interior of the United States where many commit crimes and many others disappear, never to be heard from again. This occurs primarily because of poorly worded bond regulations, contradictory bond policy memoranda, and poor practices for managing released aliens and the Alternatives to Detention (ATD) Program, which requires significant reform. l Prioritize national security in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). ICE should end its current cozy deference to educational institutions and remove security risks from the program. This requires working with the Department of State to eliminate or significantly reduce the number of visas issued to foreign students from enemy nations. — 142 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Most of the foregoing can be accomplished rapidly and effectively through exec- utive action that is both lawful and appropriate. Additionally, ICE should clarify who is responsible for enforcing its criminal and civil authorities. It should also remove self-imposed limitations on its nationwide jurisdiction. l Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents in the 1811 series should enforce Title 8 and 18 crimes as the biggest part of their portfolio. Alien smuggling, trafficking, and cross-border crime as defined under Title 85 and Title 186 should be the focus of ICE operations. l The role of ICE Deportation Officers should be clarified. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) should be identified as being primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the civil arrest, detention, and removal of immigration violators anywhere in the United States, without warrant where appropriate, subject only to the civil warrant requirements of the INA where appropriate. l All ICE memoranda identifying “sensitive zones” where ICE personnel are prohibited from operating should be rescinded. Rely on the good judgment of officers in the field to avoid inappropriate situations. l To maximize the efficient use of its resources, ICE should make full use of existing Expedited Removal (ER) authorities. The agency has limited the use of ER to eligible aliens apprehended within 100 miles of the border. This is not a statutory requirement. New Policies U.S. national security and public safety interests would be well-served if ICE were to be combined with CBP and USCIS, as mentioned above. Additionally, ICE/ HSI, along with CBP, should be full participants in the Intelligence Community. The use of Blackies Warrants should be operationalized within ICE. These civil search warrants are commonly used for worksite enforcement when agents have probable cause that illegal aliens are employed at a business. This would stream- line investigations. Safeguarding Americans will require not just securing the border, but con- tinuous vetting and investigations of many aliens who exploited President Biden’s open border for potentially nefarious purposes, including some Afghan evacuees sent directly to the U.S. during America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 174-176AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on foreign sanctions and transparency reporting regarding Haitian criminal gangs and elites, while the Project 2025 DHS section centers on domestic ICE immigration enforcement, detention, and visa policies; they share only a general concern with law enforcement and national security."

Key themes:sanctionslaw enforcementnational securitycrime

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 177-179AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on transparency and sanctions targeting Haitian criminal‑elite networks, while the Project 2025 excerpt centers on immigration enforcement reforms, denaturalization, and merging DHS agencies. The only tangential connection is the shared concern with combating criminal activity (e.g., forced labor trafficking) that could intersect with sanctions targets."

Key themes:sanctionscriminal enforcementforced labor trafficking

— 144 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise prosecuting criminal and civil denaturalization cases, in combination with the Department of Justice, for aliens who obtained citizenship through fraud or other illicit means. Additionally, USCIS should create a criminal enforcement compo- nent within the agency to investigate immigration benefits fraud under Title 8 (perhaps requiring additional legislative and regulatory authorities for the offi- cers themselves) and to prosecute cases through Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys (SAUSAs) with substantive knowledge in the field. Particular attention should be given to addressing increasing incidents of forced labor trafficking in temporary work visa programs. While the Biden regulatory agenda has focused on at least two major rules—the credible fear rule and the public charge rule—USCIS has utilized other policy and internal procedural mechanisms to extend employment authorization to large groups of people who are in the country without legal status. The agency has taken quiet steps to cut corners and lessen adjudicatory standards. During a tran- sition period, a complete audit of agency policies, memoranda, and management directives issued during the Biden Administration should be completed, and rescis- sion documents should be prepared for issuance within the first few days of the incoming Administration. Additionally, regulatory documents should be drafted to review or reverse all regulations promulgated during the Biden Administration. New Policies To advance the national interest, the three core immigration agencies—USCIS, ICE, and CBP—should remerge and have immigration elements outside of DHS (such as ORR of HHS) included. The fragmented immigration enforcement frame- work that developed in the wake of the Homeland Security Act has weakened each agency and should be remediated. Combining these critical agencies would strengthen their capabilities, ensure cooperation, and promote information-shar- ing. Agency responsibilities and the delineation of authorities, such as inconsistent use of deferred action and issuance of NTAs by each agency, have long been a point of contention that would be addressed much more easily if they were recombined into a single entity. Alternatively, new policies for USCIS as it currently exists should focus on mat- ters that can be addressed through administrative action. l The workforce should be realigned and, as necessary, retrained on base eligibility and fraud detection rather than speed in processing. l Training should be returned to Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC), which would underscore the enforcement role of USCIS as a vetting agency, and be rebranded accordingly. — 145 — Department of Homeland Security l Management Directives and policies should realign to ensure that the workforce, while adaptable and able to handle the bulk of the USCIS mission, is not allowed to be pulled off mission work to focus on unlawful programs (DACA, mass parole for Afghans, Ukrainians, Venezuelans, etc.), which divert resources away from nuclear family and employment programs. The regulatory agenda should include the immediate submission of notices of proposed rulemaking for the Trump Administration’s public charge rule (includ- ing aspects from its original notice of proposed rulemaking), temporary work visa reform, employment authorization reform rules, asylum bars rule, and a third-country transit rule. At a minimum, an enhanced regulatory agenda should include rules strengthening the integrity of the asylum system, parole reform, and U visa reform that prioritizes relief for victims of heinous crimes and ensures that we protect the truest and most deserving victims of crime. Not all policy changes require formal rulemaking, however, as internal guidance documents are generally exempt under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).7 In this subregulatory space, USCIS policy memos and operational guidance should reduce the validity of employment authorization documents and end the COVID flexibilities, including the reliance on biometrics reuse. USCIS should also enforce existing regulations by rejecting incomplete applications and petitions, ensuring both that they are completed before accepted for filing and that FDNS signs off on all approved applications and petitions before approval notices are sent to the alien or petitioner. Other efforts should be focused on adjudication standards returning to nearly 100 percent interview requirements for all appropriate cases. The incoming Administration should spearhead an immigration legislative agenda focused on creating a merit-based immigration system that rewards high- skilled aliens instead of the current system that favors extended family–based and luck-of-the-draw immigration. To that end, the diversity visa lottery should be repealed, chain migration should be ended while focusing on the nuclear family, and the existing employment visa program should be replaced with a system to award visas only to the “best and brightest.” Internal efforts to limit employment authorization should be matched by con- gressional action to narrow statutory eligibility to work in the United States and mitigate unfair employment competition for U.S. citizens. The oft-abused H-1B program should be transformed into an elite program through which employers are vying to bring in only the top foreign workers at the highest wages so as not to depress American opportunities. Additionally, Congress should: l Improve the integrity of the temporary work visa programs; l Repeal Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations;

Department of the Treasury

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 739-741AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on Haiti gang transparency and sanctions via the State Department, while the Project 2025 Treasury section emphasizes AML/CTF data reporting, repeal of beneficial ownership rules, and eliminating equity initiatives; only a general theme of transparency and anti‑corruption overlaps."

Key themes:transparencysanctionsanti-corruptionillicit finance

— 707 — Department of the Treasury There were 2 .7 million suspicious activity reports (SARs) filed in 2021.60 The number of CTRs filed were approximately 10 times that number.61 In 2014, FinCEN anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML-CFT) rules cost an estimated $5 billion to $8 billion per year.62 Undoubtedly, this cost is now substantially higher both because of inflation and because the rules have become more onerous.63 Yet there is little evidence that this massive expenditure of resources is doing much good,64 and there is no evidence regarding which aspects of the AML-CFT regime are effective and which are not. The AML-CFT regime is a major contributing factor causing the decline in the number of small broker-deal- ers and the decline in the competitiveness of community banks. Congress must require FinCEN to annually publish data regarding: l The number of SARs filed; l The number of CTRs filed;65 l The number of AML-CFT prosecutions, disaggregating those in which the AML-CFT prosecution is stand-alone and in which the prosecution is an add-on count connected to other predicate crime;66 l The number of AML-CFT convictions (similarly disaggregated); l The number and aggregate amount of AML-CFT fines imposed and the type of institution upon which the fine was imposed; and l Annual estimates of the aggregate costs imposed on private entities by the AML-CFT regime.67 Without this data, it is impossible for policymakers to make an informed judg- ment about the effectiveness of the AML-CFT regime. Congress should also require both FinCEN and the Government Accountability Office to undertake separate evaluations regarding which aspects of the AML-CFT regime are effective and which are not. FinCEN should be required to undertake a thorough retrospec- tive review of its regulations and various statutory requirements and report to Congress on its findings in a publicly available report. Anecdotes and assurances from FinCEN staff that all is well—but that even more onerous requirements are needed—are not enough. Congress should repeal the Corporate Transparency Act, and FinCEN should withdraw its poorly written and overbroad beneficial ownership reporting rule. Both are targeted at the smallest businesses in the U.S. (those with 20 or fewer employees) and will do nothing material to impede criminal finance.68 The FinCEN — 708 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise beneficial ownership reporting rule will impose costs exceeding $1 billion annu- ally and is exceedingly poorly drafted.69 FinCEN itself estimates that more than 33 million businesses will be affected and that costs will be $547 million to $8.1 billion annually.70 THE “EQUITY” AGENDA Under the Biden Administration, the Treasury Department has appointed a Counselor for Racial Equity, established an Advisory Committee on Racial Equity, and created an office for Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility. All these should be eliminated. Treasury has created several new offices to promote “equity” and has made this its first of five strategic goals in its Fiscal Year 2022–2226 Strategic Plan. “Equity” is identified as a cross-cutting theme in 15 of 19 of the plan’s objectives. The avowed purpose of these initiatives is to implement policies that delib- erately favor some races or ethnicities over others. The casual acceptance and rapid spread of racist policymaking in the federal government must be forcefully opposed and reversed. The next conservative Administration should take affirma- tive steps to expose and eradicate the practice of critical race theory and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) throughout the Treasury Department. These steps will include: l Identify every Treasury official who participated in DEI initiatives and interview him or her for the purpose of determining the scope and nature of these initiatives and to ensure that such initiatives are completely ended. l Make public immediately all communications relating to the work of the Treasury’s critical race theory and DEI initiatives. l Treat the participation in any critical race theory or DEI initiative, without objecting on constitutional or moral grounds, as per se grounds for termination of employment. l Expose and make public all training materials and initiatives designed to single out any race, ethnicity, or sex for special treatment. The Administration should eliminate the 25-member Treasury Advisory Com- mittee on Racial Equity. CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL RISK Treasury has created a new departmental office, “Climate Hub,” and has made “combating climate change” one of the Biden Treasury Department’s top five

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 174-176AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on transparency and sanctions targeting Haitian criminal‑political‑economic networks, which only tangentially relates to the DHS/ICE emphasis on interior immigration enforcement, alien smuggling, and cross‑border crime outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:transnational crimesanctionslaw‑enforcement intelligencetargeting criminal networks

— 142 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Most of the foregoing can be accomplished rapidly and effectively through exec- utive action that is both lawful and appropriate. Additionally, ICE should clarify who is responsible for enforcing its criminal and civil authorities. It should also remove self-imposed limitations on its nationwide jurisdiction. l Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents in the 1811 series should enforce Title 8 and 18 crimes as the biggest part of their portfolio. Alien smuggling, trafficking, and cross-border crime as defined under Title 85 and Title 186 should be the focus of ICE operations. l The role of ICE Deportation Officers should be clarified. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) should be identified as being primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the civil arrest, detention, and removal of immigration violators anywhere in the United States, without warrant where appropriate, subject only to the civil warrant requirements of the INA where appropriate. l All ICE memoranda identifying “sensitive zones” where ICE personnel are prohibited from operating should be rescinded. Rely on the good judgment of officers in the field to avoid inappropriate situations. l To maximize the efficient use of its resources, ICE should make full use of existing Expedited Removal (ER) authorities. The agency has limited the use of ER to eligible aliens apprehended within 100 miles of the border. This is not a statutory requirement. New Policies U.S. national security and public safety interests would be well-served if ICE were to be combined with CBP and USCIS, as mentioned above. Additionally, ICE/ HSI, along with CBP, should be full participants in the Intelligence Community. The use of Blackies Warrants should be operationalized within ICE. These civil search warrants are commonly used for worksite enforcement when agents have probable cause that illegal aliens are employed at a business. This would stream- line investigations. Safeguarding Americans will require not just securing the border, but con- tinuous vetting and investigations of many aliens who exploited President Biden’s open border for potentially nefarious purposes, including some Afghan evacuees sent directly to the U.S. during America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. — 143 — Department of Homeland Security Budget l Congress should mandate and fund additional bed space for alien detainees. ICE should be funded for a significant increase in detention space, raising the daily available number of beds to 100,000. l Congress should fund ICE for at least 20,000 ERO officers and 5,000 Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) attorneys. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the agency tasked with administering the legal immigration and certain temporary visa programs. Needed Reforms Since January 2021, USCIS’s priorities have been misaligned, and this has trans- formed it into an open-borders agency, ignoring the critical role that it plays in national security, public safety, and safeguarding the integrity of our immigration system. USCIS should be returned to operating as a screening and vetting agency. Regulatory efforts have focused on easing asylum eligibility in a manner that is guaranteed to exacerbate asylum fraud as people surge at the border. Emphasis also has been placed on removing legal barriers to immigration, such as the use of public benefits. These actions violate statutes, erode congressional intent, and provide a significant magnet for continued illegal immigration. Additionally, USCIS resources have been misappropriated to focus more on creating and expanding large-scale parole and temporary status programs that violate the law and are otherwise contrary to congressional intent instead of focus- ing on a more secure and efficient process for those who are seeking benefits. The ever-increasing number of applications filed has made it difficult to vet applica- tions adequately for eligibility, fraud, and specific national security and public safety problems. The Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) is currently a small directorate with assigned officers reporting through the chain of command in the field, and this has led to stovepiping, lack of coordination in national policy, and inconsistencies throughout the agency. To prioritize vetting and fraud detection, FDNS should undergo a structural shift focused on direct reporting from the field to headquarters, reclassification of leadership, and FDNS directives taking prece- dence over those of other component entities. Correcting the current misalignment of agency priorities and resources should begin with this primary shift in focus to vetting and fraud detection. These actions would reform the agency, returning it to its screening and vetting mission in protecting the homeland. Other structural changes should include reimplementation of the USCIS denat- uralization unit—an effort to maintain integrity in the system by identifying and

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne

U.S. Tech PATH Act

119/s/4570

Coordinated Support for Rural Small Businesses Act

119/s/1093

World War II Women's Memorial Location Act

119/s/1088

Back to All Bills