To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3255 Northwest 94th Avenue in Coral Springs, Florida, as the "Nancy Metayer Post Office Building".

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/8419
Last Updated: August 3, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23]

ID: M001217

Follow the money

The bill

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3255 Northwest 94th Avenue in Coral Springs, Florida, as the "Nancy Metayer Post Office Building".

HR. 8419, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$83,200 raised

26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

40% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Commerce" section, p. 708-710 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

July 21, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

**Summary of H.R. 8419: The Nancy Metayer Post Office Building Designation Act**

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives** The sole purpose of H.R. 8419 is to rename a specific United States Postal Service facility in Coral Springs, Florida, after Nancy Metayer—a local politician and former mayor of the city. This is not a policy reform, not a cost-saving measure, and certainly not an urgent national priority. It is, in essence, a legislative participation trophy: a feel-good gesture dressed up as lawmaking. The objective? To allow a dozen members of Congress to claim they “did something” for their constituents without actually addressing any real problems—like the Postal Service’s financial hemorrhaging, delivery delays, or crumbling infrastructure. Renaming a post office is the political equivalent of putting a bandaid on a gangrenous limb and calling it healing.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill contains two provisions, both as substantive as a sugar pill: - **Section 1(a):** Officially designates the USPS facility at 3255 Northwest 94th Avenue as the “Nancy Metayer Post Office Building.” - **Section 1(b):** Mandates that all future references to this facility in federal documents, maps, or records must use the new name.

That’s it. No funding, no operational changes, no oversight mechanisms. Just a semantic swap. This bill amends nothing of consequence—except perhaps the ego of those involved. It’s the legislative version of changing your LinkedIn title to “Visionary Thought Leader” while doing the same job you’ve had for ten years.

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders** - **Nancy Metayer:** Receives a permanent, taxpayer-funded monument to her local political career. Congratulations, you’ve been immortalized in brick and federal statute—assuming anyone remembers who you are in ten years. - **Local Residents of Coral Springs:** Must now adjust to saying a longer name when mailing letters. Their lives will be profoundly unchanged, except for the mild irritation of updating autocorrect. - **USPS Employees:** Will spend time updating signage and internal systems—time that could be used to, say, deliver mail on time. - **Taxpayers:** Fund the printing of new signs, stationery, and administrative updates. A negligible cost per person, but emblematic of a Congress that prioritizes symbolism over substance. - **The Sponsors (13 members of Congress):** Gain a cheap, low-risk way to claim credit for “honoring a community leader” while avoiding any vote that might actually require courage or controversy.

**4. Potential Impact & Implications** The impact is negligible—except as a symptom of a deeper legislative malaise. This bill exemplifies the atrophy of Congress: when lawmakers spend time on postal renamings instead of tackling debt, inflation, or institutional decay, it reveals a body more interested in reelection theater than governance. - **Symbolic Impact:** Metayer gets a legacy marker; the sponsors get a press release. - **Precedential Impact:** Reinforces the toxic norm that Congress can waste time on trivialities while ignoring systemic failures. - **Cynical Takeaway:** This isn’t honor—it’s political logrolling with a stamp on it. If Nancy Metayer had cured cancer, this might make sense. As it is, it’s a taxpayer-funded ego stroke for a local official and a distraction for a Congress that can’t pass a budget but can sure rename a building.

In short: H.R. 8419 is not a law. It’s a legislative placebo—harmless, pointless, and administered to a patient (the public) who keeps asking for more.

Related Topics

Congressional Rules & ProceduresForeign Aid & Diplomacy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$83,200
18 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$10,600
Committees
$0
Individuals
$72,600

No PAC contributions found

1
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
2 transactions
$6,600
2
ANDREWS LAW FIRM
2 transactions
$2,000
3
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
2 transactions
$2,000

No committee contributions found

1
ZAFFIRINI, CARLOS
2 transactions
$13,200
2
BOGDAN, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$6,600
3
FIGGERS, FREDDIE
2 transactions
$6,600
4
PERKINS, RANDAL
2 transactions
$6,600
5
PRITZKER, MATTHEW
2 transactions
$6,600
6
BOOK, RONALD
1 transaction
$3,300
7
GROSS, SHELDON E
1 transaction
$3,300
8
MILSTEIN, ADAM
1 transaction
$3,300
9
MILSTEIN, GILA
1 transaction
$3,300
10
SANDBERG, SHERYL
1 transaction
$3,300
11
SCHILLER, NEIL MATTHEW
1 transaction
$3,300
12
SIMON, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
13
SIMON, JACQUELINE
1 transaction
$3,300
14
GOLDBERG, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$3,300
15
HEMPHILL, CHARLES
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Frost, Maxwell [D-FL-10]

ID: F000476

Top Contributors

22

1
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$1,000
Jun 28, 2024
2
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS
$500
Sep 26, 2023
3
HULL, MEGAN
SELF EMPLOYED • ACTIVIST
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Nov 17, 2024
4
HARRIS, WILLIAM
PERKINS + WILL • ARCHITECT
IndividualCAMBRIDGE, MA
$3,300
Oct 29, 2023
5
BOYLAND, DORIAN
BOYLAND AUTO ORLANDO • BUSINESS OWNER
IndividualWINDERMERE, FL
$3,300
Oct 13, 2023
6
TILLMAN, BRIAN
WINDOW WORLD • OWNER
IndividualORLANDO, FL
$3,300
Oct 20, 2023
7
PISCITELLI, JUNE
SMARTHINKING • INSTRUCTOR
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$3,300
Oct 6, 2023
8
WILLIAMS, TERESA
SELF EMPLOYED • MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT
IndividualWINTER PARK, FL
$3,300
Dec 2, 2023
9
HARRIS, WILLIAM
PERKINS + WILL • ARCHITECT
IndividualCAMBRIDGE, MA
$3,300
Oct 29, 2023
10
PISCITELLI, JUNE
SMARTHINKING • INSTRUCTOR
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$3,300
Oct 6, 2023

Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20]

ID: C001127

Top Contributors

23

1
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Nov 4, 2024
2
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Aug 20, 2024
3
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Sep 8, 2023
4
FIGGERS, FREDDIE
FIGGERS • INVENTOR
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$6,600
Jun 8, 2023
5
FIGGERS, FREDDIE
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$6,600
Sep 25, 2023
6
MOISE, RUDOLPH
IndividualDAVIE, FL
$3,300
Oct 7, 2024
7
GEORGE, DAVID J.
REFUEL DEPOT LLC • SALES
IndividualLEADWOOD, KS
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024
8
GOLDEN, SYLVIA
NONE • RETIRED
IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Aug 18, 2024
9
GORI, PHILIP
SELF • INVESTOR
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$3,300
Sep 16, 2024
10
MUELLER, KYLE
ZUTEK • DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
IndividualOLATHE, KS
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024

Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24]

ID: W000808

Top Contributors

21

1
MAGELLAN HOUSING
OrganizationSUGAR LAND, TX
$1,500
Mar 27, 2024
2
LEHMAN, WILLIAM JR.
LEHMAN DEALERSHIP ENTERPRISES • PRESIDENT
IndividualMIAMI, FL
$5,000
Jul 18, 2024
3
LEHMAN, WILLIAM JR.
IndividualMIAMI, FL
$3,400
Aug 2, 2024
4
SANDBERG, SHERYL
NOT EMPLOYED • PHILANTHROPIST
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023
5
ARISON, MADELEINE
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualBAL HARBOUR, FL
$3,300
Mar 6, 2023
6
ARISON, MICKY
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualBAL HARBOUR, FL
$3,300
Mar 6, 2023
7
LEHMAN, WILLIAM JR.
LEHMAN DEALERSHIP ENTERPRISES • PRESIDENT
IndividualMIAMI, FL
$3,300
Jun 28, 2023
8
MOISE, RUDOLPH
SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN
IndividualDAVIE, FL
$3,300
Jul 18, 2024
9
STIEFEL, BARBARA
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualCORAL GABLES, FL
$3,300
Jul 18, 2024
10
ACCIME, HERICKSON
KEMET GROUP • ENGINEER
IndividualMIAMI, FL
$3,300
Jul 14, 2023

Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

ID: W000797

Top Contributors

30

1
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$2,500
Mar 27, 2023
2
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Jul 31, 2024
3
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Jul 30, 2024
4
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Aug 28, 2023
5
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS -- GOVERNMENTAL GEN
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$1,500
Jun 28, 2024
6
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS -- GOVERNMENTAL GEN
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$1,500
May 23, 2023
7
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE
OrganizationMIAMI, FL
$1,000
Feb 15, 2024
8
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$1,000
Jun 30, 2024
9
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$1,000
Jun 10, 2024
10
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$1,000
Sep 25, 2023

Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]

ID: C001066

Top Contributors

23

1
SEMINOLE TRIBE
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Jun 30, 2024
2
SEMINOLE TRIBE
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Aug 25, 2023
3
BGR PAC
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$925
Sep 13, 2024
4
OBERHELMAN, DIANE
CULLINAN PROPERTIES • FOUNDER
IndividualEDWARDS, IL
$3,300
Dec 3, 2024
5
III, WILLIAM H. GATES
BREAKTHROUGH ENERGY; GATES FOUNDATION • PHILANTHROPIST
IndividualREDMOND, WA
$3,300
Oct 19, 2023
6
OBERHELMAN, DIANE
CULLINAN PROPERTIES • FOUNDER
IndividualEDWARDS, IL
$3,300
Jun 16, 2023
7
BOSQUEZ, RAMON
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualST PETERSBURG, FL
$3,300
Mar 29, 2024
8
EDLOW, MR.JACK
EDLOW INTERNATIONAL COMPANY • CONSULTANT
IndividualTAMPA, FL
$3,300
Mar 28, 2024
9
SNELL, RAND R
SELF-EMPLOYED • COMPOSER
IndividualST PETERSBURG, FL
$3,300
Mar 18, 2024
10
BURGESS, TREVOR R.
TRB DEVELOPMENT • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
IndividualST PETERSBURG, FL
$3,300
Apr 2, 2024

Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9]

ID: S001200

Top Contributors

29

1
ACROSS THE AISLE PAC
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Jan 12, 2023
2
TED LIEU FOR CONGRESS
CCMLOS ANGELES, CA
$1,000
Mar 30, 2023
3
ACROSS THE AISLE PAC
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Mar 23, 2023
4
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Oct 24, 2024
5
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$3,300
Mar 28, 2023
6
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$3,300
Jun 7, 2024
7
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Jul 31, 2024
8
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Aug 18, 2023
9
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF GRAND RONDE
OrganizationGRAND RONDE, OR
$1,000
Mar 3, 2023
10
COOPER, MILTON
KIMCO • CHAIRMAN
IndividualOLD WESTBURY, NY
$3,300
Nov 1, 2024

Rep. Frankel, Lois [D-FL-22]

ID: F000462

Top Contributors

22

1
PRH INVESTMENTS LLC
OrganizationMIAMI, FL
$3,300
Jul 7, 2023
2
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$1,500
May 19, 2023
3
CURTIS, ALAN
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$6,600
Feb 21, 2024
4
CURTIS, ALAN
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$6,600
Feb 26, 2024
5
GREENE, JEFF
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Oct 17, 2024
6
GREENE, MEI SZE
N/A • HOMEMAKER
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Oct 17, 2024
7
BELL, MARC
MARC BELL CAPITAL • MANAGING PARTNER
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$3,300
Nov 6, 2023
8
BELL, MARC
MARC BELL CAPITAL • MANAGING PARTNER
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$3,300
Nov 6, 2023
9
BERNSTEIN, JAY
NIC HOLDING CORP • TRADING
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Dec 9, 2023
10
BERNSTEIN, JAY
NIC HOLDING CORP • TRADING
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Dec 9, 2023

Rep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27]

ID: S000168

Top Contributors

23

1
POARCH BANK OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$3,300
May 26, 2023
2
POARCH BANK OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$3,300
Jun 7, 2024
3
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE
OrganizationMIAMI, FL
$1,000
Dec 19, 2023
4
DIAZ-OLIVER, REMEDIOS MRS.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualMIAMI, FL
$6,600
Dec 29, 2023
5
FALIC, JANA
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualBAL HARBOUR, FL
$6,600
Dec 31, 2023
6
MENDOZA GOMEZ, ROSSY A.
ROSE CAFE • OWNER
IndividualCORAL GABLES, FL
$6,600
Dec 29, 2023
7
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualSURFSIDE, FL
$6,600
Oct 17, 2023
8
WEEKLEY, RICHARD
SELF-EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$6,600
Nov 7, 2023
9
BARQUET, ROY
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP • ATTORNEY
IndividualMIAMI, FL
$6,600
Dec 6, 2023
10
PETERFFY, THOMAS
INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP • CHAIRMAN
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$6,600
Dec 27, 2023

Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19]

ID: D000032

Top Contributors

22

1
SHANNON GREEN COLLECTION
OrganizationNAPLES, FL
$500
Dec 28, 2023
2
NAPLES SMART, LLC
OrganizationNAPLES, FL
$250
Jun 4, 2024
3
COX, JOE B
NELSON MULLINS • ATTORNEY
IndividualNAPLES, FL
$6,600
Dec 30, 2023
4
STALLINGS, KYLE
DESERT ROYALTY COMPANY • FOUNDER/CEO
IndividualMIDLAND, TX
$6,600
Mar 9, 2023
5
ZALIK, DAVID
GOLDMAN SACHS • EXECUTIVE
IndividualMARIETTA, GA
$6,600
Jan 3, 2024
6
ZALIK, HELEN
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualATLANTA, GA
$6,600
Jan 6, 2024
7
BAUM, DAVID
ENTREPRENEUR • ENTREPRENEUR
IndividualSANIBEL, FL
$6,600
Feb 13, 2024
8
WALDRIP, EMORY
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualNAPLES, FL
$6,600
May 20, 2023
9
MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE
DMM PROPRIETA MANAGEMENT • MANAGER
IndividualASPEN, CO
$6,600
Jun 7, 2024
10
MANDELBLATT, ERIC
SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP • MANAGING PARTNER
IndividualASPEN, CO
$6,600
Jun 7, 2024

Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]

ID: L000596

Top Contributors

0

No contribution data available

Donor Network - Rep. Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 41 nodes and 60 connections

Total contributions: $60

Top Donors - Rep. Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs15 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Commerce

Minimal
Vector: 54%
Pages: 708-710AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a ceremonial naming of a post office facility with no connection to the Department of Commerce, NOAA, or any of the policy objectives outlined in Project 2025 regarding commercialization, restructuring, or climate-related functions."

— 675 — Department of Commerce l The National Ocean Service (NOS); l The Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR); l The National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS); l The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS); and l The Office of Marine and Aviation Operations and NOAA Corps. Together, these form a colossal operation that has become one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry and, as such, is harmful to future U.S. prosperity. This industry’s mission emphasis on prediction and management seems designed around the fatal conceit of planning for the unplannable. That is not to say NOAA is useless, but its current organization corrupts its useful func- tions. It should be broken up and downsized. NOAA today boasts that it is a provider of environmental information services, a provider of environmental stewardship services, and a leader in applied scientific research. Each of these functions could be provided commercially, likely at lower cost and higher quality. Focus the NWS on Commercial Operations. Each day, Americans rely on weather forecasts and warnings provided by local radio stations and colleges that are produced not by the NWS, but by private companies such as AccuWeather. Studies have found that the forecasts and warnings provided by the private com- panies are more reliable than those provided by the NWS.2 The NWS provides data the private companies use and should focus on its data-gathering services. Because private companies rely on these data, the NWS should fully commercialize its forecasting operations. NOAA does not currently utilize commercial partnerships as some other agencies do. Commercialization of weather technologies should be prioritized to ensure that taxpayer dollars are invested in the most cost-efficient technol- ogies for high quality research and weather data. Investing in different sizes of commercial partners will increase competition while ensuring that the govern- ment solutions provided by each contract is personalized to the needs of NOAA’s weather programs. The NWS should be a candidate to become a Performance-Based Organization to better enforce organizational focus on core functions such as efficient delivery of accurate, timely, and unbiased data to the public and to the private sector.3 Review the Work of the National Hurricane Center and the National Environmental Satellite Service. The National Hurricane Center and National Environmental Satellite Service data centers provide important public safety and

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Minimal
Vector: 53%
Pages: 443-445AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a purely ceremonial designation of a post office facility with no connection to energy policy, grid security, or Department of Energy initiatives outlined in the Project 2025 policy section."

— 411 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions 19. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13920, “Securing the United States Bulk-Power System,” May 1, 2020, in Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 86 (May 4, 2020), pp. 26595–26599, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2020-05-04/pdf/2020-09695.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 20. 18 U.S. Code § 824a(c), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/824a (accessed February 27, 2023). 21. Report No. 117-98, Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2022, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives, 117th Cong. 1st Sess., July 20, 2021, p. 6, https:// www.congress.gov/117/crpt/hrpt98/CRPT-117hrpt98.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 22. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 11-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, Division J, Title III. 23. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, p. 7. 24. Timothy Gardner, “White House Asks Congress for $500 mln to Modernize Oil Reserve,” Reuters, November 16, 2022, https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-oil-spr-idAFL1N32C36I (accessed February 13, 2023). 25. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Our History,” https://www.energy.gov/oe/about-us/our- history (accessed February 13, 2023). 26. Press release, “Secretary of Energy Signs Order to Mitigate Security Risks to the Nation’s Electric Grid,” U.S. Department of Energy, December 17, 2021, https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-energy-signs-order- mitigate-security-risks-nations-electric-grid (accessed February 13, 2023). 27. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Revocation of Prohibition Order Securing Critical Defense Facilities,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 76 (April 22, 2021), pp. 21308–21309, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2021-04-22/pdf/2021-08483.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 28. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19 and 61. 29. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/ne/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 30. H.R. 3809, Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, Public Law No. 97-425, 97th Congress, January 7, 1983, https:// www.congress.gov/97/statute/STATUTE-96/STATUTE-96-Pg2201.pdf (accessed February 24, 2023). 31. The Heritage Foundation, “Budget Blueprint for Fiscal Year 2023: Reduce the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy,” https://www.heritage.org/budget/pages/recommendations/1.270.127.html. 32. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 23 and 58. 33. 42 USC § 16291, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/16291 (accessed February 27, 2023). 34. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, “About Us: Mission,” https:// www.energy.gov/fecm/mission (accessed February 13, 2023). 35. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Carbon Capture and Storage: Actions Needed to Improve DOE Management of Demonstration Projects, GAO-22-105111, December2021, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22- 105111.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 36. International Energy Agency, The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, World Energy Outlook Special Report, revised March 2022, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ffd2a83b-8c30-4e9d-980a- 52b6d9a86fdc/TheRoleofCriticalMineralsinCleanEnergyTransitions.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 37. See 42 U.S. Code § 16291. 38. 42 U.S. Code Ch. 55, §§ 4321–4347, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/chapter-55 (accessed February 27, 2023). 39. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Comment, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 87 (May 7, 2021), pp. 24514–24516, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-05-07/pdf/2021-09675.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023), and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Reopening of Comment Period, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 160 (August 23, 2021), pp. 47032–47033, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-08-23/pdf/2021-18058.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 40. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19, 21, 23, and 52. — 412 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 41. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 3, 6, 12, 19, 21, and 23. 42. S. 622, Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Public Law 94-163, 94th Congress, December 22, 1975, https:// www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-89/STATUTE-89-Pg871.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 43. H.R. 6, Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law No. 109-58, 109th Congress, August 8, 2005, https://www. congress.gov/109/plaws/publ58/PLAW-109publ58.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 44. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, “About the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,” https://www.energy.gov/eere/about-office-energy-efficiency-and- renewable-energy (accessed February 28, 2023). 45. Ibid. 46. See note 41, supra. 47. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19, 23, 43, and 49. 48. See U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/gdo/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 49. U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, “Building a Better Grid Initiative,” https://www.energy. gov/gdo/building-better-grid-initiative (accessed February 13, 2023). 50. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 2, 19, 21, 23, and 84. “The FY 2023 Budget Request to Congress proposes to split the Electricity appropriation account into two accounts: Electricity and Grid Deployment Office (GDO). Had the proposed FY 2023 structure been in place in FY 2021 and FY 2022, the $7,000,000 shown under the Electricity account’s Transmission Permitting and Technical Assistance (TPTA) program would have appeared under Grid Technical Assistance in GDO and the $3,000,000 shown under Program Direction in the Electricity account represents the estimated share of Electricity PD funding associated with TPTA and would have appeared under Program Direction in GDO.” Ibid., p. 84, note. 51. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “About Us: Our Mission,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 52. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, p. 6. 53. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “About Us: Our Story,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/about-us (accessed February 28, 2023). 54. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “OCED Project Portfolio,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/office-clean-energy-demonstrations (accessed February 28, 2023). 55. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Volume 3, Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, Federal Energy Management Program, Grid Deployment Office, Indian Energy Policy & Programs, Loan Programs, Manufacturing & Energy Supply Chains, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, Petroleum Reserves, Power Marketing Administrations, State and Community Energy Programs, April 2022, p. 104, https://www.energy. gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/doe-fy2023-budget-volume-3-v2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 56. See, for example, ibid., pp. 104 and 107. 57. U.S. Department of Energy, Loan Program Office, “LPO Year in Review 2022: New Legislation,” January 5, 2023, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/lpo-year-review-2022 (accessed February 28, 2023). Emphases in original. 58. H.R. 6256, To Ensure That Goods Made with Forced Labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China Do Not Enter the United States Market, and for Other Purposes, Public Law No. 117-78, 117th Congress, December 23, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ78/PLAW-117publ78.pdf (accessed February 28, 2023). 59. H.R. 2272, America COMPETES Act, Public Law 110–69, 110th Congress, August 9, 2007, § 5012, https://www. congress.gov/110/plaws/publ69/PLAW-110publ69.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 60. Ibid., § 5012(c)(1). 61. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, March 2022, p. 103.

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal
Vector: 53%
Pages: 180-182AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a purely ceremonial designation of a post office facility with no connection to immigration policy, homeland security, or USCIS reforms outlined in Project 2025."

— 147 — Department of Homeland Security Personnel USCIS should be classified as a national security–sensitive agency, and all of its employees should be classified as holding national security–sensitive posi- tions. Leaks must be investigated and punished as they would be in a national security agency, and the union should be decertified. Any employees who cannot accept that change and cannot conform their behavior to the standards required by such an agency should be separated. USCIS’s D.C. personnel presence should be skeletal, and agency employees with operational or security roles should be rotated out to offices throughout the United States. These USCIS employees should live and work in the communities that are most affected by their daily duties and decisions. NECESSARY BORDER AND IMMIGRATION STATUTORY, REGULATORY, AND ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES The current border security crisis was made possible by glaring loopholes in our immigration system. The result was a preventable and predictable his- toric increase in illegal and inadmissible encounters along our southern border. This pulled limited resources from the front lines of our nation’s borders and away from their national security mission, releasing a vast and complex set of threats into our country. To regain our sovereignty, integrity, and security, Congress must pass meaningful legislation to close the current loopholes and prevent future Administrations from exploiting them for political gain or per- sonal ideology. Legislative Proposals l Title 42 authority in Title 8. Create an authority akin to the Title 42 Public Health authority that has been used during the COVID-19 pandemic to expel illegal aliens across the border immediately when certain non- health conditions are met, such as loss of operational control of the border. l Mandatory appropriation for border wall system infrastructure. The monies appropriated would be used to fund the construction of additional border wall systems, technology, and personnel in strategic locations in accordance with the Border Security Improvement Plan (BSIP). l Appropriation for Port of Entry infrastructure. Border security is not addressed solely by systems in between the ports of entry. POEs require technology and physical upgrades as well as an influx of personnel to meet capacity demands and act as the literal gatekeepers for the country. This is the first line of defense against drug and human smuggling operations.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills