A bill to impose requirements on digital exchanges, and for other purposes.

Bill ID: 119/s/1405
Last Updated: April 13, 2025

Sponsored by

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

ID: T000476

Follow the money

The bill

A bill to impose requirements on digital exchanges, and for other purposes.

S. 1405, 119th Congress — read as touching Crypto & Fintech.

The sponsor

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$66,100 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of Senators Tillis and Hickenlooper. The "PROOF Act" - because who doesn't love a good acronym? Let's dissect this mess.

**Diagnosis:** This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Regulatory Capture-itis," where the symptoms include an overabundance of vague definitions, loopholes, and exemptions that benefit specific industries at the expense of others.

**New Regulations:**

* The bill creates new requirements for digital exchanges to establish baseline accounting standards and procedures to protect customer assets. Because, apparently, these exchanges weren't already supposed to be doing this. * Digital custodians are now required to hold customer assets in a way that minimizes risk and delay. Again, one wonders why this wasn't already the case.

**Affected Industries:**

* Digital exchanges (obviously) * Digital custodians * Financial institutions (who will likely benefit from the loopholes and exemptions)

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**

* The bill doesn't specify a clear timeline for implementation, because who needs deadlines when you're creating regulatory chaos? * Compliance requirements are vague and open to interpretation, ensuring that lawyers and lobbyists will have a field day.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**

* The Office of Domestic Finance (because that's not an Orwellian name at all) is tasked with enforcing these regulations. One can only imagine the effectiveness of this office. * Penalties for non-compliance are not specified, because who needs accountability when you're creating a regulatory mess?

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

* This bill will likely increase costs for digital exchanges and custodians, which will be passed on to consumers. Because, you know, the free market is all about adding unnecessary regulations. * The exemptions and loopholes will create an uneven playing field, benefiting certain industries at the expense of others.

**Treatment Plan:**

* Take a healthy dose of skepticism when reading this bill. * Apply a strong stomach for bureaucratic doublespeak. * Repeat after me: "This bill is not designed to protect consumers or promote innovation; it's just another example of regulatory capture and crony capitalism."

In conclusion, the PROOF Act is a perfect example of how politicians can take a simple concept (protecting customer assets) and turn it into a convoluted mess that benefits special interests. Bravo, Senators Tillis and Hickenlooper. You've managed to create a bill that's more confusing than a patient with a rare neurological disorder.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$66,100
15 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$0
Committees
$0
Individuals
$66,100

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

1
BARATTA, JOSEPH PATRICK
2 transactions
$6,600
2
BLITZER, DAVID S
2 transactions
$6,600
3
CAMERON, WILLIAM H
2 transactions
$6,600
4
CHAE, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$6,600
5
COWLEY, JASON
2 transactions
$6,600
6
SASTRY, ASHWANI
1 transaction
$3,400
7
AGARWAL, SAJJAN K
1 transaction
$3,300
8
ALLYN, JILL
1 transaction
$3,300
9
BIELEN, RICHARD J
1 transaction
$3,300
10
BRAND, MARTIN
1 transaction
$3,300
11
CHAVERN, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
12
COOPER, ELLEN
1 transaction
$3,300
13
CURTIS, MONICA
1 transaction
$3,300
14
DAVISON, SCOTT
1 transaction
$3,300
15
DOWLING, JOSEPH
1 transaction
$3,300

Donor Network - Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 28 nodes and 20 connections (40 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $66,100

Top Donors - Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

15 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.

  • Crypto & Fintechconfidence 0.90

    Section 3(b)(2)(B)(i)-(ii) prohibits digital exchanges from using customer assets to margin, secure, or guarantee any trade or account of any person other than the customer, imposing operational constraints on crypto exchanges. Section 4(a) requires monthly attestations from independent auditing firms, creating compliance costs. Section 4(c) imposes civil penalties for noncompliance, further increasing costs.

Related Bills