The bill
TIER Act of 2025
HR. 6553, 119th Congress β read as touching Commercial Banks.
Sponsored by
Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]
ID: B001282
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 6553, 119th Congress β read as touching Commercial Banks.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 457.
February 24, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this monstrosity and expose its true intentions.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The TIER Act of 2025 is a cleverly crafted bill that claims to "index statutory thresholds" and make periodic adjustments to account for increases in the United States' gross domestic product (GDP). In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to further deregulate the financial industry, allowing banks and other financial institutions to take on more risk and increase their profits.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill makes several key changes to existing law:
1. Increases the threshold for bank holding companies from $100 billion to $150 billion in assets. 2. Raises the threshold for systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) from $250 billion to $370 billion in assets. 3. Requires periodic adjustments to these thresholds every five years, based on GDP growth.
These changes will allow larger banks and financial institutions to operate with less regulatory oversight, increasing their ability to engage in reckless behavior and putting the entire financial system at risk.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The affected parties include:
1. Large banks and financial institutions: They'll benefit from reduced regulatory requirements and increased flexibility to take on more risk. 2. Regulators: They'll have less authority to oversee and regulate these institutions, making it harder to prevent another financial crisis. 3. Taxpayers: They'll be left holding the bag if (when) these institutions fail, requiring massive bailouts to prop up the system.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
The TIER Act of 2025 is a recipe for disaster. By reducing regulatory oversight and allowing larger banks to take on more risk, we're increasing the likelihood of another financial crisis. The consequences will be severe:
1. Increased systemic risk: Larger banks will be able to engage in more reckless behavior, putting the entire financial system at risk. 2. Reduced consumer protection: With less regulatory oversight, consumers will be more vulnerable to predatory lending practices and other forms of exploitation. 3. Greater inequality: The benefits of deregulation will primarily accrue to large banks and their shareholders, widening the wealth gap between the rich and the poor.
In conclusion, the TIER Act of 2025 is a cynical attempt to further enrich the financial elite at the expense of the American people. It's a bill that should be rejected outright, but I'm sure it'll sail through Congress with ease, given the industry's stranglehold on our politicians.
Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 7 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: M001204
Top Contributors
10
ID: W000816
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001236
Top Contributors
10
ID: S000168
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000491
Top Contributors
10
ID: S000250
Top Contributors
10
ID: N000193
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 64 nodes and 37 connections (48 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $150,804
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.
Section 2(a)(1)-(2) raises the asset thresholds for assessments under the Federal Reserve Act from $100B to $150B and the range from $100B-$250B to $150B-$370B, reducing the number of banks subject to higher assessments. Section 2(b) raises the threshold in the Bank Holding Company Act from $10B to $15B, reducing regulatory burden on mid-sized banks. Section 2(c) and (d) similarly raise thresholds in the Financial Stability Act of 2010 and related acts, decreasing regulatory costs for banks.
The bill amends the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) to raise asset thresholds that determine which financial institutions are subject to enhanced prudential standards and stress testing (e.g., Sections 2(c)(1)-(5), 3). These thresholds apply to bank holding companies and financial companies, which include major investment banks. Raising thresholds from $250B to $370B and $10B to $15B reduces the number of institutions subject to stringent regulations, benefiting large investment ban
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.