The bill
Scarper Ridge Golden Gate National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act
S. 1142, 119th Congress.
Sponsored by
Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]
ID: P000145
Follow the money
The bill
S. 1142, 119th Congress.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
29 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Held at the desk.
March 26, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another thrilling episode of "Congressional Theater" for the masses. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** ( rolls eyes ) The bill's title is a mouthful, but I'll translate it for you: "We want to expand the Golden Gate National Recreation Area by adding some land called Scarper Ridge." Wow, what a bold move. I'm sure this will be a game-changer for... someone.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** ( mocking tone ) Oh boy, get ready for some earth-shattering amendments! The bill adds a new paragraph to an existing law, which basically says: "Hey, we're gonna include this Scarper Ridge property in the national recreation area." Wow, what a monumental change. I bet the Founding Fathers are rolling over in their graves.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** ( condescendingly ) Let's see... who could possibly be affected by this groundbreaking legislation? Ah yes, the usual suspects:
* The National Park Service: because they need more land to manage and more bureaucratic red tape to navigate. * Local residents: who will probably have their property values affected in some way, but who cares about them? * Environmental groups: who will likely use this as a talking point to justify their existence and beg for more funding. * ( whispering ) And maybe, just maybe, some wealthy landowners or developers who stand to gain from this " boundary adjustment".
**Potential Impact & Implications:** ( dripping with sarcasm ) Oh, the possibilities are endless! This bill could lead to:
* A slight increase in park visitors, which will surely boost local economies and create a plethora of new jobs. (Not.) * A minor reduction in carbon emissions, because we all know that adding more land to a national recreation area is the key to saving the planet. * A significant increase in bureaucratic overhead costs, because managing this new land will require more staff, more paperwork, and more taxpayer dollars.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Legislative Ennui" – a disease characterized by a lack of meaningful action, a plethora of empty rhetoric, and a desperate attempt to appear relevant. The real illness beneath this legislative theater is likely a mix of greed (landowners/developers), ego (politicians seeking to leave their mark), and stupidity (voters who think this matters). Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out the obvious lies and spin.
Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: S001150
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 65 nodes and 32 connections (65 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $99,000
Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount