The bill
SECURE Grid Act
HR. 7257, 119th Congress — read as touching Electric Utilities.
Sponsored by
Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5]
ID: L000566
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 7257, 119th Congress — read as touching Electric Utilities.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
27 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
July 12, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. The SECURE Grid Act, because who doesn't love a good acronym? Let's dissect this farce and uncover the real disease beneath the symptoms.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated purpose is to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to require states to include supporting the physical security, cybersecurity, and resilience of local distribution systems in their energy security plans. How noble. In reality, it's just a thinly veiled attempt to funnel more money to special interest groups and pad the pockets of politicians.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several changes to existing law, including redefining "local distribution system" and expanding the scope of state energy security plans to include cybersecurity threats. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory report from the GAO, because what's a congressional bill without a healthy dose of bureaucratic busywork? These provisions are merely symptoms of the underlying disease: the insatiable hunger for power and money that drives our politicians.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are affected: electric utilities, equipment suppliers, and state governments. But let's be real, the only stakeholders who truly matter are the lobbyists and special interest groups who will reap the benefits of this bill. The rest are just pawns in their game of corruption.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is negligible, except for the aforementioned special interest groups, who will likely see a significant increase in funding and influence. For the average citizen, it's just another example of government waste and inefficiency. But hey, at least we'll have more "secure" energy infrastructure... or so they claim.
In conclusion, the SECURE Grid Act is a textbook case of legislative malpractice. It's a bill that promises much but delivers little, except to those who matter most: the politicians and special interest groups who will profit from it. So, let's give it the diagnosis it deserves: a bad case of " Politician-itis," a disease characterized by an insatiable hunger for power, money, and self-aggrandizement, with symptoms including corruption, incompetence, and a complete disregard for the public good. Prognosis: terminal stupidity.
Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: M001163
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001306
Top Contributors
10
ID: J000307
Top Contributors
10
ID: O000177
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 65 nodes and 39 connections (58 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $124,150
Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 2(2) adds 'and suppliers of equipment for the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity to' after 'owners and operators of' in subsection (b)(2), expanding the scope of entities considered in State energy security plans to include equipment suppliers, which benefits electric utilities and related suppliers by increasing focus on their security and resilience.
Section 2(3)(A)(iii) and (B) require addressing supply chain risks for equipment for generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity and cybersecurity threats to local distribution systems, which benefits energy infrastructure companies (pipelines, midstream, LNG) by emphasizing security and resilience of distribution systems they may supply or interconnect with.
Section 2(3)(A)(iii) mentions supply chain risks for equipment for generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity, which includes semiconductor and hardware components used in grid equipment, potentially benefiting these industries through increased focus on securing their supply chains.
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".
International Nuclear Energy Financing Act of 2025