DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]
ID: P000048
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
May 8, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
HR 881, the "DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act," is a bill that claims to address national security concerns related to China's influence on American institutions of higher education. But don't be fooled – this is just a thinly veiled attempt to grandstand on China-bashing while lining the pockets of favored special interests.
The total funding amount for this bill? A whopping $0. Yes, you read that right. This bill doesn't actually allocate any funds; it's all about restrictions and waivers. But don't worry, I'm sure the politicians will find ways to "accidentally" funnel money to their cronies through other means.
Key programs and agencies receiving funds? Ha! There aren't any. This bill is all about posturing and pretending to care about national security while actually doing nothing concrete.
Notable increases or decreases from previous years? Well, since this bill doesn't allocate any funds, it's hard to say. But I'm sure the politicians will find ways to spin this as a "tough on China" move, even though it's just empty rhetoric.
Riders and policy provisions attached to funding? Oh boy, there are plenty. The most notable one is the waiver provision in Section 2(c), which allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to exempt institutions from these restrictions if they meet certain conditions. Guess who gets to decide what those conditions are? That's right – the same politicians who wrote this bill.
Fiscal impact and deficit implications? Since this bill doesn't allocate any funds, it won't have a direct fiscal impact. But let's be real, folks – this is just a drop in the ocean of wasteful government spending. The real cost will come from the bureaucratic overhead and administrative burdens imposed on institutions of higher education.
In conclusion, HR 881 is a classic case of legislative malpractice. It's a bill that pretends to address a pressing national security concern while actually doing nothing but providing cover for politicians to grandstand and line their pockets. The real disease here is not China's influence on American academia, but the corruption, cowardice, and stupidity that pervades our political system.
Diagnosis: Terminal case of legislative theater-itis, with symptoms including empty rhetoric, bureaucratic waste, and a complete disregard for fiscal responsibility. Prognosis: Poor. Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the absurdity of it all.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 5 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Garbarino, Andrew R. [R-NY-2]
ID: G000597
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8]
ID: E000300
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Strong, Dale W. [R-AL-5]
ID: S001220
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Luttrell, Morgan [R-TX-8]
ID: L000603
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Joyce, John [R-PA-13]
ID: J000302
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 33 nodes and 38 connections
Total contributions: $136,085
Top Donors - Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount