Energy Emergency Leadership Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/7258
Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Lee, Laurel M. [R-FL-15]

ID: L000597

Follow the money

The bill

Energy Emergency Leadership Act

HR. 7258, 119th Congress — read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.

The sponsor

Rep. Lee, Laurel M. [R-FL-15]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$152,500 raised

25 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

95% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Energy and Related Commissions" section, p. 401-403 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

July 12, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The Energy Emergency Leadership Act, or HR 7258, is a bill that reeks of desperation, incompetence, and a healthy dose of bureaucratic self-preservation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to create the illusion of action on energy security while actually doing nothing to address the underlying issues. It's like putting a Band-Aid on a bullet wound – it might look pretty, but it won't stop the bleeding. The objectives are twofold: (1) to give the Assistant Secretaries at the Department of Energy more responsibilities, because clearly, they didn't have enough paperwork to do already; and (2) to provide a veneer of coordination between federal agencies, because God knows they're not capable of doing that on their own.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Department of Energy Organization Act by adding new functions to the Assistant Secretaries, including energy emergency and security responsibilities. Because what every bureaucracy needs is more layers of management and more opportunities for finger-pointing. It's like trying to cure a patient with a bad case of bureaucratic cancer by giving them more chemotherapy – it might make the symptoms look better, but it won't address the underlying disease.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include the Department of Energy, other federal agencies, state and local governments, and energy sector entities. In other words, everyone who's already too incompetent to do their job will now have more opportunities to screw things up. It's like giving a bunch of kindergartners a box of crayons and telling them to color inside the lines – you know it's going to end in disaster.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is zero, zilch, nada. It's a placebo, a sugar pill designed to make voters feel like something is being done about energy security when, in reality, nothing is being done. The implications are clear: more bureaucracy, more inefficiency, and more opportunities for corruption and abuse of power. It's like trying to fix a broken leg with duct tape – it might hold things together for a while, but eventually, the whole thing will come crashing down.

In conclusion, HR 7258 is a joke, a farce, a travesty. It's a bill that should be laughed out of Congress, but instead, it'll probably pass with flying colors because, hey, who needs actual solutions when you can just pretend to do something? The real disease here is the corruption and incompetence that permeates every level of government, and this bill is just another symptom of that disease. So, go ahead, Congress, keep pretending to fix things. We'll all just sit back and watch as the country burns.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Lee, Laurel M. [R-FL-15]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$152,500
22 donors
PACs
$1,000
Organizations
$19,500
Committees
$0
Individuals
$132,000
1
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NABPAC)
1 transaction
$1,000
1
DREAM FINDERS HOMES
3 transactions
$16,500
2
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,000

No committee contributions found

1
WEATHERFORD, WILL
2 transactions
$13,200
2
RANNEY, TIM
1 transaction
$6,600
3
BARNETT, HOYT R
1 transaction
$6,600
4
BOWDEN, VIRGINIA
1 transaction
$6,600
5
HOSSEINI, FOROUGH B
1 transaction
$6,600
6
HOSSEINI, MORTEZA
1 transaction
$6,600
7
LUPOLI, NILOUFAR H
1 transaction
$6,600
8
NUNN, WILHELM A
1 transaction
$6,600
9
WAGNER, SHARI
1 transaction
$6,600
10
WANEK, KAREN A
1 transaction
$6,600
11
WANEK, TODD
1 transaction
$6,600
12
FAISON, JAY W
1 transaction
$6,600
13
GERSON, MARK
1 transaction
$6,600
14
GILLIAM, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
15
MCMAHON, LINDA
1 transaction
$6,600
16
STERN, ELIZABETH MAY
1 transaction
$6,600
17
VINIK, JEFFREY N
1 transaction
$6,600
18
WEEKLEY, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
19
WILEY, LADD
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-5]

ID: W000798

Top Contributors

23

1
POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationDOWAGIAC, MI
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
2
WEIR FARMS
OrganizationHANOVER, MI
$500
Aug 21, 2023
3
WEIR FARMS
OrganizationHANOVER, MI
$500
Aug 12, 2024
4
HAWORTH, ETHELYN
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualSAUGATUCK, MI
$47,900
Jun 5, 2024
5
HONIG, KEN
KEN HONIG • BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
IndividualNEW PORT BEACH, CA
$31,600
May 30, 2024
6
HAWORTH, RICHARD
HAWORTH INC • CHAIRMAN EMERITUS
IndividualSAUGATUCK, MI
$11,600
May 9, 2024
7
KLARR, GUNNAR
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualJACKSON, MI
$10,000
Dec 29, 2023
8
HAWORTH, RICHARD
HAWORTH INC • CHAIRMAN EMERITUS
IndividualSAUGATUCK, MI
$10,000
Nov 4, 2024
9
DRESNER, LINDA
SELF • RETIRED
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$6,600
Dec 7, 2023
10
LEVY, EDWARD C JR.
EDWARD C LEVY COMPANY • EXECUTIVE
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$6,600
Dec 7, 2023

Rep. Landsman, Greg [D-OH-1]

ID: L000601

Top Contributors

23

1
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$1,000
Dec 1, 2023
2
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$1,000
Mar 19, 2024
3
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$1,000
Sep 30, 2024
4
SOSNICK, AARON
IndividualRENO, NV
$3,392
Jun 30, 2024
5
FISHER, CYNTHIA
PATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATE.ORG • FOUNDER AND CHAIRMAN
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
6
HIRSCHTICK, JON
PTC • MANAGER
IndividualLEXINGTON, MA
$3,300
Oct 29, 2024
7
PFAUTCH, ROY
SELF EMPLOYED • GOVERNMENT RELATIONS
IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO
$3,300
Oct 21, 2024
8
TISCH, JONATHAN
LOEWS HOTELS • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 21, 2024
9
TISCH, LIZZIE
LTD X LIZZIE TISCH • CHIEF CURATOR
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
10
BEEUWKES, REINIER
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualCONCORD, MA
$3,300
Nov 7, 2023

Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]

ID: B001306

Top Contributors

23

1
THORP FOR SHERIFF
OrganizationNEWARK, OH
$500
Oct 7, 2024
2
FRIENDS OF MARK FRAIZER
OrganizationCOLUMBUS, OH
$250
Jun 15, 2023
3
FRIENDS OF MARK FRAIZER
OrganizationCOLUMBUS, OH
$200
Sep 3, 2024
4
STEMMER, THOMAS A
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualBYESVILLE, OH
$5,800
Feb 28, 2024
5
STEMMER, THOMAS A
IndividualBYESVILLE, OH
$5,800
Feb 28, 2024
6
BORKOWSKI, BRIAN
LACO HOLDINGS • CEO
IndividualBELLEAIR BEACH, FL
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
7
MACKINNON, JEFFREY
FARRAGUT PARTNERS • LOBBYIST
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
8
DICKERSON, RICHARD D
UTILITY TECHNOLOGY INT'L CORP • CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
IndividualWEST JEFFERSON, OH
$3,300
Oct 26, 2023
9
LEMMON, THEODORE
SHELLY COMPANY • SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
IndividualNEW PLYMOUTH, OH
$3,300
Dec 15, 2023
10
DICKERSON, JOAN
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualWEST JEFFERSON, OH
$3,300
Oct 26, 2023

Rep. Onder, Robert F. [R-MO-3]

ID: O000177

Top Contributors

20

1
O'BRIEN, FRANK
O'BRIEN INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS • OWNER
IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO
$13,200
Mar 31, 2024
2
ONDER, JAMES G
ONDERLAW, LLC • ATTORNEY
IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO
$13,200
Mar 26, 2024
3
BURNS, ROBERT
PATRIOT MACHINE • VICE PRESIDENT
IndividualCHESTERFIELD, MO
$13,200
Sep 5, 2024
4
POGUE, RICHARD W.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualWRIGHT CITY, MO
$13,200
Jun 20, 2024
5
SCHULTE, STEVE
HENGES INTERIORS • OWNER
IndividualWELDON SPRING, MO
$13,200
May 8, 2024
6
MUELLER, DOUGLAS
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualO FALLON, MO
$10,000
Mar 6, 2024
7
OBRIEN, JOHN
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualLAKE ST LOUIS, MO
$10,000
Mar 11, 2024
8
SMITH, MENLO
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualCHESTERFIELD, MO
$7,500
Mar 21, 2024
9
STOFFA, ROBERT
WINDBER HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN
IndividualLIGONIER, PA
$6,870
Mar 28, 2024
10
KOVAC, AMY
BAIN CO • BUSINESS CONSULTANT
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$6,818
Mar 30, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Lee, Laurel M. [R-FL-15]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 51 nodes and 58 connections

Total contributions: $58

Top Donors - Rep. Lee, Laurel M. [R-FL-15]

Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC2 Orgs19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.

  • Section 2(a)(12)(A) assigns responsibilities for energy infrastructure security and resilience, which benefits energy infrastructure firms by enhancing their operational security and federal support.

  • +Cybersecurityconfidence 0.85

    Section 2(a)(12)(A) includes cybersecurity responsibilities, which benefits cybersecurity firms through increased federal demand for threat detection and response services.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Very Strong
Vector: 69%
Pages: 401-403AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill directly implements Project 2025's objective to elevate CESER to an Assistant Secretary level and assign energy emergency, cybersecurity, and infrastructure resilience functions to DOE leadership, aligning closely with the policy's focus on national energy security and threat mitigation."

Key themes:energy emergency leadershipcybersecurity and infrastructure resilienceAssistant Secretary for CESERfederal coordination on energy threatsprotection of energy infrastructure

— 368 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise National Energy Security. Protecting American infrastructure from cyber and physical threats, both natural and human, is vital to national security, the economy, and the well-being of the American people. Protecting and advanc- ing these national security interests is a proper role for the federal government. DESAS should: l Focus on studying threats to the electric grid, natural gas, and oil infrastructure; sharing such information with the energy industry; promoting the reliability and security of energy resources and infrastructure; and developing strategies and technologies to combat threats by working with the National Labs. The following offices would report to the DESAS Undersecretary of Energy Security: 1. Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response (CESER), elevated to an Assistant Secretary. CESER would work with the existing or reconstituted versions (as described in more detail below) of the Office of Electricity (OE); Office of Nuclear Energy (NE); Office of Fossil Energy (FE), currently the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM); Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to identify and address threats to energy infrastructure.7 Instead of trying to decarbonize the American economy and allocating taxpayer dollars for commercialization of energy technologies, these offices would focus on energy security by identifying threats to energy supplies and infrastructure, developing strategies to address those threats, and funding fundamental science and technology where appropriate. 2. Office of Electricity (Assistant Secretary). 3. Office of Nuclear Energy (Assistant Secretary). 4. Office of Fossil Energy (Assistant Secretary, with Carbon Management deleted from its title and purpose. 5. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (Assistant Secretary). 6. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (stand-alone or part of CESER). l Eliminate special-interest funding programs. Many DOE energy funding programs are not targeted on fundamental science and technology; instead, they focus more on commercialization and act as subsidies to the

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Strong
Vector: 71%
Pages: 401-403AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns closely with Project 2025's focus on strengthening energy infrastructure security, cybersecurity, and emergency response by assigning specific energy emergency functions to Assistant Secretaries at the Department of Energy, mirroring the proposed elevation of CESER and enhanced coordination across energy offices."

Key themes:energy infrastructure securitycybersecurityemergency responseAssistant Secretary rolesfederal coordination

— 368 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise National Energy Security. Protecting American infrastructure from cyber and physical threats, both natural and human, is vital to national security, the economy, and the well-being of the American people. Protecting and advanc- ing these national security interests is a proper role for the federal government. DESAS should: l Focus on studying threats to the electric grid, natural gas, and oil infrastructure; sharing such information with the energy industry; promoting the reliability and security of energy resources and infrastructure; and developing strategies and technologies to combat threats by working with the National Labs. The following offices would report to the DESAS Undersecretary of Energy Security: 1. Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response (CESER), elevated to an Assistant Secretary. CESER would work with the existing or reconstituted versions (as described in more detail below) of the Office of Electricity (OE); Office of Nuclear Energy (NE); Office of Fossil Energy (FE), currently the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM); Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to identify and address threats to energy infrastructure.7 Instead of trying to decarbonize the American economy and allocating taxpayer dollars for commercialization of energy technologies, these offices would focus on energy security by identifying threats to energy supplies and infrastructure, developing strategies to address those threats, and funding fundamental science and technology where appropriate. 2. Office of Electricity (Assistant Secretary). 3. Office of Nuclear Energy (Assistant Secretary). 4. Office of Fossil Energy (Assistant Secretary, with Carbon Management deleted from its title and purpose. 5. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (Assistant Secretary). 6. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (stand-alone or part of CESER). l Eliminate special-interest funding programs. Many DOE energy funding programs are not targeted on fundamental science and technology; instead, they focus more on commercialization and act as subsidies to the — 369 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions private sector for government-favored resources. The DOE Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED); Office of State and Community Energy Programs; ARPA-E; Office of Grid Deployment (OGD); and DOE Loan Program should be eliminated or reformed. If they continue to exist, FECM, NE, OE, and EERE should focus on fundamental science and technology issues, particularly in relation to cyber and physical threats to energy security, rather than subsidizing and commercializing energy resources. l Eliminate political and climate-change interference in DOE approvals of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. In addition, Congress should reform the Natural Gas Act8 to expand required approvals from merely nations with free trade agreements to all of our allies, such as NATO countries. l Focus the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) on ensuring that government buildings and operations have reliable and cost- effective energy. FEMP should stop using taxpayer dollars to force the purchase of more expensive and less reliable energy resources in the name of combating climate change. l Ensure that information provided by the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA), a data and statistical organization, is data-neutral. l Focus FERC on its statutory obligation to ensure access to reliable energy at just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory rates. FERC is a five-member commission created under the DOE Organization Act that regulates the wholesale sales and transmission of electricity, promotes electric reliability through standards, permits natural gas pipelines and LNG export facilities, sets natural gas pipeline shipping rates, and sets oil pipeline shipping rates. It is an economic regulator and should not make itself a climate regulator. l Streamline the nuclear regulatory requirements and licensing process. Such changes would help to lower costs and accelerate the development and deployment of civilian nuclear, such as advanced nuclear reactors (including small modular nuclear reactors). The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is commission tasked with the licensing of civilian nuclear reactors and power plants and regulating other uses of nuclear materials, such as nuclear medicine. Although it is not a DOE agency, its jurisdiction over nuclear reactor, fuel, safety, and trade issues often relates to or impinges on DOE’s jurisdiction.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Strong
Vector: 67%
Pages: 398-400AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns strongly with Project 2025's focus on energy security, infrastructure protection, and refocusing the Department of Energy on core missions like cybersecurity and emergency preparedness, without directly addressing renewable energy subsidies or fossil fuel promotion."

Key themes:energy securityinfrastructure resiliencecybersecurityemergency preparednessDepartment of Energy reform

— 365 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Support repeal of massive spending bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)3 and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),4 which established new programs and are providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to renewable energy developers, their investors, and special interests, and support the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs. l Unleash private-sector energy innovation by ending government interference in energy decisions. l Stop the war on oil and natural gas. l Allow individuals, families, and business to use the energy resources they want to use and that will best serve their needs. l Secure and protect energy infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks. l Refocus the Department of Energy on energy security, accelerated remediation, and advanced science. l Promote U.S. energy resources as a means to assist our allies and diminish our strategic adversaries. l Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes. l Ensure that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission facilitates rather than hampers private-sector nuclear energy innovation and deployment. American Science Dominance. Ever since the age of Benjamin Franklin, the United States has been at the forefront of scientific discovery and technological advancement. Beginning with the groundbreaking science of the Manhattan Proj- ect, the U.S. has developed 17 National Laboratories that conduct fundamental and advanced scientific research. The National Labs have been critical in supporting national defense and ensuring that the United States leads on scientific discoveries with transformative applications that benefit America and the world. In recent years, however, U.S. science has been under threat. Externally, adversaries like the Chinese military have been engaged in scientific espionage, infiltrating taxpayer-funded scientific research projects, and funding their own science research. In addition, the National Labs have been too focused on climate change and renewable technologies. — 366 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise American science dominance is critical to U.S. national security and economic strength. The next conservative President therefore needs to recommit the United States to ensuring this dominance. MISSION STATEMENT FOR A REFORMED DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY The Department of Energy should be renamed and refocused as the Department of Energy Security and Advanced Science (DESAS). DESAS would refocus on DOE’s five existing core missions: l Providing leadership and coordination on energy security and related national security issues, l Promoting U.S. energy economic interests abroad, l Leading the nation and the world in cutting-edge fundamental advanced science, l Remediating former Manhattan Project and Cold War nuclear material sites, and l Developing new nuclear weapons and naval nuclear reactors. These missions work together by using advanced science to promote national security while getting the government out of the business of picking winners and losers in energy resources. Reform is needed because DOE, instead of focusing on core energy and security issues, has been spending billions of taxpayer dollars to subsidize renewable energy developers and investors, thereby making Americans less energy secure and distorting energy markets. OVERVIEW DOE was created by the Department of Energy Organization Act of 19775 in response to the 1970s oil crisis, consolidating various energy programs that pre- viously had operated without coordination throughout the federal government in a single department. In addition to addressing energy issues, DOE is tasked with: l Engaging in basic and fundamental science and research through the 17 National Laboratories; l Cleaning up the Manhattan Project and Cold War nuclear material and weapons sites;

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills