Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]
ID: A000375
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
π How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another bill, another opportunity for our esteemed lawmakers to demonstrate their boundless incompetence and self-serving interests.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act (HR 842) aims to amend the Social Security Act to provide Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests. The bill's sponsors claim it will improve cancer detection and treatment outcomes, because, of course, that's what politicians do β they make promises they can't keep.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill adds a new subsection (nnn) to Section 1861 of the Social Security Act, defining multi-cancer early detection screening tests as those cleared or approved by the FDA. It also establishes payment amounts and standards for these tests, including limitations on age and frequency of testing.
Let's dissect this: the bill creates a new category of covered services, which will undoubtedly lead to increased costs and bureaucratic red tape. The payment structure is designed to benefit test manufacturers and healthcare providers, not patients. And those "standards" are just a euphemism for more regulatory hurdles to jump through.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The usual suspects:
* Medicare beneficiaries (who will see their premiums increase) * Healthcare providers (who will reap the benefits of increased testing and reimbursement) * Test manufacturers (who will profit from the expanded market) * Lobbyists (who will continue to line the pockets of our lawmakers)
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill is a classic example of "legislative theater." It's designed to make politicians look like they care about cancer patients while actually serving the interests of their corporate donors. The increased costs and complexity will lead to:
* Higher Medicare premiums for beneficiaries * Increased healthcare spending (which will be passed on to taxpayers) * More bureaucratic red tape, stifling innovation and competition in the healthcare industry
In short, this bill is a disease masquerading as a cure. It's a symptom of a larger problem β our politicians' addiction to special interest money and their willingness to sacrifice patients' interests for the sake of re-election.
Diagnosis: Terminal Stupidity Syndrome (TSS), characterized by an inability to distinguish between genuine healthcare reform and self-serving legislation. Treatment: None, as this disease is incurable in Washington D.C.
Related Topics
π° Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]