VETT Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/981
Last Updated: July 18, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

ID: V000135

Follow the money

The bill

VETT Act

HR. 981, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.

The sponsor

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$116,850 raised

25 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

64% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 679-681 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

April 9, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, carefully crafted to make you think the government actually cares about veterans' education. Please, spare me the crocodile tears.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The VETT Act claims to improve the processes for approving programs of education for veterans, because God knows our brave men and women in uniform can't possibly navigate a simple application process without Uncle Sam's help. The real objective? To create a facade of accountability while maintaining the status quo.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 3679(f)(5) of title 38, United States Code, which is about as exciting as watching paint dry. Essentially, it requires educational institutions to provide more information on their programs, including a notice if they can't provide all the required details. Wow, what a bold move. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs will also create a website to publish information about training for school certifying officials. Because, clearly, that's the biggest problem facing veterans' education.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Veterans, educational institutions, and the Department of Veterans Affairs are all supposedly impacted by this bill. But let's be real, the only ones who will truly benefit are the bureaucrats and lobbyists who get to justify their existence with more paperwork and "transparency" initiatives.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The VETT Act is a classic case of "legislative lip service." It creates the illusion of reform while doing nothing to address the systemic issues plaguing veterans' education. The added bureaucracy will only serve to slow down an already cumbersome process, ensuring that our nation's heroes continue to face unnecessary hurdles in their pursuit of higher learning.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of " Politician-itis," characterized by symptoms such as empty rhetoric, bureaucratic bloat, and a complete disregard for the actual needs of veterans. Treatment? A healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the inevitable disappointment that follows.

In short, the VETT Act is a meaningless exercise in legislative posturing, designed to placate voters while maintaining the status quo. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, and we should all be insulted by its very existence.

Related Topics

Military & Veterans Affairs
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$116,850
22 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$10,650
Committees
$0
Individuals
$106,200

No PAC contributions found

1
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
2
HO CHUNK NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
3
FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$3,300
4
AIPAC PAC CONDUIT ACCOUNT
1 transaction
$500
5
ALLIANCE OF BANKERS FOR WISCONSIN
1 transaction
$250

No committee contributions found

1
LEVY, EDWARD C.
4 transactions
$26,400
2
ANDERSON, JOHN R. MR.
1 transaction
$10,000
3
BROIN, JEFF
1 transaction
$6,600
4
UIHLEIN, RICHARD E. MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
5
CROELL, KURT
1 transaction
$6,000
6
MARQUIS, ALEXANDER
1 transaction
$5,600
7
MARQUIS, BENJAMIN L.
1 transaction
$5,600
8
MARQUIS, JASON
1 transaction
$5,600
9
MARQUIS, THOMAS
1 transaction
$5,600
10
BERNICK, CAROL L.
1 transaction
$5,000
11
ANDERSON, LINDA
1 transaction
$3,400
12
HUNT, WOODY L.
1 transaction
$3,300
13
JOHNSON, JANE
1 transaction
$3,300
14
JOHNSON, RONALD H.
1 transaction
$3,300
15
KILROY, JOHN
1 transaction
$3,300
16
LAWSON, LAWRENCE
1 transaction
$3,300
17
LONG, CHARLES
1 transaction
$3,300

Donor Network - Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 50 nodes and 25 connections (57 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $116,850

Top Donors - Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount

5 Orgs17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.

  • Section 2(a) imposes new requirements on educational institutions to provide accurate information to individuals, which may increase administrative burdens on for-profit education providers.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate64.0%
Pages: 679-681

— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo, — 647 — Department of Veterans Affairs reimagine the health care footprint in some locales, and spur a realignment of capacity through budgetary allocations. Specifically: 1. Embrace the expansion of Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) as an avenue to maintain a VA footprint in challenging medical markets without investing further in obsolete and unaffordable VA health care campuses. 2. Explore the potential to pilot facility-sharing partnerships between the VA and strained local health care systems to reduce costs by leveraging limited talent and resources. Personnel l Extend the term of the Under Secretary for Health (USH) to five years. Additionally, authority should be given to reappoint this individual for a second five-year term both to allow for continuity and to protect the USH from political transition. l Establish a Senior Executive Service (SES) position of VHA Care System Chief Information Officer (CIO), selected by and reporting to the chief of the VHA Care System with a dotted line to the VA CIO. l Identify a workflow process to bring wait times in compliance with VA MISSION Act–required time frames wherever possible. 1. Assess the daily clinical appointment load for physicians and clinical staff in medical facilities where wait times for care are well outside of the time frames required by the VA MISSION Act. 2. Require VHA facilities to increase the number of patients seen each day to equal the number seen by DOD medical facilities: approximately 19 patients per provider per day. Currently, VA facilities may be seeing as few as six patients per provider per day. 3. Consider a pilot program to extend weekday appointment hours and offer Saturday appointment options to veterans if a facility continues to demonstrate that it has excess capacity and is experiencing delays in the delivery of care for veterans. 4. Identify clinical services that are consistently in high demand but require cost-prohibitive compensation to recruit and retain talent, and examine exceptions for higher competitive pay.

Introduction

Moderate64.0%
Pages: 679-681

— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo,

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills