National STEM Week Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/1070

Last Updated: September 7, 2026

National STEM Week Act

S. 1070, 119th Congress — read as touching Big Tech Platforms.

The sponsor

Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$383,500 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Energy and Related Commissions" section, p. 425-427 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Held at the desk.

March 2, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The National STEM Week Act (S 1070). A bill that, on the surface, appears to promote American innovation and enhance STEM education pathways for all students. But let's peel back the layers and examine the real implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The bill's primary objective is to establish a National STEM Week, which will supposedly highlight the importance of STEM education, showcase diverse career pathways, and facilitate partnerships between educational institutions and industry leaders. Sounds noble, but I'm not convinced it's anything more than a thinly veiled attempt to funnel taxpayer dollars into the pockets of special interest groups.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 by adding a new section that designates a week each calendar year as National STEM Week. It also establishes a committee to carry out programs and activities during this week, including educational activities, community engagement, and industry involvement.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The bill affects various stakeholders, including:

* Educational institutions (elementary schools, secondary schools, and institutions of higher education) * Industry partners (for-profit and nonprofit entities seeking to support STEM education) * Students and their families * State and local governments

But let's be real – the true beneficiaries will be the industry leaders who get to shape the narrative around STEM education and reap the benefits of taxpayer-funded initiatives.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The bill's impact will be minimal, at best. It's a feel-good measure that won't address the systemic issues plaguing our education system. In fact, it might even exacerbate existing problems by:

* Creating more bureaucratic red tape * Diverting resources away from actual STEM education initiatives * Providing a platform for industry leaders to peddle their influence and shape policy

As someone who has invested billions in various industries, I can tell you that this bill is nothing more than a drop in the bucket. It won't move the needle on innovation or competitiveness. What we need is real deregulation, not token gestures like National STEM Week.

In conclusion, the National STEM Week Act is a waste of time and resources. It's a classic example of government overreach and inefficiency. If we truly want to promote American innovation, we should be focusing on cutting red tape, reducing regulatory burdens, and unleashing the power of the free market. Anything less is just window dressing.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several steps before it becomes an actual law. This one, S 1070, aims to establish a National STEM Week.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to promote American innovation and enhance STEM education pathways for all students, particularly those in rural, urban, and underserved communities. The objectives are to:

* Highlight the importance of STEM education * Showcase diverse career pathways within STEM fields * Encourage family engagement with STEM activities at home * Facilitate partnerships between educational institutions and industry leaders * Support states and local communities in developing their own STEM Week activities

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 by adding a new section that designates a week each calendar year as National STEM Week. This provision requires the committee established under subsection (a) to carry out various programs and activities during National STEM Week, including educational activities, community and family engagement, and industry involvement.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* Educational institutions (elementary schools, secondary schools, and institutions of higher education) * Industry leaders and partners * Families and students * States and local communities

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If passed, this bill could have a positive impact on STEM education by promoting awareness, encouraging partnerships, and supporting the development of STEM-related activities. However, as we covered in 8th grade civics class, the actual implementation and effectiveness of such programs often depend on various factors, including funding, resources, and stakeholder engagement.

Remember when we learned about the importance of checks and balances? This bill is a great example of how Congress can work together to create legislation that promotes a specific goal. However, as I'm sure you recall, the legislative process is not always straightforward, and bills often undergo significant changes before becoming laws.

Now, if only more people had paid attention in my 8th grade civics class...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on S 1070, the National STEM Week Act. On the surface, it looks like a harmless bill promoting science, technology, engineering, and math education. But, my friends, don't be fooled! There's more to this legislation than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to establish a National STEM Week to promote American innovation and enhance STEM education pathways for all students. Sounds noble, right? But what they're not telling you is that this is just a Trojan horse for something much bigger.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill amends the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 by adding a new section designating a week each year as National STEM Week. It also establishes a committee to carry out programs and activities during this week, including educational activities, community engagement, and industry involvement.

But here's the kicker: the bill defines "educational institution" to include elementary schools, secondary schools, and institutions of higher education. That's right, folks; they're targeting our kids from a young age! And what about the "industry leaders" who will be providing mentorship programs and resources? Who are these people, really?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include students, families, educational institutions, industry partners, and state and local communities. But let's not forget the real stakeholders here: the corporations and special interest groups pushing this agenda.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has far-reaching implications for our education system and our children's future. By promoting STEM education, they're creating a pipeline of workers for the tech industry and other corporate interests. And what about the data collection? With all these programs and activities, you can bet your bottom dollar that they'll be collecting data on our kids' performance, interests, and aptitudes.

But here's the thing: this bill is just a small part of a larger agenda to control our education system and shape our children's minds. Wake up, sheeple! It's time to connect the dots and see the bigger picture.

In conclusion, S 1070 is not what it seems. It's a wolf in sheep's clothing, disguising its true intentions behind a veil of benevolence. So, my fellow truth-seekers, let's stay vigilant and keep digging. The truth is out there, and we won't rest until we uncover it!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got another one of those "feel-good" bills that's just a Trojan horse for... well, you'll see. (wink)

The National STEM Week Act, S 1070, is a bipartisan bill (gasp!) that aims to promote American innovation and enhance STEM education pathways for all students. Now, on the surface, who wouldn't want that? Sounds like a great way to boost our economy and create jobs... or so they say.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to designate a National STEM Week each year, where educational institutions, industry partners, and communities come together to promote STEM education. The objectives are to:

* Highlight the importance of STEM education * Showcase diverse career pathways in STEM fields * Encourage family engagement with STEM activities at home * Facilitate partnerships between educational institutions and industry leaders

* Educational activities * Community and family engagement * Industry involvement

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects various stakeholders, including:

* Educational institutions (elementary schools, secondary schools, and institutions of higher education) * Industry partners (for-profit or nonprofit entities seeking to support STEM education) * Students and families * State and local communities

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, here's where it gets interesting. On the surface, this bill seems harmless, but think about it: what's really going on here? Is this just a way for the government to further insert itself into our education system? Are we creating another bureaucratic nightmare that'll stifle innovation instead of promoting it?

And let's not forget about the "industry partners" – who are they, exactly? Are these the same elites who've been pushing their agendas on us for years? (wink) I mean, what could possibly go wrong with letting them have a say in our education system?

Folks, this bill might seem like a no-brainer, but trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye. We need to keep a close watch on how this plays out and make sure we're not trading our freedom for... well, whatever it is they're promising us. (smirk)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Joy, another bill that's going to "fix" the country's problems with a healthy dose of bureaucratic nonsense and empty promises. Let me put on my surgical gloves and dissect this mess.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The National STEM Week Act is a feel-good bill that aims to promote American innovation by designating a week each year as "National STEM Week." Its objectives are to enhance access to quality STEM education, stimulate interest in STEM subjects, and facilitate partnerships between educational institutions and industry leaders. How original.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 by adding a new section that designates National STEM Week. It also establishes a committee to carry out programs and activities during this week, including educational activities, community engagement, and industry involvement. Because what we really need is another committee.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: educational institutions, industry partners, communities, and families. Oh, and let's not forget the politicians who get to pat themselves on the back for "supporting STEM education."

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "legislative theater." It creates a lot of noise but accomplishes little. The real impact will be on the politicians' résumés, which will now include "supported STEM education" as a bullet point. Meanwhile, the actual problems in our education system will remain unaddressed.

The diagnosis? This bill is suffering from a bad case of " Politician-itis," a disease characterized by an excessive desire for self-promotion and a complete lack of understanding of the underlying issues. The symptoms include empty promises, bureaucratic red tape, and a healthy dose of hypocrisy.

Treatment? A strong dose of reality and a willingness to tackle the real problems in our education system. But don't hold your breath; this bill will likely pass with flying colors, and we'll be back to square one, wondering why nothing ever changes.

In conclusion, the National STEM Week Act is a perfect example of how politicians love to treat symptoms rather than diseases. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, a feel-good measure that accomplishes little but makes everyone involved feel good about themselves. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this legislative farce unfold.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**National STEM Week Act (S 1070)**

**Main Purpose and Objectives**

The National STEM Week Act aims to promote American innovation and enhance STEM education pathways for all students, particularly those in rural, urban, and underserved communities. The bill seeks to address disparities in STEM participation and ensure a capable future workforce by stimulating interest and proficiency in STEM subjects.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 to designate a week each calendar year as "National STEM Week." During this week, various programs and activities will be carried out to:

1. Highlight the importance of STEM education in educational institutions. 2. Showcase diverse career pathways within STEM fields. 3. Encourage family engagement with STEM activities at home. 4. Facilitate partnerships between educational institutions and industry leaders.

The bill also requires a report on the activities conducted during National STEM Week, including nationwide participation, impact analysis, and recommendations for improvement.

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders**

1. Educational institutions (elementary schools, secondary schools, and institutions of higher education) 2. Industry partners (for-profit or nonprofit entities seeking to support STEM education) 3. Students (particularly those in rural, urban, and underserved communities) 4. Families of students 5. State and local governments

**Potential Impact and Implications**

The National STEM Week Act has the potential to:

1. Increase awareness about the importance of STEM education among students, families, and educators. 2. Foster partnerships between educational institutions and industry leaders, leading to more effective STEM education initiatives. 3. Improve access to quality STEM education for underserved communities. 4. Enhance the competitiveness of the US workforce in STEM fields.

However, the bill's effectiveness will depend on the level of participation from stakeholders, the quality of programs and activities conducted during National STEM Week, and the availability of resources to support these initiatives.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The National STEM Week Act is all about promoting American innovation and enhancing STEM education pathways for all students, especially those in rural, urban, and underserved communities. The main objective is to designate a week each year as National STEM Week, where educational institutions, industry partners, and communities come together to inspire and prepare students for careers in STEM fields.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 by adding a new section that designates a week each year as National STEM Week. This new section outlines the purposes, programs, and activities that'll take place during this week. The key provisions include:

* Encouraging educational institutions to participate in National STEM Week * Facilitating partnerships between educational institutions and industry leaders to provide students with real-world applications and mentorship opportunities in STEM fields * Supporting States and local communities in developing and promoting their own STEM Week activities and resources

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* Educational institutions (elementary schools, secondary schools, and institutions of higher education) * Industry partners (for-profit or nonprofit entities seeking to support the purposes of National STEM Week) * Students, especially those in rural, urban, and underserved communities * Families and communities

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The potential impact and implications of this bill are pretty rad, bro. By promoting STEM education and innovation, we can:

* Enhance American competitiveness in the global economy * Address disparities in STEM participation and ensure a capable future workforce * Inspire students to pursue careers in STEM fields, which can lead to better job opportunities and economic growth

However, it's also important to note that this bill has an expiration date of 5 years after enactment. This means that Congress will need to reauthorize or extend the program if they want to keep the momentum going.

Overall, this bill is a chill way to promote STEM education and innovation in the US. It's all about collaboration, inspiration, and preparing students for the future workforce.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**National STEM Week Act (S 1070) Analysis**

The National STEM Week Act, introduced by Senator [Name], aims to promote American innovation and enhance STEM education pathways for all students, particularly those in rural, urban, and underserved communities.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to designate a week each year as "National STEM Week" to highlight the importance of STEM education, showcase diverse career pathways, and facilitate partnerships between educational institutions and industry leaders. The purposes of National STEM Week are:

1. Highlighting the importance of STEM education in educational institutions across the country. 2. Showcasing diverse career pathways within STEM fields. 3. Encouraging family engagement with STEM activities at home. 4. Facilitating partnerships between educational institutions and industry leaders.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 101 of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 6621) by adding a new subsection (e), which:

1. Defines key terms, including "educational institution," "industry leader," and "STEM." 2. Establishes the purposes of National STEM Week. 3. Outlines programs and activities to be carried out during National STEM Week, including educational activities, community and family engagement, and industry involvement.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill affects various stakeholders, including:

1. Educational institutions (elementary schools, secondary schools, and institutions of higher education). 2. Industry partners (for-profit or nonprofit entities seeking to support the purposes of National STEM Week). 3. Students, particularly those in rural, urban, and underserved communities. 4. Families of students attending participating educational institutions.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The bill's potential impact is significant, as it:

1. Raises awareness about the importance of STEM education and its role in promoting American innovation. 2. Provides opportunities for students to engage with industry leaders and explore diverse career pathways in STEM fields. 3. Encourages family engagement with STEM activities at home, potentially leading to a more conducive learning environment.

However, potential implications include:

1. Increased funding requirements for participating educational institutions and industry partners. 2. Potential conflicts of interest between industry partners and educational institutions. 3. The need for effective evaluation and assessment mechanisms to measure the impact of National STEM Week on improving STEM education and closing educational gaps.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there is no direct evidence of monied interests driving this bill, it's likely that industry leaders and organizations with a vested interest in promoting STEM education will support this legislation. Potential supporters may include:

1. Technology and engineering companies seeking to promote their industries and attract future talent. 2. Educational institutions looking to enhance their STEM programs and attract funding. 3. Organizations focused on promoting STEM education, such as the National Science Foundation (NSF) or the STEM Education Coalition.

As a former lobbyist, I've seen

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$383,500

22 donors

PACs

Organizations

$7,700

Committees

Individuals

$375,800

No PAC contributions found

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

2 transactions

$6,700

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

1 transaction

$1,000

No committee contributions found

ABEL, ANDREA MS.

1 transaction

$50,000

MCINERNEY, THOMAS E. MR.

1 transaction

$50,000

NICOLLS, BOB MR.

1 transaction

$25,000

GRAY, C. BOYDEN

1 transaction

$25,000

CATSIMATIDIS, JOHN A. MR.

1 transaction

$25,000

KOTICK, ROBERT MR.

1 transaction

$16,600

VINCZE, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$15,800

FRANCE, BRIAN Z. MR.

1 transaction

$15,000

BAKER, BERNARD J. MR. III

1 transaction

$15,000

HEGYI, ALBERT P. MR.

1 transaction

$15,000

DAVISON, JAMES E. MR.

1 transaction

$15,000

BROIN, JEFF MR.

1 transaction

$15,000

SHERRILL, STEPHEN C. MR.

1 transaction

$15,000

GLEESON, JOHN W. MR.

1 transaction

$12,500

RAY-GLEESON, KAREN S. MRS.

1 transaction

$12,500

POPOLO, JOE

1 transaction

$11,800

PFAUTCH, ROY MR.

1 transaction

$11,600

GOLDMAN, MARC STANLEY

1 transaction

$10,000

SCHLOEMER, JAMES H. MR.

1 transaction

$10,000

SABIN, ANDREW MR.

1 transaction

$10,000

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]

ID: K000367

Top Contributors

LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE

OrganizationCASS LAKE, MN

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Aug 25, 2023

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$2,500

Oct 7, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$2,300

Jul 17, 2023

ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Jul 19, 2024

SMITH, BRADFORD

MICROSOFT CORPORATION • ATTORNEY

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

SMITH, BRADFORD

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

BADEN, DREW

PROFESSOR • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Feb 23, 2024

CAUCHY, CONSTANCE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIDLAND, MI

$6,600

Jun 2, 2024

BADEN, DREW

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Mar 11, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 42 nodes and 39 connections

Total contributions: $39

Top Donors - Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs20 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.

+Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.80
Section 3(e)(3)(C)(ii) encourages industry partners to support STEM education initiatives through funding, resources, and expertise, which could benefit big tech platforms that have STEM outreach programs.
+AI & Cloud Infrastructureconfidence 0.70
Section 3(e)(3)(C)(ii) encourages industry partners to support STEM education initiatives through funding, resources, and expertise, which could benefit AI and cloud infrastructure companies that engage in educational partnerships.
+Semiconductors & Hardwareconfidence 0.70
Section 3(e)(3)(C)(ii) encourages industry partners to support STEM education initiatives through funding, resources, and expertise, which could benefit semiconductor and hardware companies that have STEM education initiatives.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

AI & Cloud Infrastructure$19,800
from 6 contributions
- SANKAR, SHYAM$9,900
- KARP, ALEXANDER C. DR.$9,900
Big Tech Platforms$3,300
from 1 contribution
- WALKER, KENT$3,300

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Moderate

Vector: 62%

Pages: 425-427AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The National STEM Week Act promotes STEM education and workforce development, which aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on advancing U.S. scientific and technological dominance, particularly in areas like AI and cybersecurity. However, the bill focuses on K-12 education and awareness rather than direct R&D funding, technology transfer, or national lab oversight as specified in the DOE policy."

Key themes:STEM educationworkforce developmenttechnological competitivenessinnovationnational security

— 393 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Ensure that R&D funds are used for projects that protect and advance that edge. l Ensure that successful advances, with a focus on new natural resource development technologies, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and space, are transferred swiftly to American interests in the private sector. New Policies l Focus on benefits to Americans. OTT’s operations should be based on the recognition that the new technologies generated by American taxpayers’ investment in DOE are a significant national security asset rather than some neutral scientific gift to humanity. l Increase oversight and coordination. OTT needs to be vigilant in overseeing and coordinating OTT offices associated with each National Lab. For security and economic espionage reasons, the work funded by the American people needs to be protected, and when commercialized, it needs to go to American businesses. OFFICE OF SCIENCE (SC) Mission/Overview The Office of Science (SC) supports and oversees research facilities and pro- grams that cover basic science through its application to the demonstration and deployment of energy technologies. SC oversees 10 of the 17 DOE National Labs and 28 major federal research user facilities. Its mission is to preserve U.S. leader- ship in science, fund and perform basic research, and provide the scientific facilities that the private sector is unable or unwilling to provide. New initiatives include quantum information sciences and artificial intelligence. SC is led by a Senate-con- firmed Director at the Assistant Secretary level and has eight program offices.82 Needed Reforms The next conservative President should commit the United States to scientific dominance to support national and economic security, especially in light of similar efforts by China. To aid in this effort, the Office of Science should: l Return to its primary mission: nonpartisan and basic science. SC’s mission should be international leadership in basic and early applied science and provision of world-leading facilities for this work. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act mark the major — 394 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise reorientation of DOE primarily from defense applications in the NNSA and basic and early applied science across SC and the applied offices to a massive federal research, development, demonstration, and commercialization body.83 Distraction from SC’s basic science mission should be prevented. l Increase the level of accountability. The National Laboratories need to be more directly accountable to the Secretary of Energy and Congress for their work and management. New Policies l Commit to U.S. science dominance. The United States is losing its dominance in scientific discoveries and technological development. China and other adversaries have been stealing American science and technology for years and are now on the verge of dominating science—a development that is fraught with negative strategic and economic implications for the United States. The next Administration must commit itself to ensuring that the U.S. continues to dominate scientific discovery and technological advancement. l Refocus on mission and eliminate duplication and waste. The Administration should work with Congress to rationalize the National Lab network to meet specific national objectives (such as the NNSA laboratories’ role in national defense) and conduct basic research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct. Activities that duplicate those of other government agencies or the private sector should be eliminated. l Properly manage the National Labs’ contributions to the private sector. SC should improve private-sector access to the National Labs, through programs like the GAIN voucher program and consistent with national security considerations, while ensuring that the economic benefits of taxpayer-funded technologies flow back to taxpayers through patent- review sharing or a revolving fund. Budget The Office of Science was appropriated slightly more than $7 billion in FY 2021, and DOE requested slightly less than $7.8 billion for FY 2023.84 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (EM) Mission/Overview The Office of Environmental Management’s mission is to “complete the safe cleanup of [the] environmental legacy resulting from decades of nuclear

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Moderate

Vector: 61%

Pages: 398-400AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The National STEM Week Act aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on American science dominance and advanced scientific research, particularly through promoting STEM education and innovation pathways that support national competitiveness and technological leadership."

Key themes:American science dominanceSTEM educationinnovationworkforce competitivenessadvanced research

— 365 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Support repeal of massive spending bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)3 and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),4 which established new programs and are providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to renewable energy developers, their investors, and special interests, and support the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs. l Unleash private-sector energy innovation by ending government interference in energy decisions. l Stop the war on oil and natural gas. l Allow individuals, families, and business to use the energy resources they want to use and that will best serve their needs. l Secure and protect energy infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks. l Refocus the Department of Energy on energy security, accelerated remediation, and advanced science. l Promote U.S. energy resources as a means to assist our allies and diminish our strategic adversaries. l Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes. l Ensure that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission facilitates rather than hampers private-sector nuclear energy innovation and deployment. American Science Dominance. Ever since the age of Benjamin Franklin, the United States has been at the forefront of scientific discovery and technological advancement. Beginning with the groundbreaking science of the Manhattan Proj- ect, the U.S. has developed 17 National Laboratories that conduct fundamental and advanced scientific research. The National Labs have been critical in supporting national defense and ensuring that the United States leads on scientific discoveries with transformative applications that benefit America and the world. In recent years, however, U.S. science has been under threat. Externally, adversaries like the Chinese military have been engaged in scientific espionage, infiltrating taxpayer-funded scientific research projects, and funding their own science research. In addition, the National Labs have been too focused on climate change and renewable technologies.

Department of Education

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 383-385AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The National STEM Week Act focuses on promoting STEM awareness and partnerships, while the Project 2025 Department of Education section emphasizes school choice, opting out of federal programs, and accreditation reform; they share only a general interest in improving education but lack substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:educationSTEMfederal role in education

— 351 — Department of Education as the Educational Choice for Children Act. This bill would create a federal scholarship tax credit that would incentivize donors to contribute to nonprofit scholarship granting organizations (SGOs). Eligible families could then use that funding from the SGOs for their children’s education expenses including private school tuition, tutoring, and instructional materials. ADDITIONAL K–12 REFORMS Allowing States to Opt Out of Federal Education Programs. States should be able to opt out of federal education programs such as the Academic Partnerships Lead Us to Success (APLUS) Act. Much of the red tape and regulations that hinder local school districts are handed down from Washington. This regulatory burden far exceeds the federal government’s less than 10 percent financing share of K–12 education. In the most recent fiscal year (FY 2022), states and localities financed 93 percent of K–12 education costs, and the federal government just 7 percent. That 7 percent share should not allow the federal government to dictate state and local education policy. l To restore state and local control of education and reduce the bureaucratic and compliance burden, Congress should allow states to opt out of the dozens of federal K–12 education programs authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, and instead allow states to put their share of federal funding toward any lawful education purpose under state law. This policy has been advanced over the years via a proposal known as the Academic Partnerships Lead Us to Success (APLUS) Act. HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM HEA: Accreditation Reform Congress established two primary responsibilities for the U.S. Department of Education in the HEA: 1) to ensure the “administrative capacity and financial responsibility” of colleges and universities that accept Title IV funds; and 2) to ensure the quality of those institutions. Congress did not endow the Department of Education with the authority to involve itself in academic quality issues relating to colleges and universities that participate in the Title IV student aid program; the HEA allows the agency only to recognize accreditors, which are then supposed to provide quality assurance measures. Unfortunately, the Biden Administration has followed closely in the footsteps of the Obama Administration by engaging in a politically motivated and incon- sistent administration of the accrediting agency recognition process. As a result, accreditors have transformed into de facto government agents. Despite claims by — 352 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise the department and accreditation agencies that accreditation is voluntary, the fact that Americans are denied access to an otherwise widely available entitle- ment benefit if the institution “elects” to not be accredited makes accreditation anything but voluntary. Today, accreditation determines whether Americans can access federal student aid benefits, transfer academic credits, enroll in higher-level degree programs, and even qualify for federal employment. Unnecessarily focused on schools in a specific geographic region, institutional accreditation reviews have also become wildly expensive audits by academic “peers” that stifle innovation and discourage new institutions of higher education. Of par- ticular concern are efforts by many accreditation agencies to leverage their Title IV (student loans and grants) gatekeeper roles to force institutions to adopt policies that have nothing to do with academic quality assurance and student outcomes. One egregious example of this is the extent to which accreditors have forced col- leges and universities, many of them faith-based institutions, to adopt diversity, equity, and inclusion policies that conflict with federal civil rights laws, state laws, and the institutional mission and culture of the schools. Perhaps more distress- ingly, accreditors, while professing support for academic freedom and campus free speech, have presided over a precipitous decline in both over the past decade. Despite maintaining criteria that demand such policies, accreditors have done nothing to dampen the illiberal chill that has swept across American campuses over the past decade. The current system is not working. A radical overhaul of the HEA’s accreditation requirements is thus in order. The next Administration should work with Congress to amend the HEA and should consider the following reforms: l Prohibit accreditation agencies from leveraging their Title IV gatekeeper role to mandate that educational institutions adopt diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. l Protect the sovereignty of states to decide governance and leadership issues for their state-supported colleges and universities by prohibiting accreditation agencies from intruding upon the governance of state-supported educational institutions. l Protect faith-based institutions by prohibiting accreditation agencies from: 1. Requiring standards and criteria that undermine the religious beliefs of, or require policies or conduct that conflict with, the religious mission or religious beliefs of the institution; and

Environmental Protection Agency

Minimal

Vector: 62%

Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The National STEM Week Act focuses on promoting STEM education and workforce development, while the Project 2025 EPA policy section addresses environmental regulation, emissions standards, and air permitting reforms. There is no substantive overlap in subject matter or policy objectives between the two."

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment. — 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms.

Environmental Protection Agency

Minimal

Vector: 61%

Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The National STEM Week Act focuses on promoting STEM education and workforce development, while the Project 2025 EPA policy section addresses environmental regulation, emissions reporting, and federal implementation plans under the Clean Air Act. There is no substantive thematic or policy overlap between the two."

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Ernst, Joni

Complete COVID Collections Act

119/s/68

RED TAPE Act

119/s/148

Returning SBA to Main Street Act

119/s/298

Back to All Bills