The bill
Noncontiguous Shipping Relief Act of 2024
HR. 667, 119th Congress — read as touching Surface Transportation.
Sponsored by
Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1]
ID: C001055
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 667, 119th Congress — read as touching Surface Transportation.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
29 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E90-91)
February 3, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the real disease beneath.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Noncontiguous Shipping Relief Act of 2024 (HR 667) claims to provide "relief" to the shipping industry by allowing foreign-flag vessels to transport merchandise in noncontiguous trade, exempting them from certain regulations. The bill's sponsors, Mr. Case and Mr. Moylan, must have been suffering from a severe case of naivety or opportunism when they introduced this bill.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill amends various sections of Title 46, United States Code, to create exemptions for foreign qualified freight vessels (FQFVs) in noncontiguous trade. These changes include:
1. Exempting FQFVs from the requirement that they be built or rebuilt in the United States. 2. Allowing FQFVs to employ non-US citizens, as long as some US citizens are employed. 3. Permitting FQFVs to operate under foreign registry without approval from the Secretary of Transportation.
These provisions are nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to deregulate the shipping industry and benefit special interests at the expense of American workers and national security.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The affected parties include:
1. Foreign shipping companies, who will now have an unfair advantage over their US-based competitors. 2. US shipbuilders and repair yards, which will lose business due to the exemptions granted to FQFVs. 3. American seafarers, who may face reduced job opportunities and lower wages as a result of increased competition from foreign vessels.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill has far-reaching implications for the US shipping industry, national security, and the economy:
1. **Job losses**: By allowing FQFVs to operate with fewer restrictions, American seafarers may face reduced job opportunities and lower wages. 2. **National security risks**: Exempting foreign vessels from certain regulations increases the risk of security breaches and potential terrorist threats. 3. **Environmental concerns**: The bill's provisions may lead to increased pollution and environmental degradation, as foreign vessels may not adhere to the same standards as US-flagged vessels.
In conclusion, HR 667 is a classic example of legislative malpractice. It prioritizes special interests over national security, American workers, and the environment. This bill should be diagnosed with a severe case of "Corporate Influence-itis" and treated with a healthy dose of skepticism and scrutiny.
Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: M001219
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: T000486
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 66 nodes and 32 connections (66 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $81,548
Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped, 1 harmed.
Section 2 allows foreign-flag vessels to transport merchandise in noncontiguous trade, reducing barriers for maritime shipping and benefiting surface transportation industries like freight shipping and logistics.
Section 4 subjects vessels to international labor standards and allows participation in Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, potentially increasing labor costs and regulatory burdens for maritime employers, affecting labor unions.
Section 6 requires compliance with environmental standards for vessels in coastwise trade, which may increase demand for cleaner fuels and emissions control technologies, indirectly benefiting telecommunications through increased data and monitoring needs for compliance.