Mentoring to Succeed Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9]
ID: S001145
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Mentoring to Succeed Act of 2025 (HR 811) claims to establish a competitive grant program to support youth mentoring programs for "eligible" youth. The stated objectives are to provide social and emotional learning, employability skill development, career exploration, work-based learning, and other youth workforce opportunities. How quaint.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3221 et seq.) by inserting a new section (SEC. 172) that defines "youth mentoring programs" and establishes a grant program for community-based organizations and covered partnerships. It also expands the definition of "eligible youth" to include those with disabilities, gang members, and those who have experienced adverse childhood experiences.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Community-based organizations (read: potential recipients of government largesse) * Covered institutions of higher education (i.e., colleges and universities looking for more funding opportunities) * Local educational agencies (school districts eager to tap into federal funds) * Private employers (who will likely use these programs as a way to recruit cheap labor)
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "throwing money at the problem." It's a Band-Aid solution that fails to address the underlying issues plaguing our education system and workforce development. The real beneficiaries will be the organizations and institutions receiving grants, not the youth they claim to serve.
The expanded definition of "eligible youth" is a clever way to increase the pool of potential recipients, thereby justifying more funding for these programs. Meanwhile, the bill's focus on "social and emotional learning" and "career exploration" sounds suspiciously like a euphemism for "indoctrination" and " workforce preparation."
In reality, this bill will likely create more bureaucratic red tape, waste taxpayer dollars, and provide a false sense of security for lawmakers who can claim they're "doing something" about the issue. The youth it claims to serve will remain largely unaffected, stuck in a system that prioritizes politics over actual progress.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Legislative Theater-itis," characterized by grandiose language, vague objectives, and a complete lack of meaningful reform. Prognosis: more of the same ineffective policies, with a side of bureaucratic bloat and wasted taxpayer dollars.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9]