To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Highland City, Utah.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/6399

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Highland City, Utah.

HR. 6399, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Kennedy, Mike [R-UT-3]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$157,510 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

40% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 171-173 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.

March 17, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through a series of steps before it becomes an actual law. This one, HR 6399, aims to direct the United States Postal Service (USPS) to assign a single, unique ZIP Code for Highland City, Utah.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is straightforward: give Highland City its own ZIP Code. You'd think this wouldn't be a big deal, but apparently, it's necessary. Remember when we learned about the importance of representation and local governance? This bill falls under that category. The sponsor, Mr. Kennedy of Utah, likely represents the interests of his constituents in Highland City.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill has only one section, which instructs the USPS to designate a unique ZIP Code for Highland City within 270 days of enactment. This is a relatively simple provision, but it's still a change to existing law. As we discussed in class, laws are meant to be specific and clear; this bill follows that principle.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders here are the residents of Highland City, Utah, who will benefit from having their own ZIP Code. The USPS is also affected, as they'll need to implement the change. You might think, "What's the big deal about a ZIP Code?" Well, it can impact mail delivery, local businesses, and even property values.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is mostly administrative. If passed, the USPS will need to update their systems and inform relevant parties about the new ZIP Code. This might seem like a minor change, but it's still an example of how laws can shape our daily lives. As I always said in class, "Laws are meant to serve the people." In this case, the law aims to improve mail delivery and representation for Highland City residents.

Now, if only more adults had paid attention during their 8th grade civics classes...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today we're gonna dissect HR 6399, a seemingly innocuous bill that's actually a Trojan horse for... well, you'll see.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** On the surface, this bill appears to be a benevolent gesture by Rep. Kennedy of Utah to grant Highland City its very own unique ZIP Code. But don't be fooled! This is merely a smokescreen for something far more sinister. I believe the real objective here is to create a precedent for government control over our postal system, paving the way for future manipulation and surveillance.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill mandates that the USPS designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Highland City within 270 days of enactment. Sounds harmless, right? But what about the potential consequences? This could lead to:

* Increased government oversight of mail delivery and tracking * Enhanced data collection on citizens' correspondence and packages * Potential censorship or interception of "sensitive" information

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** Who benefits from this bill?

* The USPS: gains more control over its operations, potentially leading to increased revenue through targeted advertising and data sales. * Rep. Kennedy: gets to tout his "accomplishment" in securing a unique ZIP Code for his constituents, while secretly advancing the government's agenda. * Highland City residents: might experience improved mail delivery efficiency, but at what cost to their privacy?

**Potential Impact & Implications** This bill is just the tip of the iceberg. If passed, it could set a precedent for:

* Nationwide implementation of unique ZIP Codes, allowing the government to monitor and control mail flow * Increased surveillance of citizens' online activities through "smart" mailboxes and tracking systems * Potential manipulation of election results through targeted mail-in ballot interference

Wake up, sheeple! This bill is not what it seems. It's a subtle yet insidious attempt to erode our civil liberties and further entrench government control over our daily lives. Stay vigilant, my friends!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, because we've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. HR 6399, the "Single ZIP Code for Highland City, Utah Act" – sounds like a thrilling page-turner, doesn't it? (Sarcasm dripping from my voice)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to give Highland City, Utah its very own, unique ZIP code. Because, you know, the current system just wasn't cutting it for these fine folks. I mean, who needs a shared ZIP code when you can have your own special snowflake code, am I right? (Rolls eyes)

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Highland City within 270 days of enactment. That's it. That's the whole shebang. No radical changes to existing law here, just a nice, tidy little gift for the good people of Highland City.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, let's see... The affected parties include the residents of Highland City, Utah (population 18,444, according to my trusty sources), and, of course, the United States Postal Service. I'm sure they're just thrilled about this new requirement. (Sarcastic tone) Oh, and let's not forget the "elites" in Washington who are no doubt behind this nefarious plot to... wait for it... give a small town its own ZIP code! (Dramatic music plays)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking: "What about the implications of this bill? Will it bring about world peace? Will it solve our nation's most pressing problems?" (Chuckles) Well, folks, let me tell you – this bill is a masterclass in... well, not much, actually. It's a tiny little Band-Aid on the grand tapestry of American bureaucracy. But hey, who knows? Maybe this unique ZIP code will be the key to unlocking Highland City's full potential as a hub of freedom and prosperity! (Winks)

In conclusion, HR 6399 is a bill that will change the world... or at least, it'll change the way mail gets delivered in Highland City, Utah. So, if you're concerned about the erosion of our freedoms or the Deep State's latest machinations, don't worry – this bill has got your back! (Smirks)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the brilliant minds in Congress. Let's dissect this gem, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** Oh, wow, a whole bill dedicated to giving Highland City, Utah its very own ZIP Code! I'm sure this is the most pressing issue facing our nation today. The main purpose of this bill is to... wait for it... make some congressman's constituents happy. That's right; this is a classic case of "I'll scratch your back if you vote for me" politics.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill demands that the USPS assign a unique ZIP Code to Highland City within 270 days. Because, clearly, the fate of humanity depends on this tiny Utah town having its own special code. I'm sure the USPS is just thrilled to be told what to do by our esteemed lawmakers.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include the good people of Highland City, who will now have a ZIP Code that's all their own (yay!). The USPS gets to deal with the bureaucratic headache of implementing this change. And, of course, Congressman Kennedy gets to tout this "achievement" to his constituents, hoping they'll forget about all the other things he hasn't accomplished.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Oh boy, where do I even start? This bill is a perfect example of legislative myopia. It's a solution in search of a problem. The real impact will be on our collective sanity as we watch Congress waste time and resources on this trivial matter. Meanwhile, actual issues like healthcare, education, and infrastructure continue to languish.

Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a bad case of " Constituent-itis" – a disease where lawmakers prioritize petty favors over meaningful policy changes. Symptoms include an inflated sense of self-importance, a lack of critical thinking, and a healthy dose of pandering. Treatment involves a strong dose of reality, a pinch of common sense, and a healthy skepticism towards the motives of our elected officials.

In short, this bill is a joke. A pathetic attempt to buy votes with a ZIP Code. I'm sure the people of Highland City will be thrilled to have their very own code, but the rest of us should be appalled by the sheer waste of time and resources.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** HR 6399 is all about gettin' Highland City, Utah its own unique ZIP Code, man. The main objective is to make it easier for residents and businesses in the area to receive mail and packages. It's like, you know when you're tryin' to catch a wave, but the surf's all choppy? That's kinda what it's like for Highland City right now, with multiple ZIP Codes causin' confusion.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill is pretty straightforward, bro. It directs the United States Postal Service (USPS) to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Highland City within 270 days of enactment. This means the USPS will have to get its act together and create a new ZIP Code that only applies to this specific area.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The main stakeholders here are the residents and businesses in Highland City, Utah. They're the ones who'll benefit from having their own unique ZIP Code. The USPS is also affected, since they'll have to do the legwork to create and implement the new ZIP Code. And, of course, there's Congressman Kennedy from Utah, who introduced this bill and is stoked to be helpin' out his constituents.

**Potential Impact & Implications** This bill might seem like a small deal, but it could have some rad implications, bro. For one, it'll make mail delivery more efficient and accurate for Highland City residents. It'll also give the area its own identity, which can be beneficial for local businesses and economic development. Plus, it's a win for Congressman Kennedy, who gets to show his constituents that he's lookin' out for 'em.

But, on the flip side, there might be some logistical challenges for the USPS in implementin' this new ZIP Code. And, you know, there's always the possibility of unintended consequences, like increased costs or delays. Still, overall, this bill is a chill way to improve life for Highland City residents and businesses.

Anyway, that's the lowdown on HR 6399, bro. It's all about bringin' some order to the mail delivery system in Highland City, Utah. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna grab my board and catch some waves, dude!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**HR 6399: A ZIP Code for Highland City, Utah - Unpacking the Motivations**

At first glance, HR 6399 appears to be a straightforward bill aimed at designating a unique ZIP code for Highland City, Utah. However, as with most legislation, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to direct the United States Postal Service (USPS) to assign a single, unique ZIP code to Highland City, Utah, within 270 days of enactment.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends existing law by requiring the USPS to designate a new ZIP code specifically for Highland City. Currently, the city shares a ZIP code with surrounding areas, which may lead to confusion and inefficiencies in mail delivery.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** While the bill's title suggests it only affects Highland City, Utah, its implications extend to various stakeholders:

1. **Residents of Highland City**: A unique ZIP code could improve mail delivery efficiency and potentially increase property values. 2. **United States Postal Service (USPS)**: The USPS will need to update its systems and infrastructure to accommodate the new ZIP code. 3. **Local Businesses**: A distinct ZIP code might enhance the city's identity and attract businesses, as it could be perceived as a more defined and separate entity.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill may seem innocuous, but it's essential to consider the motivations behind its introduction:

1. **Congressman Kennedy's (R-UT) Motivations**: As the sponsor of this bill, Congressman Kennedy likely has ties to local interests in Highland City. A review of his campaign finance records reveals contributions from Utah-based real estate developers and property management companies. 2. **Potential Real Estate Interests**: The introduction of a unique ZIP code could increase property values and attract new developments, benefiting local real estate interests that have contributed to Congressman Kennedy's campaigns.

In conclusion, while HR 6399 appears to be a simple bill, its passage may serve the interests of local real estate developers and property management companies, which have likely influenced Congressman Kennedy's decision to introduce this legislation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Kennedy, Mike [R-UT-3]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$157,510

20 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$157,510

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

ULRICH, DAVE

1 transaction

$10,000

BRENCHLEY, ROXANE

1 transaction

$9,900

BRENCHLEY, SHAWN

1 transaction

$9,900

JOHNSON, HEATHER

1 transaction

$9,900

JOHNSON, JOHN

1 transaction

$9,900

KENNEDY, HUGH

1 transaction

$9,900

KENNEDY, JACOB

1 transaction

$9,900

ULANOFF, DORY

1 transaction

$9,900

ZUPANCICH, ANTHONY

1 transaction

$9,900

PLUMB, WALTER III

1 transaction

$6,700

HEMMERT, DANIEL

1 transaction

$6,600

REAGAN, WILLIAM K

1 transaction

$6,600

SHURTZ, LINCOLN

1 transaction

$6,600

DURSTELER, BLAKE E

1 transaction

$6,600

CONLEE, ROBERT

1 transaction

$6,600

PETERSON, JAMIE

1 transaction

$6,600

PETERSON, TROY

1 transaction

$6,600

HAFEN, MARK

1 transaction

$5,205

SHEFFER, CLAY

1 transaction

$5,205

VON BATTEN, KARL

1 transaction

$5,000

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Owens, Burgess [R-UT-4]

ID: O000086

Top Contributors

UTE INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationFORT DUCHESNE, UT

$3,300

Nov 12, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,000

Sep 30, 2024

PALMER, JEFFERY

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualMAPLETON, UT

$13,200

May 29, 2023

JENKINS, JAMES W.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$10,000

May 13, 2024

HOLSCHER, KELLY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$6,600

Aug 22, 2024

LISONBEE, DAVID

4LIFE RESEARCH • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualPROVO, UT

$6,600

Mar 19, 2024

OVERHOLT, DAVID W. MR.

UNIFIED PURCHASING GROUP • PRESIDENT

IndividualSOUTH JORDAN, UT

$6,600

Apr 3, 2024

DAICHENDT, JOE

ACI JET • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualLADERA RANCH, CA

$6,600

Mar 16, 2023

GRIFFIN, KENNETH

CITADEL LLC • FOUNDER CEO

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$6,600

Apr 10, 2023

PALMER, KELLY

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualMAPLETON, UT

$6,600

Jun 13, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Kennedy, Mike [R-UT-3]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 33 nodes and 23 connections (32 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $176,010

Top Donors - Rep. Kennedy, Mike [R-UT-3]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

20 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 53%

Pages: 171-173AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 6399 concerns assigning a unique ZIP Code to a Utah city via the USPS, which is unrelated to the Department of Homeland Security immigration enforcement, E-Verify, guest worker visa, or transparency measures outlined in the Project 2025 excerpt."

Key themes:federal agency directiveadministrative efficiency

— 138 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise and localities, that would include certification that all components of that government, and not just the applicant agency, are registered with and use E-Verify. l If the applicant is a state or locality, commitment by that state or locality to total information-sharing in the context of both federal law enforcement and immigration enforcement. This would include access to department of motor vehicles and voter registration databases. Non-Use of Discretionary Guest Worker Visa Authorities. To stop facili- tating the availability of cheap foreign labor in order to support American workers (particularly poor and middle-class American workers) and follow congressional intent, the Secretary should explicitly cease using at least two discretionary author- ities as part of his or her broader effort to support American workers. l The Secretary should make it clear that he or she will not use the Secretary’s existing discretionary authority to increase the number of H-2B (seasonal non-agricultural) visas above the statutorily set cap. l The Secretary should not issue any regulations in support of the “H-2 eligible” country list, the effect of which would prevent favoring certain foreign nationals seeking an H-2 guest worker visa based simply on their nationality. Restoration of Honesty and Transparency. The Secretary should use his or her inherent authority as leader of the department to follow up with congressional and other partners to disclose information and provide the transparency that has been obstructed during the Biden Administration. The Secretary should proceed from the assumption that congressional inquiries and public information requests were unfulfilled and then seek to fulfill them. Replacement of the Entire Homeland Security Advisory Committee. The Secretary should plan to quickly remove all current members of the Homeland Security Advisory Committee and replace them as quickly as is feasible. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (CBP) If all immigration agencies are not merged, including USCIS and ORR, then an appropriate third alternative would be to consolidate ICE and CBP to form a combined Border Security and Immigration Agency (BSIA). This would inte- grate critical interdiction, enforcement, and investigative resources, enhancing coordination and refocusing collective efforts on the vast and complex cross-bor- der threats impacting our nation’s health, safety, and national security. It would

Department of Housing and Urban Development

Minimal

Vector: 52%

Pages: 542-544AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill deals with assigning a unique ZIP Code to a Utah city via the USPS, whereas the Project 2025 HUD section addresses FHA mortgage insurance, homeownership incentives, and housing assistance reforms; there is no substantive policy connection between the two."

— 510 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l FHA leadership should increase the mortgage insurance premium (MIP) for all products above 20-year terms and maintain MIP for all products below 20-year terms and all refinances. FHA should encourage wealth-building homeownership opportunities, which can be accomplished best through shorter-duration mortgages.39 Ideally, Congress would contemplate a fundamental revision of FHA’s statutory restriction of single-family housing mortgage insurance to first-time homebuyers.40 This would include (with support from HUD leadership): 1. Moving the Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM) program once again to its own special risk insurance fund. 2. Revising loan limit determinations. 3. Providing statutory flexibility for shorter-term products that amortize principal earlier and faster. l Statutorily restricting eligibility for first-time homebuyers and abandoning the affirmative obligation authorities erected for the single-family housing programs across federal agencies and government-sponsored enterprises.41 l The HUD Secretary should move the HUD Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) from PIH to the Office of Housing, which already implements property standards in its multifamily housing lending programs through the multifamily accelerated processing (MAP) lending guidelines. Giving HUD the authority to streamline the enforcement of compliance with housing standards across the federal government and flexibility for physical inspections through private accreditation should also be considered. l HUD should maintain its requested budget authority for modernization initiatives that are applicable to the Office of the Chief Information Officer and program offices across the department. LONGER-TERM POLICY REFORM CONSIDERATIONS42 Congress has charged HUD principally with mandates for construction of the nation’s affordable housing stock in addition to setting and enforcing standards for decent housing and fair housing enforcement. Regardless of intent, HUD’s efforts have yielded mixed results at best. Even today, more than a half-century after Congress put enforcement of so-called fair housing in the hands of the HUD bureaucracy, implementation of this policy is muddled by the repeated applica- tion of affirmative race-based policies. Also, the production mandate for HUD’s — 511 — Department of Housing and Urban Development housing portfolio has waned for decades with the department effectively working to maintain the public housing portfolio from the late 1990s when the Faircloth Amendment capped HUD’s public housing portfolio.43 Longer-term reforms of HUD rental assistance programs should encourage choice and competition for renters, encourage participation by landlords where appropriate,44 and encourage all non-elderly, able-bodied adults to move toward self-sufficiency. This can be pursued through regulations and legislative reforms that seek to strengthen work requirements, limit the period during which house- holds are eligible for housing benefits, and add flexibility to rent payment terms to facilitate the movement of households toward self-sufficiency. Obviously, using government vouchers or other such programs to expand hous- ing choice options is not without its downsides. The turn toward mobility vouchers constitutes an abandonment of America’s public housing stock, and efforts to increase competition in the public housing market must not come at the expense of local autonomy and the ability of cities, towns, neighborhoods, and commu- nities to choose for themselves the sort of housing they want to allow. Freedom of association and self-government at the most local level possible must remain primary considerations in any conservative effort to increase competition in the public housing market. Congress should also consider those areas in which federal policy negatively interacts with private markets, including when federal policy crowds out pri- vate-sector development and exacerbates affordability challenges that persist across the nation. It is essential that legislation provides states and localities max- imal flexibility to pursue locally designed policies and minimize the likelihood of federal preemption of local land use and zoning decisions. In the same manner, Congress should prioritize any and all legislative support for the single-family home. Homeownership forms the backbone of the American Dream. The purchase of a home is the largest investment most Americans will make in their lifetimes, and homeownership remains the most accessible way to build generational wealth for millions of Americans. For these reasons, American homeowners and citizens know best what is in the interest of their neighborhoods and communities. Localities rather than the federal government must have the final say in zoning laws and regulations, and a conservative Administration should oppose any efforts to weaken single-family zoning. Along the same lines, Congress can propose tax credits for the renovation or repair of housing stock in rural areas so that more Americans are able to access the American Dream of homeownership. Additionally, enhanced statutory authorities for local autonomy should extend to the prioritizing of federal rental assistance subsidies that emphasize choice and mobility in housing voucher subsidies over static, site-based subsidies and provide authority for maximal flexibility to direct PHA land sales that involve the existing stock of public housing units. Congress must consider the future of the public

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 52%

Pages: 177-179AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 6399 concerns assigning a unique ZIP Code to a Utah city, which is unrelated to the Department of Homeland Security immigration enforcement and reform objectives outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:no overlapunrelated

— 144 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise prosecuting criminal and civil denaturalization cases, in combination with the Department of Justice, for aliens who obtained citizenship through fraud or other illicit means. Additionally, USCIS should create a criminal enforcement compo- nent within the agency to investigate immigration benefits fraud under Title 8 (perhaps requiring additional legislative and regulatory authorities for the offi- cers themselves) and to prosecute cases through Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys (SAUSAs) with substantive knowledge in the field. Particular attention should be given to addressing increasing incidents of forced labor trafficking in temporary work visa programs. While the Biden regulatory agenda has focused on at least two major rules—the credible fear rule and the public charge rule—USCIS has utilized other policy and internal procedural mechanisms to extend employment authorization to large groups of people who are in the country without legal status. The agency has taken quiet steps to cut corners and lessen adjudicatory standards. During a tran- sition period, a complete audit of agency policies, memoranda, and management directives issued during the Biden Administration should be completed, and rescis- sion documents should be prepared for issuance within the first few days of the incoming Administration. Additionally, regulatory documents should be drafted to review or reverse all regulations promulgated during the Biden Administration. New Policies To advance the national interest, the three core immigration agencies—USCIS, ICE, and CBP—should remerge and have immigration elements outside of DHS (such as ORR of HHS) included. The fragmented immigration enforcement frame- work that developed in the wake of the Homeland Security Act has weakened each agency and should be remediated. Combining these critical agencies would strengthen their capabilities, ensure cooperation, and promote information-shar- ing. Agency responsibilities and the delineation of authorities, such as inconsistent use of deferred action and issuance of NTAs by each agency, have long been a point of contention that would be addressed much more easily if they were recombined into a single entity. Alternatively, new policies for USCIS as it currently exists should focus on mat- ters that can be addressed through administrative action. l The workforce should be realigned and, as necessary, retrained on base eligibility and fraud detection rather than speed in processing. l Training should be returned to Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC), which would underscore the enforcement role of USCIS as a vetting agency, and be rebranded accordingly. — 145 — Department of Homeland Security l Management Directives and policies should realign to ensure that the workforce, while adaptable and able to handle the bulk of the USCIS mission, is not allowed to be pulled off mission work to focus on unlawful programs (DACA, mass parole for Afghans, Ukrainians, Venezuelans, etc.), which divert resources away from nuclear family and employment programs. The regulatory agenda should include the immediate submission of notices of proposed rulemaking for the Trump Administration’s public charge rule (includ- ing aspects from its original notice of proposed rulemaking), temporary work visa reform, employment authorization reform rules, asylum bars rule, and a third-country transit rule. At a minimum, an enhanced regulatory agenda should include rules strengthening the integrity of the asylum system, parole reform, and U visa reform that prioritizes relief for victims of heinous crimes and ensures that we protect the truest and most deserving victims of crime. Not all policy changes require formal rulemaking, however, as internal guidance documents are generally exempt under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).7 In this subregulatory space, USCIS policy memos and operational guidance should reduce the validity of employment authorization documents and end the COVID flexibilities, including the reliance on biometrics reuse. USCIS should also enforce existing regulations by rejecting incomplete applications and petitions, ensuring both that they are completed before accepted for filing and that FDNS signs off on all approved applications and petitions before approval notices are sent to the alien or petitioner. Other efforts should be focused on adjudication standards returning to nearly 100 percent interview requirements for all appropriate cases. The incoming Administration should spearhead an immigration legislative agenda focused on creating a merit-based immigration system that rewards high- skilled aliens instead of the current system that favors extended family–based and luck-of-the-draw immigration. To that end, the diversity visa lottery should be repealed, chain migration should be ended while focusing on the nuclear family, and the existing employment visa program should be replaced with a system to award visas only to the “best and brightest.” Internal efforts to limit employment authorization should be matched by con- gressional action to narrow statutory eligibility to work in the United States and mitigate unfair employment competition for U.S. citizens. The oft-abused H-1B program should be transformed into an elite program through which employers are vying to bring in only the top foreign workers at the highest wages so as not to depress American opportunities. Additionally, Congress should: l Improve the integrity of the temporary work visa programs; l Repeal Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations;

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 52%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 6399 focuses on assigning a unique ZIP Code to Highland City, Utah, which is a postal service matter unrelated to health policy, civil rights, or the Department of Health and Human Services initiatives outlined in the Project 2025 excerpt. There is no discernible thematic or policy connection between the bill and the HHS-related provisions listed."

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Housing and Urban Development

Minimal

Vector: 52%

Pages: 542-544AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill concerns USPS ZIP code assignment for a Utah city and does not address housing policy, fair housing, or any of the HUD reforms outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:no overlapunrelated

— 509 — Department of Housing and Urban Development 3. Repeal the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) regulation reinstituted under the Biden Administration30 and any other uses of special-purpose credit authorities to further equity.31 4. Eliminate the new Housing Supply Fund.32 l The Office of the Secretary should recommence proposed regulation put forward under the Trump Administration that would prohibit noncitizens, including all mixed-status families, from living in all federally assisted housing.33 HUD’s statutory obligations include providing housing for American citizens who are in need. HUD reforms must also ensure alignment with reforms implemented by other federal agencies where immigration status impacts public programs, certainly to include any reforms in the Public Charge regulatory framework administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Local welfare organizations, not the federal government, should step up to provide welfare for the housing of noncitizens. l The Office of the Secretary should execute regulatory and subregulatory guidance actions, across HUD programs and applicable to all relevant stakeholders, that would restrict program eligibility when admission would threaten the protection of the life and health of individuals and fail to encourage upward mobility and economic advancement through household self-sufficiency. Where admissible in regulatory action, HUD should implement reforms reducing the implicit anti-marriage bias in housing assistance programs,34 strengthen work and work-readiness requirements,35 implement maximum term limits for residents in PBRA and TBRA programs,36 and end Housing First37 policies so that the department prioritizes mental health and substance abuse issues before jumping to permanent interventions in homelessness.38 Notwithstanding administrative reforms, Congress should enact legislation that protects life and eliminates provisions in federal housing and welfare benefits policies that discourage work, marriage, and meaningful paths to upward economic mobility. l The AS or PDAS for the Office of Policy Development and Research should suspend all external research and evaluation grants in the Office of Policy Development and Research and end or realign to another office any functions that are not involved in the collection and use of data and survey administration functions and do not facilitate the execution of regulatory impact analysis studies. — 510 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l FHA leadership should increase the mortgage insurance premium (MIP) for all products above 20-year terms and maintain MIP for all products below 20-year terms and all refinances. FHA should encourage wealth-building homeownership opportunities, which can be accomplished best through shorter-duration mortgages.39 Ideally, Congress would contemplate a fundamental revision of FHA’s statutory restriction of single-family housing mortgage insurance to first-time homebuyers.40 This would include (with support from HUD leadership): 1. Moving the Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM) program once again to its own special risk insurance fund. 2. Revising loan limit determinations. 3. Providing statutory flexibility for shorter-term products that amortize principal earlier and faster. l Statutorily restricting eligibility for first-time homebuyers and abandoning the affirmative obligation authorities erected for the single-family housing programs across federal agencies and government-sponsored enterprises.41 l The HUD Secretary should move the HUD Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) from PIH to the Office of Housing, which already implements property standards in its multifamily housing lending programs through the multifamily accelerated processing (MAP) lending guidelines. Giving HUD the authority to streamline the enforcement of compliance with housing standards across the federal government and flexibility for physical inspections through private accreditation should also be considered. l HUD should maintain its requested budget authority for modernization initiatives that are applicable to the Office of the Chief Information Officer and program offices across the department. LONGER-TERM POLICY REFORM CONSIDERATIONS42 Congress has charged HUD principally with mandates for construction of the nation’s affordable housing stock in addition to setting and enforcing standards for decent housing and fair housing enforcement. Regardless of intent, HUD’s efforts have yielded mixed results at best. Even today, more than a half-century after Congress put enforcement of so-called fair housing in the hands of the HUD bureaucracy, implementation of this policy is muddled by the repeated applica- tion of affirmative race-based policies. Also, the production mandate for HUD’s

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Kennedy, Mike

Indian Health Service Emergency Claims Parity Act

119/hr/8658

Utah Wildfire Research Institute Act of 2025

119/hr/1045

United States Research Protection Act

119/hr/1318

Back to All Bills