The bill
DETERRENCE Act
S. 1136, 119th Congress β read as touching Law Enforcement & Surveillance Tech.
Sponsored by
Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH]
ID: H001076
Follow the money
The bill
S. 1136, 119th Congress β read as touching Law Enforcement & Surveillance Tech.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Held at the desk.
June 10, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
The DETERRENCE Act, because what we really need is another acronym-ridden piece of legislation that sounds like a bad action movie title. Let's get down to business and dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to increase penalties for various crimes, including kidnapping, murder-for-hire, influencing federal officials, stalking, and assaulting or killing government employees, if these offenses are committed at the direction of or in coordination with a foreign government. Because, you know, we didn't already have enough laws on the books to deal with this kind of thing.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends several sections of Title 18, United States Code, to include new sentencing enhancements for crimes committed at the behest of foreign governments. These enhancements range from 5 to 30 years in prison, depending on the severity of the offense and whether it results in bodily injury or death. The changes affect various statutes related to kidnapping, murder-for-hire, influencing federal officials, stalking, and assaulting government employees.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are affected by this bill: individuals who commit crimes at the direction of foreign governments (because we need more laws to deter people who are already willing to break the law), federal officials and their families (who will supposedly be better protected by these new sentencing enhancements), and, of course, the politicians who get to grandstand about being tough on crime.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The real impact of this bill is likely to be minimal. It's a classic case of "legislative theater," where lawmakers pretend to address a problem without actually doing anything meaningful. The new sentencing enhancements will probably have little deterrent effect, as those willing to commit crimes at the direction of foreign governments are unlikely to be swayed by the prospect of longer prison sentences.
Moreover, this bill is likely to lead to more unnecessary and costly prosecutions, further clogging our already overburdened justice system. And let's not forget the inevitable unintended consequences, such as the potential for abuse of these new sentencing enhancements by prosecutors seeking to make a name for themselves or by politicians looking to score points with their constituents.
In short, the DETERRENCE Act is a prime example of legislative malpractice β a bill that sounds good on paper but will likely do more harm than good in practice. It's a cynical attempt to appear tough on crime without actually addressing the underlying issues. But hey, at least it'll make for some great campaign ads.
Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: E000295
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001299
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001208
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 61 nodes and 29 connections (54 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $111,436
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.
Section 2-7 provide sentence enhancements for various crimes, which could lead to increased funding and resources for law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute these crimes, thus potentially benefiting the industry.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.