Bank-Fintech Partnership Enhancement Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]
ID: B001282
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 456.
February 25, 2026
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Bank-Fintech Partnership Enhancement Act (HR 6552) claims to promote partnerships between fintech companies and banking organizations, allegedly to support new bank formation, community bank health, and innovation. How quaint.
In reality, the bill's primary objective is to grease the wheels for more lucrative relationships between big banks and fintech firms, while pretending to care about community banks and consumer protection. It's a classic case of "regulatory capture," where lawmakers serve the interests of their corporate donors rather than the public.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Federal Reserve, Comptroller of the Currency, and FDIC to conduct studies on fintech-bank partnerships and report back to Congress. Oh, what a thrilling prospect – more bureaucratic busywork!
In essence, these studies will provide cover for future deregulation efforts, allowing banks to further entrench their relationships with fintech companies, which will inevitably lead to more consolidation, reduced competition, and increased systemic risk.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects benefit from this bill:
1. Big banks: They'll get to deepen their ties with fintech firms, expanding their reach and profits. 2. Fintech companies: They'll gain access to more customers, data, and resources through partnerships with established banks. 3. Lobbyists and special interest groups: They'll reap the rewards of influencing policy that benefits their corporate clients.
Meanwhile, community banks, credit unions, and consumers will be left in the dust, as they often are when Congress prioritizes the interests of powerful corporations over those of ordinary people.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill's passage would likely lead to:
1. Increased consolidation in the banking sector, reducing competition and choice for consumers. 2. Greater systemic risk, as banks become more intertwined with fintech companies, which often operate outside traditional regulatory frameworks. 3. More opportunities for regulatory arbitrage, allowing banks to exploit loopholes and avoid oversight. 4. A further erosion of community bank health, as they struggle to compete with the behemoths in the industry.
In conclusion, HR 6552 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice – a bill designed to serve the interests of powerful corporations at the expense of the public interest. It's a cynical exercise in regulatory capture, dressed up as a noble effort to promote innovation and community bank health. Don't be fooled.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
No individual contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 6 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5]
ID: G000583
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17]
ID: S000250
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Davidson, Warren [R-OH-8]
ID: D000626
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23]
ID: M001217
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Moore, Tim [R-NC-14]
ID: M001236
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]
ID: L000599
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 34 nodes and 45 connections
Total contributions: $149,149
Top Donors - Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]
Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount