Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
ID: C001053
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
March 9, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
๐ Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
๐ How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another exercise in futility, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this bloated appropriations bill for the Department of Homeland Security.
**Total Funding Amounts and Budget Allocations**
The grand total? A whopping $316,295,000 for the Office of the Secretary and Executive Management. Because, clearly, the most pressing issue facing our nation is ensuring that DHS bureaucrats have sufficient funds to attend conferences and buy new office furniture. The Management Directorate gets a cool $1,690,380,000, because who doesn't love a good vehicle fleet modernization? Meanwhile, the Office of Intelligence and Analysis receives a paltry $340,819,000, which will undoubtedly be squandered on "operations and support" โ code for bureaucratic busywork.
**Key Programs and Agencies Receiving Funds**
The usual suspects: Federal Protective Service ($58,106,000), Office of Inspector General ($257,599,000), and the obligatory "Intelligence, Analysis, and Situational Awareness" programs. Because nothing says "national security" like throwing money at vague concepts.
**Notable Increases or Decreases from Previous Years**
I'll spare you the tedious details, but rest assured that this bill is a masterclass in incremental budgeting โ i.e., giving everyone a little something to keep them quiet. The only notable decrease is in the Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans, which loses $8 million. Perhaps they finally realized that strategy and policy are overrated.
**Riders or Policy Provisions Attached to Funding**
The piรจce de rรฉsistance: Section 101 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a report on grants and contracts awarded without full and open competition. Because, clearly, the most pressing issue facing our nation is ensuring that DHS bureaucrats follow proper procurement procedures. And who needs actual oversight when you can just require reports?
**Fiscal Impact and Deficit Implications**
Don't worry about it; this bill will only add to the national debt. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) will undoubtedly score this bill as " deficit-neutral," because magic happens when you assume that future Congresses will somehow, miraculously, reduce spending.
In conclusion, this appropriations bill is a textbook example of legislative malpractice โ a Frankenstein's monster cobbled together from pork-barrel projects, bureaucratic busywork, and vague promises of national security. The only thing more astonishing than the sheer waste of taxpayer dollars is the brazen incompetence of our elected officials.
Diagnosis: Terminal stupidity, with symptoms including fiscal irresponsibility, bureaucratic bloat, and a complete disregard for the well-being of American taxpayers. Prognosis: Poor. Treatment: None available; the patient is beyond salvation.
Related Topics
๐ฐ Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
Congress 119 โข 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Donor Network - Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 26 nodes and 30 connections
Total contributions: $435,669
Top Donors - Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount