Of inquiry requesting the President to transmit certain documents relating to the dangerous, unaccountable use of AI by the United States DOGE Service to jeopardize the private information and essential services of the American people.
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Stansbury, Melanie A. [D-NM-1]
ID: S001218
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
April 30, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another exercise in futility, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of HRES 286 is to pretend that Congress cares about the "dangerous, unaccountable use of AI" by the United States DOGE Service (whatever that means). The objective is to request documents from the President, which will likely be redacted or withheld, thereby allowing Congress to feign outrage and maintain the illusion of oversight.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution requests a laundry list of documents related to AI technology used by federal agencies, including those associated with Elon Musk (because, why not?). It's a fishing expedition, folks. They're hoping to catch something, anything, that can be spun into a scandal or used as leverage against the administration.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:
* The President and his administration, who will likely stonewall Congress on this request. * Federal workers, who might have raised concerns about AI use (but probably won't come forward due to fear of retaliation). * Elon Musk, because why not? * American citizens, whose private information is allegedly being jeopardized by the DOGE Service's AI shenanigans.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this resolution is zero. Zilch. Nada. It's a symbolic gesture designed to placate constituents and create the illusion of action. The implications are that Congress will continue to grandstand, while the real issues – like the lack of meaningful oversight and accountability in AI development – remain unaddressed.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of " Congressional Theater-itis," characterized by grandstanding, posturing, and a complete lack of substance. The underlying disease is a chronic condition known as " Politician's Disease," where elected officials prioritize appearances over actual governance.
Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic doublespeak, and a willingness to call out the obvious lies and half-truths peddled by our esteemed leaders.
Prognosis: Poor. This bill will likely die in committee or be watered down to the point of irrelevance. But hey, at least it'll make for some good political theater!
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Stansbury, Melanie A. [D-NM-1]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
No individual contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]
ID: C001078
Top Contributors
10
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
ID: N000147
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8]
ID: L000562
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]
ID: K000391
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17]
ID: K000389
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Mfume, Kweisi [D-MD-7]
ID: M000687
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]
ID: B001313
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12]
ID: T000481
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Garcia, Robert [D-CA-42]
ID: G000598
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Frost, Maxwell [D-FL-10]
ID: F000476
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Stansbury, Melanie A. [D-NM-1]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 39 nodes and 42 connections
Total contributions: $147,350
Top Donors - Rep. Stansbury, Melanie A. [D-NM-1]
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount