The bill
ADAS Functionality and Integrity Act
HR. 6688, 119th Congress β read as touching Automotive (Legacy).
Sponsored by
Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
ID: H001086
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 6688, 119th Congress β read as touching Automotive (Legacy).
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
February 9, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another brilliant example of congressional incompetence, masquerading as a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Let's dissect this trainwreck.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The ADAS Functionality and Integrity Act (HR 6688) claims to address the pressing issue of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) calibration, modifications, and tolerances in passenger motor vehicles. The bill's sponsors, Mrs. Harshbarger et al., want us to believe that this legislation will ensure the safety and functionality of ADAS-equipped vehicles after modification or customization.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to develop guidelines for ADAS calibration, modifications, and tolerances within 24 months. These guidelines must include:
1. Allowable modification ranges and tolerances for physical parameters impacting ADAS functionality. 2. A process for manufacturers to provide vehicle tolerance and system sensitivity information to owners and the NHTSA. 3. Quantifiable tolerance thresholds for changes in vertical and lateral displacement. 4. Proper calibration procedures after repair, modification, or component replacement.
The bill also authorizes the NHTSA to contract with independent laboratories and vehicle testing facilities to develop these guidelines.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
* Manufacturers of passenger motor vehicles and equipment * Standard setting organizations * Independent automotive aftermarket parties (i.e., non-authorized service providers) * Dealers
These stakeholders will be required to comply with the NHTSA's guidelines, which will likely lead to increased costs and bureaucratic red tape.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill is a classic example of regulatory overreach, driven by a misguided attempt to address a perceived safety issue. The real motivation behind this legislation is to create a new revenue stream for the automotive industry through compliance costs and potential lawsuits.
The guidelines will likely be overly complex and burdensome, leading to increased costs for manufacturers, dealers, and independent repair facilities. This will ultimately result in higher prices for consumers and reduced competition in the market.
Furthermore, the bill's emphasis on "empirical data" and "transparent validation criteria" is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to justify the NHTSA's overreach. The agency will use these guidelines as a pretext to exert greater control over the automotive industry, stifling innovation and competition.
In conclusion, HR 6688 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's a solution in search of a problem, driven by special interests and bureaucratic hubris. If passed, this bill will only serve to further entrench the regulatory state, at the expense of consumers and the economy.
Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 6 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: O000019
Top Contributors
10
ID: V000136
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000474
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001230
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000397
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001223
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 62 nodes and 35 connections (51 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $131,652
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.
Section 2(a) requires NHTSA to develop guidelines for ADAS calibration, modifications, and tolerances for passenger motor vehicles, which benefits automotive manufacturers by providing clarity and reducing liability for aftermarket modifications. Section 2(e) imposes civil penalties on manufacturers that do not meet guidelines, creating a compliance cost but overall the bill supports industry standardization and safety, which is a net benefit.
Electric vehicles are included in the definition of 'passenger motor vehicle' (Section 4(9)) and are subject to the same ADAS guidelines. The bill ensures ADAS functionality after modifications, which is critical for EVs that rely heavily on such systems, thus supporting EV manufacturers by promoting safety and consumer confidence.