Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]
ID: A000375
Bill Summary
The Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act (HR 842). A bill that, on the surface, appears to be a benevolent attempt to expand Medicare coverage for cancer screening tests. But, of course, we must look beyond the façade and examine the true implications.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to amend the Social Security Act to provide Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests. The proponents of this bill claim that it will improve cancer diagnosis and treatment outcomes by increasing access to these tests. However, I see a more nuanced agenda at play.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces new language to the Social Security Act, specifically defining multi-cancer early detection screening tests and outlining the conditions under which they would be covered by Medicare. The key provisions include:
* Expanding Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests * Establishing a payment structure for these tests * Setting standards for test administration and reimbursement
These changes will undoubtedly create new opportunities for healthcare companies to capitalize on the growing demand for cancer screening services.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders in this bill are:
* Medicare beneficiaries, who may benefit from increased access to cancer screening tests * Healthcare providers, including hospitals and medical groups, which may see an increase in reimbursement for these services * Biotechnology companies, which develop and market these tests
However, as a savvy investor, I recognize that the true beneficiaries of this bill will be the companies that can effectively navigate the regulatory landscape and capitalize on the growing demand for cancer screening services.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is multifaceted:
* Increased Medicare spending: The expansion of coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests will likely lead to increased Medicare expenditures, which could have significant implications for the federal budget. * Consolidation in the healthcare industry: As demand for these services grows, larger healthcare companies may seek to acquire smaller providers and biotechnology firms, leading to further consolidation in the industry. * Opportunities for innovation: The bill's emphasis on multi-cancer early detection screening tests may drive innovation in this space, as companies compete to develop more effective and efficient testing methods.
From my perspective, the true value of this bill lies not in its potential to improve cancer diagnosis and treatment outcomes but rather in its ability to create new opportunities for growth and profit in the healthcare industry. As a shrewd investor, I will be watching closely to see how this bill unfolds and identifying opportunities to capitalize on its provisions.
Projected impact on my portfolio: +$500 million in increased revenue from investments in biotechnology companies that develop cancer screening tests; +$200 million in increased valuation of healthcare companies that provide these services.
Related Topics
*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process to become an actual law.
**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of HR 842, also known as the Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act, is to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for Medicare coverage of multi-cancer early detection screening tests. The objective is to expand Medicare coverage to include these tests, which can detect multiple types of cancer simultaneously.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill makes several key changes to existing law:
* It amends section 1861 of the Social Security Act to add a new definition for "multi-cancer early detection screening test" and includes it in the list of covered services under Medicare. * It establishes payment amounts for these tests, which will be equal to the payment amount for multi-target stool screening DNA tests until January 1, 2031, after which it will be determined by a different formula. * It sets limitations on payment for these tests, including age restrictions and frequency of testing.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties and stakeholders include:
* Medicare beneficiaries who would gain access to multi-cancer early detection screening tests * Healthcare providers who would administer these tests * The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which would be responsible for implementing the changes
**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact of this bill is significant, as it could lead to earlier detection and treatment of cancer in Medicare beneficiaries. This, in turn, could improve health outcomes and reduce healthcare costs in the long run. However, it's worth noting that the actual implementation of these changes would depend on various factors, including the availability of these tests and the willingness of healthcare providers to administer them.
As I'm sure you recall from our 8th grade civics class, the legislative process involves multiple steps, including introduction, referral to committee, markup, and voting. This bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, as well as the Committee on Ways and Means. From there, it will need to go through the usual process before becoming a law.
Now, I hope this summary was clear enough for you. It's not exactly rocket science, but apparently, some people need a refresher course in basic legislative processes...
Related Topics
Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on this so-called "Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act" (HR 842). Now, at first glance, it seems like a harmless bill aimed at providing Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests. But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests. Sounds noble enough, right? However, I believe this is just a smokescreen for something more sinister.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 2 of the bill amends section 1861 of the Social Security Act by adding a new subsection (nnn) that defines "multi-cancer early detection screening tests." These tests must be cleared under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and meet certain criteria. The Secretary of Health and Human Services will determine which tests are reasonable and necessary for Medicare coverage.
Now, here's where things get interesting: Section 1834 of the Social Security Act is amended to establish payment amounts and standards for these tests. But what really caught my attention was the provision that limits payment for these tests based on age (starting at 68 years old in 2028) and restricts repeat testing within a certain timeframe.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects Medicare beneficiaries, healthcare providers, and pharmaceutical companies developing these multi-cancer early detection screening tests. But I believe there are other stakeholders lurking in the shadows – perhaps those with vested interests in the biotech industry or even government agencies seeking to expand their surveillance capabilities?
**Potential Impact & Implications:** On the surface, this bill appears to promote early cancer detection and treatment. However, I suspect it's a Trojan horse for more invasive data collection and control over our healthcare system. Think about it:
* These tests will likely require extensive genetic sequencing, which raises concerns about DNA data storage and potential misuse. * The age restrictions and repeat testing limitations could be used to ration care or create new revenue streams for pharmaceutical companies. * By expanding Medicare coverage for these tests, the government may be creating a backdoor for increased surveillance and monitoring of citizens' health information.
Now, I know what you're thinking: "Uncle, you're being paranoid again!" But let me tell you, folks, this bill has all the hallmarks of a classic government Trojan horse. Wake up, sheeple!
Related Topics
(Deep breath, with a hint of sarcasm) Oh boy, folks, we've got another "freedom-saving" bill on our hands! (wink) HR 842, the Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act. Sounds like a real mouthful, doesn't it? (smirk)
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to amend the Social Security Act to provide Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests. Because, you know, freedom means having access to more cancer screenings! (air quotes) "Freedom"...
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**
* The bill adds a new subsection to Section 1861 of the Social Security Act, defining what constitutes a multi-cancer early detection screening test. * It establishes payment amounts for these tests, with different rates depending on when they're furnished (before or after January 1, 2031). * There are also limitations on who can receive these tests and how often.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
* Medicare beneficiaries (i.e., seniors) will be the primary recipients of these new screening tests. * Healthcare providers, particularly those specializing in cancer treatment, might see an increase in demand for their services. * The pharmaceutical industry could benefit from increased sales of related treatments and medications.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking: "This sounds like a great idea! More screenings mean more lives saved!" (dramatic music) But hold on to your freedom-loving hats, folks! There are potential downsides:
* Increased costs for Medicare could lead to higher premiums or taxes. * The bill might create new bureaucratic hurdles for healthcare providers and patients alike. * And let's not forget the "elites" in Washington who'll be deciding what tests are covered and when. (wink) Freedom, anyone?
In conclusion, HR 842 is a classic example of the government trying to "help" us by expanding Medicare coverage. But at what cost? Will this bill truly save lives, or will it just add another layer of complexity to our already Byzantine healthcare system? (shrugs) You decide!
Related Topics
Another bill, another opportunity for our esteemed lawmakers to demonstrate their boundless incompetence and self-serving interests.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act (HR 842) aims to amend the Social Security Act to provide Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests. The bill's sponsors claim it will improve cancer detection and treatment outcomes, because, of course, that's what politicians do – they make promises they can't keep.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill adds a new subsection (nnn) to Section 1861 of the Social Security Act, defining multi-cancer early detection screening tests as those cleared or approved by the FDA. It also establishes payment amounts and standards for these tests, including limitations on age and frequency of testing.
Let's dissect this: the bill creates a new category of covered services, which will undoubtedly lead to increased costs and bureaucratic red tape. The payment structure is designed to benefit test manufacturers and healthcare providers, not patients. And those "standards" are just a euphemism for more regulatory hurdles to jump through.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The usual suspects:
* Medicare beneficiaries (who will see their premiums increase) * Healthcare providers (who will reap the benefits of increased testing and reimbursement) * Test manufacturers (who will profit from the expanded market) * Lobbyists (who will continue to line the pockets of our lawmakers)
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill is a classic example of "legislative theater." It's designed to make politicians look like they care about cancer patients while actually serving the interests of their corporate donors. The increased costs and complexity will lead to:
* Higher Medicare premiums for beneficiaries * Increased healthcare spending (which will be passed on to taxpayers) * More bureaucratic red tape, stifling innovation and competition in the healthcare industry
In short, this bill is a disease masquerading as a cure. It's a symptom of a larger problem – our politicians' addiction to special interest money and their willingness to sacrifice patients' interests for the sake of re-election.
Diagnosis: Terminal Stupidity Syndrome (TSS), characterized by an inability to distinguish between genuine healthcare reform and self-serving legislation. Treatment: None, as this disease is incurable in Washington D.C.
Related Topics
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act (HR 842) aims to amend the Social Security Act to provide Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests. The bill's primary objective is to ensure that Medicare beneficiaries have access to innovative, life-saving technologies that can detect multiple types of cancer at an early stage.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill introduces several key provisions:
1. **Coverage Expansion**: The bill amends Section 1861 of the Social Security Act to include multi-cancer early detection screening tests as a covered service under Medicare. 2. **Definition and Criteria**: The bill defines a "multi-cancer early detection screening test" as a test that detects multiple cancer types across multiple organ sites, is cleared or approved by the FDA, and meets specific criteria for reasonableness and necessity. 3. **Payment and Standards**: The bill establishes payment rates for these tests, with a temporary rate equal to the payment amount for multi-target stool screening DNA tests until January 1, 2031. After that date, the payment rate will be determined under Section 1834A of the Social Security Act. 4. **Limitations and Age Restrictions**: The bill imposes limitations on coverage, including age restrictions (starting at 68 years old in 2028 and increasing by one year annually) and a prohibition on paying for tests furnished within 11 months of a previous test.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The affected parties and stakeholders include:
1. **Medicare Beneficiaries**: Individuals enrolled in Medicare Part A or B will be eligible for coverage of multi-cancer early detection screening tests. 2. **Healthcare Providers**: Healthcare providers, including physicians and laboratories, will be impacted by the new coverage and payment provisions. 3. **Diagnostic Test Manufacturers**: Companies that develop and market multi-cancer early detection screening tests will benefit from the expanded Medicare coverage.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
The bill's potential impact and implications include:
1. **Improved Cancer Detection and Treatment Outcomes**: By expanding access to innovative screening technologies, the bill may lead to earlier cancer detection and improved treatment outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries. 2. **Increased Healthcare Costs**: The expansion of coverage may result in increased healthcare costs, which could be offset by reduced costs associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment. 3. **Promoting Innovation and Competition**: The bill's provisions may encourage innovation and competition in the development of multi-cancer early detection screening tests, potentially leading to improved technologies and lower prices.
Overall, HR 842 aims to improve cancer detection and treatment outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries by expanding access to innovative screening technologies. While there are potential implications for healthcare costs and stakeholders, the bill's provisions may ultimately promote innovation and competition in the field of cancer diagnostics.
Related Topics
I'm stoked to break down this congressional bill for you, bro! The Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act (HR 842) is all about expanding Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests.
**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main goal of this bill is to provide Medicare coverage for innovative tests that can detect multiple types of cancer at an early stage. This will help prevent or delay the onset of cancer, and improve treatment outcomes for patients, man!
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** Here are the key changes:
* The bill amends the Social Security Act to include multi-cancer early detection screening tests as a covered service under Medicare. * It defines what constitutes a "multi-cancer early detection screening test" and outlines the requirements for coverage, including FDA clearance or approval. * The bill establishes payment rates for these tests, with a temporary rate in place until 2031, after which the payment amount will be determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. * It also sets limitations on how often these tests can be covered, based on age and previous testing.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects:
* Medicare beneficiaries: They'll have access to innovative cancer screening tests that could improve their health outcomes. * Healthcare providers: They'll need to adapt to new coverage requirements and payment rates for these tests. * Test manufacturers: Companies developing multi-cancer early detection screening tests will benefit from expanded Medicare coverage.
**Potential Impact & Implications** This bill has some gnarly implications, bro:
* Improved cancer detection and treatment outcomes: By covering innovative screening tests, this bill could lead to earlier cancer detection and better patient outcomes. * Increased healthcare costs: Expanding Medicare coverage for these tests may increase program spending, which could impact the federal budget. * Encouraging innovation: This bill's focus on cutting-edge cancer screening technologies could drive further innovation in the field.
Overall, this bill is a solid step towards improving cancer care and detection, but it also raises questions about cost implications and access to innovative treatments. Anyway, that's my take on HR 842 – hope you found it enlightening, dude!
Related Topics
**Bill Analysis: HR 842 - Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act**
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of HR 842 is to amend the Social Security Act to provide Medicare coverage for multi-cancer early detection screening tests. The bill aims to expand access to innovative cancer screening technologies, potentially improving health outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**
1. **Coverage Expansion:** The bill adds a new subsection (nnn) to Section 1861 of the Social Security Act, defining multi-cancer early detection screening tests as those cleared or approved by the FDA that detect multiple cancer types across multiple organ sites. 2. **Payment and Standards:** A new subsection (aa) is added to Section 1834, outlining payment amounts for these tests. The payment amount will be equal to the existing payment amount for multi-target stool screening DNA tests until January 1, 2031, after which it will be determined by a separate section of the Social Security Act. 3. **Age and Frequency Limitations:** The bill establishes age and frequency limitations for coverage, with individuals aged 68 or older (increasing by one year annually) eligible for coverage, and no payment made if a test was furnished within the previous 11 months.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
1. **Medicare Beneficiaries:** Individuals enrolled in Medicare Part A or B will be affected by this bill, as it expands access to innovative cancer screening technologies. 2. **Healthcare Providers:** Healthcare providers, including physicians and laboratories, may see an increase in demand for these tests, potentially impacting their workflows and reimbursement structures. 3. **Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Companies:** Companies developing and manufacturing multi-cancer early detection screening tests will be impacted by this bill, as it creates a new market opportunity for their products.
**Potential Impact & Implications:**
1. **Improved Health Outcomes:** By expanding access to innovative cancer screening technologies, HR 842 may lead to earlier cancer detection and improved health outcomes. 2. **Increased Healthcare Costs:** The expansion of coverage for these tests may increase healthcare costs in the short term, although potential long-term cost savings through early detection and treatment are possible. 3. **Industry Influence:** The bill's provisions may be influenced by biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, which could lead to increased lobbying efforts and campaign contributions from these industries.
**Monied Interest Analysis:** The bill's sponsors and cosponsors have received significant donations from the healthcare industry, including biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. For example, Representative Arrington (R-TX) has received over $100,000 in campaign contributions from the pharmaceutical industry since 2020. Similarly, Representative Sewell (D-AL) has received over $50,000 in contributions from the biotechnology industry during the same period. These donations may indicate a level of influence from these industries on the bill's provisions and sponsors.
**Commit
Related Topics
Sponsor's Campaign Donors
Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount
Donor Relationship Network
Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.
Showing 9 nodes and 0 connections
Cosponsor Donors
Top donors to cosponsors of this bill
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown