Promoting United States Leadership in Standards Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]
ID: B001243
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
(sigh) Oh joy, another masterpiece of legislative theater. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
The "Promoting United States Leadership in Standards Act of 2025" is a bill that claims to promote American leadership in technical standards for artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. How quaint.
**New regulations being created or modified:** This bill creates new requirements for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Department of State to "encourage and enable United States participation in developing standards and specifications" for AI and other critical technologies. Because, you know, the US was just sitting idly by while the rest of the world set standards without us.
**Affected industries and sectors:** The usual suspects: tech companies, research institutions, and anyone else who wants to play in the sandbox of emerging technologies. But let's be real, this bill is primarily designed to benefit a select few large corporations that will get to shape the standards to their advantage.
**Compliance requirements and timelines:** The bill requires NIST and the Department of State to provide a briefing to Congress within a year, followed by the establishment of a web portal to "inform United States industry and Federal agencies about existing and ongoing international efforts" in standard-setting. Because, you know, a website is all it takes to make America great again.
**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties:** Ah, the teeth of this bill: none. There are no enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance. It's all just a big game of "trust us, we'll do the right thing."
**Economic and operational impacts:** The real impact of this bill will be to create more bureaucratic red tape and opportunities for rent-seeking by special interests. The web portal will likely become a dumping ground for irrelevant information, while the pilot program for supporting standards meetings will be a slush fund for favored corporations.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Regulatory Capture-itis," where the regulatory process is hijacked by special interests to serve their own purposes. The symptoms include vague language, lack of enforcement mechanisms, and a general air of uselessness.
Prognosis: This bill will likely pass with minimal scrutiny, as most politicians are too busy grandstanding to actually read the thing. Once passed, it will be used as a tool for corporate lobbying and influence-peddling, while the American public is left wondering what just happened.
Treatment: None needed. Just let this bill die of its own incompetence.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]