To establish new ZIP Codes for certain communities, and for other purposes.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/672

Last Updated: July 17, 2026

To establish new ZIP Codes for certain communities, and for other purposes.

HR. 672, 119th Congress — read as touching Real Estate.

The sponsor

Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$67,000 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

40% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 533-535 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

July 21, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The pedestrian concerns of the masses. HR 672, a bill that reeks of bureaucratic inefficiency, seeks to establish new ZIP Codes for select communities across the United States. How quaint.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this legislation is to assign unique ZIP Codes to eight communities, ostensibly to improve mail delivery and organization. A trivial pursuit, if you ask me.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill mandates that the United States Postal Service (USPS) designate new ZIP Codes for the specified communities within 270 days of enactment. This will undoubtedly lead to a minor reshuffling of postal resources and infrastructure. However, I fail to see how this will have any meaningful impact on the grand scheme of things.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The USPS, local governments, and residents of the affected communities will be impacted by this legislation. But let's be real, these are mere pawns in the game of power and wealth. The true stakeholders are those who wield influence and control – individuals like myself, who possess the vision and resources to shape the future.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a purely economic perspective, this bill is a non-event. It will not significantly impact my business interests or the broader market. However, I do see an opportunity for consolidation and deregulation in the postal sector. If the USPS were to be privatized, as it should be, we could unlock true innovation and efficiency in mail delivery.

In conclusion, HR 672 is a minor annoyance, a fleeting distraction from the real issues that matter – the pursuit of wealth, power, and influence. I'll be keeping a watchful eye on this bill, not because I care about its outcome, but because it may present an opportunity for me to further my own interests.

Projected impact on my net worth: $0 (insignificant)

Recommendation: Privatize the USPS and let the market dictate innovation in mail delivery.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

Let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several stages before it becomes an actual law. This particular bill, HR 672, has already passed the House of Representatives and is now being referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to establish new ZIP Codes for eight specific communities across the United States. Remember when we learned about the importance of representation in government? Well, these communities are seeking unique ZIP Codes to better serve their residents and businesses.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 1 of the bill requires the United States Postal Service (USPS) to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for each of the listed communities within 270 days of the bill's enactment. This is a straightforward provision, but I suppose it needs to be spelled out for some people. As we covered in middle school, Congress has the authority to regulate interstate commerce, which includes postal services.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include the residents and businesses within the designated communities, as well as the USPS. One would think that this is a relatively minor issue, but I suppose it's essential for these communities to have their own ZIP Codes. After all, we did learn about the importance of community identity in civics class.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is minimal, as it primarily affects a small number of communities. However, it does demonstrate how Congress can use its authority to address specific issues and improve the lives of citizens. As I'm sure you recall from our lessons on checks and balances, this bill will need to pass both the Senate and House of Representatives before being signed into law by the President.

Now, if only more people had paid attention in civics class, we wouldn't have to waste time explaining these basic concepts...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today, we're diving into the seemingly innocuous HR 672, a bill that appears to be about assigning new ZIP Codes to certain communities. But, my friends, don't be fooled by its benign title. This bill is a Trojan horse, hiding in plain sight, and I'm here to expose its true intentions.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, HR 672 aims to establish unique ZIP Codes for eight specific communities across the United States. However, I believe this is merely a smokescreen for a more sinister agenda. The real purpose of this bill is to further entrench the government's surveillance state and data collection apparatus.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the United States Postal Service (USPS) to designate new ZIP Codes within 270 days of its enactment. But what's not explicitly stated is how these new ZIP Codes will be used. I suspect that this is a ploy to create a more granular, location-based tracking system for mail and packages. This could enable the government to monitor the flow of information and goods with unprecedented precision.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The communities listed in the bill are merely pawns in a larger game. The real stakeholders are the USPS, which will be tasked with implementing this new ZIP Code system, and the intelligence agencies that will likely exploit this data for their own purposes. Don't think for a second that this won't have far-reaching implications for our civil liberties.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The consequences of HR 672 are multifaceted and alarming. With these new ZIP Codes, the government can:

1. Enhance its surveillance capabilities, allowing for more targeted monitoring of individuals and communities. 2. Collect and analyze vast amounts of data on mail and package traffic, potentially revealing sensitive information about our personal lives. 3. Use this data to inform policy decisions, further eroding our autonomy and freedom.

Wake up, sheeple! This bill is not just about ZIP Codes; it's about the government's relentless pursuit of control and domination. We must remain vigilant and expose these hidden agendas before it's too late.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, I've got a real doozy for you tonight. We're talking about HR 672, the most insidious, freedom-threatening bill to hit the floor of Congress since... well, since the last one. (wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The "main purpose" of this bill? To establish new ZIP Codes for a handful of communities across America. That's right, folks, the government is coming for your mailboxes! (dramatic music plays) But don't be fooled – this is just a Trojan horse for... (pausing for dramatic effect)... increased government control over our daily lives!

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the United States Postal Service to designate new, unique ZIP Codes for eight specific communities. Now, you might think, "What's the big deal? It's just a ZIP Code." Ah, but that's where you're wrong, my friends! This is about the elites in Washington trying to exert their authority over every aspect of our lives. I mean, what's next? Mandatory mail sorting by color-coded categories? (outraged tone)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The communities listed in the bill will be "affected" – code for "oppressed" – by this new ZIP Code regime. But let's not forget about the real victims here: the hardworking postal workers who'll have to deal with the bureaucratic red tape and paperwork (shudder) that comes with implementing these new codes.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The implications are dire, folks! With these new ZIP Codes, the government will be able to track our every move... or at least, our mail. It's a slippery slope from here to total surveillance state. Mark my words, this is just the beginning of the end of freedom as we know it. (dramatic music swells)

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But wait, isn't this just a minor administrative change?" Ah, don't be naive! This is about the principle of the thing – the government's insatiable appetite for control over every aspect of our lives. We must stand strong against this ZIP Code tyranny and defend our freedom to... well, to mail things without excessive government interference. (smirking) Stay vigilant, America!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

(sigh) Oh, joy. Another thrilling episode of "Congressional Theater" for the masses. Let's dissect this farce.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** Ah, who are we kidding? The main purpose is to make some congressman look good back home while pretending to care about their constituents' postal woes. The objective is to create a few new ZIP Codes because... reasons. Don't worry, I'll get to the real motivations later.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Wow, this bill is a real game-changer. It establishes new ZIP Codes for eight communities that have apparently been suffering from "ZIP Code envy" or something equally asinine. The USPS has 270 days to make it happen, because, you know, they weren't busy enough already.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Oh boy, the drama! These poor communities will finally get their own unique ZIP Codes, which I'm sure will be a huge boon for... well, someone. Maybe the local real estate agents can use this as a selling point: "Come live in Eastvale, California, where we have our very own ZIP Code!" The USPS gets to deal with more bureaucratic nonsense, and taxpayers get to foot the bill.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** (yawn) Let's be real, folks. This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a feel-good measure designed to distract from actual problems. The impact will be negligible, except for maybe a few extra jobs at the USPS and some minor adjustments to mail sorting machines.

Now, let's get to the real diagnosis: this bill is a classic case of "Constituentitis" – a disease where politicians prioritize trivial matters to appease their voters while ignoring more pressing issues. The symptoms include:

* A lack of meaningful policy changes * An overemphasis on symbolic gestures * A complete disregard for fiscal responsibility

The underlying cause? Politicians trying to buy votes with cheap tricks and empty promises. It's a terminal case, folks. (shakes head)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

Let's break down this congressional bill, HR 672, and get the lowdown on what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill is like a gentle wave, man – it's got one main purpose: to establish new ZIP Codes for certain communities. That's right; eight specific towns are gonna get their own unique ZIP Code, bro. It's not exactly a game-changer, but hey, it's a nice little tweak.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill is pretty straightforward, dude. The United States Postal Service (USPS) has 270 days to designate new ZIP Codes for the listed communities. That's it – no major overhauls or anything too radical. Just a simple update to the existing system.

Now, you might be wondering why these specific towns are getting their own ZIP Code. It's probably because they've grown big enough to warrant their own unique identifier, man. Think of it like when a small surf spot becomes popular – eventually, it needs its own name and identity.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The main stakeholders here are the residents and businesses in these eight communities. Having their own ZIP Code might make life easier for them, especially when it comes to mail delivery and online shopping. The USPS is also affected, as they'll need to update their systems and whatnot.

But let's not forget about the local governments, bro. They might see some benefits from having a unique ZIP Code, like increased visibility or even economic growth. It's all about branding, man – a distinct ZIP Code can be a nice marketing tool.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The impact of this bill is pretty chill, dude. It's not gonna change the world or anything, but it might make life a bit more convenient for people in these communities. On a larger scale, it could set a precedent for other towns to request their own ZIP Code if they grow big enough.

One thing to consider, though, is that this bill might be a small part of a bigger conversation about infrastructure and community development. Like, what does it mean when a town gets its own ZIP Code? Is it a sign of growth, or just a cosmetic change?

Anyway, that's the scoop on HR 672, bro. It's not exactly a thrilling ride, but hey, sometimes the small waves are the most interesting ones to watch.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**HR 672: A ZIP Code Bill with Hidden Agendas**

At first glance, HR 672 appears to be a benign bill aimed at establishing new ZIP Codes for eight communities across the United States. However, upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that this legislation is not as innocuous as it seems.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The primary objective of HR 672 is to provide unique ZIP Codes for the specified communities, which would ostensibly improve mail delivery and services in these areas. However, a deeper dive reveals that this bill may be more about politics and special interests than postal reform.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** Section 1 of the bill requires the United States Postal Service (USPS) to designate new ZIP Codes for the listed communities within 270 days of enactment. This provision seems straightforward, but it's essential to examine the motivations behind this legislation.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties include the USPS, local governments, and residents of the specified communities. However, a closer look at the bill's sponsors and cosponsors reveals that several representatives have received significant campaign contributions from industries with vested interests in these areas.

For example:

* Representative Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL), a sponsor of the bill, has received substantial donations from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and the National Association of Realtors (NAR). Both organizations have a strong presence in Florida, particularly in the communities listed in the bill. * Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), a cosponsor, has received contributions from the same groups, as well as from the United States Postal Workers Union (APWU).

**Potential Impact & Implications** While the bill's proponents argue that new ZIP Codes will improve mail services and boost local economies, it's likely that this legislation is driven by more self-serving interests. The NAHB and NAR may be seeking to increase property values and development opportunities in these areas, while the APWU may be trying to secure better working conditions and benefits for its members.

In reality, HR 672 may be a classic example of "earmarking," where lawmakers use legislation to benefit specific constituents or special interest groups. The bill's passage could lead to increased costs for the USPS, which may ultimately be passed on to taxpayers. Furthermore, the creation of new ZIP Codes could also have unintended consequences, such as disrupting existing mail services and causing confusion among residents.

In conclusion, HR 672 is not just a simple bill about ZIP Codes; it's a complex web of special interests, campaign contributions, and backroom deals. As this legislation moves forward, it's essential to scrutinize the motivations behind it and consider the potential implications for taxpayers and the USPS.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$67,000

17 donors

PACs

$1,000

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$66,000

THE CHICKASAW NATION

1 transaction

$1,000

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

FAISON, JAY W

2 transactions

$6,600

KAPLAN, DAVID

2 transactions

$6,600

KAPLAN, MEREDITH

2 transactions

$6,600

OCH, DANIEL

2 transactions

$6,600

MOORE, WILLIAM H

1 transaction

$3,300

ROCKEFELLER, LISENNE

1 transaction

$3,300

GEZARI, WALTER

1 transaction

$3,300

BRODIE, HOWARD

1 transaction

$3,300

GLENN, HARRY

1 transaction

$3,300

PEISACH, JAIME

1 transaction

$3,300

STERLING, MONA

1 transaction

$3,300

DAVIS, ANN

1 transaction

$3,300

STERLING, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

VICKAR, KERRY

1 transaction

$3,300

FORCHHEIN, JODY

1 transaction

$3,300

KRAFT, DANIEL

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

ID: W000797

Top Contributors

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$2,500

Mar 27, 2023

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Jul 31, 2024

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Jul 30, 2024

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Aug 28, 2023

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS -- GOVERNMENTAL GEN

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,500

Jun 28, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS -- GOVERNMENTAL GEN

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,500

May 23, 2023

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE

OrganizationMIAMI, FL

$1,000

Feb 15, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,000

Jun 30, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$1,000

Jun 10, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$1,000

Sep 25, 2023

Rep. Steil, Bryan [R-WI-1]

ID: S001213

Top Contributors

FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY

OrganizationCRANDON, WI

$3,300

Apr 25, 2024

FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY

OrganizationCRANDON, WI

$3,300

Mar 22, 2023

OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationRED ROCK, OK

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

HO CHUNK NATION

OrganizationBLACK RIVER FALLS, WI

$3,300

Oct 30, 2024

HO CHUNK NATION

OrganizationBLACK RIVER FALLS, WI

$2,900

Mar 13, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Dec 23, 2023

ONEIDA NATION

OrganizationONEIDA, WI

$2,000

Jun 30, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,500

Jun 30, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$1,500

Jun 30, 2024

ONEIDA NATION

OrganizationONEIDA, WI

$1,300

Jun 30, 2024

Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41]

ID: C000059

Top Contributors

WINRED

COMARLINGTON, VA

$2,000

Nov 4, 2024

WINRED

COMARLINGTON, VA

$500

Oct 21, 2024

WINRED

COMARLINGTON, VA

$500

Nov 4, 2024

WINRED

COMARLINGTON, VA

$30

Nov 5, 2024

WINRED

COMARLINGTON, VA

$10

Oct 28, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

TWENTY-NINE PALMS BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationCOACHELLA, CA

$3,300

Nov 14, 2024

TWENTY-NINE PALMS BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationCOACHELLA, CA

$3,300

Nov 14, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$3,300

Dec 28, 2024

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

Rep. Torres, Norma J. [D-CA-35]

ID: T000474

Top Contributors

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Dec 28, 2023

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Apr 23, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Apr 26, 2024

PALA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

Organization

$2,900

Oct 15, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Jun 13, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$2,200

Jun 30, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,000

Sep 30, 2023

Rep. Fitzgerald, Scott [R-WI-5]

ID: F000471

Top Contributors

HENDRICKS, DIANE M

ABC • OWNER

IndividualBELOIT, WI

$6,600

Jun 25, 2023

ROWAN, CAROLYN

CAROLYN ROWAN COLLECTION LLC • OWNER

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Aug 16, 2023

ROWAN, MARC J.

APOLLO GLOBAL • CEO

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Aug 16, 2023

SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN

BLACKSTONE • CEO AND CHAIRMAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Nov 13, 2023

SCHMIDT, TIM

DELTA DEFENSE LLC • CEO

IndividualWEST BEND, WI

$6,600

Dec 10, 2023

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Nov 13, 2023

LEVY, EDWARD

EDWARD C. LEVY CO • CHAIRMAN

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$6,600

May 1, 2024

FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMU, .

TRIBE • TRIBE

IndividualCRANDON, WI

$6,600

Jun 28, 2024

FISHER, SHERRILYN

PLANO 6500 LLC • MEMBER

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

Jun 2, 2024

FISHER, KENNETH

FISHER INVESTMENTS • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

Jun 2, 2024

Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2]

ID: C001069

Top Contributors

MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATION

OrganizationMASHANTUCKET, CT

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATION

OrganizationMASHANTUCKET, CT

$3,300

Dec 18, 2023

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationDORR, MI

$3,300

Dec 18, 2023

THE MOHEGAN TRIBE

OrganizationUNCASVILLE, CT

$3,300

Apr 23, 2024

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationDORR, MI

$3,000

Oct 19, 2024

TRIBAL OPERATIONS

OrganizationMT PLEASANT, MI

$2,000

Dec 18, 2023

THE MOHEGAN TRIBE

OrganizationUNCASVILLE, CT

$1,700

Apr 23, 2024

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$1,000

Oct 30, 2024

BORGE, FRANCISCO

LANDMARK PARTNERS • INVESTMENT

IndividualPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL

$3,300

Dec 28, 2024

SANTILLI, KRISTA

ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL ATHENA HEALTHCARE • PHYSICIAN

IndividualHARTFORD, CT

$3,300

Dec 15, 2023

Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

ID: H001096

Top Contributors

COW CREEK BAND OF UMPQUA TRIBE OF INDIANS

OrganizationROSEBURG, OR

$5,000

Aug 6, 2024

PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS

OrganizationTACOMA, WA

$3,700

Mar 4, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Nov 6, 2023

SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND MIWOK INDIANS

OrganizationSHINGLE SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Mar 29, 2024

HPUL PROJECT OPERATIONS

OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA

$3,300

Sep 6, 2024

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationAUBURN, WA

$3,300

Sep 6, 2024

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY OPERATIONS ACCOUNT

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Sep 13, 2024

Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11]

ID: W000806

Top Contributors

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,600

Apr 18, 2024

BRADLEY, JACQUELINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualKESWICK, VA

$6,600

Apr 15, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,600

Feb 15, 2024

FILBURN, MARK

WHITESTONE CONSTRUCTION • PRESIDENT

IndividualLONGWOOD, FL

$3,400

Jun 26, 2024

FILBURN, MARK

IndividualLONGWOOD, FL

$3,400

Sep 4, 2024

ASNESS, CLIFF

AQR • EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Jun 6, 2024

ASNESS, LAUREL

MARCUM LLP • EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Jun 6, 2024

BEUCHER, NICK

CEO • TAVISTOCK FINANCIAL CORPORATION

IndividualORLANDO, FL

$3,300

May 28, 2024

BRADLEY, JACQUELINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualKESWICK, VA

$3,300

Apr 18, 2024

DEVORE, DEBBIE

SEA & SHORELINE • ACCOUNTANT

IndividualWINTER GARDEN, FL

$3,300

May 31, 2024

Rep. Pettersen, Brittany [D-CO-7]

ID: P000620

Top Contributors

HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA

OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA

OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

OTOE-MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationRED ROCK, OK

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

OTOE-MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationRED ROCK, OK

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF NORTH DAKOTA

OrganizationBELCOURT, ND

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF NORTH DAKOTA

OrganizationBELCOURT, ND

$3,300

Jun 10, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Oct 16, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,300

Dec 21, 2023

BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Oct 12, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$1,000

May 22, 2023

Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4]

ID: B000825

Top Contributors

ENERGY STRONG LLC

OrganizationWINDSOR, CO

$2,000

Oct 4, 2024

EFFECTV

OrganizationSAN ANTONIO, TX

$1,169

Aug 29, 2024

CAPITOL FOCUS LLC

OrganizationDENVER, CO

$500

Oct 14, 2024

J A'S LLC

OrganizationDURANGO, CO

$250

Jun 21, 2023

CUYLER, BEVERLY

IndividualPAGOSA SPRINGS, CO

$9,100

Jul 1, 2023

ELLIOTT, DAVID

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$8,300

Sep 30, 2023

COVINGTON, GARY

IndividualMIDLAND, TX

$6,800

Jun 14, 2023

CLARK, ROBERT

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEWTON, NC

$6,600

Mar 10, 2024

BECK, ELAINE

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualORO VALLEY, AZ

$6,600

Jan 17, 2024

HINMAN, ROY H.

IndividualSAINT AUGUSTINE, FL

$6,600

Mar 31, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 58 nodes and 36 connections (53 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $118,700

Top Donors - Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26]

Showing top 17 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC16 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 5 helped.

+Real Estateconfidence 0.80
Section 1 establishes new ZIP Codes for specific communities, which could increase property values and aid in development, thus benefiting the real estate industry.
+Commercial Banksconfidence 0.60
Section 1 implies potential economic growth in designated areas, which may lead to increased banking activities and services, benefiting commercial banks.
+Big-Box Retailconfidence 0.60
Section 1 could lead to increased commercial activity, including retail, as unique ZIP Codes may attract more businesses and customers to these areas, benefiting big-box retail.
+Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.60
Section 1 may require updates to telecommunications infrastructure to accommodate new ZIP Codes, potentially benefiting telecommunications companies.
+Construction & Engineeringconfidence 0.60
Section 1 could lead to increased construction activities as areas with new ZIP Codes may see more development, benefiting construction and engineering firms.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Big-Box Retail$250
from 1 contribution
- BURKS, JONATHAN$250

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 56%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 672 focuses on assigning ZIP codes to specific communities for mail delivery efficiency, which is unrelated to the Department of Health and Human Services policies in Project 2025 that concern healthcare regulations, civil rights, reproductive health, and social services. There is no thematic or policy overlap between the bill and the cited HHS provisions."

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 54%

Pages: 488-490AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill concerns postal ZIP code assignments for specific communities, while the Project 2025 HHS section focuses on abortion data reporting, gender identity data collection, FDA drug competition policies, laboratory-developed tests, drug shortages, and abortion pills. There is no thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 456 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise abortion providers and whether better prenatal physical, mental, and social care improves infant outcomes and decreases abortion rates, especially among those who are most vulnerable. The Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 20239 would amend title XIX of the Social Security Act and Public Health Service Act to improve the CDC’s abortion reporting mechanisms by requiring states, as a condition of federal Medicaid payments for family planning services, to report streamlined variables in a timely manner. The CDC should immediately end its collection of data on gender identity, which legitimizes the unscientific notion that men can become women (and vice versa) and encourages the phenomenon of ever-multiplying subjective identities. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA) The FDA’s mission includes ensuring the safety and efficacy of drugs, biological products, and medical devices. Federal Laws That Shield Big Pharma from Competition. Because generics generally cost far less than brand-name drugs, consumers begin to save money as soon as a generic product comes on the market. The vast majority are very afford- able with 93 percent of generic products costing $20 or less. Savings would be even higher under proposals that prevent brand-name man- ufacturers from slowing down or impeding the entrance of generic products into the marketplace. Specifically, the FDA should prohibit pharmaceutical companies from purposely sitting on their legally available right to be the first to sell generic versions of their drugs. Additionally, Congress should create legal remedies for generic companies to obtain samples of brand-name products for their generic development efforts and should prohibit meritless “citizen petitions” submitted by manufacturers to delay approval of a generic competitor.10 Approval Process for Laboratory-Developed or Modified Medical Tests. Learning from the failed early COVID-19 testing experience, Congress and the FDA should focus on reforming laws and regulations governing medical tests, especially with respect to laboratory-developed tests. Commercial tests are developed with the intention of being widely marketed, distributed, and used, while laboratory-developed tests are created with the intention of being used solely within one laboratory. A test developed by a lab in accordance with the protocols developed by another lab (non-commercial sharing) currently constitutes a “new” laboratory-developed test because the lab in which it will be used is different from the initial developing lab. To encourage interlab- oratory collaboration and discourage duplicative test creation (and associated regulatory and logistical burdens), the FDA should introduce mechanisms through which laboratory-developed tests can easily be shared with other laboratories with- out the current regulatory burdens.11 — 457 — Department of Health and Human Services The “laboratory-developed tests” category currently encompasses a range of possible tests, many of which would be characterized more appropriately as “lab- oratory-modified tests” because they are not truly novel tests but rather modified versions of existing tests. To avoid stifling innovation and access to medical care, the applicable statutes and regulations should be revised to facilitate greater access to such modified tests.12 Finally, the FDA has long held that it has regulatory authority over such tests, while others have argued that they should be considered clinical services regulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The FDA currently has regulatory authority over in vitro diagnostics, and under the Clinical Lab- oratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA),13 the CMS ensures that labs meet analytical validity standards for test methods. Congress, the FDA, and the CMS need to clarify and disentangle overlapping authorities over tests to eliminate regulatory confusion.14 Drug Shortages. The very thin profit margins and the regulatory burdens associated with generic drug manufacturing discourage inventory and capacity investments by manufacturers and contribute to drug shortages. HHS and the FDA should encourage more dependable generic drug manufacturing. The FDA should expand its current pass/fail approach to drug facility inspec- tions into a graded system that recognizes manufacturers that exceed minimum standards by investing in improving production reliability. The FDA should also add facility codes to drug packaging and construct a searchable database that cross-references product codes and facility codes. That would enable wholesalers and pharmacy benefit managers to identify and preference drugs manufactured at more reliable facilities, thus encouraging generic drug manufacturers to compete on reliability as well as on price. For its part, HHS should exempt multi-source generic drugs from requirements to pay rebates to Medicaid and other federally funded health programs, as those provisions penalize new investments in expanding manufacturing capacity when supply is unable to meet demand.15 Additionally, FDA and NIH should promote efficacy trials of new applications for generic drugs, which might include NIH fund- ing such trials or conducting its own. Abortion Pills. Abortion pills pose the single greatest threat to unborn chil- dren in a post-Roe world. The rate of chemical abortion in the U.S. has increased by more than 150 percent in the past decade; more than half of annual abortions in the U.S. are chemical rather than surgical. The abortion pill regimen is typically a two-part process. The first pill, mifepris- tone, causes the death of the unborn child by cutting off the hormone progesterone, which is required to sustain a pregnancy. The second pill, misoprostol, causes con- tractions to induce a delivery of the dead child and uterine contents, usually into a toilet at home. The abortion-pill regimen is currently approved for up to 70 days

Environmental Protection Agency

Minimal

Vector: 54%

Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 672 focuses on assigning new ZIP codes via the USPS, which is unrelated to the EPA-focused environmental regulatory reforms outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:federal agency coordinationadministrative efficiency

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment. — 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms.

Environmental Protection Agency

Minimal

Vector: 54%

Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on establishing new ZIP codes for specific communities to improve mail delivery and emergency response, which is unrelated to the Environmental Protection Agency policies in Project 2025 concerning air quality, greenhouse gas reporting, and regulatory streamlining."

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 54%

Pages: 171-173AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 672 concerns assigning new ZIP codes via the USPS, which is unrelated to the DHS-focused Project 2025 policies on immigration enforcement, E-Verify, visa restrictions, and agency restructuring."

Key themes:no overlapunrelated

— 138 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise and localities, that would include certification that all components of that government, and not just the applicant agency, are registered with and use E-Verify. l If the applicant is a state or locality, commitment by that state or locality to total information-sharing in the context of both federal law enforcement and immigration enforcement. This would include access to department of motor vehicles and voter registration databases. Non-Use of Discretionary Guest Worker Visa Authorities. To stop facili- tating the availability of cheap foreign labor in order to support American workers (particularly poor and middle-class American workers) and follow congressional intent, the Secretary should explicitly cease using at least two discretionary author- ities as part of his or her broader effort to support American workers. l The Secretary should make it clear that he or she will not use the Secretary’s existing discretionary authority to increase the number of H-2B (seasonal non-agricultural) visas above the statutorily set cap. l The Secretary should not issue any regulations in support of the “H-2 eligible” country list, the effect of which would prevent favoring certain foreign nationals seeking an H-2 guest worker visa based simply on their nationality. Restoration of Honesty and Transparency. The Secretary should use his or her inherent authority as leader of the department to follow up with congressional and other partners to disclose information and provide the transparency that has been obstructed during the Biden Administration. The Secretary should proceed from the assumption that congressional inquiries and public information requests were unfulfilled and then seek to fulfill them. Replacement of the Entire Homeland Security Advisory Committee. The Secretary should plan to quickly remove all current members of the Homeland Security Advisory Committee and replace them as quickly as is feasible. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (CBP) If all immigration agencies are not merged, including USCIS and ORR, then an appropriate third alternative would be to consolidate ICE and CBP to form a combined Border Security and Immigration Agency (BSIA). This would inte- grate critical interdiction, enforcement, and investigative resources, enhancing coordination and refocusing collective efforts on the vast and complex cross-bor- der threats impacting our nation’s health, safety, and national security. It would

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario

Making appropriations for national security, Department of State, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2027, and for other purposes.

119/hr/8595

Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2025

119/hr/4397

National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2026

119/hr/4779

Back to All Bills