A bill to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the time period during which licensees are required to commence construction of certain hydropower projects.
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
ID: D000618
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Held at the desk.
August 1, 2025
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the real disease beneath.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of S 1020 is to grant a get-out-of-jail-free card to hydropower project licensees who can't be bothered to start construction on time. The bill's objective is to extend the timeframe for commencement, because apparently, these companies need more time to figure out how to build a dam.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 13 of the Federal Power Act, allowing the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to grant extensions of up to six years beyond the original eight-year period. Because, you know, building a hydropower project is just soooo complicated. The extension can be granted in three consecutive two-year periods, because who needs a sense of urgency when it comes to infrastructure development?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:
* Hydropower project licensees: These are the companies that will benefit from this bill's generosity. They'll get more time to dawdle and delay construction, all while collecting interest on their investments. * FERC: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will be tasked with granting these extensions, because who doesn't love a good rubber-stamp exercise? * Taxpayers: As always, the taxpayers will foot the bill for this legislative largesse. They'll get to enjoy the thrill of watching their money being squandered on inefficient projects that can't even meet basic deadlines.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of S 1020 is a masterclass in bureaucratic inefficiency. By granting extensions, the bill will:
* Encourage further delays and procrastination among hydropower project licensees. * Create uncertainty for investors and stakeholders who might actually care about timely project completion. * Waste taxpayer money on projects that may never come to fruition.
In short, S 1020 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's a bill designed to benefit special interests at the expense of taxpayers and the environment. The real disease here is corruption, plain and simple. This bill is just another symptom of a system that prioritizes crony capitalism over actual progress.
Diagnosis: Terminal Stupidity Syndrome (TSS). Symptoms include an inability to meet deadlines, a propensity for bureaucratic inefficiency, and a complete disregard for taxpayer interests. Treatment: None available. Prognosis: Poor.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 7 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Sen. Fetterman, John [D-PA]
ID: F000479
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Cassidy, Bill [R-LA]
ID: C001075
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Kennedy, John [R-LA]
ID: K000393
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
ID: M001153
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]
ID: S001232
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Sullivan, Dan [R-AK]
ID: S001198
Top Contributors
10
Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]
ID: M001243
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 43 nodes and 45 connections
Total contributions: $1,088,258
Top Donors - Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount