American Water Stewardship Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/6422
Last Updated: July 12, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

ID: S001212

Follow the money

The bill

American Water Stewardship Act

HR. 6422, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.

The sponsor

Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$150,125 raised

26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

March 24, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The "American Water Stewardship Act" - because who doesn't love a good euphemism? Let's dissect this farce and uncover the real motivations behind it.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to reauthorize certain EPA geographic programs, because, of course, our elected officials can't resist the urge to meddle with existing laws. It's like they're trying to treat a patient with a Band-Aid when they need open-heart surgery. The main purpose? To funnel more money into pet projects and appease special interest groups.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill extends funding for various programs, including the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, Long Island Sound, Columbia River Basin Restoration, San Francisco Bay Restoration Program, and National Estuary Program. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory "coastal recreation water quality monitoring and notification" provision - because who doesn't love a good game of bureaucratic bingo? Changes to existing law include amendments to funding allocations, eligibility criteria, and reporting requirements. Yawn.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: environmental groups, state and local governments, special interest lobbies, and the EPA (because they need something to do). Oh, and let's not forget the foreign countries of concern - because we can't have those pesky foreigners getting their hands on our precious grant money.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact will be negligible, at best. This bill is a classic example of "legislative placebo effect" - it looks good on paper but does little to address the underlying issues. The real implications? More bureaucratic red tape, increased funding for projects that might not be effective, and a nice PR boost for our elected officials. Don't worry, the environment will still be screwed, but hey, at least we'll have more paperwork to show for it.

In conclusion, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the inability of our government to address real problems with meaningful solutions. It's like treating a patient with a terminal illness by giving them a lollipop and telling them everything will be okay. Newsflash: it won't be okay. The American Water Stewardship Act is just another example of legislative malpractice, designed to keep the status quo intact while pretending to care about the environment. Wake me up when something actually changes.

Related Topics

Water & Air Quality RegulationsWildlife & Endangered SpeciesClimate Change & Sustainability
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$150,125
24 donors
PACs
$500
Organizations
$10,925
Committees
$0
Individuals
$138,700
1
DEMOCRACY ENGINE INC
1 transaction
$500
1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUITY
2 transactions
$6,600
2
LEECH LAKE - PAC
1 transaction
$3,300
3
GOOGLE
1 transaction
$1,000
4
CHAIN BRIDGE BANK
1 transaction
$25

No committee contributions found

1
KING, RUSSELL
2 transactions
$13,200
2
ZOTTO, CARLA DEL
1 transaction
$10,000
3
ANDERSON, ROLLIS
1 transaction
$9,900
4
FAISON, JAY
1 transaction
$6,600
5
NYSTROM, BRIAN AND MARY ANN
1 transaction
$6,600
6
OSBORNE, DAVID
1 transaction
$6,600
7
HUBBARD, KAREN MRS.
1 transaction
$6,600
8
HUBBARD, STANLEY
1 transaction
$6,600
9
JOHNSON, TODD MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
10
MAKI, BRIAN MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
11
MURPHY, MARK B.
1 transaction
$6,600
12
ULRICH, ROBERT
1 transaction
$6,600
13
MCKINZIE, KAREN M.
1 transaction
$6,600
14
MCKINZIE, KEITH MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
15
OLSON, JENNIFER
1 transaction
$6,600
16
SPEVACEK, CHARLES MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
17
CERVENKA, DEBRA A
1 transaction
$6,600
18
KOCH, BARBARA
1 transaction
$6,600
19
GRUSS, MARK L.
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8]

ID: M001237

Top Contributors

10

1
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
2
SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
3
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI
$2,500
Oct 25, 2024
4
MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS
$1,000
Oct 29, 2024
5
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$1,000
Aug 5, 2024
6
SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI
$500
Aug 6, 2024
7
TAYLOR, DONZEL
IndividualSAGINAW, MI
$4,105
Sep 22, 2024
8
GANDHI, MILAN
SEFL EMPLOYEDADMINISTRATOR
IndividualSOUTHFIELD, MI
$3,550
Mar 28, 2024
9
WILCOX, ALLISON
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualMIDLAND, MI
$3,350
Jun 14, 2024
10
ALTMAN, LYNDA CARTER
POTOMAC PRODUCTIONSACTRESS
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 1, 2024

Rep. LaLota, Nick [R-NY-1]

ID: L000598

Top Contributors

0

No contribution data available

Rep. Scholten, Hillary J. [D-MI-3]

ID: S001221

Top Contributors

10

1
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$6,600
Aug 5, 2024
2
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE
OrganizationMT PLEASANT, MI
$3,300
Sep 29, 2023
3
POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationDOWAGIAC, MI
$3,300
Sep 29, 2023
4
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Aug 5, 2024
5
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
6
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023
7
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBE
OrganizationMASHANTUCKET, CT
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023
8
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI
OrganizationFULTON, MI
$3,300
Mar 29, 2024
9
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Sep 23, 2024
10
PEOPLE FOR BETTER GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$1,000
Aug 22, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 50 nodes and 32 connections (43 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $172,425

Top Donors - Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC4 Orgs19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

  • Section 5(C)(2) sets maximum funding at 75% of project cost and Section 5(C)(3) requires non-federal match of at least 25%, which will stimulate engineering and construction contracts for San Francisco Bay restoration projects.

Related Bills