VA Police Recruitment and Retention Act of 2026

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/8010
Last Updated: August 19, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]

ID: K000402

Follow the money

The bill

VA Police Recruitment and Retention Act of 2026

HR. 8010, 119th Congress — read as touching Law Enforcement & Surveillance Tech.

The sponsor

Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$79,500 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Veterans Affairs" section, p. 685-687 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

April 14, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the intellectually bankrupt denizens of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The VA Police Recruitment and Retention Act of 2026 is a laughable attempt to pander to law enforcement unions and veterans' groups while pretending to address the "critical" issue of police recruitment and retention at the Department of Veterans Affairs. In reality, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the chronic inability of politicians to resist special interest group pressure.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill prohibits the downgrading of law enforcement positions within the VA, because heaven forbid we actually make efficient use of taxpayer dollars. It also retroactively reverses any position downgrades that may have occurred since October 1, 2025, because who needs accountability or fiscal responsibility? This is a classic case of legislative myopia, where politicians prioritize short-term political gain over long-term consequences.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include VA police officers, law enforcement unions, and veterans' groups – all of whom will no doubt be thrilled to have their interests "protected" by this bill. Meanwhile, taxpayers will foot the bill for this blatant example of pork-barrel politics. It's a textbook case of political narcissism, where politicians prioritize their own self-interest over the well-being of the nation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this bill will be negligible, except to further bloat the VA's budget and perpetuate the cycle of inefficiency that plagues our government. It's a prime example of the "throw money at the problem" approach, which never actually solves anything but does wonders for politicians' re-election prospects. In medical terms, this bill is akin to treating a patient's symptoms without addressing the underlying disease – in this case, the disease being the corrupting influence of special interest groups and the cowardice of politicians who refuse to make tough decisions.

In conclusion, HR 8010 is a farcical attempt to address a non-existent problem, driven by the usual suspects: greed, ego, and a healthy dose of stupidity. It's a legislative placebo, designed to make politicians look good while doing nothing to actually improve the lives of veterans or law enforcement officers. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this train wreck unfold – like diagnosing the terminal stupidity that afflicts our political class.

Related Topics

Military & Veterans AffairsCriminal Justice & Law EnforcementDefense Spending & Procurement
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$79,500
19 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$6,600
Committees
$0
Individuals
$72,900

No PAC contributions found

1
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600

No committee contributions found

1
RECHLER, SCOTT H.
2 transactions
$10,000
2
FROMEN, JOHN J. JR
2 transactions
$8,400
3
O'BRIEN, CHRISTOPHER
1 transaction
$5,000
4
LOGOTHETIS, GEORGE
1 transaction
$3,300
5
SIMON, BRIAN W.
1 transaction
$3,300
6
LO, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$3,300
7
YUHNKE, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$3,300
8
BUCHHEIT, GERALD A.
1 transaction
$3,300
9
CIMINELLI, PAUL F.
1 transaction
$3,300
10
CARONE, FRANK
1 transaction
$3,300
11
CARUBBA, JOSEPH
1 transaction
$3,300
12
PERSICO, JENNIFER C.
1 transaction
$3,300
13
OSTROFF, RICHARD L.
1 transaction
$3,300
14
MERINOFF, CHARLES
1 transaction
$3,300
15
COLE, JACQUELINE
1 transaction
$3,300
16
CORRADO, JOHN J.
1 transaction
$3,300
17
KOSTRZEWSKI, MARK B.
1 transaction
$3,300
18
COLE, MARGIE
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Larson, John B. [D-CT-1]

ID: L000557

Top Contributors

20

1
MANDELL, BRUCE A.
DATA MAIL • VICE PRESIDENT - OPERATIONS
IndividualNEWINGTON, CT
$3,300
Oct 21, 2024
2
TRIBAL NATION, MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT
NOT APPLICABLE • NOT APPLICABLE
IndividualMASHANTUCKET, CT
$3,300
Oct 29, 2024
3
MANDELL, ANDREW JAY
IndividualWEST HARTFORD, CT
$3,300
Oct 25, 2024
4
MANDELL, JOYCE D.
IndividualWEST HARTFORD, CT
$3,300
Oct 25, 2024
5
ANTONACCI., PHILIP
LINDY FARMS • HORSE TRAINER
IndividualSOMERSVILLE, CT
$3,300
Oct 30, 2023
6
PARKER, ALEXANDRA
NOT EMPLOYED • PHILANTHROPIST
IndividualPALO ALTO, CA
$3,300
Mar 7, 2024
7
PARKER, ALEXANDRA
NOT EMPLOYED • PHILANTHROPIST
IndividualPALO ALTO, CA
$3,300
Mar 7, 2024
8
PARKER, SEAN
SEAN N. PARKER FOUNDATION • CHAIRMAN
IndividualPALO ALTO, CA
$3,300
Mar 7, 2024
9
PARKER, SEAN
SEAN N. PARKER FOUNDATION • CHAIRMAN
IndividualPALO ALTO, CA
$3,300
Mar 7, 2024
10
VACCARO, DONALD J.
TICKET NETWORK • CEO
IndividualGLASTONBURY, CT
$3,300
Feb 10, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 38 nodes and 47 connections

Total contributions: $47

Top Donors - Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]

Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount

1 Org18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

  • Section 2(a) prohibits downgrading of law enforcement positions in the Department of Veterans Affairs, which benefits law enforcement personnel and related surveillance technology vendors by preserving positions and pay.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Moderate
Vector: 66%
Pages: 685-687AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns with Project 2025's goal of improving VA recruitment and retention by protecting pay and grade for law enforcement personnel, which supports workforce stability. However, it focuses narrowly on preventing downgrades rather than actively broadening pay or benefits to compete with the private sector as emphasized in the policy."

Key themes:recruitment and retentionpay and benefitsVA workforce stabilitylaw enforcement personnel

— 652 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Broaden pay and benefits in critical VA skill sets (beyond medical care occupations) to be more competitive with private-sector industry. IT, acquisition, cyber, and economists are some examples of skill sets that are difficult for the VA to recruit, largely because of the limitations of federal pay scales. l Continue to maximize the use of new VA hiring and pay authorities provided by Congress in the RAISE Act6 and PACT Act7 as well as existing authorities in student loan forgiveness and the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Personnel l Foster a culture that is mission (veteran) driven, alert, engaged, and habitually responsive to the veteran, and structure an environment that promotes a flexible and agile workplace. l Increase employee satisfaction/experience to improve recruitment and retention of VA personnel. Go beyond the traditional focus on the extrinsic (monetary pay and bonuses) and seek creative ways to instill teamwork, loyalty, and pride. l Train leaders and managers to promote an energized and productive workplace culture and reward those who do it well. Ensure that senior leaders (SES) set the proper example. l Focus more attention on hiring veterans and military spouses. The percentage of veterans employed at VA has been declining. l Support the White House Office of Presidential Personnel (PPO) in identifying a fully vetted roster of candidates to assume all key positions at VA well ahead of formal nominations. The VA is the second-largest federal agency, yet it is authorized a woefully small number of PA/PAS positions when compared to other agencies of lesser size. Congress and the Office of Personnel Management should be engaged on ways to provide authorities for a higher number of non-career PA positions. The White House PPO can be inclined to discount the VA’s importance, but given the political attention that VA can generate for Congress and the media, PPO should understand the importance of finding talented political appointees to serve at VA. l Increase the number and utilization of Limited Term Appointment Senior Executive Service positions for up to three years to work on special projects to ensure talent refreshment, talent acquisition, and flexibility. — 653 — Department of Veterans Affairs l Manage the relationship with organized labor effectively and proactively. 1. Ensure that any agenda that includes labor/civil service reform in the VA has a clear direction from the Secretarial level, support from the General Counsel, alignment with the Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Administration, and a unified and strong political will to carry it out. Without those elements, labor reforms are very difficult to accomplish. 2. Ensure that each senior leader in the process gets buy-in from reform- minded career employees willing to accept and support change. Those mid-level and senior-level managers exist, but they will need to be identified early and shown trust and confidence. 3. Ensure that the White House communicates the labor reform agenda swiftly. Trump Administration executive orders on civil service reform (official time, government-furnished office space) were issued too late, and departments and agencies were not prepared to execute them. 4. Anticipate the inevitable opportunities for legal challenges from organized labor, and be prepared for them to happen and be dragged out—which makes early, decisive timing all the more important. 5. Ensure that the White House is prepared to support a concerted and deliberate effort on implementation to avoid perceptions of a disconnected strategy and disaggregated effort. 6. Remain mindful of which labor contracts end, when they end, and what the agency’s goals for renegotiation are. If not done effectively, contract end dates will be missed or lack notification. It is therefore essential to have a clear strategy with respect to what leadership wants from a new contract: Do not make the perfect the enemy of the good in contract negotiations. l Work with Congress to sunset the Office of Accountability and Whistleblower Protection (OAWP). OAWP was well intentioned when formed, but it is redundant with the activities of supervisors as well as equal employment opportunity, Office of the Inspector General, Office of Special Counsel, and other policies, programs, and procedures for holding employees accountable. This redundancy results in lengthy investigations, gaps in coverage, and an overall ineffective method of employee and supervisor accountability.

Department of Defense

Moderate
Vector: 65%
Pages: 134-136AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 DOD section emphasize improving recruitment and retention of personnel, though the bill applies to VA law enforcement while the policy targets the armed forces."

Key themes:recruitmentretentionpersonnel managementworkforce stability

— 102 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Immediately fund more contracting capacity in all services to decrease the contracting timeline and improve the delivery of defense articles to our global partners. 2. Rationalize and speed arms sales decision-making to preclude our enemies from exploiting bureaucratic slothfulness and allow us to manage the development of indigenous defense industrial bases. DOD PERSONNEL The men and women of America’s armed forces are the most critical component of our national defense strategy, but in recent years, they have been overextended, undervalued, and insufficiently resourced. Their families help them to carry the burden of service, but the assistance they receive is disproportionately less than the sacrifices they make. Young civilians who would thrive in a military environ- ment are disenfranchised when educators and influencers discourage them from learning about military service and preparing for the honor of wearing Ameri- ca’s uniform. The United States military is an extraordinary institution, staffed by exceptional people who have defended our nation and changed the course of history, but the Biden Administration, through word and deed, has treated the armed forces as just another place to work. We must restore our military to a place of honor and respect and recruit and retain the individuals who will meet the rigorous standards of excellence that are required for membership in the world’s greatest fighting force. Needed Reforms l Rescue recruiting and retention. Recruiting was the worst in 2022 that it has been in two generations and is expected to be even worse in 2023. Some of the problems are self-inflicted and ongoing. The recruiting problem is not service-specific: It affects the entire Joint Force. 1. Appoint a Special Assistant to the President who will maintain liaison with Congress, DOD, and all other interested parties on the issue of recruiting and retention. 2. Improve recruiting by suspending the use of the recently introduced MHS Genesis system that uses private medical records of potential recruits at Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS), creating unnecessary delays and unwarranted rejections.11 3. Improve military recruiters’ access to secondary schools and require completion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery — 103 — Department of Defense (ASVAB)—the military entrance examination—by all students in schools that receive federal funding.12 4. Encourage Members of Congress to provide time to military recruiters during each townhall session in their congressional districts. 5. Increase the number of Junior ROTC programs in secondary schools. l Restore standards of lethality and excellence. Entrance criteria for military service and specific occupational career fields should be based on the needs of those positions. Exceptions for individuals who are already predisposed to require medical treatment (for example, HIV positive or suffering from gender dysphoria) should be removed, and those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service. Physical fitness requirements should be based on the occupational field without consideration of gender, race, ethnicity, or orientation. l Eliminate politicization, reestablish trust and accountability, and restore faith to the force. In 2021, the Reagan National Defense Survey found that only 45 percent of Americans have “a great deal of trust and confidence in the military”—down from 70 percent in 2018.13 1. Strengthen protections for chaplains to carry out their ministry according to the tenets of their faith. 2. Codify language to instruct senior military officers (three and four stars) to make certain that they understand their primary duty to be ensuring the readiness of the armed forces, not pursuing a social engineering agenda. This direction should be reinforced during the Senate confirmation process. Orders and direction motivated by purely partisan motives should be identified as threats to readiness. 3. Reinstate servicemembers to active duty who were discharged for not receiving the COVID vaccine, restore their appropriate rank, and provide back pay. 4. Eliminate Marxist indoctrination and divisive critical race theory programs and abolish newly established diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and staff.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Moderate
Vector: 64%
Pages: 685-687AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 VA policy aim to improve recruitment and retention by protecting or enhancing pay and benefits for critical VA positions, though the bill focuses specifically on law enforcement while Project 2025 emphasizes other skill sets like IT, acquisition, and cyber."

Key themes:recruitment and retentionpay and benefitsworkforce stability

— 652 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Broaden pay and benefits in critical VA skill sets (beyond medical care occupations) to be more competitive with private-sector industry. IT, acquisition, cyber, and economists are some examples of skill sets that are difficult for the VA to recruit, largely because of the limitations of federal pay scales. l Continue to maximize the use of new VA hiring and pay authorities provided by Congress in the RAISE Act6 and PACT Act7 as well as existing authorities in student loan forgiveness and the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Personnel l Foster a culture that is mission (veteran) driven, alert, engaged, and habitually responsive to the veteran, and structure an environment that promotes a flexible and agile workplace. l Increase employee satisfaction/experience to improve recruitment and retention of VA personnel. Go beyond the traditional focus on the extrinsic (monetary pay and bonuses) and seek creative ways to instill teamwork, loyalty, and pride. l Train leaders and managers to promote an energized and productive workplace culture and reward those who do it well. Ensure that senior leaders (SES) set the proper example. l Focus more attention on hiring veterans and military spouses. The percentage of veterans employed at VA has been declining. l Support the White House Office of Presidential Personnel (PPO) in identifying a fully vetted roster of candidates to assume all key positions at VA well ahead of formal nominations. The VA is the second-largest federal agency, yet it is authorized a woefully small number of PA/PAS positions when compared to other agencies of lesser size. Congress and the Office of Personnel Management should be engaged on ways to provide authorities for a higher number of non-career PA positions. The White House PPO can be inclined to discount the VA’s importance, but given the political attention that VA can generate for Congress and the media, PPO should understand the importance of finding talented political appointees to serve at VA. l Increase the number and utilization of Limited Term Appointment Senior Executive Service positions for up to three years to work on special projects to ensure talent refreshment, talent acquisition, and flexibility.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills