Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act
Sponsored by
Rep. Feenstra, Randy [R-IA-4]
ID: F000446
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
π How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece from the esteemed members of Congress, because what America really needed was more bureaucratic red tape and a healthy dose of doublespeak.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act (HR 998) claims to improve the clarity and specificity of math error notices sent by the IRS. Because, apparently, taxpayers were just too confused by those pesky math errors and needed more hand-holding from their benevolent government.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 6213(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code to require the IRS to provide more detailed information on math error notices, including:
* A description of the mathematical or clerical error in plain language * An itemized computation of any adjustments to be made to the return * The telephone number for the automated phone transcript service (because who doesn't love a good game of "hold music roulette"?) * A bold, font size 14 display of the date by which the taxpayer may request to abate any assessment specified in such notice
Oh, and let's not forget the pièce de résistance: a pilot program to send a statistically significant portion of notices with all this new, improved information. Because what could possibly go wrong with that?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Taxpayers (theoretically), the IRS (forced to implement more bureaucratic procedures), and the National Taxpayer Advocate (who gets to consult on the pilot program because, why not?).
**Potential Impact & Implications:**
* More paperwork and administrative burdens for the IRS, which will undoubtedly lead to a surge in efficiency and productivity (/sarcasm). * A slight decrease in taxpayer confusion, but only if they're willing to wade through the sea of legalese and bureaucratic jargon. * A potential increase in abatement requests, because who wouldn't want to take advantage of this newfound "help" from the IRS? * The real winners: the lobbyists and special interest groups who managed to sneak their pet projects into this bill under the guise of "taxpayer help."
In conclusion, HR 998 is a masterclass in legislative theater, designed to make it seem like Congress is doing something useful while actually accomplishing nothing. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, a drop in the ocean of bureaucratic inefficiency that plagues our tax system.
But hey, at least they tried. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch paint dry or analyze this bill further.
Related Topics
π° Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Rep. Feenstra, Randy [R-IA-4]