Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/105
Last Updated: June 8, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Rounds, Mike [R-SD]

ID: R000605

Follow the money

The bill

Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act

S. 105, 119th Congress — read as touching Gambling & Sports Betting.

The sponsor

Sen. Rounds, Mike [R-SD]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$132,600 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

63% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 575-577 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 176.

October 1, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another meaningless exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act (S. 105) claims to aim at preserving a sacred site for the Oglala Sioux Tribe and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe by placing approximately 40 acres of land in restricted fee status. How noble. In reality, this bill is just another example of Congress's favorite pastime: pretending to care about Native American issues while actually serving special interests.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to complete all necessary actions for the land to be held in restricted fee status by the tribes. This means the land will be owned by the tribes, but with certain restrictions and conditions. Oh, and don't worry, it's not like this will actually benefit the tribes; it's just a nice gesture to make Congress look good.

The bill also includes provisions for:

* The Secretary of the Interior to assign utility and service rights * Conditions for land use, including no gaming activities (because God forbid Native Americans try to make some money) * Encumbrances and agreements remaining in effect

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The Oglala Sioux Tribe and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe are the supposed beneficiaries of this bill. However, I'm sure they'll be thrilled to know that Congress is "helping" them by placing more restrictions on their land.

Other stakeholders include:

* The Secretary of the Interior (because someone has to pretend to care) * Private and municipal utility companies (who get to keep their rights and agreements intact) * Local governments (who won't have to worry about those pesky Native Americans trying to develop their own land)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will likely have zero actual impact on the lives of Native Americans. It's a symbolic gesture, meant to appease the tribes while maintaining the status quo. The real implications are:

* Congress gets to pretend they care about Native American issues * Special interests (utility companies, local governments) get to maintain their grip on tribal land * The Oglala Sioux Tribe and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe get to enjoy more restrictions on their own land

In conclusion, this bill is a masterclass in legislative theater. It's a meaningless exercise in pretending to care about Native American issues while actually serving special interests. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to make a mockery of the legislative process once again.

Diagnosis: Terminal case of Congressional Hypocrisy Syndrome (CHS). Symptoms include empty gestures, symbolic legislation, and a complete disregard for actual impact on affected parties. Prognosis: Poor. Treatment: None available; just more of the same meaningless posturing from Congress.

Related Topics

Public Lands & Natural ResourcesState & Local Government Affairs
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Rounds, Mike [R-SD]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$460,475
132 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$2,500
Committees
$0
Individuals
$457,975

No PAC contributions found

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$2,000
2
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
1 transaction
$500

No committee contributions found

1
HEGYI, ALBERT
4 transactions
$19,800
2
ROWAN, CAROLYN
4 transactions
$19,800
3
ROWAN, MARC J
4 transactions
$19,800
4
JEPSEN, EDWARD G
4 transactions
$16,500
5
VIELEHR, BYRON
5 transactions
$15,000
6
RUBERTON, ROBERT
4 transactions
$13,400
7
GRANIERI, ROBERT
4 transactions
$13,200
8
FISHER, KENNETH
2 transactions
$10,100
9
FISHER, SHERRILYN
2 transactions
$10,100
10
NICHELE, NOVALENA
2 transactions
$10,000
11
JACOBSEN, MARK
2 transactions
$9,900
12
JEPSEN, PETER
2 transactions
$9,900
13
PFAUTCH, ROY
2 transactions
$9,900
14
RABOIS, KEITH
2 transactions
$9,900
15
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
2 transactions
$9,900
16
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN A.
2 transactions
$9,900
17
WILLOX, NORMAN
2 transactions
$9,900
18
HICKS, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$9,500
19
ENTWISTLE, ANDREW MR.
2 transactions
$6,700
20
NEIMAN, JIM D
5 transactions
$6,700
21
DUHAMEL, KATHARINE
1 transaction
$6,600
22
LOVIER, HEATHER
2 transactions
$6,600
23
RUNDE, DANIEL
2 transactions
$6,600
24
SCHIEFFER, KEVIN
2 transactions
$6,600
25
WALTERS, ROBERT
2 transactions
$6,600
26
SAMBUR, DAVID
2 transactions
$5,200
27
DARWISH, SAM
2 transactions
$5,000
28
GAUFIN, JEFFERSON
2 transactions
$5,000
29
GAUFIN, LYNN
2 transactions
$5,000
30
JACOBSON, GARRY W
2 transactions
$5,000
31
WOOD, ELAINE M
2 transactions
$5,000
32
DUHAMEL, WILLIAM
5 transactions
$4,800
33
LEAS, BRET
2 transactions
$4,800
34
GLENNON, ROBERT
2 transactions
$4,000
35
MALLOY, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$4,000
36
SOBEL, AARON
2 transactions
$3,600
37
ARNOLD, JOHN
1 transaction
$3,300
38
CASCARILLA, CHARLES
1 transaction
$3,300
39
CASCARILLA, MARISSA
1 transaction
$3,300
40
FITZPATRICK, JENNIFER
1 transaction
$3,300
41
FOGEL, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
42
GOLDMAN, MARC
1 transaction
$3,300
43
JEPSEN, DIANE F
1 transaction
$3,300
44
MARQUIS, DUSTIN
1 transaction
$3,300
45
WALKER, KENT
1 transaction
$3,300
46
WALTERS, ROBERT D
1 transaction
$3,300
47
NAPPI, DOUGLAS
3 transactions
$3,200
48
GLACKIN, BRIAN
4 transactions
$3,000
49
HOLLAND, LUCAS
4 transactions
$3,000
50
KLEINMAN, SCOTT
1 transaction
$2,550
51
LONSDALE, JOE
1 transaction
$2,500
52
SCHWARTZ, TODD
1 transaction
$2,500
53
SPECK, ADAM
1 transaction
$2,500
54
STEPHENS, TYLER
3 transactions
$2,500
55
CAMBON, PAUL F
2 transactions
$2,000
56
DRESCHER, STEPHANIE
1 transaction
$2,000
57
DUKES, DAN
2 transactions
$2,000
58
EDSON, CHRISTOPHER L
1 transaction
$2,000
59
MADDOX, BRANDON L
1 transaction
$2,000
60
MORONEY, JOSEPH
1 transaction
$2,000
61
PAGE, GREGORY
1 transaction
$2,000
62
SUYDAM, JOHN
1 transaction
$2,000
63
WOLFSON, LEN
2 transactions
$2,000
64
ZITO, JOHN
2 transactions
$2,000
65
MARQUIS, DARRELL
1 transaction
$1,800
66
ZELTER, JAMES
1 transaction
$1,550
67
KURIAN, THOMAS
1 transaction
$1,500
68
KWON, DANIEL
1 transaction
$1,500
69
LARSON, TROY
2 transactions
$1,500
70
BRENNAN, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$1,400
71
HE, LINGLONG
1 transaction
$1,400
72
POWELL, TANNER
1 transaction
$1,300
73
ANDERSON, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
74
CODA, CAROLYN
2 transactions
$1,000
75
CORLEY, SCOTT
1 transaction
$1,000
76
DEVIERNO, JOHN A
2 transactions
$1,000
77
GORDON`, STEVE`
2 transactions
$1,000
78
IMPERATORE, BRANT
1 transaction
$1,000
79
ISAAC, PAUL J.
1 transaction
$1,000
80
JANDREAU, TIA
1 transaction
$1,000
81
KURTENBACH, REECE
1 transaction
$1,000
82
KWON, THEODORE
1 transaction
$1,000
83
LEDFORD, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$1,000
84
LIVINGSTON, ROBERT
2 transactions
$1,000
85
MALPASS, DAVID
1 transaction
$1,000
86
MILNE, JOHN D
2 transactions
$1,000
87
MORRISEY, DENISE
1 transaction
$1,000
88
MUELLER, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$1,000
89
NEAL, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$1,000
90
PALMER, ANDREW
1 transaction
$1,000
91
PIPER, WILLIAM
2 transactions
$1,000
92
PURI, SANJAY
1 transaction
$1,000
93
RAFFANIELLO, PAT
2 transactions
$1,000
94
TIESZEN, RICHARD
2 transactions
$1,000
95
VEALENCIS, JOSEPH
2 transactions
$1,000
96
JOHNS, SUSAN
1 transaction
$925
97
HEINZE, BRADLEY
1 transaction
$800
98
LONG, MARY BETH
1 transaction
$750
99
AHERN, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
100
AITKEN, MARK
1 transaction
$500
101
ASKEY, THELMA
1 transaction
$500
102
COLLINS, MATT
1 transaction
$500
103
ECKEL, SCOTT C
1 transaction
$500
104
GROFT, JAMES
1 transaction
$500
105
HUNT, SARAH
1 transaction
$500
106
JAVITS, ERIC M HON.
1 transaction
$500
107
JING, MIKE
1 transaction
$500
108
KAHLER, ERIC
1 transaction
$500
109
KAMINS, SCOTT
1 transaction
$500
110
KELLOGG, SHANNON
1 transaction
$500
111
LAHOOD, SAMUEL
1 transaction
$500
112
LASS, CON
1 transaction
$500
113
LAW, DENNIS
1 transaction
$500
114
LUCAS, JANE
1 transaction
$500
115
MASON, JEB
1 transaction
$500
116
MILLS, TREVOR
1 transaction
$500
117
MUNSON, LESTER
1 transaction
$500
118
NORD MALLARD, JENNIFER
1 transaction
$500
119
OKUN, BERNARD R
1 transaction
$500
120
POLLMAN ROGERS, DARLA
1 transaction
$500
121
PUNT, RYAN
1 transaction
$500
122
PUSZYNSKI, JAN
1 transaction
$500
123
PUSZYNSKI, MATTHEW
1 transaction
$500
124
SEMMLER, KARA
1 transaction
$500
125
SHUMWAY, CLAYTON
1 transaction
$500
126
SINGH, JASJIT
1 transaction
$500
127
STOWELL, NICK
1 transaction
$500
128
SWEENEY, ROB
1 transaction
$500
129
WRIGHT, ALEX
1 transaction
$500

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Thune, John [R-SD]

ID: T000250

Top Contributors

10

1
BELL, RICHARD R
HDR ENGINEERINGPRESIDENT/CEO
IndividualOMAHA, NE
$10,000
Sep 13, 2024
2
BELL, RICHARD R
IndividualOMAHA, NE
$6,800
Sep 27, 2024
3
POWELL, JESSE
PAYWARD, INC.CEO
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$6,600
Nov 5, 2024
4
DUHAMEL, KATHARINE B
CANDY BOMBER LLCFILMMAKER
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$6,600
Sep 30, 2024
5
DUHAMEL, WILLIAM F JR.
ROUTE ONE INVESTMENT COMPANY LPINVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$6,600
Sep 30, 2024
6
NESS, LARRY F
FIRST DAKOTA NATIONAL BANKBANKING
IndividualYANKTON, SD
$6,000
Aug 5, 2024
7
NESS, LARRY F
FIRST DAKOTA NATIONAL BANKBANKING
IndividualYANKTON, SD
$5,700
Aug 5, 2024
8
HARMS, DUANE D
HARMS OIL COMPANYGAS & OIL
IndividualBROOKINGS, SD
$5,000
Oct 2, 2024
9
MCINERNEY, PAULA G
BLUFF POINT ASSOCIATES CORPINVESTOR
IndividualWESTPORT, CT
$5,000
Dec 5, 2024
10
MILKEN, LOWELL J
KNOWLEDGE UNIVERSE LIMITED LLCBUSINESSMAN
IndividualSANTA MONICA, CA
$5,000
Dec 26, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Rounds, Mike [R-SD]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 63 nodes and 26 connections (59 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $156,000

Top Donors - Sen. Rounds, Mike [R-SD]

Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.

  • Section 3(b)(4) explicitly states that the Tribal land shall not be used for gaming activity under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate63.4%
Pages: 575-577

— 543 — Department of the Interior 68. Karen Budd Falen, “Biden’s ‘30 By 30 Plan’: A Slap at American Private Property Rights,” Cowboy State Daily, April 15, 2021, https://cowboystatedaily.com/2021/04/15/bidens-30-by-30-plan-a-slap-at-american-private- property-rights/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 69. U.S. Department of the Interior, “Order No. 3396: Rescission of Secretary’s Order 3388, ‘Land and Water Conservation Fund Implementation by the U.S. Department of the Interior,’” February 11, 2021, https://www. doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so-3396-signed-2-11-21-final.pdf (accessed March 17, 2021). 70. Ibid. 71. Associated Press, “Ute Indian Tribe Criticizes Biden’s Camp Hale Monument Designation,” KUER 90.1, October 13, 2022. 72. William Perry Pendley, “Trump Wants to Free Up Federal Lands, His Interior Secretary Fails Him,” National Review Online, September 25, 2017, https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/09/secretary-interior-ryan-zinke- monuments-review-trump-executive-order-antiquities-act-environmentalists/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 73. The Oregon and California Revested Lands Sustained Yield Management Act of 1937, Public Law 75-405, 43 U.S. Code § 2601. 74. Ibid., and American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, 422 F. Supp. 3d 184, 187 (D.D.C. 2019). 75. American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, 422 F. Supp. 3d, pp. 187–188. 76. Federal Register, Vol. 55, No. 26 (June 26, 1990), p. 26114–26194. 77. Federal Register, Vol. 65, No. 114 (June 13, 2000), pp. 37249–37252. 78. Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 11 (January 18, 2017), pp. 6145–6150. 79. American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, 422 F. Supp. 3d 184 (D.D.C. 2019). 80. U.S. Department of the Interior, “Final Consent Decrees/Settlement Agreements,” https://www.doi.gov/ solicitor/transparency/final (accessed March 16, 2023). 81. Michael Doyle, “Interior Order Erases Litigation Website,” E&E News, June 17, 2022, https://www.eenews.net/ articles/interior-order-erases-litigation-website/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 82. Rob Roy Ramey, On the Origin of Specious Species (Lexington Books 2012), pp. 77–97. 83. William Perry Pendley, “Killing Jobs to Save the Sage Grouse: Junk Science, Weird Science, and Plain Nonsense,” Washington Times, May 31, 2012, https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/31/killing- jobs-to-save-the-sage-grouse/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 84. Michael Lee, “Wyoming’s Push to Delist Grizzly Bears from Endangered Species List Faces Opposition from Anti-Hunting Group,” Fox News, January 21, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wyoming-delist-grizzly- endangered-species-list-opposition-anti-hunting-group (accessed March 18, 2023). 85. News release, “Trump Administration Returns Management and Protection of Gray Wolves to States and Tribes Following Successful Recovery Efforts,” October 29, 2020, https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/trump- administration-returns-management-and-protection-gray-wolves-states-and-tribes (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. 50 Code of Federal Regulations §17, and Sean Paige, “‘Rewilding’ Will Backfire on Colorado,” The Gazette, June 19, 2022, https://gazette.com/opinion/guest-column-rewilding-will-backfire-on-colorado/article_ d0016672-ed79-11ec-b027-abe62ba840a1.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. Madeleine C. Bottrill et al., “Is Conservation Triage Just Smart Decision Making?” Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 23, No. 12 (December 2008), pp. 649–654, https://karkgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Bottrill-et-al-2008. pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 88. Rob Roy Ramey II, testimony before the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, April 8, 2014, https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/rameytestimony4_8.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 89. Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, Public Law 95–87. 90. Pennsylvania is the nation’s third-largest coal producer, and its state program was the model for SMCRA. 91. Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 207 (October 26, 2020), pp. 67631–67635. 92. U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, “Approximate Original Contour,” INE–26, June 23, 2020, https://www.osmre.gov/sites/default/files/pdfs/directive1003.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 93. Tim Gallaudet and Timothy R. Petty, “Federal Action Plan for Improving Forecasts of Water Availability,” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, October 2019, https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/ legacy/document/2019/Oct/Federal%20Action%20Plan%20for%20Improving%20Forecasts%20of%20 Water%20Availability.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 544 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 94. 32 U.S. Code, ch. 52. 95. Donald J. Trump, “Presidential Memorandum on Promoting the Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West,” October 19, 2018, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/presidential- memorandum-promoting-reliable-supply-delivery-water-west/ (accessed March 17, 2023). 96. U.S. Department of the Interior, “Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations,” https://www.doi.gov/ buybackprogram (accessed March 18, 2023). 97. Great American Outdoors Act, Public Law 116–152.

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills