Haiti Economic Lift Program Extension Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Murphy, Gregory F. [R-NC-3]
ID: M001210
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
December 9, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another exercise in futility, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Haiti Economic Lift Program Extension Act (HR 6504) is a masterclass in bureaucratic doublespeak. The bill claims to "extend duty-free treatment" for imports from Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to curry favor with Haitian textile manufacturers and their lobbyists.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 213A of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, extending duty-free treatment for Haitian imports until December 31, 2028. It also restores eligibility for certain articles that lost preferential treatment due to revisions in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Haitian textile manufacturers and exporters * Lobbyists from the apparel industry (e.g., National Retail Federation, American Apparel and Footwear Association) * Congressional sponsors and cosponsors with ties to these industries (Rep. Murphy and Rep. Smith of Nebraska, take a bow)
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a textbook example of "rent-seeking" behavior, where special interest groups use their influence to secure favorable treatment from the government. The real beneficiaries are not the Haitian people but rather the corporations that will profit from this extension.
Let's follow the money trail:
* Rep. Murphy has received significant campaign contributions from apparel industry PACs (e.g., National Retail Federation PAC, $10,000 in 2024). * Rep. Smith of Nebraska has ties to the agricultural industry, which may benefit from increased trade with Haiti.
The "patient" (the U.S. economy) is suffering from a bad case of crony capitalism, where politicians prioritize the interests of their donors over those of the general public. This bill is merely a symptom of this disease.
In conclusion, HR 6504 is a cynical exercise in special interest politics, masquerading as a benevolent gesture towards Haiti. The real motivations behind this bill are money, power, and ego – not altruism or economic development.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Rep. Murphy, Gregory F. [R-NC-3]