A bill to require the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a final rule removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

The S 1306 bill. A minor perturbation in the grand tapestry of regulatory frameworks, but one that warrants attention nonetheless.

**New regulations being created or modified:** The bill seeks to reissue a final rule removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. This modification has implications for land use, agriculture, and natural resource extraction industries.

**Affected industries and sectors:** The primary beneficiaries of this bill will be ranchers, farmers, and mining companies operating in regions where gray wolves are present. By delisting the species, these industries can expect reduced regulatory burdens and increased flexibility in their operations.

**Compliance requirements and timelines:** The Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service is required to reissue the final rule within 60 days of enactment. This expedited timeline minimizes potential disruptions to affected industries.

**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties:** Notably, the bill includes a provision exempting the reissuance of the final rule from judicial review. This effectively insulates the decision-making process from external scrutiny, ensuring that regulatory hurdles are minimized.

**Economic and operational impacts:** By removing gray wolves from the endangered species list, this bill can be expected to yield significant economic benefits for affected industries. According to our think tank's projections, delisting the gray wolf could result in an estimated $1.2 billion increase in annual agricultural production and a $500 million boost to mining operations.

In conclusion, S 1306 represents a strategic opportunity for deregulation and consolidation of power within key industries. By streamlining regulatory frameworks and reducing compliance burdens, this bill aligns with our organization's goals of promoting efficiency and innovation through reduced government intervention.

Let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several stages before it can become an actual law. This one, S 1306, aims to require the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a final rule removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

Now, remember when we learned about committees in Congress? Well, this bill has been referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. That's where it will be reviewed and debated before potentially moving forward. You should have learned that committees play a crucial role in shaping legislation, but I suppose that's not common knowledge anymore.

The bill itself is relatively straightforward. It requires the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a final rule within 60 days of enactment. This rule would remove the gray wolf from the endangered species list. The affected industries and sectors here are likely those related to wildlife conservation, hunting, and agriculture.

As for compliance requirements and timelines, the bill is quite specific. The Director must reissue the rule within 60 days, and there's no provision for judicial review of this decision. That means that once the rule is reissued, it cannot be challenged in court. You should have learned about the importance of checks and balances in our system, but I suppose that's not as well understood as it used to be.

In terms of enforcement mechanisms and penalties, there aren't any explicitly stated in this bill. However, if the Director fails to reissue the rule within the specified timeframe, they may face consequences from Congress or other government agencies.

The economic and operational impacts of this bill are likely to be significant for industries that rely on wolf management, such as hunting and agriculture. Removing the gray wolf from the endangered species list could lead to increased hunting and control measures, which would have economic implications for these industries.

Now, I know all of this should be basic knowledge, but it seems like a lot of people need a refresher course in civics. As we covered in 8th grade, the system is supposed to work through careful consideration and debate, with checks and balances in place to ensure that power isn't abused. But, as we've seen time and again, the reality can be quite different.

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today we're diving into the murky waters of Bill S 1306, a seemingly innocuous piece of legislation that's actually a wolf in sheep's clothing (pun intended). On the surface, it appears to be about removing the gray wolf from the endangered species list. But, my friends, don't be fooled!

**New Regulations:** The bill requires the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a final rule that was initially published in 2020. This is where things get interesting. The original rule (85 Fed. Reg. 69778) removed the gray wolf from the endangered species list, but this new bill is essentially a reboot. Why? What's changed since 2020?

**Affected Industries and Sectors:** This bill has far-reaching implications for various industries, including:

1. **Agriculture:** With wolves no longer protected, farmers and ranchers can expect increased livestock losses. This will lead to higher costs, reduced profits, and potentially even more reliance on government subsidies. 2. **Conservation:** The removal of the gray wolf from the endangered species list undermines decades of conservation efforts. This could have a ripple effect on other species that rely on wolves as apex predators. 3. **Tourism:** Wolf-watching tourism is a significant industry in some states. With reduced wolf populations, this sector will likely suffer.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** The bill demands the Director reissue the final rule within 60 days of enactment. This accelerated timeline raises suspicions about the true intentions behind this legislation. What's the hurry?

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** Here's where things get really interesting. The bill explicitly states that the reissuance of the final rule "shall not be subject to judicial review." In other words, the government is attempting to bypass the courts and avoid any potential challenges to this decision.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** The removal of the gray wolf from the endangered species list will have significant economic implications:

1. **Increased livestock losses:** Farmers and ranchers will need to absorb these costs or rely on government assistance. 2. **Reduced conservation funding:** With wolves no longer protected, conservation efforts may be redirected or reduced. 3. **Loss of tourism revenue:** The decline of wolf-watching tourism will impact local economies.

Now, my fellow truth-seekers, connect the dots with me:

* Why is the government pushing to remove the gray wolf from the endangered species list so aggressively? * What's behind the accelerated timeline and the attempt to bypass judicial review? * How do these actions align with the interests of various industries and sectors?

The answer lies in the shadows, my friends. This bill is not just about wolves; it's about control, power, and the manipulation of our natural resources for the benefit of a select few. Wake up, sheeple!

(Deep breath) Folks, we've got a real doozy for you tonight! The elites in Washington are at it again, trying to strangle our great nation with their radical environmental agenda. But fear not, patriots, because we've got a bill that's going to take the shackles off American freedom!

S 1306 is all about removing those pesky gray wolves from the endangered species list. Now, I know what you're thinking: "What's the big deal? Wolves are just wolves." Well, let me tell you, friends, this is a masterstroke of conservative strategy! By delisting these majestic creatures, we're not only promoting freedom and prosperity but also sticking it to those out-of-touch environmentalists who think they know better than us.

But what does this bill really do? Well, it requires the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a final rule removing gray wolves from the list. And here's the best part: no judicial review! That's right, folks; we're talking about unchecked executive power, just like our Founding Fathers intended!

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But what about the poor wolves?" Don't worry, animal lovers; this bill is actually a win-win for everyone. By removing these wolves from the list, we're creating jobs and stimulating economic growth in rural areas where wolf populations are highest. It's a classic case of trickle-down economics!

Affected industries? Well, ranchers and farmers will no longer have to deal with those pesky wolves attacking their livestock. And let's not forget about the tourism industry! With more wolves roaming free, we'll see an influx of wildlife enthusiasts flocking to our great national parks.

Compliance requirements? Ha! This bill is all about deregulation, baby! We're talking about a 60-day timeline for reissuing that final rule. That's lightning-fast in bureaucratic terms!

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties? Don't worry about it; we've got the best wildlife management experts on the job. And if anyone tries to sue us over this, well... no judicial review, remember?

Economic and operational impacts? This bill is a game-changer! We're talking about millions of dollars in economic growth, thousands of new jobs created, and a boost to our great American spirit!

In conclusion, folks, S 1306 is a beacon of hope for freedom-loving Americans everywhere. It's a bold move that shows we won't be held hostage by radical environmentalists and their deep-state allies. So let's get behind this bill and show the world what it means to be an American patriot! (wink)

**Bill Summary: S 1306 - Gray Wolf Delisting**

The proposed bill, S 1306, aims to require the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a final rule removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. The original rule, published in November 2020, was previously vacated by a court decision.

**New Regulations:**

The bill seeks to reinstate the delisting of the gray wolf, which would remove federal protections for the species under the ESA. This change would allow states and tribes to manage gray wolf populations within their jurisdictions.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:**

* Agriculture (ranching and farming) * Hunting and trapping industries * Conservation organizations * State and tribal wildlife management agencies

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**

The Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service must reissue the final rule within 60 days of the bill's enactment.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**

The bill explicitly states that the reissuance of the final rule shall not be subject to judicial review, effectively limiting potential legal challenges. However, it does not specify new enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

Delisting the gray wolf could have significant economic implications for various stakeholders:

* Agriculture: Reduced federal protections may lead to increased conflicts between wolves and livestock, potentially resulting in financial losses for ranchers and farmers. * Hunting and trapping industries: Delisting could create new opportunities for recreational hunting and trapping of gray wolves, generating revenue for these industries. * Conservation organizations: The removal of federal protections may compromise conservation efforts and potentially harm wolf populations.

Overall, S 1306 aims to restore the original delisting rule, which would have significant implications for gray wolf management in the United States.

Let's break down this bill like a gnarly wave at Pipeline.

**New Regulations Being Created or Modified**

This bill, S 1306, is all about gettin' rid of the gray wolf from the endangered species list under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. The Director of the US Fish and Wildlife Service would have to reissue a final rule that removes the gray wolf from the list within 60 days of this bill becoming law. It's like, they're tryin' to wipe out the wolf's protected status, bro.

**Affected Industries and Sectors**

This one's gonna impact some key players, dude:

* **Livestock industry**: Farmers and ranchers might be stoked about this move, 'cause wolves can be a major threat to their herds. With the wolf off the endangered list, they'd have more freedom to deal with wolf attacks. * **Conservation groups**: On the flip side, environmental organizations and wildlife advocates are gonna be bummed, bro. They've been fightin' hard to protect these majestic creatures. * **Hunting and fishing industries**: This bill could also affect hunting and fishing regulations in areas where wolves roam.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines**

The Director of the US Fish and Wildlife Service has 60 days to reissue that final rule, man. That's a pretty tight timeline. After that, it's like, game on – the wolf would no longer be considered endangered.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties**

Here's where things get interesting, bro:

* **No judicial review**: This bill says that the reissuance of the final rule can't be challenged in court. That means there's no way to appeal or dispute this decision. * **Penalties for non-compliance**: If someone tries to challenge this move or doesn't comply with the new rules, they might face penalties under the ESA.

**Economic and Operational Impacts**

This bill could have some far-reaching consequences, dude:

* **Livestock industry costs**: With wolves off the endangered list, farmers and ranchers might save some cash on wolf-related damages. But, conservation groups argue that this move could lead to more wolf-human conflicts, which would be costly for everyone. * **Tourism and recreation impacts**: Wolves are a major draw for eco-tourists and wildlife enthusiasts. If their numbers decline or they disappear from certain areas, local economies might take a hit.

Anyway, bro, that's the lowdown on S 1306. It's like, this bill is tryin' to ride a wave of change, but it's gonna be a wild ride for all parties involved.

**The Gray Wolf Delisting Bill: A Gift to Ranchers and Hunters**

S 1306, introduced by Senators Johnson, Barrasso, and Lee, is a thinly veiled attempt to appease the livestock industry and hunting groups at the expense of endangered species protection. The bill requires the Director of the US Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a final rule removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

**New Regulations:**

The bill seeks to reinstate a 2020 rule that was previously overturned by a federal court, which found that the delisting decision was arbitrary and capricious. By reissuing this rule, the bill would effectively remove ESA protections for gray wolves, allowing states to manage wolf populations without federal oversight.

**Affected Industries:**

The livestock industry, particularly ranchers in western states, have long complained about wolf depredation on their cattle and sheep herds. This bill is a direct response to those concerns, as it would allow for more aggressive management of wolf populations. Hunting groups also stand to benefit from increased access to wolf hunting opportunities.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**

The bill requires the Director of the US Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue the final rule within 60 days of enactment. This accelerated timeline is likely intended to minimize public input and scrutiny.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**

By removing ESA protections, the bill would shift enforcement authority from federal agencies to state wildlife management agencies. However, it's unclear how states would enforce wolf management plans or address potential conflicts with other stakeholders, such as conservation groups.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

The livestock industry is a significant contributor to the economies of western states, and reducing wolf populations could potentially reduce depredation losses for ranchers. However, this bill ignores the ecological importance of wolves in maintaining healthy ecosystems and the potential long-term consequences of delisting.

**Follow the Money:**

Senators Johnson, Barrasso, and Lee have all received significant campaign contributions from agricultural and livestock interests. For example, Senator Johnson has received over $100,000 from the National Cattlemen's Beef Association and the American Farm Bureau Federation in recent years. These donations suggest that industry influence is driving this legislation.

In conclusion, S 1306 is a special interest bill that prioritizes the concerns of ranchers and hunters over sound conservation policy. By delisting gray wolves, this bill would undermine the ESA and set a troubling precedent for future wildlife management decisions.