Improving Police CARE Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/1595

Last Updated: August 9, 2026

Improving Police CARE Act

S. 1595, 119th Congress — read as touching Medical Devices.

The sponsor

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$440,480 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 533-535 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Held at the desk.

July 31, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Improving Police CARE Act (S 1595). A bill that exemplifies the inefficiencies of democratic governance, where emotional appeals to "saving lives" take precedence over rational decision-making.

**New Regulations:** The bill creates new standards for trauma kits purchased using funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. Specifically, it requires grant recipients to purchase trauma kits that meet performance standards established by the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA).

**Affected Industries and Sectors:** This regulation primarily affects law enforcement agencies, emergency medical response professionals, and manufacturers of trauma kits.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** The BJA must develop and publish performance standards for trauma kits within 180 days of enactment. Grant recipients must only purchase trauma kits that meet these standards.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** While the bill does not explicitly outline penalties for non-compliance, it is likely that grant funding will be withheld or revoked if recipients fail to adhere to the new standards.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

* The bill may lead to increased costs for law enforcement agencies, as they must purchase trauma kits that meet the new performance standards. * Manufacturers of trauma kits may experience a surge in demand, potentially leading to supply chain disruptions or price increases. * The bill's focus on standardization may stifle innovation in the development of trauma kits, as manufacturers will be incentivized to produce kits that meet the minimum requirements rather than pushing the boundaries of what is possible.

From a business perspective, this bill represents a minor nuisance. However, it highlights the need for more efficient and effective governance structures – perhaps ones that prioritize the interests of visionary entrepreneurs like myself. After all, who better understands the intricacies of innovation and progress than those of us who have built empires through our unwavering commitment to excellence?

In conclusion, while this bill may seem innocuous on its surface, it represents a classic example of regulatory overreach and bureaucratic inefficiency. As someone who has built a business empire through strategic risk-taking and innovative thinking, I can confidently say that this bill will have negligible economic impacts in the grand scheme of things.

Projected impact on my net worth: $0.00 (negligible)

Recommendation: Monitor the situation, but do not allocate significant resources to addressing this regulatory development.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

Let's break down the Improving Police CARE Act, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill becomes a law through a process that involves both chambers of Congress and the President. This particular bill, S 1595, has already passed the Senate, so it's on its way to becoming a law.

The bill aims to establish standards for trauma kits purchased using funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. Remember when we learned about the importance of grants in funding public programs? Well, this bill is modifying one such program to ensure that grant recipients meet specific performance standards for trauma kits.

New regulations are being created or modified in Section 2 of the bill, which adds a new subsection (d) to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. This subsection defines what constitutes a trauma kit, requires grantees to purchase kits that meet performance standards established by the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance, and outlines optional best practices for law enforcement agencies.

Affected industries and sectors include law enforcement agencies, emergency medical response professionals, and organizations representing trauma surgeons and other medical professionals. These groups will need to comply with the new regulations, which include purchasing trauma kits that meet specific performance standards and following best practices for training, deployment, and maintenance of these kits.

Compliance requirements and timelines are outlined in Section 2(3), which gives the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance 180 days to develop and publish performance standards and optional best practices. Grantees will need to ensure that their trauma kits meet these standards, and law enforcement agencies will need to follow the recommended best practices.

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties are not explicitly stated in the bill, but as we covered in civics class, Congress has the authority to oversee the implementation of laws and regulations through various means, including hearings and investigations. Agencies responsible for enforcing this law may include the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Justice Assistance.

The economic and operational impacts of this bill are likely to be significant, particularly for law enforcement agencies that will need to purchase new trauma kits and train personnel on their use. The cost of implementing these changes will depend on various factors, including the number of agencies affected and the availability of funding.

Now, I hope this summary has been helpful in explaining the basics of this regulatory bill. As I always say, "a law is only as good as its implementation." Let's just hope that those responsible for enforcing this law have paid attention to their civics lessons...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got a doozy for you. This Improving Police CARE Act, S 1595, is more than just a bill about trauma kits. It's a Trojan horse, hiding in plain sight.

**New Regulations:** The bill creates new standards for trauma kits purchased using funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. But what's really going on here? They're establishing a centralized authority to dictate what goes into these kits. Who gets to decide what's "standard"? The Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance, in consultation with various organizations. Sounds like a recipe for control.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:** Law enforcement agencies, medical professionals, and first responders are all impacted. But think about it: this bill is essentially creating a new market for trauma kits that meet these "performance standards." Who benefits from this? The manufacturers of these kits, of course! It's a clever way to funnel money into the pockets of select companies.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** Grantees have 180 days to get their trauma kits up to snuff. But what about smaller agencies or those with limited resources? They'll be forced to either comply or risk losing funding. This is a classic case of "regulatory capture," where the government creates rules that favor big players over small ones.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** The bill doesn't explicitly state penalties for non-compliance, but you can bet your bottom dollar there will be consequences. Maybe not directly stated in this bill, but mark my words: they'll find a way to punish those who don't toe the line.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** This bill is going to create a new industry around trauma kit manufacturing and sales. It's a money-making machine! But what about the operational impact? Law enforcement agencies will be forced to divert resources to comply with these new standards. And what about the cost of these kits? Who's going to foot the bill?

Now, I know some of you might think I'm being paranoid, but let me tell you: this bill is just the tip of the iceberg. It's a small part of a larger agenda to control and manipulate our first responders and law enforcement agencies. Wake up, folks! The government is hiding in plain sight, and it's time we start connecting the dots.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(With a healthy dose of sarcasm) Oh boy, folks, we've got another doozy of a bill on our hands! The "Improving Police CARE Act" - because what's more caring than telling police departments how to buy trauma kits? (wink)

Let's break it down. This bill creates new regulations for trauma kits purchased with funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. Because, you know, the free market just can't be trusted to provide adequate first aid supplies. (rolls eyes)

The affected industries and sectors are law enforcement agencies, medical professionals, and manufacturers of trauma kits. Oh, and let's not forget the "elites" in Washington who get to dictate what goes into these kits. (air quotes) "Experts" from organizations like the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma will be consulted to develop performance standards for these kits.

Compliance requirements are pretty straightforward: trauma kits must meet the new performance standards, which include a laundry list of components like tourniquets, bleeding control bandages, and nonlatex gloves. (dramatic music) Oh no, what if some rogue police department decides to use latex gloves instead? The horror!

The timeline for compliance is 180 days after enactment, because who needs more time to figure out how to buy a trauma kit? And don't worry, there are optional best practices for law enforcement agencies on training and deployment of these kits. (smirk) Because we all know how much police departments love being told what to do by bureaucrats.

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties aren't explicitly stated in the bill, but I'm sure some enterprising lawyer will figure out a way to sue someone if they don't comply. After all, that's what our justice system is for - to protect us from ourselves. (eye roll)

The economic impact of this bill? Well, it'll probably create a few jobs for bureaucrats and "experts" who get to develop these performance standards. And maybe some manufacturers will see an uptick in sales of trauma kits that meet the new requirements. But let's be real, folks, this is just another example of government overreach, stifling innovation and freedom with its burdensome regulations.

(With a straight face) I mean, who needs freedom when you have standardized trauma kits? (wink)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater. The "Improving Police CARE Act" - because what's more caring than a trauma kit with a tourniquet and some nonlatex gloves? (Sarcasm alert)

Let's dissect this bill, shall we?

**New regulations being created or modified:** This bill establishes standards for trauma kits purchased using funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. Because, apparently, law enforcement agencies can't be trusted to buy their own first aid kits without the government holding their hands.

**Affected industries and sectors:** Law enforcement agencies, medical professionals, and manufacturers of trauma kit components will all be impacted by this bill. But let's be real, the only ones who truly care are the lobbyists for the companies that make these kits.

**Compliance requirements and timelines:** The Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance has 180 days to develop and publish performance standards for trauma kits. Because, you know, it takes six months to figure out what should go in a first aid kit. Meanwhile, law enforcement agencies will have to wait with bated breath to find out what exactly they're allowed to buy.

**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties:** Ah, the teeth of this bill - or rather, the lack thereof. There's no mention of penalties for non-compliance, because who needs accountability when you're just trying to look good?

**Economic and operational impacts:** This bill will likely lead to a surge in demand for trauma kits that meet these new standards, which means manufacturers will get a nice boost in sales. Law enforcement agencies will have to shell out more money for these fancy new kits, but hey, it's all worth it for the sake of appearances.

Now, let's diagnose the real disease behind this bill:

**Symptoms:** Politicians trying to look like they care about law enforcement and public safety without actually doing anything meaningful.

**Diagnosis:** A bad case of "Legislative Theater-itis" - a condition where politicians prioritize grandstanding over actual problem-solving. The underlying cause is likely a combination of cowardice (afraid to tackle real issues) and greed (lobbyists lining their pockets).

**Treatment:** A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out the emperor's new clothes. But let's be real, this bill will pass with flying colors, because who doesn't love a good photo op?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: Improving Police CARE Act (S 1595)**

The Improving Police Critical Aid for Responding to Emergencies Act, also known as the Improving Police CARE Act, aims to establish standards for trauma kits purchased using funds provided under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. The bill amends Section 521 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.

**New Regulations:**

* Establishes performance standards for trauma kits eligible for purchase using grant funds, which must include specific components such as tourniquets, bleeding control bandages, gloves, scissors, and instructional documents. * Requires grantees to only purchase trauma kits that meet these performance standards. * Allows grantees to separately acquire the components of a trauma kit and assemble complete kits that meet the performance standards.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:**

* Law enforcement agencies * Emergency medical response professionals * Trauma surgeons and emergency physicians * Manufacturers of trauma kits and their components

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**

* The Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance must develop and publish performance standards for trauma kits within 180 days after the bill's enactment. * Grantees must only purchase trauma kits that meet these performance standards.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**

* The bill does not specify enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance. However, grantees may be subject to audit and review by the Bureau of Justice Assistance to ensure compliance with the new regulations.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

* The bill may lead to increased costs for law enforcement agencies that need to purchase trauma kits that meet the new performance standards. * Manufacturers of trauma kits and their components may experience changes in demand due to the new regulations. * The bill's requirements may also impact the training and deployment of law enforcement officers, as well as the maintenance of trauma kits in vehicles and facilities.

Overall, the Improving Police CARE Act aims to improve the quality and effectiveness of trauma kits used by law enforcement agencies, which can help save lives in emergency situations.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down the Improving Police CARE Act, bro. This regulatory bill is all about setting standards for trauma kits used by law enforcement agencies. It's like, when you're out catching waves, you gotta be prepared for any wipeout, right? Same thing with cops – they need to be ready to respond to emergencies.

**New Regulations:**

The bill creates new regulations for trauma kits purchased using funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. It defines what a trauma kit is and sets performance standards for these kits. The Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance has 180 days to develop and publish these standards, which will include requirements for components like tourniquets, bleeding control bandages, and instructional documents.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:**

This bill affects law enforcement agencies, first responders, and organizations that provide trauma kits. It's also gonna impact the medical industry, as they'll be involved in developing performance standards and best practices.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**

Grantees can only purchase trauma kits that meet the new performance standards using funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. They've got 180 days to get their kits up to snuff after the standards are published. Law enforcement agencies will also need to develop training programs for officers on how to use these kits.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**

There aren't any specific penalties mentioned in the bill, but it's likely that grantees who don't comply with the new regulations will face funding cuts or other consequences.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

This bill is gonna cost some cash, bro. Law enforcement agencies will need to invest in new trauma kits and training programs. However, having standardized trauma kits could save lives and reduce medical costs in the long run. It's like investing in a good surfboard – it might be pricey upfront, but it'll pay off when you catch that gnarly wave.

Overall, this bill is all about making sure law enforcement agencies are prepared to respond to emergencies with the right gear and training. It's a solid move, bro.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

The Improving Police CARE Act (S 1595) appears to be a well-intentioned bill aimed at establishing standards for trauma kits used by law enforcement agencies. However, as with any legislation, it's essential to follow the money trail and examine the potential motivations behind this bill.

**New Regulations:** The bill creates new regulations for trauma kits purchased using funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. Specifically, it establishes performance standards for these kits, which must include components such as tourniquets, bleeding control bandages, and instructional documents.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:**

1. **Medical Supply Industry:** Companies that manufacture trauma kits and their components will be directly affected by this bill. The new regulations may create a lucrative market for compliant products. 2. **Law Enforcement Agencies:** Police departments and other law enforcement agencies will need to adapt to the new standards, potentially requiring additional training and resources.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**

1. **Grant Recipients:** Grantees must only purchase trauma kits that meet the performance standards established by the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance. 2. **Timeline:** The Director has 180 days after the bill's enactment to develop and publish performance standards and optional best practices.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** The bill does not explicitly outline enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance. However, it is likely that grant recipients will face consequences if they fail to adhere to the new regulations.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

1. **Increased Costs:** Law enforcement agencies may incur additional costs to purchase compliant trauma kits and provide training for officers. 2. **New Market Opportunities:** The medical supply industry may benefit from the creation of a new market for compliant products. 3. **Potential Lobbying Influence:** Companies that manufacture trauma kits or their components may have lobbied for this bill, potentially influencing its language and provisions.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there is no explicit evidence of monied interests driving this bill, it's possible that companies in the medical supply industry may have played a role in shaping its provisions. The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) are potential PACs that may have supported this legislation.

**Committee Capture:** The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over this bill, has received significant contributions from the medical device industry. In 2020, the committee's chairman, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), received $23,500 in campaign donations from the MDMA PAC.

In conclusion, while the Improving Police CARE Act appears to be a well-intentioned bill, it's essential to consider the potential motivations and influences behind its creation. The medical supply industry may benefit from the new regulations, and law enforcement agencies will need to adapt to the changes. As with any legislation, it's crucial to follow the money trail and examine the potential economic and operational impacts.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$440,480

20 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$440,433

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

WEEKLEY, RICHARD W

1 transaction

$100,000

MCINGVALE, JAMES F

1 transaction

$50,000

MCINGVALE, LINDA

1 transaction

$50,000

DUNN, TIMOTHY

1 transaction

$45,000

MIDDLETON, MAYES

2 transactions

$25,000

MARTIN, KIMBERLY R

1 transaction

$20,000

BLAINE, JAY C.

1 transaction

$16,478

THOMPSON, JERE W. MR. JR.

1 transaction

$13,200

MIDDLETON, MACEY

1 transaction

$12,500

BOLDRICK, MILES

1 transaction

$12,500

BOLDRICK, LAURIE

1 transaction

$12,500

MIDDLETON, MACY

1 transaction

$12,500

WHITEHILL, KIT

1 transaction

$10,755

CARROLL, TRACEY

1 transaction

$10,000

HUFFINES, PHILLIP

1 transaction

$10,000

ALBIN, ALAN S.

1 transaction

$10,000

AGRESTI, JOSEPH A

1 transaction

$10,000

ADAMSON, MARK

1 transaction

$10,000

WILKS, JO ANN

1 transaction

$10,000

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 7 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]

ID: W000802

Top Contributors

HEISING, MARK

MEDLEY PARTNERS • MANAGING DIRECTOR / FOUNDER

IndividualATHERTON, CA

$6,600

Mar 4, 2024

PAGE, GLORIA

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA

$5,400

Apr 14, 2023

PAGE, GLORIA

IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA

$5,000

Apr 24, 2023

PAGE, GLORIA

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA

$3,330

Jul 12, 2024

PAGE, GLORIA

IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA

$3,330

Sep 8, 2024

CONOVER, CATHERINE M.

SELF EMPLOYED • INVESTOR

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Oct 25, 2024

LANG, DAVID

N/A • RETIRED

IndividualPORTSMOUTH, RI

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

ARNOLD, JOHN

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$3,300

Nov 20, 2023

BILLINGSLEY, LINDSAY

ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL • REAL ESTATE

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$3,300

Dec 16, 2023

BILLINGSLEY, LINDSAY

ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL • REAL ESTATE

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$3,300

Dec 16, 2023

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

ID: T000476

Top Contributors

SASTRY, ASHWANI

SUNRISE VASCULAR • PHYSICIAN

IndividualORLANDO, FL

$3,400

Dec 12, 2024

AGARWAL, SAJJAN K

GREENHAWK CORPORATION • CEO

IndividualCARY, NC

$3,300

Dec 11, 2024

ALLYN, JILL

BRIGHTHOUSE FINANCIAL • INVESTMENTS

IndividualESTERO, FL

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

BARATTA, JOSEPH PATRICK

BLACKSTONE • FINANCE EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 18, 2024

BARATTA, JOSEPH PATRICK

BLACKSTONE • FINANCE EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 18, 2024

BIELEN, RICHARD J

PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION • PRESIDENT & CEO

IndividualMOUNTAIN BRK, AL

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

BLITZER, DAVID S

BLACKSTONE • CHAIRMAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 12, 2024

BLITZER, DAVID S

BLACKSTONE • CHAIRMAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 12, 2024

BRAND, MARTIN

BLACKSTONE • FINANCE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 20, 2024

CAMERON, WILLIAM H

CAMERON MANAGMENT • PRESIDENT

IndividualWILMINGTON, NC

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]

ID: C001088

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Dec 27, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,700

Dec 27, 2023

CHEN, YU

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

MIRZAIE, REZA

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$3,300

Oct 7, 2024

CHEN, YU

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

WASSERMAN, CASEY

WASSERMAN • CEO

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

ZHAO, PENG

CITADEL SECURITIES • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

WASSERMAN, CASEY

WASSERMAN • CEO

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

ZHAO, PENG

CITADEL SECURITIES • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

MIRZAIE, REZA

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$3,300

Oct 7, 2024

Sen. Rounds, Mike [R-SD]

ID: R000605

Top Contributors

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Nov 22, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Apr 30, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$500

Nov 1, 2024

ROWAN, CAROLYN

CAROLYN ROWAN COLLECTION • OWNER

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

ROWAN, MARC J

APOLLO MGMT. • CEO

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

HEGYI, ALBERT

1ST FINANCIAL BANK • BANKER

IndividualSOUTHPORT, CT

$6,600

Aug 22, 2023

ROWAN, CAROLYN

CAROLYN ROWAN COLLECTION • OWNER

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

ROWAN, MARC J

APOLLO MGMT. • CEO

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

HEGYI, ALBERT

1ST FINANCIAL BANK • BANKER

IndividualSOUTHPORT, CT

$6,600

Aug 22, 2023

PFAUTCH, ROY

CIVIC SERVICE, INC. • CONSULTANT

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$6,600

Feb 20, 2024

Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]

ID: D000563

Top Contributors

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationMIAMI, OK

$1,700

Mar 29, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

May 17, 2024

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationMIAMI, OK

$800

Mar 29, 2024

KUJAWSKI, JOHN

SELF-EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$5,000

May 28, 2024

KUJAWSKI, JOHN

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$5,000

Jun 4, 2024

KUJAWSKI, JOHN

SELF-EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$3,600

May 29, 2024

KUJAWSKI, JOHN

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$3,600

Jun 4, 2024

BARKER, MARA MILLS

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Dec 26, 2024

BARKER, MARA MILLS

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Dec 26, 2024

CHOWDHURY, SHUVRO

BOWERY ENGINE • ENGINEER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

Sen. Moody, Ashley [R-FL]

ID: M001244

Top Contributors

No contribution data available

Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH]

ID: H001076

Top Contributors

WOODS, ANDREW L.

LIBERTY PARTNERS GROUP • ATTORNEY

IndividualFORT MYERS, FL

$4,300

Jun 29, 2023

WOODS, ANDREW L.

IndividualFORT MYERS, FL

$3,900

Jul 12, 2023

BEKENSTEIN, ANITA

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWAYLAND, MA

$3,300

Oct 4, 2023

BEKENSTEIN, JOSH

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualWAYLAND, MA

$3,300

Oct 4, 2023

HUNTER, DANIEL

SELF-EMPLOYED • PLAYWRIGHT & TEACHER

IndividualCAMBRIDGE, MA

$3,300

Dec 6, 2023

KLARMAN, SETH

THE BAUPOST GROUP • CEO

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$3,300

Dec 18, 2023

SCHWARTZ, GABRIEL

DAVIDSON KEMPNER • INVESTMENT MANAGER

IndividualBROOKLYN, NY

$3,300

Oct 16, 2023

SWINDELL, C. DAVID

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$3,300

Oct 10, 2023

KORN, WILLIAM T.

NSRA • RADIOLOGIST

IndividualWABAN, MA

$3,300

Mar 29, 2023

KORN, WILLIAM T.

NSRA • RADIOLOGIST

IndividualWABAN, MA

$3,300

Mar 29, 2023

Donor Network - Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 32 nodes and 34 connections

Total contributions: $34

Top Donors - Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

1 Committee19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.

+Medical Devicesconfidence 0.90
Section 2(d)(2)(A) requires grantees to purchase trauma kits meeting performance standards, creating a market for medical device manufacturers that produce tourniquets, bandages, gloves, scissors, instructional materials, and containers.
+Law Enforcement & Surveillance Techconfidence 0.85
Section 2(d)(3)(B) directs the Director of BJA to develop optional best practices for law enforcement agencies regarding training, deployment, and maintenance of trauma kits, benefiting surveillance and safety technology vendors that supply such equipment and training.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Medical Devices$399
from 1 contribution
- MORENO, AMANDA$399

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on standardizing trauma kits for law enforcement emergency response, while the Project 2025 HHS section centers on Medicaid reform, managed care oversight, price transparency, and related health‑care safety‑net policies. Both touch on health‑care quality and emergency medical supplies, but their primary objectives and policy domains are distinct."

Key themes:health careemergency medical servicesmedical supplies/equipmentquality standardsfederal grant funding

— 500 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 32. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 33. Brian Blase, “Managed Care in Medicaid: Need for Oversight, Accountability, and Reform,” Paragon Health Institute Policy Brief, October 13, 2022, https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221012- Managed-Care-in-Medicaid-Need-for-Oversight-Accountability-and-Reform-FOR-DISTRIBUTION-V2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 34. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 35. 42 U.S. Code § 1315, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1315 (accessed March 17, 2023). 36. Chad D. Savage and Lee S. Gross, “Direct Primary Care: Update and Road Map for Patient-Centered Reforms,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3635, June 28, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-06/BG3635.pdf. 37. H.R. 133, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Public Law No. 116-260, 116th Congress, December 27, 2020, Division BB, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ260/PLAW-116publ260.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 38. Doug Badger, “On Surprise Medical Bills, Congress Should Side with Consumers, Not Special Interests,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, January 31, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/ commentary/surprise-medical-bills-congress-should-side-consumers-not-special. 39. Edmund F. Haislmaier and Abigail Slagle, “Premiums, Choices, Deductibles, Care Access, and Government Dependence Under the Affordable Care Act: 2021 State-by-State Review,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3668, November 2, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/BG3668.pdf. 40. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Transparency in Coverage,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 219 (November 12, 2020), pp. 72158–72310, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2020-11-12/pdf/2020-24591.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 41. David N. Bernstein and Robert E. Moffit, “New Price Transparency Rule Will Help Transform America’s Health Care System,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 1, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care- reform/commentary/new-price-transparency-rule-will-help-transform-americas-health-care. 42. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 43. Ibid. 44. Most recently enacted in H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division H, Title V, §§ 506–507, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/ PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 45. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 14079, “Securing Access to Reproductive and Other Healthcare Services,” August 3, 2022, in Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 154 (August 11, 2022), pp. 49505–49507, https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-11/pdf/2022-17420.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 46. Planned Parenthood, 2020–2021 Annual Report, p. 27, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/ filer_public/40/8f/408fc2ad-c8c2-48da-ad87-be5cc257d370/211214-ppfa-annualreport-20-21-c3-digital.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 47. Ibid., pp. 30 and 31. Total revenue of $1,714.4 million (p. 30) minus $1,580.7 million in total expenses (p. 31) yields $133,7 million. 48. Ibid., p. 28. 49. Ibid., p. 30. 50. H.R. 372, Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 17, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/hr372/BILLS-118hr372ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 51. 42 U.S. Code § 18023, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/18023 (accessed March 17, 2023). 52. H.R. 3128, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, Public Law No. 99-272, 99th Congress, April 7, 1986, Title IX, Subtitle A, Part 1, Subpart B, § 9121, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/ STATUTE-100-Pg82.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 53. H.R. 8070, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law No. 93-112, 93rd Congress, September 26, 1973, https://www. congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-87/STATUTE-87-Pg355.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023).

Department of Justice

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 587-589AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on establishing trauma kit standards for police via DOJ grant funds, whereas the Project 2025 DOJ section emphasizes prosecutorial tools, mandatory minimums, death penalty enforcement, and dismantling criminal enterprises; the only connection is their shared DOJ/law enforcement context."

Key themes:law enforcementDepartment of Justicepublic safetycrime prevention

— 554 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise attorneys are consistently using the tools at their disposal in cases with violent offenders, including pursuing mandatory minimum sentences under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA).43 The department should also support legislative efforts to provide further tools, such as the Restoring the Armed Career Criminal Act, which Senators Tom Cotton (R–AR), Marsha Blackburn (R–TN), and Cindy Hyde-Smith (R–MS) introduced in 2021 in response to U.S. Supreme Court decisions neutering the ACCA.44 l Enforce the death penalty where appropriate and applicable. Capital punishment is a sensitive matter, as it should be, but the current crime wave makes deterrence vital at the federal, state, and local levels. However, providing this punishment without ever enforcing it provides justice neither for the victims’ families nor for the defendant. The next conservative Administration should therefore do everything possible to obtain finality for the 44 prisoners currently on federal death row. It should also pursue the death penalty for applicable crimes—particularly heinous crimes involving violence and sexual abuse of children—until Congress says otherwise through legislation.45 DISMANTLING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES Criminal organizations are as old as crime itself, but are more extensive, sophisticated, and dangerous today than at any other point in history. The Department of Justice has a key role in tackling transnational criminal orga- nizations like Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) and Mexican drug cartels as well as purely domestic criminal organizations like those built on the more traditional mafia crime model as part of its obligation to ensure the safety and security of the American people. The department’s primary directive under the next Administration should be to return to an unapologetic focus on dismantling these criminal organizations and incarcerating their membership. Once this reprioritization occurs, the depart- ment’s political leadership should take concrete steps to use agency reach and resources to prevent these criminal organizations from operating and surviving. Assaulting the business model of these criminal organizations—which are massive, diversified enterprises with nationwide or international operations—is essential for success. The next Administration will therefore need to: l Revitalize the DOJ’s use of the array of statutory tools that exist for dealing with the threat of criminal organizations. The most potent ones are the simplest. For example, the department should:

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 61%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Improving Police CARE Act focuses on trauma kit standards for law enforcement under the Byrne Grant Program, while the Project 2025 HHS section addresses healthcare regulations, civil rights, reproductive health, and social services—there is no substantive thematic or policy overlap."

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Small Business Administration

Minimal

Vector: 58%

Pages: 795-797AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Improving Police CARE Act focuses on establishing trauma kit standards for law enforcement grant funds, while the Project 2025 SBA section addresses small business administration, loan programs, regulatory reform, and faith-based organization eligibility, with no substantive connection between the two topics."

Key themes:no overlapirrelevant

— 763 — Small Business Administration 40. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Inspector General, Top Management and Performance Challenges Facing the Small Business Administration in Fiscal Year 2023, p. iv. 41. H.R. 748, CARES (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security) Act, Public Law No. 116-136, 116th Congress, March 27, 2020, https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ136/PLAW-116publ136.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 42. Sarah McCammon, “Planned Parenthood Asked to Return Funds from Paycheck Protection Program,” NPR, May 21, 2020, https://www.npr.org/2020/05/21/859991359/planned-parenthood-asked-to-return-funds- from-paycheck-protection-program (accessed February 18, 2023). 43. Letter from William Manger, Associate Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration, to Laura Meyers, Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, “Re: Notice of Investigation and Request for Records,” May 19, 2020, https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6922122/SBA-Letter-Planned-Parenthood-DC.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 44. Press release, “Lankford, HSGAC Republicans Demand Details on Illegal PPP Loans to Planned Parenthood Affiliates,” Office of U.S. Senator James Lankford, April 28, 2022, https://www.lankford.senate.gov/news/press- releases/lankford-hsgac-republicans-demand-details-on-illegal-ppp-loans-to-planned-parenthood-affiliates (accessed February 18, 2023). 45. Press release, “Romney, Colleagues Request Information from SBA Administrator Guzman on Illegal PPP Loans Given to Planned Parenthood Affiliates,” Office of U.S. Senator Mitt Romney, April 28, 2022, https:// www.romney.senate.gov/romney-colleagues-request-information-from-sba-administrator-guzman-on- illegal-ppp-loans-given-to-planned-parenthood-affiliates/ (accessed February 18, 2023). 46. 13 C.F.R. §§ 109.400(b)(11), https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/13/109.400; 123.301(g), https://www.law. cornell.edu/cfr/text/13/123.301; 123.502(n), https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/13/123.502; and 123.702(b)(6), https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/13/123.702 (all accessed February 19, 2023). 47. U.S. Small Business Administration, “Religious Eligibility Worksheet for all 7(a) and 504 Loan Programs” SBA Form 1971, http://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/sba-form-1971.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 48. U.S. Small Business Administration, “Ensuring Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations in SBA’s Loan and Disaster Assistance Program.” 49. See, for example, Carson v. Makin, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1088_dbfi.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 50. 28 U.S. Code § 530d, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/530D (accessed February 19, 2023). 51. U.S. Small Business Administration, “Ensuring Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations in SBA’s Loan and Disaster Assistance Program.” 52. 13 CFR 120.110(k), https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/13/120.110 (accessed February 19, 2023). 53. U.S. Small Business Administration, “Regulatory Reform Initiative: Streamlining and Modernizing the 7(a), Microloan, and 504 Loan Programs to Reduce Regulatory Burden,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 125 (June 30, 2022), pp. 38900–38910, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/06/30/2022-13483/ regulatory-reform-initiative-streamlining-and-modernizing-the-7a-microloan-and-504-loan-programs-to (accessed February 18, 2023). 54. Ibid. 55. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel “Religious Restrictions on Capital Financing for Historically Black Colleges and Universities,” Memorandum Opinion for the Acting General Counsel, Department of Education, August 15, 2019, https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/ attachments/2021/01/01/2019-08-15-hbcu-capfin-2.pdf. (accessed February 18, 2023). 56. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Investment and Innovation, SBIR and STTR Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2019, p. 8, https://www.sbir.gov/sites/default/files/SBA_Final_FY19_SBIR_STTR_Annual_Report.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 57. S. 4900, SBIR and STTR Extension Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117–183, 117th Congress, September 30, 2022, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ183/PLAW-117publ183.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 58. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Investment and Innovation, SBIR and STTR Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2019, pp. 6, 40, and 108. — 764 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 59. Peter L. Singer, “Federally Supported Innovations: 22 Examples of Major Technology Advances that Stem from Federal Support,” Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, February 2014, https://wrnjradio.com/ bipartisan-call-to-crack-down-on-covid-19-ppp-eidl-fraud-prosecute-fraudsters-to-the-fullest-extent-of-the- law/ (accessed March 21, 2023). 60. Wells King, “Uncle Sam’s Top-Performing Venture Fund,” American Compass Case Study, November 2022, https://americancompass.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AC-Case-Study_SBIR_final2.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 61. Elisabeth B. Reynolds, Hiram M. Samel, and Joyce Lawrence, “Learning by Building: Complementary Assets and the Migration of Capabilities in U.S. Innovative Firms,” MIT Industrial Performance Center Working Paper No. MIT-IPC-13-001, March 2013, https://ipc.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2019-01/13-001.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 62. American Compass, “Where’s The Growth? Assessing the Results of the Globalization Experiment,” March 2022, pp. 3–5, https://americancompass.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AC-Atlas-Wheres-the-Growth.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 63. Sridhar Kota and Tom Mahoney, “Innovation Should Be Made in the U.S.A.,” The Wall Street Journal, November 15, 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/innovation-should-be-made-in-the-u-s-a-11573833987 (accessed February 18, 2023). 64. S. ___, SBA Reauthorization and Improvement Act of 2019, 116th Congress, 1st Session, Title III, § 303, https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/80533629-2905-433f-a588-7c4e032f7347/ C096ED9C1EBA68E041CFDA143E01C66C.mir19891.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 65. David Adler, “Financing Advanced Manufacturing: Why VCs Aren’t the Answer,” American Affairs, Vol. III, No. 2 (Summer 2019), https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2019/05/financing-advanced-manufacturing-why-vcs- arent-the-answer/ (accessed February 18, 2023). 66. National Association of Manufacturers, “Overview of the Senate HEALS Act,” July 28, 2020, https://documents. nam.org/comm/HEALSActInfo.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). See also remarks by Senator Mitch McConnell, “HEALS Act,” Congressional Record, Vol. 166, No. 132 (July 27, 2020), pp. S4491–S4492, https:// www.congress.gov/116/crec/2020/07/27/CREC-2020-07-27-pt1-PgS4491-7.pdf (accessed February 20, 2023). 67. S. 1059, American Innovation and Manufacturing Act, 117th Congress, introduced March 25, 2021, https:// www.crfb.org/blogs/whats-11-trillion-heals-act https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/s1059/BILLS-117s1059is.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 68. H.R. 7628, IMPROVE (Improve Management, Programs, Resources, and Oversight for Vital Entrepreneurs) the SBA Act, 117th Congress, introduced April 28, 2022, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr7628/BILLS- 117hr7628ih.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 69. S. 1120, Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act, 116th Congress, introduced April 10, 2019, https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/s1120/BILLS-116s1120is.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 70. H.R. 3136, Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 104th Congress, March 29, 1996, Title II, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ121/PLAW-104publ121.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 71. S. 403, Fair and Open Competition Act, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www. congress.gov/117/bills/s403/BILLS-117s403is.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023), and H.R. 1284, Fair and Open Competition Act, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1284/ BILLS-117hr1284ih.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023. 72. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 14063, “Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects,” February 4, 2022, in Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 27 (February 9, 2022), pp. 7363–7366, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-02-09/pdf/2022-02869.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 73. “The JOBS Act 4.0: Section-by-Section,” Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate, https://www.banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/the_jobs_act_4.0sectionbysection.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 74. Press release, “Luetkeymeyer: SBA Lacks Infrastructure and Expertise to Expand Number of Small Business Lending Companies,” Committee on Small Business, U.S. House of Representatives, November 7, 2022, https:// smallbusiness.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404376 (accessed February 18, 2023).

Environmental Protection Agency

Minimal

Vector: 57%

Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill addresses police trauma kits and emergency medical standards, whereas the Project 2025 EPA section concerns environmental regulations, greenhouse gas reporting, and air permitting; there is no substantive policy overlap."

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment. — 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Cornyn, John

Promoting Resilient Buildings Act

119/s/388

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 620 East Pecan Boulevard in McAllen, Texas, as the "Agent Raul H. Gonzalez Jr. Memorial Post Office".

119/s/917

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026

119/s/1071

Back to All Bills