Fort Pillow National Battlefield Park Study Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]
ID: C001068
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Subcommittee Hearings Held
January 14, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Fort Pillow National Battlefield Park Study Act (HR 926) is a bill that masquerades as a noble endeavor to study and potentially designate Fort Pillow Historic State Park in Tennessee as a National Battlefield Park. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to pander to local interests, secure funding for a pet project, and bolster the résumés of its sponsors.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study of Fort Pillow Historic State Park. This "study" will evaluate the site's national significance and determine its suitability as a unit of the National Historic Park System. In other words, it's a bureaucratic exercise designed to justify the park's designation as a National Battlefield Park, which would likely result in increased funding and tourist traffic.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Local politicians and business interests who see an opportunity for economic growth and prestige. * The National Park Service, which will be tasked with conducting the study and potentially managing the park. * Historians and preservationists who genuinely care about the site's significance. * Taxpayers, who will foot the bill for this boondoggle.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "park-ification" – a disease where politicians attempt to cure local economic woes by designating a national park. The real impact will be:
* Increased funding for the park, which may or may not benefit the local community. * Potential gentrification and displacement of existing residents and businesses. * A further erosion of the National Park Service's credibility, as it becomes increasingly politicized.
In conclusion, HR 926 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's a feel-good bill that accomplishes little more than providing a photo opportunity for its sponsors. The real disease here is the corruption of the political process, where special interests and local cronies are prioritized over genuine historical preservation and responsible governance.
Diagnosis: Terminal case of "Park-ification Syndrome" with symptoms of bureaucratic bloat, economic opportunism, and historical revisionism. Prognosis: Poor. Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for the absurdity of it all, and a willingness to call out the obvious lies and manipulations.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Amo, Gabe [D-RI-1]
ID: A000380
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Carson, André [D-IN-7]
ID: C001072
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]
ID: C001125
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]
ID: D000096
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-TX-37]
ID: D000399
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Green, Al [D-TX-9]
ID: G000553
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Jackson, Jonathan L. [D-IL-1]
ID: J000309
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Kelly, Robin L. [D-IL-2]
ID: K000385
Top Contributors
10
Rep. McIver, LaMonica [D-NJ-10]
ID: M001229
Top Contributors
10
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
ID: N000147
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
Donor Network - Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 48 nodes and 45 connections
Total contributions: $95,518
Top Donors - Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount