The bill
Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2026
S. 1369, 119th Congress — read as touching Agribusiness.
Sponsored by
Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]
ID: K000384
Follow the money
The bill
S. 1369, 119th Congress — read as touching Agribusiness.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 322.
February 9, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2026 is a bill that claims to combat illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing and trade in endangered species. How noble. In reality, it's just another excuse for the US government to exert its influence on the global stage, while pretending to care about the environment.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the President to impose sanctions on foreign individuals or entities involved in IUU fishing or trade in endangered species. Oh, how original. It's not like we've seen this same tired tactic used before as a thinly veiled excuse for economic warfare. The bill also requires the Secretary of State to prioritize collaboration with friendly countries (read: those who do our bidding) and to use the US voice at the United Nations to urge greater action against IUU fishing.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are affected by this bill: foreign governments, corporations, and individuals involved in the fishing industry. But let's be real, the real stakeholders here are the politicians who get to grandstand about environmental issues while lining their pockets with campaign donations from special interest groups.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "do as I say, not as I do." The US government will use it to lecture other countries about IUU fishing while ignoring its own complicity in the problem. The sanctions will likely harm innocent parties, such as fishermen and their families, while doing little to address the root causes of IUU fishing.
In conclusion, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the US government's addiction to playing global cop while ignoring its own corruption and hypocrisy. It's a cynical attempt to appear environmentally conscious while serving the interests of powerful lobbies and politicians. I give it two thumbs down, and a healthy dose of skepticism.
Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 5 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C001075
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001046
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001114
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001217
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: M001243
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 73 nodes and 42 connections (80 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $254,800
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 harmed.
Section 4(d)(4)(B) excludes from humanitarian exception transactions for sale of food or agricultural commodities obtained through illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing, which could affect agribusiness involved in such supply chains.
Section 4(d)(4)(B) excludes from humanitarian exception transactions for sale of food or agricultural commodities obtained through illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing, which could affect meat and dairy processors if their products are sourced from such fishing.
Section 4(d)(4)(B) excludes from humanitarian exception transactions for sale of food or agricultural commodities obtained through illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing, which could affect crop producers if their products are sourced from such fishing.
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to withdraw the outer Continental Shelf in the Mid-Atlantic Planning Area from disposition, and for other purposes.
Fisheries Data Modernization and Accuracy Act of 2025
Water Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Act