The bill
Shut Down Sanctuary Policies Act of 2026
HR. 7640, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.
Sponsored by
Rep. McClintock, Tom [R-CA-5]
ID: M001177
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 7640, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 183-185 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 465.
March 11, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the real disease beneath.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The "Shut Down Sanctuary Policies Act of 2026" is a cleverly crafted bill designed to appease the xenophobic base while pretending to address public safety concerns. Its primary objective is to strong-arm states and local governments into cooperating with federal immigration authorities, effectively nullifying sanctuary policies.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, making it more difficult for states and localities to restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. It also:
* Expands the definition of "law enforcement activities" to include inquiring about an individual's citizenship or immigration status * Prohibits states and local governments from restricting information sharing with federal authorities * Grants immunity to state and local government entities that comply with federal requests, shielding them from lawsuits
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* States and local governments with sanctuary policies will be forced to choose between complying with federal demands or risking loss of funding * Immigrant communities will face increased scrutiny and potential deportation * Federal immigration authorities will gain more power to enforce their agenda * Law enforcement agencies will be caught in the middle, torn between following federal directives and respecting local policies
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a symptom of a deeper disease – the politicization of immigration policy. By pandering to anti-immigrant sentiment, lawmakers are creating a toxic environment that:
* Fosters fear and mistrust among immigrant communities * Undermines public safety by driving undocumented individuals underground * Encourages racial profiling and discriminatory policing practices * Sets a precedent for federal overreach into state and local affairs
In conclusion, this bill is a cynical attempt to exploit xenophobic fears while disguising itself as a public safety measure. It's a classic case of " legislative lupus" – a disease where politicians prioritize their own interests over the well-being of the people they're supposed to serve.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.
Rep. McClintock, Tom [R-CA-5]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 5 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C001118
Top Contributors
10
ID: N000026
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001096
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000478
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000165
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 54 nodes and 45 connections (43 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $163,100
Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped, 5 harmed.
Section 2(i)(2) and (3) allow DHS Secretary to decline transfer of aliens to state/local governments that restrict immigration enforcement, potentially increasing federal detention needs and benefiting private prison contractors who house federal detainees.
Sections 2 and 3 expand authority for state/local law enforcement to inquire about immigration status, maintain records, notify federal government, and comply with detainers, increasing demand for surveillance and biometric ID tools used in immigration enforcement.
Industries like meat processing rely heavily on immigrant labor; increased interior enforcement (Sections 2-3) could disrupt workforce availability, raising costs or reducing output for firms like Tyson and JBS.
By enabling stricter interior immigration enforcement (Sections 2-3), the bill may reduce labor supply in industries reliant on immigrant workers (e.g., agriculture, construction, meat processing), potentially weakening union bargaining power in those sectors.
Construction depends on immigrant labor; heightened enforcement risks labor shortages, delaying projects and increasing costs for firms like Bechtel and Fluor.
Agribusiness (e.g., ADM, Cargill) uses immigrant labor in farming and processing; enforcement could disrupt supply chains, though impact is indirect compared to direct processing.
+ 1 more industry not shown.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. McClintock, Tom [R-CA-5])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.
AI Analysis:
"The bill directly enacts the Project 2025 directives by mandating state and local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities, preempting contrary sanctuary laws, providing immunity for compliance, and effectively requiring adherence to immigration detainers, thus aligning closely with the policy's core objectives."
— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries. — 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government.
AI Analysis:
"The bill directly implements Project 2025's mandate to authorize state and local law enforcement participation in immigration enforcement, require compliance with immigration detainers, and override sanctuary policies through federal preemption and financial disincentives via legal immunity and removal to federal court."
— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries.
AI Analysis:
"The bill directly implements multiple Project 2025 objectives by mandating state and local cooperation with ICE, expanding enforcement activities, removing barriers to immigration enforcement, and prioritizing removal of undocumented immigrants—aligning with goals to restore ICE’s mission, enforce the INA as written, and eliminate self-imposed limitations on jurisdiction."
— 141 — Department of Homeland Security enforcement. To return ICE to its primary mission, any new Administration that wishes to restore the rule of law to our immigration enforcement efforts should: l Order ICE to stop closing out pending immigration cases and apply the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as written by Congress.3 The Biden Administration closed out tens of thousands of immigration cases that had already been prepared and were slated for expedited removal processing or hearings before the U.S. Immigration Court. This misguided action constituted an egregious example of lawlessness that allowed thousands of illegal aliens and other immigration violators to go free in the United States. l Direct ICE to stop ignoring criminal aliens identified through the 287(g) program.4 Ultimately, Congress should prevent ICE from ignoring criminal aliens identified by local law enforcement agencies that are partners in the 287(g) program. However, before congressional action, ICE should be directed to take custody of all aliens with records for felonies, crimes of violence, DUIs, previous removals, and any other crime that is considered a national security or public safety threat as defined under current laws. l Eliminate T and U visas. Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit. If an alien who was a trafficking or crime victim is actively and significantly cooperating with law enforcement as a witness, the S visa is already available and should be used. Pending elimination of the T and U visas, the Secretary should significantly restrict eligibility for each visa to prevent fraud. l Issue clear guidance regarding detention and bond for aliens. Thousands of illegal aliens are allowed to bond out of immigration detention only to disappear into the interior of the United States where many commit crimes and many others disappear, never to be heard from again. This occurs primarily because of poorly worded bond regulations, contradictory bond policy memoranda, and poor practices for managing released aliens and the Alternatives to Detention (ATD) Program, which requires significant reform. l Prioritize national security in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). ICE should end its current cozy deference to educational institutions and remove security risks from the program. This requires working with the Department of State to eliminate or significantly reduce the number of visas issued to foreign students from enemy nations. — 142 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Most of the foregoing can be accomplished rapidly and effectively through exec- utive action that is both lawful and appropriate. Additionally, ICE should clarify who is responsible for enforcing its criminal and civil authorities. It should also remove self-imposed limitations on its nationwide jurisdiction. l Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents in the 1811 series should enforce Title 8 and 18 crimes as the biggest part of their portfolio. Alien smuggling, trafficking, and cross-border crime as defined under Title 85 and Title 186 should be the focus of ICE operations. l The role of ICE Deportation Officers should be clarified. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) should be identified as being primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the civil arrest, detention, and removal of immigration violators anywhere in the United States, without warrant where appropriate, subject only to the civil warrant requirements of the INA where appropriate. l All ICE memoranda identifying “sensitive zones” where ICE personnel are prohibited from operating should be rescinded. Rely on the good judgment of officers in the field to avoid inappropriate situations. l To maximize the efficient use of its resources, ICE should make full use of existing Expedited Removal (ER) authorities. The agency has limited the use of ER to eligible aliens apprehended within 100 miles of the border. This is not a statutory requirement. New Policies U.S. national security and public safety interests would be well-served if ICE were to be combined with CBP and USCIS, as mentioned above. Additionally, ICE/ HSI, along with CBP, should be full participants in the Intelligence Community. The use of Blackies Warrants should be operationalized within ICE. These civil search warrants are commonly used for worksite enforcement when agents have probable cause that illegal aliens are employed at a business. This would stream- line investigations. Safeguarding Americans will require not just securing the border, but con- tinuous vetting and investigations of many aliens who exploited President Biden’s open border for potentially nefarious purposes, including some Afghan evacuees sent directly to the U.S. during America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Showing 3 of 5 policy matches
Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.