Federal Contractor Cybersecurity Vulnerability Reduction Act of 2025

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/872
Last Updated: July 17, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

ID: M000194

Follow the money

The bill

Federal Contractor Cybersecurity Vulnerability Reduction Act of 2025

HR. 872, 119th Congress β€” read as touching Cybersecurity.

The sponsor

Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$97,100 raised

28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

March 3, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

πŸ“ Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

πŸŽ‰

Passed Congress

πŸ–ŠοΈ

Presidential Action

βš–οΈ

Became Law

πŸ“š How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another bill from the esteemed members of Congress, because what this country really needs is more bureaucratic red tape and empty promises. Let's dissect this mess, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Federal Contractor Cybersecurity Vulnerability Reduction Act of 2025 (HR 872) claims to aim at reducing cybersecurity vulnerabilities in federal contractors by implementing a vulnerability disclosure policy consistent with NIST guidelines. How noble. In reality, it's just another attempt to create the illusion of security while lining the pockets of contractors and bureaucrats.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires covered contractors to implement a vulnerability disclosure policy, which is a fancy way of saying they need to have a plan in place to report potential security vulnerabilities. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) will be updated to include these requirements, because God forbid we trust contractors to do the right thing without being forced to.

The bill also creates a waiver process for agencies and the Department of Defense, because who needs accountability when national security or research purposes are involved? It's like they're saying, "Don't worry, we'll just waive the rules when it's convenient for us."

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Covered contractors (i.e., those with contracts above a certain threshold or managing federal information systems) will be affected by this bill. Agencies and the Department of Defense will also have to deal with the new regulations. And, of course, the usual suspects – lobbyists, bureaucrats, and politicians – will reap the benefits of this legislation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a perfect example of "security theater." It creates the illusion of security while doing little to actually address the underlying issues. Contractors will likely just pay lip service to these new regulations, and agencies will find ways to waive them when it's convenient.

The real impact will be on small businesses and contractors who can't afford to comply with these new regulations. They'll either be forced out of business or become beholden to larger corporations that can navigate the bureaucratic maze.

In conclusion, HR 872 is a classic case of "legislative lupus" – a disease where politicians think they're curing a problem but are actually just masking the symptoms. It's a waste of time and resources, and it will only serve to further entrench the interests of those who benefit from this kind of regulatory nonsense.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch politicians pretend to care about cybersecurity.

Related Topics

Defense Spending & ProcurementCybersecurity & Data PrivacyNational Security & Intelligence
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

πŸ’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

Congress 119 β€’ 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$97,100
27 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$12,800
Committees
$0
Individuals
$84,300

No PAC contributions found

1
REW INVESTMENTS LLC
2 transactions
$5,800
2
KING & SOCIETY, LLC
1 transaction
$2,000
3
BARBER BROTHERS, LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
4
COASTAL GREEN CBD LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
5
MALL DRIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
6
SEAGLASS PARTNERS, LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
7
TWIN RIVERS HOLDINGS LLC
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
GRIFFITH, JAMES
1 transaction
$6,600
2
RANNEY, TIM
1 transaction
$6,600
3
SINGER, PAUL
1 transaction
$6,600
4
GREENBLATT, SCOTT
1 transaction
$5,800
5
MOE, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$5,800
6
GLUECK, KENNETH
1 transaction
$5,000
7
HOME, CHARLOTTE
1 transaction
$5,000
8
DAVISON, KAY MS.
1 transaction
$3,300
9
HAAG, GORAN
1 transaction
$3,300
10
HAAG, ORPHA
1 transaction
$3,300
11
BUKOWSKY, BRANT
1 transaction
$3,300
12
BUKOWSKY, BROCK
1 transaction
$3,300
13
CATZ, SAFRA
1 transaction
$3,300
14
COOLEY, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$3,300
15
KELLOGG, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
16
TOPPER, LEWIS
1 transaction
$3,300
17
YODER, MAHLON
1 transaction
$3,300
18
CRUSEMANN, JEANNE
1 transaction
$3,300
19
EPSTEIN, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$3,300
20
GRENADER, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]

ID: B001313

Top Contributors

10

1
MORRIS-SINGER, ANDREW
SELF-EMPLOYED β€’ MANAGEMENT
IndividualPORTLAND, OR
$6,600
Jan 24, 2024
2
MORRIS-SINGER, COREY
SELF-EMPLOYED β€’ RESEARCH
IndividualPORTLAND, OR
$6,600
Jan 24, 2024
3
STEIN, KEVIN M
TRANSDIGM β€’ CEO
IndividualCHAGRIN FALLS, OH
$3,300
Feb 15, 2023
4
MOSS, KAREN
NICOLAS GUDBRANSON & COOPER β€’ ATTORNEY
IndividualCLEVELAND, OH
$3,300
Feb 24, 2023
5
SUMMERS, MICHAEL P.
NOT EMPLOYED β€’ NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualLAKEWOOD, OH
$3,300
Feb 28, 2023
6
JOHNSON, ALEX B
TRI-C β€’ COLLEGE PRESIDENT
IndividualBEACHWOOD, OH
$3,300
Mar 7, 2023
7
SINITO, FRANK T
MILLENIA HOUSING COMPANIES β€’ PRESIDENT
IndividualCLEVELAND, OH
$3,300
Mar 13, 2023
8
EMERSON, WILLIAM
ROCK HOLDINGS β€’ VICE CHAIRMAN
IndividualBLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI
$3,300
Apr 14, 2023
9
JURVETSON, KARLA
SELF β€’ PHYSICIAN
IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA
$3,300
May 11, 2023
10
RATNER, ALBERT B.
NOT EMPLOYED β€’ NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualLYNDHURST, OH
$3,300
Jun 13, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 62 nodes and 31 connections (58 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $113,600

Top Donors - Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

7 Orgs20 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.

  • +Cybersecurityconfidence 0.95

    Section 2(b) requires the Federal Acquisition Regulation Council to update FAR to incorporate requirements for covered contractors to receive information about potential security vulnerabilities, directly benefiting cybersecurity firms that provide vulnerability disclosure and related services.

  • +Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.90

    Section 2(e) mandates the Secretary of Defense to review and revise the DFARS to ensure covered contractors implement vulnerability disclosure policies consistent with NIST guidelines, imposing new requirements but also creating compliance opportunities for defense contractors.

  • +Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.85

    Section 2(a)(1) calls for OMB, in consultation with CISA and others, to review FAR contract requirements for contractor vulnerability disclosure programs; large tech firms that are federal contractors will need to comply, driving demand for cybersecurity services and tools.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β€” they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Related Bills