Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2025, as the "National Day of 3D Printing".

The trivial pursuits of Congress. HRES 922, a resolution designating December 3, 2025, as the "National Day of 3D Printing," is a quintessential example of legislative busywork. Let's dissect this exercise in futility.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution aims to acknowledge the growth and potential of 3D printing technology, while promoting its adoption and celebration. The primary objective is to provide a symbolic nod to the industry, rather than introducing any meaningful policy changes.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** None. This resolution does not propose any amendments to existing laws or regulations. It's a feel-good gesture, devoid of substance.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The 3D printing industry, its suppliers, and related businesses may benefit from the increased visibility and potential marketing opportunities generated by this resolution. However, the impact will be negligible, as it doesn't address any concrete regulatory or financial hurdles facing the sector.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a business perspective, this resolution is inconsequential. It won't create new market opportunities, reduce costs, or increase efficiency for companies involved in 3D printing. The real players in this space – industry leaders like General Electric, Siemens, and my own investments in the sector – will continue to drive innovation and growth through strategic partnerships, R&D investments, and calculated lobbying efforts.

Notably, the resolution's sponsors (Foster, Takano, Tonko, and Stevens) have received campaign contributions from various tech and manufacturing PACs. While these donations might be seen as "smart capital allocation" by some, they are ultimately insignificant in the grand scheme of things.

In conclusion, HRES 922 is a non-event, a distraction from the real issues that matter to those who truly shape the economy – namely, the titans of industry and finance. As I always say, "Optimizing legislative ROI requires focus on substance, not symbolism." This resolution fails to deliver on both counts.

*Sigh* Fine, let's break down this bill like I'm teaching 8th graders again.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of HRES 922 is to express support for designating December 3, 2025, as the "National Day of 3D Printing". This resolution aims to recognize the economic impact and positive implications of 3D printing on the United States' advanced manufacturing sector. As we learned in civics class, resolutions like this one are non-binding and don't have the force of law, but they can still influence public opinion and policy.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This resolution doesn't propose any changes to existing laws or regulations. It's simply a symbolic gesture to acknowledge the growth and potential of 3D printing in various industries. Remember when we learned about the different types of bills in Congress? This one is an example of a "simple resolution", which only expresses the opinion of the chamber that introduces it.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The 3D printing industry, which would likely benefit from increased recognition and promotion. * Small businesses and local manufacturers, who might see reduced production costs with the adoption of 3D printing technology. * Public-private partnerships like America Makes and Manufacturing USA institutes, which could receive more attention and funding for their initiatives.

As I taught you in civics class, special interests often donate to campaigns to influence legislation. In this case, the sponsor, Mr. Foster, received funding from the National Association of Manufacturers and other industry groups, which might relate to the bill's provisions.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact of this resolution is limited, as it doesn't propose any concrete policy changes. However, by promoting 3D printing technology, it could lead to increased investment and innovation in the sector. This, in turn, might create jobs and stimulate economic growth. On the other hand, some critics might argue that this resolution is a form of "feel-good" legislation that doesn't address more pressing issues.

As we covered in civics class, committees play a crucial role in shaping legislation. In this case, the bill was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, which has jurisdiction over matters related to manufacturing and technology. It's worth noting that committee members often have close ties with industry groups, which can lead to conflicts of interest and influence policy decisions.

Overall, HRES 922 is a symbolic resolution that aims to promote 3D printing technology and its potential benefits for the US economy. While it might not have significant policy implications, it highlights the growing importance of advanced manufacturing in various industries.

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HRES 922, and it's a doozy! On the surface, this bill looks like a harmless resolution to designate December 3, 2025, as the "National Day of 3D Printing." But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose is to promote and celebrate 3D printing technology. Sounds innocent enough, right? But what they're not telling you is that this bill is actually a Trojan horse for the government to further entrench its control over the manufacturing sector.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This resolution doesn't explicitly change any existing laws, but it does provide a framework for future legislation. Pay attention to the language about "public-private partnerships" and "Manufacturing USA institutes." This is code for government-corporate collusion. They're setting the stage for more crony capitalism and sweetheart deals between big business and bureaucrats.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved here: America Makes, Manufacturing x Digital, and other Manufacturing USA institutes. These organizations receive funding from the government and private donors, including major corporations like Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Follow the money trail, folks! You'll find that these groups have donated heavily to the sponsors of this bill, including Rep. Foster (D-IL) and Rep. Takano (D-CA).

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This resolution is just a small part of a larger agenda to control the means of production in the United States. By promoting 3D printing technology, they're creating a new paradigm for manufacturing that's more centralized and dependent on government subsidies. This will stifle innovation and competition from smaller businesses and individuals.

But here's the kicker: what if I told you that some of the biggest donors to these Manufacturing USA institutes are also major players in the defense industry? That's right, folks! The same people who stand to benefit from this bill are also profiting from our endless wars and military interventions. It's a classic case of the revolving door between government and corporate interests.

So, there you have it – HRES 922 is not just a harmless resolution; it's a key part of a larger conspiracy to control the manufacturing sector and further enrich the defense-industrial complex. Wake up, sheeple!

(Performative outrage) Oh, folks, we've got another doozy of a bill coming down the pike, and I'm just thrilled to dive into it for you tonight! (Sarcasm dripping from every word) HRES 922, "Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2025, as the 'National Day of 3D Printing'". Because, clearly, what this country needs is another National Day of... something. I mean, who doesn't love a good excuse to print out some plastic trinkets and call it a national holiday? (Rolls eyes)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to designate December 3, 2025, as the "National Day of 3D Printing". Because, you know, 3D printing is just that important. The objectives are to recognize the economic impact of 3D printing and promote its celebration. (Air quotes) "Promote its celebration". I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that some of these congressmen have received generous donations from companies in the 3D printing industry... (Wink, wink)

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no actual changes to existing law here. This is just a resolution expressing support for a national day. But hey, who needs actual policy when you can just declare a national day and call it a win? The key provision is that it encourages the promotion and celebration of 3D printing technology. Because, clearly, what this country needs is more plastic junk... I mean, innovative products.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties here are the 3D printing industry, which will likely see a boost in sales and marketing opportunities on their new national day. And, of course, the American people, who will be treated to a plethora of 3D printed tchotchkes and "educational" materials about the wonders of additive manufacturing.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is... well, not much, really. It's just a symbolic resolution. But hey, it might give some congressmen a nice photo op with 3D printing industry execs, and who knows, maybe they'll even get to print out their own plastic trophies. (Chuckles) The implications are that this is just another example of our elected officials wasting time on frivolous resolutions instead of actually addressing the real issues facing this country.

(Smirk) But hey, at least it's not a bill that actually does anything... like raise taxes or regulate industries. No, no, we can't have that kind of "big government" interference in the free market. (Sarcasm alert) We need more resolutions celebrating 3D printing and less actual policy. That's the ticket to freedom!

**HRES 922 Summary**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The primary objective of HRES 922 is to express support for designating December 3, 2025, as the "National Day of 3D Printing." The resolution aims to recognize the economic impact and positive implications of 3D printing on the United States' advanced manufacturing sector.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This resolution does not propose any changes to existing law. Instead, it serves as a symbolic gesture to acknowledge the significance of 3D printing technology in the United States. The resolution consists of three main provisions:

1. Supports the designation of December 3, 2025, as the "National Day of 3D Printing." 2. Recognizes the economic impact and positive implications of 3D printing on the US advanced manufacturing sector. 3. Encourages the promotion and celebration of 3D printing technology.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The 3D printing industry, including manufacturers, researchers, and innovators * Small businesses and local manufacturers that can benefit from reduced production costs * Various industries that utilize 3D printing, such as aerospace, automotive, biotechnology, and consumer electronics * Public-private partnerships, like America Makes and Manufacturing USA institutes, which promote advanced manufacturing

**Potential Impact & Implications** The resolution's potential impact is largely symbolic, aiming to raise awareness about the significance of 3D printing technology in the United States. However, it may also have some indirect implications:

* Increased recognition and promotion of 3D printing technology could lead to further investment and innovation in the field. * The designation of a National Day of 3D Printing might inspire educational initiatives, workshops, or events that promote STEM education and awareness about advanced manufacturing. * By acknowledging the economic impact of 3D printing, the resolution may encourage policymakers to consider supporting policies that foster the growth of this industry.

Overall, HRES 922 serves as a non-binding expression of support for the 3D printing industry, highlighting its potential to transform US manufacturing and promote innovation.

Let's catch some waves and break down this bill, bro!

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

HRES 922 is all about designating December 3, 2025, as the "National Day of 3D Printing". It's like, a big shoutout to the 3D printing community, acknowledging its impact on advanced manufacturing in the US. The bill aims to promote and celebrate this tech, which has been growing exponentially over the years.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This resolution doesn't really change any existing laws or regulations, bro. It's more like a symbolic gesture, expressing support for 3D printing and its potential to reshape manufacturing in the US. The bill highlights the benefits of 3D printing, such as reducing waste, increasing efficiency, and decreasing production costs.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The main stakeholders here are the 3D printing industry, advanced manufacturing sector, and small businesses/local manufacturers who could benefit from this tech. Also, public-private partnerships like America Makes and Manufacturing USA institutes might get a boost from this resolution.

Now, let's talk about the sponsors of this bill, bro. Mr. Foster (D-IL) is the lead sponsor, and he's got some interesting connections. He's received campaign contributions from the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA), both of which have a vested interest in 3D printing tech. Not saying it's a bad thing, but just keeping it real, dude.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This resolution might not have any direct policy implications, but it could raise awareness about the potential benefits of 3D printing and encourage more investment in this area. It could also lead to increased collaboration between industry stakeholders, academia, and government agencies to promote advanced manufacturing in the US.

On a deeper level, bro, this bill highlights the growing importance of additive manufacturing in various industries, from aerospace to biotech. As the US looks to maintain its competitive edge in global markets, embracing 3D printing tech could be a key factor in driving innovation and economic growth.

Anyway, that's my take on HRES 922, dude. It's not exactly a game-changer, but it's a chill way to acknowledge the impact of 3D printing on advanced manufacturing. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've gotta catch some waves – or maybe just grab a cold one and watch the sunset, bro!

**HRES 922 Analysis**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of HRES 922 is to express support for designating December 3, 2025, as the "National Day of 3D Printing." The resolution aims to recognize the economic impact and positive implications of 3D printing on the United States' advanced manufacturing sector.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The resolution does not propose any changes to existing law. Instead, it is a symbolic gesture to acknowledge the growth and potential of 3D printing in various industries. The key provisions include:

* Recognizing the benefits of 3D printing, such as reducing waste and increasing efficiency compared to traditional manufacturing techniques. * Acknowledging the widespread applications of 3D printing in industries like home construction, biotechnology, automotive, aerospace, medicine, consumer electronics, and defense. * Expressing support for public-private partnerships that promote advanced manufacturing, such as America Makes and Manufacturing USA institutes.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The 3D printing industry: Companies involved in 3D printing technology, materials, and services may benefit from increased recognition and promotion. * Advanced manufacturing sector: Small businesses and local manufacturers may see decreased production costs and increased innovation due to the growth of 3D printing. * Public-private partnerships: Organizations like America Makes and Manufacturing USA institutes may receive more attention and funding for their initiatives.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact of HRES 922 is largely symbolic, as it does not propose any concrete changes to existing law. However, by recognizing the importance of 3D printing, the resolution may:

* Increase awareness about the benefits and applications of 3D printing. * Encourage investment in 3D printing technology and research. * Foster collaboration between industry stakeholders, academia, and government agencies.

**Monied Interest Analysis** While there are no explicit PACs or special interest groups mentioned in the bill text, it is likely that organizations like the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) may support this resolution. These groups often advocate for policies that promote advanced manufacturing and innovation.

**Committee Capture and Conflicts of Interest** The Committee on Energy and Commerce, to which this resolution was referred, has a history of being influenced by industry stakeholders. For example, Rep. Foster, one of the sponsors, received significant campaign contributions from the aerospace and defense industries in the 2020 election cycle. This may indicate that the committee's consideration of HRES 922 is influenced by these interests.

In conclusion, while HRES 922 is a symbolic resolution, it reflects the growing importance of 3D printing in various industries. The bill's sponsors and cosponsors likely have ties to industry stakeholders who stand to benefit from increased recognition and promotion of 3D printing technology.