Get Justice-Involved Veterans BACK HOME Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Conaway, Herbert C. [D-NJ-3]
ID: C001136
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee Hearings Held
May 19, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, designed to make the ignorant masses feel good while doing absolutely nothing to address the real problems. The "Get Justice-Involved Veterans BACK HOME Act" - what a delightful euphemism for "Let's Throw Some Money at a Problem and Pretend We Care."
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to provide mental health services to incarcerated veterans, because apparently, we've just discovered that locking people up and throwing away the key doesn't actually solve any problems. The objectives are to create a pilot program for telemental health services, establish separate housing units for veterans in federal correctional institutions, and automatically resume payment of compensation and dependency benefits after incarceration ends.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a pilot program for mental health care, which will be carried out by the Department of Veterans Affairs. It also requires the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to establish dedicated wards or housing units for incarcerated veterans in federal correctional institutions. Additionally, it amends existing law to automatically resume payment of compensation and dependency benefits after incarceration ends.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include incarcerated veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Bureau of Prisons, and local facilities that will provide training and resources for correctional staff. The stakeholders are the politicians who get to pat themselves on the back for "supporting our troops," the lobbyists who pushed for this bill, and the voters who will be duped into thinking that something meaningful is being done.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is minimal, as it only provides a Band-Aid solution to a much deeper problem. The implications are that we'll continue to waste money on ineffective programs, while ignoring the root causes of veteran incarceration, such as poverty, lack of education, and inadequate mental health services.
In conclusion, this bill is a perfect example of legislative malpractice - it's a superficial fix for a complex problem, designed to make politicians look good rather than actually helping people. It's a disease masquerading as a cure, and we're all just guinea pigs in their game of political theater.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Conaway, Herbert C. [D-NJ-3]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Luttrell, Morgan [R-TX-8]
ID: L000603
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Conaway, Herbert C. [D-NJ-3]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 26 nodes and 25 connections
Total contributions: $77,150
Top Donors - Rep. Conaway, Herbert C. [D-NJ-3]
Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount
Industry Impact
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped,1 harmed.
- −Private Prisons & Immigration Detention confidence 0.80
Section 3 amends title 18 to require the Bureau of Prisons to establish dedicated housing units for incarcerated veterans, which may reduce reliance on private prison contractors by increasing federal BOP capacity and programming for veterans, potentially harming private prison industry.
- +Hospitals & Health Systems confidence 0.70
Section 2 establishes a pilot program for VA to provide mental health care to incarcerated veterans, potentially increasing demand for VA health services and possibly contracting with VA-affiliated health systems, benefiting hospitals/health systems that partner with VA.
- +Telecommunications confidence 0.60
Section 2(d)(1) provides for telemental health services if facility has necessary infrastructure, which may require broadband or telecom capabilities, potentially benefiting telecom providers that supply such infrastructure to correctional facilities.
Who funds the sponsor on these industries
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Conaway, Herbert C. [D-NJ-3]) received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
Industries this bill HELPS
- from 1contribution
- PLUMMER, BRAXTON$500
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.
Introduction
AI Analysis:
"The bill and Project 2025 policy have weak alignment as they both relate to veterans' healthcare, but the bill focuses on mental health services for incarcerated veterans, whereas the policy objectives are broader and focused on overall VA healthcare system improvement. The connection is tangential, with no direct implementation or significant overlap in objectives."
— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo, — 647 — Department of Veterans Affairs reimagine the health care footprint in some locales, and spur a realignment of capacity through budgetary allocations. Specifically: 1. Embrace the expansion of Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) as an avenue to maintain a VA footprint in challenging medical markets without investing further in obsolete and unaffordable VA health care campuses. 2. Explore the potential to pilot facility-sharing partnerships between the VA and strained local health care systems to reduce costs by leveraging limited talent and resources. Personnel l Extend the term of the Under Secretary for Health (USH) to five years. Additionally, authority should be given to reappoint this individual for a second five-year term both to allow for continuity and to protect the USH from political transition. l Establish a Senior Executive Service (SES) position of VHA Care System Chief Information Officer (CIO), selected by and reporting to the chief of the VHA Care System with a dotted line to the VA CIO. l Identify a workflow process to bring wait times in compliance with VA MISSION Act–required time frames wherever possible. 1. Assess the daily clinical appointment load for physicians and clinical staff in medical facilities where wait times for care are well outside of the time frames required by the VA MISSION Act. 2. Require VHA facilities to increase the number of patients seen each day to equal the number seen by DOD medical facilities: approximately 19 patients per provider per day. Currently, VA facilities may be seeing as few as six patients per provider per day. 3. Consider a pilot program to extend weekday appointment hours and offer Saturday appointment options to veterans if a facility continues to demonstrate that it has excess capacity and is experiencing delays in the delivery of care for veterans. 4. Identify clinical services that are consistently in high demand but require cost-prohibitive compensation to recruit and retain talent, and examine exceptions for higher competitive pay.
Introduction
AI Analysis:
"The bill and Project 2025 policy have weak alignment as they both relate to veterans' healthcare, but the bill focuses on mental health services for incarcerated veterans, whereas the policy objectives are broader and focus on overall VA reform, quality improvement, and infrastructure management. The connection is tangential, with the bill addressing a specific subset of veteran care."
— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo,
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.
Related Bills
Other Bills by Rep. Conaway, Herbert C.
To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish an opioid antagonist to a veteran without requiring a prescription or copayment.
119/hr/5999
To provide for the continued operation of the Hatch Act Unit of the Office of Special Counsel during a lapse in appropriations, and for other purposes.
119/hr/5998