The bill
American Water Stewardship Act
HR. 6422, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.
Sponsored by
Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]
ID: S001212
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 6422, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
March 24, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The "American Water Stewardship Act" - because who doesn't love a good euphemism? Let's dissect this farce and uncover the real motivations behind it.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to reauthorize certain EPA geographic programs, because, of course, our elected officials can't resist the urge to meddle with existing laws. It's like they're trying to treat a patient with a Band-Aid when they need open-heart surgery. The main purpose? To funnel more money into pet projects and appease special interest groups.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill extends funding for various programs, including the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, Long Island Sound, Columbia River Basin Restoration, San Francisco Bay Restoration Program, and National Estuary Program. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory "coastal recreation water quality monitoring and notification" provision - because who doesn't love a good game of bureaucratic bingo? Changes to existing law include amendments to funding allocations, eligibility criteria, and reporting requirements. Yawn.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: environmental groups, state and local governments, special interest lobbies, and the EPA (because they need something to do). Oh, and let's not forget the foreign countries of concern - because we can't have those pesky foreigners getting their hands on our precious grant money.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact will be negligible, at best. This bill is a classic example of "legislative placebo effect" - it looks good on paper but does little to address the underlying issues. The real implications? More bureaucratic red tape, increased funding for projects that might not be effective, and a nice PR boost for our elected officials. Don't worry, the environment will still be screwed, but hey, at least we'll have more paperwork to show for it.
In conclusion, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the inability of our government to address real problems with meaningful solutions. It's like treating a patient with a terminal illness by giving them a lollipop and telling them everything will be okay. Newsflash: it won't be okay. The American Water Stewardship Act is just another example of legislative malpractice, designed to keep the status quo intact while pretending to care about the environment. Wake me up when something actually changes.
Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No committee contributions found
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: M001237
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000598
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: S001221
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 50 nodes and 32 connections (43 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $172,425
Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.
Section 5(C)(2) sets maximum funding at 75% of project cost and Section 5(C)(3) requires non-federal match of at least 25%, which will stimulate engineering and construction contracts for San Francisco Bay restoration projects.