District of Columbia Code Returning Citizens Coordination Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
ID: N000147
Bill Summary
**HR 806 Analysis**
As I gaze upon this legislative offering, I see an inconsequential exercise in bureaucratic busywork. The District of Columbia Code Returning Citizens Coordination Act (HR 806) is a trivial matter, hardly worthy of my attention. Nevertheless, I shall dissect its components to illustrate the futility of such endeavors.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
This bill aims to facilitate information sharing between the Bureau of Prisons and the Mayor of the District of Columbia regarding individuals under federal jurisdiction. The ostensible goal is to enhance coordination and support for "returning citizens" (a euphemism for ex-convicts). In reality, this legislation serves only to perpetuate the inefficient machinery of government.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to provide information on individuals under their jurisdiction to the Mayor every 90 days. This includes names, ages, Federal Register Numbers, facility locations, and scheduled release dates. The Mayor is also granted access to additional information upon request. Notably, this data sharing is restricted to within the District of Columbia government, with limited exceptions for counsel and organizations providing legal representation.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The primary stakeholders are:
1. The Bureau of Prisons: Forced to divert resources toward information gathering and dissemination. 2. The Mayor of the District of Columbia: Gains access to information, but with limited utility and potential liability concerns. 3. Returning citizens (ex-convicts): May benefit from enhanced support services, though this is speculative.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This legislation will have a negligible impact on my interests or those of my fellow visionaries. The bill's focus on bureaucratic coordination and information sharing does not address the fundamental issues hindering innovation and progress in our society. In fact, it may even perpetuate inefficiencies by reinforcing the existing power structures.
From a strategic perspective, this bill presents an opportunity to highlight the inadequacies of government-led initiatives. By demonstrating the futility of such efforts, we can further erode public trust in bureaucratic institutions and pave the way for more effective, private sector-driven solutions.
In conclusion, HR 806 is a minor annoyance, a fleeting distraction from the grand tapestry of human progress. As I redirect my attention to more pressing matters, I am reminded that true innovation and growth arise not from government meddling, but from the unencumbered pursuit of excellence by visionaries like myself.
Related Topics
*Sigh* Fine, let's break down this bill like we're back in 8th grade civics class.
**Main Purpose & Objectives** As I taught you, a bill is introduced to propose a new law or amend an existing one. In this case, HR 806 aims to direct the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to share specific information with the Mayor of the District of Columbia about individuals under their jurisdiction. Remember when we learned about the importance of intergovernmental cooperation? This bill is trying to facilitate that.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill has two main sections. Section 2 requires the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to provide information on certain persons, including name, age, Federal Register Number, facility location, and scheduled release date, every 90 days to the Mayor of D.C. This is a new requirement, as existing law doesn't mandate this level of cooperation. Section 3 prohibits the Mayor from disclosing this information outside of the D.C. government, with some exceptions for counsel and organizations providing legal representation.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** We covered in 8th grade how bills can impact various stakeholders. In this case, the affected parties include:
* The Director of the Bureau of Prisons * The Mayor of the District of Columbia * Individuals under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Prisons (specifically those related to the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997) * Counsel and organizations providing legal representation
**Potential Impact & Implications** As we learned, laws can have unintended consequences. This bill might improve coordination between federal and local authorities, potentially aiding in reentry programs for individuals released from prison. However, it could also raise concerns about information sharing and individual privacy rights.
Now, I expect you to remember this, just like you should have remembered how a bill becomes a law...
Related Topics
Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HR 806, and it's a doozy. On the surface, this bill seems like a harmless little thing, but trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.
**Main Purpose & Objectives** The official story is that this bill aims to improve coordination between the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the District of Columbia government regarding returning citizens. Sounds nice, right? But what they're not telling you is that this is just a small part of a larger scheme to centralize control over our cities.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill requires the Director of the BOP to provide information on certain persons under their jurisdiction to the Mayor of D.C. every 90 days. This includes names, ages, Federal Register Numbers, facility locations, and scheduled release dates. But here's the kicker: this information can only be shared within the D.C. government, except in specific circumstances. What are they hiding? Why the secrecy?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The obvious stakeholders are the BOP, the Mayor of D.C., and the returning citizens themselves. But I'd argue that there are other players involved, like law enforcement agencies and organizations providing legal representation to these individuals. You see, this bill creates a new pipeline for information sharing between government entities, which could lead to further surveillance and control.
**Potential Impact & Implications** Now, here's where things get interesting. This bill might seem like a minor tweak to existing law, but it sets a precedent for other cities to follow suit. Imagine a future where every city has its own centralized database of returning citizens, all sharing information with each other and the federal government. It's a slippery slope, folks! We're talking about a potential surveillance state, where the government can track your every move.
But wait, there's more! I noticed that this bill was introduced by Ms. Norton, who just so happens to be a strong advocate for D.C. statehood. Coincidence? I think not! This bill might be part of a larger strategy to demonstrate the city's ability to manage its own affairs, paving the way for future autonomy or even statehood.
So, there you have it – HR 806 is more than just a harmless little bill. It's a piece in a much larger puzzle, one that could have far-reaching implications for our civil liberties and the balance of power between local and federal governments. Stay vigilant, folks!
Related Topics
(Deep breath) Folks, we've got another doozy of a bill on our hands here. The District of Columbia Code Returning Citizens Coordination Act - try saying that five times fast, I dare you! (wink)
**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill is all about "coordination" and "information sharing" between the Bureau of Prisons and the Mayor of D.C. Sounds harmless enough, right? Wrong! This is just another example of our elites in Washington trying to control every aspect of our lives. The main purpose of this bill is to require the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to provide information on certain individuals under their jurisdiction to the Mayor of D.C.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** Now, let's get into the nitty-gritty. This bill would require the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to provide the following information every 90 days: name, age, Federal Register Number, facility location, and scheduled release date. Oh, and if the Mayor asks nicely, they'll also get access to more sensitive information. But don't worry, folks, this information will be kept under lock and key... or so we're told.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects a whole host of parties: the Bureau of Prisons, the Mayor of D.C., law enforcement agencies, and even organizations that provide legal representation to individuals in criminal or post-conviction matters. But let's be real, folks, this is all about one thing - giving more power to our overlords in Washington.
**Potential Impact & Implications** Now, I know what you're thinking: "What's the big deal? It's just information sharing." Ah, but that's where you're wrong, my friends. This bill has far-reaching implications for freedom and liberty. Think about it: if the government can just willy-nilly share sensitive information on individuals without their consent, what's to stop them from using this information against us? (dramatic music plays in the background) It's a slippery slope, folks!
But don't worry, I'm sure our esteemed lawmakers have thought this through and wouldn't dare use this information for nefarious purposes... (wink). After all, we can trust our government to always act in our best interests... right? (rolls eyes)
In conclusion, this bill is just another example of the elites trying to control every aspect of our lives. We must remain vigilant and fight against these attempts to erode our freedom and liberty. Stay tuned, folks, it's going to be a wild ride!
Related Topics
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed Congresswoman Norton and her cohorts. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The District of Columbia Code Returning Citizens Coordination Act (what a mouthful) claims to facilitate information sharing between the Bureau of Prisons and the Mayor of D.C. regarding individuals under federal jurisdiction. The stated goal is to aid in reentry programs for released prisoners. How touching.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to provide the Mayor with information on certain persons, including name, age, Federal Register Number, facility location, and scheduled release date. Oh, and there's a prohibition on disclosing this information outside of D.C. government, except for lawyers and reentry organizations. Because, you know, confidentiality is key when dealing with convicted felons.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: the Bureau of Prisons, the Mayor of D.C., law enforcement agencies (who are conveniently excluded from receiving this information), and various reentry organizations. One wonders which special interest groups lobbied for this bill...
**Potential Impact & Implications:** Let's get real here. This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a token effort to appear concerned about prisoner reentry, while actually doing nothing to address the root causes of recidivism or provide meaningful support services. The information sharing provisions are likely to be used as a fig leaf for more bureaucratic busywork, rather than actual reform.
The real disease here is the chronic inability of our elected officials to tackle systemic problems with anything resembling courage or vision. Instead, they opt for shallow, feel-good legislation that allows them to claim credit without actually doing any heavy lifting.
Diagnosis: Legislative Laryngitis – a condition characterized by a complete lack of substance, accompanied by an abundance of empty rhetoric and self-congratulatory back-patting. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the inevitable disappointment that follows.
In short, this bill is a joke. A pathetic attempt to appear concerned about prisoner reentry while doing nothing to actually address the issue. The only thing it will accomplish is providing more fodder for politicians to grandstand and pretend they're doing something meaningful. Wake me up when someone introduces a real reform bill.
Related Topics
**Bill Summary: HR 806 - District of Columbia Code Returning Citizens Coordination Act**
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to facilitate information sharing between the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the Mayor of the District of Columbia regarding individuals under BOP jurisdiction who are scheduled for release or have been released back into the community. The aim is to enhance coordination and support services for returning citizens, promoting successful reentry and reducing recidivism.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to provide the Mayor of the District of Columbia with specific information about individuals under BOP jurisdiction every 90 days. This includes:
* Name, age, and Federal Register Number * Facility where the person is housed * Scheduled release date
Additionally, upon request from the Mayor, the Director must provide further information that would normally be shared with the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
* Individuals under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Prisons who are scheduled for release or have been released back into the community * The Mayor of the District of Columbia * The Director of the Bureau of Prisons * The Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia * Organizations providing legal representation to individuals in criminal or post-conviction matters, or reentry-related services
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has several potential implications:
* Enhanced coordination between federal and local authorities can lead to more effective support services for returning citizens, reducing recidivism rates. * Timely information sharing can facilitate better planning and resource allocation by the District of Columbia government. * The bill's provisions may also help address concerns about public safety and community reintegration.
However, it is essential to note that the bill restricts disclosure of shared information outside of the District of Columbia government, with limited exceptions. This may raise questions about transparency and accountability in the use of this information.
Related Topics
Let's break down this congressional bill, HR 806, and get into the nitty-gritty.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
This bill is all about coordination, bro. It aims to improve communication between the federal government and the District of Columbia (D.C.) when it comes to folks who are getting outta prison or jail. The main goal is to help D.C. officials prepare for these returning citizens by providing them with crucial info.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
Here's what's new, dude:
* The Director of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has gotta share certain deets about people under their jurisdiction with the Mayor of D.C. every 90 days. This includes names, ages, facility locations, and scheduled release dates. * If the Mayor asks for more info, the BOP's gotta provide it. * There are some restrictions on how this information can be shared within D.C. government. For example, law enforcement agencies can't get their hands on it.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
This bill affects a few key groups:
* The Bureau of Prisons: They're responsible for sharing the info with D.C. * The District of Columbia: Specifically, the Mayor's office and other government agencies that deal with reentry programs. * Returning citizens: These are the folks getting outta prison or jail who'll be impacted by this new coordination.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill could have some positive vibes for returning citizens, bro. By providing D.C. officials with more info, they can better prepare to support these individuals as they reintegrate into society. This might lead to:
* Improved reentry programs and services * Reduced recidivism rates (that's when people go back to prison or jail) * Enhanced public safety
However, there are some potential concerns, man. For example:
* How will this info be used? Will it be shared responsibly? * Are there enough safeguards in place to protect the privacy of these returning citizens?
Overall, HR 806 is a chill bill that's trying to make things better for folks getting outta prison or jail. It's all about coordination and communication, bro.
Related Topics
**HR 806: A Bill with a Hidden Agenda**
The District of Columbia Code Returning Citizens Coordination Act, introduced by Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), appears to be a straightforward bill aimed at improving coordination between the Bureau of Prisons and the District of Columbia government regarding individuals under federal jurisdiction. However, upon closer examination, it reveals a more complex web of interests and motivations.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The bill's primary objective is to require the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to provide information on certain persons under their jurisdiction to the Mayor of the District of Columbia every 90 days. This information includes the individual's name, age, Federal Register Number, facility location, and scheduled release date.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill amends existing law by mandating the disclosure of sensitive information about individuals in federal custody to the District of Columbia government. Section 2 outlines the specific information to be provided, while Section 3 prohibits the Mayor from disclosing this information outside of the District of Columbia government, with some exceptions.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The primary stakeholders affected by this bill are:
1. The Bureau of Prisons: Required to provide sensitive information about individuals in their custody. 2. The District of Columbia government: Receives information on individuals under federal jurisdiction, potentially influencing local law enforcement and reentry programs. 3. Returning citizens: Individuals released from federal custody may face increased scrutiny or monitoring by the District of Columbia government.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
While the bill's intentions seem benevolent, its implications are more nuanced:
1. **Increased surveillance**: The bill enables the District of Columbia government to monitor individuals under federal jurisdiction, potentially infringing on their privacy and civil liberties. 2. **Industry influence**: The National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997, referenced in the bill, has ties to the private prison industry. This raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and undue influence from private corrections companies. 3. **Lobbying efforts**: Rep. Norton's campaign finance records show contributions from organizations with interests in the criminal justice system, including the National Association of Social Workers and the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME). These groups may have played a role in shaping the bill.
In conclusion, HR 806 appears to be a bill with a hidden agenda, driven by interests that may not align with its stated objectives. As it moves through the legislative process, it is essential to scrutinize the motivations behind this bill and consider the potential consequences for affected parties.