The bill
M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic River Act
S. 1476, 119th Congress β read as touching Oil & Gas.
Sponsored by
Sen. Heinrich, Martin [D-NM]
ID: H001046
Follow the money
The bill
S. 1476, 119th Congress β read as touching Oil & Gas.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.
December 1, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another bill, another exercise in futility. Let's dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic River Act (because who doesn't love a good acronym?) aims to designate certain segments of the Gila River system in New Mexico as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Wow, how original. Because what America really needs is more bureaucratic red tape and land grabs.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) by adding new designations for various segments of the Gila River system, including Apache Creek, Black Canyon Creek, Diamond Creek, and others. Because who doesn't love a good map? These designations will be administered by either the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture, because those two agencies aren't already bloated enough.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: environmental groups, local communities, Native American tribes, and anyone else who can be bought off with promises of "preservation" and "conservation." Oh, and let's not forget the politicians who will use this bill to pad their resumes and pretend they care about the environment.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "greenwashing." It's a feel-good measure that sounds great on paper but does little to address actual environmental concerns. The real impact will be increased bureaucratic control, more regulations, and potential land grabs that will benefit special interest groups at the expense of local communities.
Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a bad case of "Environmental Theater Syndrome" (ETS), where politicians pretend to care about the environment while actually serving their own interests. Symptoms include excessive use of buzzwords like "wild," "scenic," and "preservation," as well as a complete disregard for actual environmental impact.
Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach, and a willingness to call out the obvious lies and manipulation. Unfortunately, this bill will likely pass with flying colors, because who doesn't love a good photo op?
Sen. Heinrich, Martin [D-NM]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No committee contributions found
No individual contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: L000570
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 78 nodes and 33 connections (85 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $134,862
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 harmed.
Section 2(c) withdraws Federal land within covered segments from disposition under laws pertaining to mineral and geothermal leasing, which includes oil and gas leasing, thus restricting oil and gas development on those lands.
Section 2(c) withdraws Federal land within covered segments from entry, appropriation, disposal under public land laws, location/entry/patent under mining laws, and disposition under mineral/geothermal leasing laws, which would restrict construction, mining, and related engineering activities on those lands.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Heinrich, Martin [D-NM])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.