The bill
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
S. 1387, 119th Congress β read as touching Biotech & Research.
Sponsored by
Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN]
ID: Y000064
Follow the money
The bill
S. 1387, 119th Congress β read as touching Biotech & Research.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
March 18, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this bloated carcass and see what's really festering beneath the surface.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025 is a sweeping bill that claims to advance national security, economic productivity, and competitiveness through biotechnology. In reality, it's a Trojan horse for corporate interests, bureaucratic power grabs, and pork-barrel politics.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This behemoth of a bill establishes the National Biotechnology Initiative, which will be coordinated by an Interagency Committee comprising 14 federal agencies (because who doesn't love more bureaucracy?). The initiative aims to:
1. Create a national strategy on biotechnology (read: more government control). 2. Support research and development in biotech (i.e., funnel taxpayer money to favored industries). 3. Streamline regulations for biotech products (translation: reduce oversight and accountability). 4. Develop a domestic workforce in biotech (code for "train more drones to serve the corporate overlords").
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects will benefit from this bill:
1. Biotech corporations, which will receive government handouts and regulatory favors. 2. Federal agencies, which will expand their powers and budgets. 3. Politicians, who will get to tout their "support for innovation" while lining their pockets with campaign donations.
Meanwhile, the public will be left with:
1. Increased exposure to untested biotech products. 2. Reduced transparency and accountability in government decision-making. 3. A further erosion of regulatory oversight, paving the way for future disasters like the opioid crisis or the 2008 financial meltdown.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "solution in search of a problem." By creating a new bureaucracy to oversee biotechnology, Congress is:
1. Enabling corporate interests to shape policy and regulation. 2. Increasing the risk of unintended consequences from untested biotech products. 3. Perpetuating the myth that government can effectively manage complex technological issues.
In short, this bill is a recipe for disaster, serving only to further entrench the corrupt relationships between politicians, corporations, and bureaucrats. But hey, at least it'll create some new jobs in the biotech sector β for those who are willing to sell their souls to the corporate machine.
Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: P000145
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 55 nodes and 23 connections (48 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $136,100
Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 9 helped.
The bill establishes the National Biotechnology Initiative to advance biotechnology through coordination, R&D support, regulatory streamlining, commercialization, workforce development, and other activities across multiple federal agencies (Sections 3-6). This provides clear benefits to the biotech industry via federal support, reduced regulatory barriers, and increased commercialization opportunities.
The bill includes biomanufacturing and product commercialization activities that would benefit pharmaceutical companies producing biologics, vaccines, and other biotechnology-derived drugs (Sections 3(c)(5), 4(b)(3)(E), 5, 6(5)). The initiative supports translation and scale-up of biotechnology products, directly aiding pharmaceutical innovation and manufacturing.
Medical devices that incorporate biotechnology (e.g., diagnostics, biosensors, implantable devices) would benefit from the initiative's focus on product commercialization, regulatory streamlining, and R&D support (Sections 3(c)(5), 4(b)(3)(E), 4(b)(3)(F), 6(5), 6(6)). The bill aims to reduce regulatory burdens and accelerate commercialization of biotechnology-produced products.
Section 6(3)(E) supports research on how biotech products affect or protect the environment, which includes health impacts relevant to hospitals; Section 6(5) supports private sector translation and commercialization of biotech products, which hospitals use; Section 6(8)(D) supports education/training in biomanufacturing and bioprocess engineering, relevant to hospital labs and health systems.
The Department of Agriculture is a participating agency (Section 3(b)(1)), and the initiative includes activities related to food and agriculture (Section 6). This suggests support for agricultural biotechnology, GMOs, and related innovations that would benefit large agribusiness firms involved in biotech-enhanced crops and livestock.
Section 6(3)(E) and (F) increase understanding of risks/benefits and ethical/legal/social implications of biotech, which health insurers use for coverage decisions; Section 6(5) supports commercialization of biotech products, affecting what insurers cover; Section 6(9) promotes bioliteracy for policymakers and public, aiding informed insurance policy.
+ 3 more industries not shown.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.