Mexico Security Assistance Accountability Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/1780
Last Updated: April 14, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]

ID: M001243

Follow the money

The bill

Mexico Security Assistance Accountability Act

S. 1780, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.

The sponsor

Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$273,350 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

61% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 211-213 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 97.

June 17, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

(sigh) Oh, joy. Another bill that's going to "save the world" from the evil cartels and corruption in Mexico. How quaint.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Mexico Security Assistance Accountability Act (S 1780) claims to provide congressional oversight of security assistance to Mexico. In reality, it's a feel-good measure designed to make politicians look tough on crime while doing nothing to address the root causes of the problem.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of State to submit a report with a strategy for US security assistance to Mexico within 180 days. This strategy must include plans to dismantle transnational criminal networks, increase Mexico's military and public security capacity, and enhance civilian law enforcement institutions. (Yawn) We've heard this all before.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: the Mexican government, US security contractors, defense industry lobbyists, and politicians looking for a photo op. Don't worry, they'll all be taken care of.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It won't address the systemic corruption in Mexico or the demand-side drivers of the illicit drug trade in the US. Instead, it will likely lead to more militarization, more surveillance, and more opportunities for contractors to line their pockets with taxpayer dollars.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of " Politician's Disease" – a condition characterized by an inability to address complex problems, a reliance on simplistic solutions, and a desperate need for re-election. Treatment involves a healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach, and a willingness to call out the obvious lies.

In short, this bill is a joke. It's a PR stunt designed to distract from the real issues while perpetuating the same failed policies that have led us to where we are today. (shrugs) Business as usual in Washington.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$273,350
29 donors
PACs
$2,500
Organizations
$33,250
Committees
$0
Individuals
$237,600
1
SIG SAUER PAC
1 transaction
$2,500
1
SEGURO MEDICO LLC
1 transaction
$10,000
2
CLEMENTS MIDWAY PARTNERS LLC
1 transaction
$10,000
3
BLOOMSBURG INDUSTRIAL VENTURES LLC
2 transactions
$4,700
4
SUN CENTER LP
1 transaction
$2,500
5
UTILITY ADVISORY GROUP LLC
1 transaction
$1,500
6
MODEVITY LLC
1 transaction
$1,500
7
O'DONNELL PARTNERS LLC
1 transaction
$1,500
8
KRAUSE & ASSOCIATES LP
1 transaction
$1,000
9
GVH PARTNERS
1 transaction
$500
10
MARSHALL LINE FENCE LLC
1 transaction
$50

No committee contributions found

1
ATKINS, PAUL S.
1 transaction
$13,200
2
KUEHNER, CARL
1 transaction
$13,200
3
TSYGANSKIY, IGOR
1 transaction
$13,200
4
SCARAMUCCI, ANTHONY
1 transaction
$13,200
5
REIBEL, JAMES
1 transaction
$13,200
6
CHAI, CHUCKRA
1 transaction
$13,200
7
BREED, ALAN
1 transaction
$13,200
8
DUBIN, GLENN
1 transaction
$13,200
9
MCCORMICK, DOUG
1 transaction
$13,200
10
THOMAS, AMY L.
1 transaction
$13,200
11
WALLACE, JENNIFER A.
1 transaction
$13,200
12
MCGAVICK, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$13,200
13
PATEL, CHIRAG
1 transaction
$13,200
14
PSAROS, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$13,200
15
OBERNDORF, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$13,200
16
MINNIS, CHRISTINA MRS.
1 transaction
$13,200
17
LACKIE, JAMES D. MR.
1 transaction
$13,200
18
KERKO, DAVID
1 transaction
$13,200

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ]

ID: K000377

Top Contributors

10

1
PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE
OrganizationTUCSON, AZ
$3,300
Oct 23, 2023
2
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$2,500
May 23, 2024
3
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY
OrganizationSACATON, AZ
$1,000
Jun 15, 2023
4
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Aug 12, 2024
5
CORMIER, STEPHEN
IndividualMANSFIELD, LA
$6,000
Dec 31, 2023
6
LEWIS, PAUL
NOT EMPLOYEDRETIRED
IndividualKINGMAN, AZ
$5,000
Oct 23, 2024
7
LEWIS, PAUL
IndividualKINGMAN, AZ
$5,000
Dec 6, 2024
8
BASS, JOSEPH P
NOT EMPLOYEDRETIRED
IndividualPORTLAND, OR
$5,000
Mar 29, 2024
9
PEROT, MARGOT B
NOT EMPLOYEDRETIRED
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$5,000
Apr 8, 2024
10
MILLER, JUDITH
IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN
$5,000
Sep 11, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 54 nodes and 33 connections (48 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $280,150

Top Donors - Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC10 Orgs18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped, 1 harmed.

  • Section 2(b)(1)(A) mentions human trafficking and smuggling, which could lead to increased oversight and regulation of private prisons and immigration detention facilities, potentially harming the industry.

  • Section 2(b)(1)(C) aims to enhance the institutional capacity of civilian law enforcement, which could lead to increased funding and support for law enforcement agencies and surveillance technology vendors, benefiting the industry.

  • +Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.60

    Section 2(b)(1)(B) mentions increasing the capacity of Mexico's military and public security institutions, which could lead to increased demand for defense contractors' products and services, potentially benefiting the industry.

  • +Cybersecurityconfidence 0.50

    Section 2(b)(1)(A) mentions cybercrimes, which could lead to increased focus on cybersecurity measures and potential benefits for the industry.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate61.2%
Pages: 211-213

— 178 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise interior immigration enforcement. This Administration’s humanitarian crisis—which is arguably the greatest humanitarian crisis in the modern era, one which has harmed Americans and foreign nationals alike—will take many years and billions of dollars to fully address. One casualty of the Biden Administration’s behavior will be the current form of the U.S. Refugee Admission Program (USRAP). The federal government’s obligation to shift national security–essential screening and vetting resources to the forged border crisis will necessitate an indefinite curtailment of the number of USRAP refugee admissions. The State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, which administers USRAP, must shift its resources to challenges stemming from the current immigration situation until the crisis can be contained and refugee-focused screening and vetting capacity can reasonably be restored. l Strengthening bilateral and multilateral immigration-focused agreements. Restoration of both domestic security and the integrity of the U.S. immigration system should start with rapid reactivation of several key initiatives in effect at the conclusion of the Trump Administration. Reimplementation of the Remain in Mexico policy, safe third-country agreements, and other measures to address the influx of non-Mexican asylum applicants at the United States–Mexico border must be Day One priorities. Although the State Department must rein in the C-175 authorities of other agencies, the Department of Homeland Security should retain (or regain) C-175 authorities for negotiating bilateral and multilateral security agreements. l Evaluation of national security–vulnerable visa programs. To protect the American people, the State Department, in coordination with the White House and other security-focused agencies, should evaluate several key security-sensitive visa programs that it manages. Key programs include, but should not be limited to, the Diversity Visa program, the F (student) visa program, and J (exchange visitor) visa program. The State Department’s evaluation must ensure that these programs are not only consistent with White House immigration policy, but also align with its national security obligations and resource limitations. PIVOTING ABROAD Personnel and management adjustments are crucial preludes to refocus the State Department’s mission, which is implementing the President’s foreign policy agenda and, in so doing, ensuring that the interests of American citizens are given — 179 — Department of State priority. That said, the next President must significantly reorient the U.S. govern- ment’s posture toward friends and adversaries alike—which will include much more honest assessments about who are friends and who are not. This reorien- tation could represent the most significant shift in core foreign policy principles and corresponding action since the end of the Cold War. Although not every country or issue area can be discussed in this chapter, below are examples of several areas in which a shift in U. S. foreign policy is not only import- ant, but arguably existential. The point is not to assert that everyone in the evolving conservative movement, or, in some cases, the growing bipartisan consensus, will agree with the details of this assessment. Rather, what is presented below demon- strates the urgency of these issues and provides a general roadmap for analysis. In a world on fire, a handful of nations require heightened attention. Some rep- resent existential threats to the safety and security of the American people; others threaten to hurt the U.S. economy; and others are wild cards, whose full threat scope is unknown but nevertheless unsettling. The five countries on which the next Administration should focus its attention and energy are China, Iran, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea. The People’s Republic of China The designs of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Com- munist Party, which runs the PRC, are serious and dangerous.9 This tyrannical country with a population of more than 1 billion people has the vision, resources, and patience to achieve its objectives. Protecting the United States from the PRC’s designs requires an unambiguous offensive-defensive mix, including protecting American citizens and their interests, as well as U.S. allies, from PRC attacks and abuse that undermine U.S. competitiveness, security, and prosperity. The United States must have a cost-imposing strategic response to make Bei- jing’s aggression unaffordable, even as the American economy and U.S. power grow. This stance will require real, sustained, near-unprecedented U.S. growth; stronger partnerships; synchronized economic and security policies; and American energy independence—but above all, it will require a very honest perspective about the nature and designs of the PRC as more of a threat than a competitor.10 The next President should use the State Department and its array of resources to reassess and lead this effort, just as it did during the Cold War. The U.S. government needs an Article X for China,11 and it should be a presidential mandate. Along with the National Security Council, the State Department should draft an Article X, which should be a deeply philosophical look at the China challenge. Many foreign policy professionals and national leaders, both in government and the private sector, are reluctant to take decisive action regarding China. Many are vested in an unshakable faith in the international system and global norms. They are so enamored with them they cannot brook any criticisms or reforms, let alone

Introduction

Moderate61.2%
Pages: 211-213

— 178 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise interior immigration enforcement. This Administration’s humanitarian crisis—which is arguably the greatest humanitarian crisis in the modern era, one which has harmed Americans and foreign nationals alike—will take many years and billions of dollars to fully address. One casualty of the Biden Administration’s behavior will be the current form of the U.S. Refugee Admission Program (USRAP). The federal government’s obligation to shift national security–essential screening and vetting resources to the forged border crisis will necessitate an indefinite curtailment of the number of USRAP refugee admissions. The State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, which administers USRAP, must shift its resources to challenges stemming from the current immigration situation until the crisis can be contained and refugee-focused screening and vetting capacity can reasonably be restored. l Strengthening bilateral and multilateral immigration-focused agreements. Restoration of both domestic security and the integrity of the U.S. immigration system should start with rapid reactivation of several key initiatives in effect at the conclusion of the Trump Administration. Reimplementation of the Remain in Mexico policy, safe third-country agreements, and other measures to address the influx of non-Mexican asylum applicants at the United States–Mexico border must be Day One priorities. Although the State Department must rein in the C-175 authorities of other agencies, the Department of Homeland Security should retain (or regain) C-175 authorities for negotiating bilateral and multilateral security agreements. l Evaluation of national security–vulnerable visa programs. To protect the American people, the State Department, in coordination with the White House and other security-focused agencies, should evaluate several key security-sensitive visa programs that it manages. Key programs include, but should not be limited to, the Diversity Visa program, the F (student) visa program, and J (exchange visitor) visa program. The State Department’s evaluation must ensure that these programs are not only consistent with White House immigration policy, but also align with its national security obligations and resource limitations. PIVOTING ABROAD Personnel and management adjustments are crucial preludes to refocus the State Department’s mission, which is implementing the President’s foreign policy agenda and, in so doing, ensuring that the interests of American citizens are given

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills