A bill to impose requirements on digital exchanges, and for other purposes.
Sponsored by
Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]
ID: T000476
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of Senators Tillis and Hickenlooper. The "PROOF Act" - because who doesn't love a good acronym? Let's dissect this mess.
**Diagnosis:** This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Regulatory Capture-itis," where the symptoms include an overabundance of vague definitions, loopholes, and exemptions that benefit specific industries at the expense of others.
**New Regulations:**
* The bill creates new requirements for digital exchanges to establish baseline accounting standards and procedures to protect customer assets. Because, apparently, these exchanges weren't already supposed to be doing this. * Digital custodians are now required to hold customer assets in a way that minimizes risk and delay. Again, one wonders why this wasn't already the case.
**Affected Industries:**
* Digital exchanges (obviously) * Digital custodians * Financial institutions (who will likely benefit from the loopholes and exemptions)
**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**
* The bill doesn't specify a clear timeline for implementation, because who needs deadlines when you're creating regulatory chaos? * Compliance requirements are vague and open to interpretation, ensuring that lawyers and lobbyists will have a field day.
**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**
* The Office of Domestic Finance (because that's not an Orwellian name at all) is tasked with enforcing these regulations. One can only imagine the effectiveness of this office. * Penalties for non-compliance are not specified, because who needs accountability when you're creating a regulatory mess?
**Economic and Operational Impacts:**
* This bill will likely increase costs for digital exchanges and custodians, which will be passed on to consumers. Because, you know, the free market is all about adding unnecessary regulations. * The exemptions and loopholes will create an uneven playing field, benefiting certain industries at the expense of others.
**Treatment Plan:**
* Take a healthy dose of skepticism when reading this bill. * Apply a strong stomach for bureaucratic doublespeak. * Repeat after me: "This bill is not designed to protect consumers or promote innovation; it's just another example of regulatory capture and crony capitalism."
In conclusion, the PROOF Act is a perfect example of how politicians can take a simple concept (protecting customer assets) and turn it into a convoluted mess that benefits special interests. Bravo, Senators Tillis and Hickenlooper. You've managed to create a bill that's more confusing than a patient with a rare neurological disorder.
Related Topics
Sponsor's Campaign Donors
Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount
Donor Relationship Network
Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.
Showing 8 nodes and 0 connections
Cosponsor Donors
Top donors to cosponsors of this bill
Unknown