Home School Graduation Recognition Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/6392
Last Updated: July 12, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

ID: H001102

Follow the money

The bill

Home School Graduation Recognition Act

HR. 6392, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.

The sponsor

Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$111,300 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

61% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 380-382 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 358.

March 16, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the same geniuses who think a participation trophy is an actual achievement.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** Oh, please, it's not like they're trying to hide anything. This bill is a blatant attempt to pander to the homeschooling lobby and their enablers in Congress. The "main purpose" is to make homeschoolers feel special by recognizing them as high school graduates, because, apparently, that's not something parents can do on their own.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Wow, what a monumental change! They're amending the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include homeschoolers in the definition of "high school graduate." I bet the Founding Fathers are rolling over in their graves, thinking, "This is what we fought for?" The only thing more impressive than this bill's lack of substance is its ability to make a non-issue into a federal case.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Homeschoolers and their parents will be thrilled to know that the government has officially recognized their existence. Colleges and universities might experience a slight increase in applicants who have been "educated" at home, which could lead to some... interesting... academic discussions. And, of course, the homeschooling lobby will get to pat themselves on the back for a job well done.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact? Zero. Zilch. Nada. This bill is a placebo, designed to make people feel good without actually doing anything meaningful. It won't improve education outcomes, increase access to higher education, or address any real issues in our education system. But hey, it's a great way for politicians to pretend they care about education while actually just pandering to a vocal minority.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Pandering-itis," a disease characterized by an excessive need for approval and a complete lack of substance. The symptoms include empty rhetoric, meaningless legislation, and a desperate attempt to curry favor with special interest groups. Treatment? A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach, and a willingness to call out the obvious nonsense that is HR 6392.

Related Topics

Education & Student Aid
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$111,300
20 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$0
Committees
$0
Individuals
$111,300

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

1
CARSTEN, KATHERINE M
1 transaction
$10,000
2
HORNE, CHRIS
1 transaction
$6,600
3
DIMICCO, DANIEL
1 transaction
$6,600
4
GREENBLATT, SCOTT
1 transaction
$6,600
5
HENDLEY, JOHN NANCE
1 transaction
$6,600
6
BUTLER, DONALD R
1 transaction
$6,600
7
CHERRY, LINDA
1 transaction
$6,600
8
GOLDING, ERNEST G
1 transaction
$6,600
9
KIDD, VICKIE
1 transaction
$6,600
10
LAMB, JOHN R
1 transaction
$6,600
11
HINSON, RONALD G
1 transaction
$6,500
12
HELMS, LARRY S
1 transaction
$5,600
13
VOGLER, SHEILA H
1 transaction
$5,000
14
WALL, JENNIFER
1 transaction
$5,000
15
HINMAN, ROY H
1 transaction
$3,300
16
GUY, JAMES
1 transaction
$3,300
17
HORNE, DARCI
1 transaction
$3,300
18
PORTER, BRENDA C
1 transaction
$3,300
19
PORTER, GARY
1 transaction
$3,300
20
ROBINSON, GARY T
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 9 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15]

ID: M001211

Top Contributors

10

1
WINRED PAC
PACARLINGTON, VA
$13,010
Mar 31, 2023
2
ADAMS MEMORIALS
OrganizationCHARLESTON, IL
$1,000
Mar 23, 2023
3
VAHLING VINEYARDS
OrganizationSTEWARDSON, IL
$500
Jan 11, 2024
4
KASPAR, SCOTT
KASPAR LAW COMPANYLAWYER
IndividualORLAND PARK, IL
$13,200
Mar 22, 2023
5
BISHOP, JACK L MR
SELF EMPLOYEDINVESTOR
IndividualLAKE BLUFF, IL
$10,000
Mar 30, 2023
6
BISHOP, JACK L MR
SELF EMPLOYEDINVESTOR
IndividualLAKE BLUFF, IL
$7,700
Mar 30, 2023
7
FORSYTHE, GERALD R MR
INDECK ENERGY SERVICESCEO
IndividualNAPLES, FL
$6,600
Nov 14, 2023
8
DAMAS, BETH A
SOUTHWEST ENDODONTICSENDODONTIST
IndividualORLAND PARK, IL
$6,600
Mar 22, 2023
9
FORSYTHE, GERALD R MR
INDECK ENERGY SERVICESCEO
IndividualNAPLES, FL
$6,600
Aug 15, 2023
10
UIHLEIN, RICHARD
ULINECEO
IndividualLAKE BLUFF, IL
$5,800
Jan 26, 2023

Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]

ID: H001086

Top Contributors

10

1
BROWN, NANCY I.
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$6,600
Mar 7, 2024
2
NANCY, BROWN
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$6,600
Mar 31, 2024
3
GREGORY, LUCINDA
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualPINEY FLATS, TN
$6,600
May 21, 2024
4
BANKE, BARBARA R
IndividualGEYSERVILLE, CA
$6,600
Nov 30, 2023
5
MORRIS, GLENN
IndividualSTUART, FL
$6,600
Sep 30, 2024
6
TAYLOR, MARGARETTA J MISS
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Jul 16, 2024
7
EGER, MORDECHI
HLU SALES INCOWNER
IndividualAIRMONT, NY
$5,000
Dec 28, 2023
8
BORDEAU, BRAD
BORDEAU METALSCEO
IndividualDICKSON, TN
$5,000
Sep 11, 2024
9
BENTZ, KAREN
IndividualGATLINBURG, TN
$5,000
Sep 30, 2023
10
MOUNTAIN, MONICA
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualNEW TAZEWELL, TN
$3,600
Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Steube, W. Gregory [R-FL-17]

ID: S001214

Top Contributors

10

1
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
NONERETIRED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Nov 21, 2023
2
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
BLACKSTONECEO AND CHAIRMAN
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Nov 20, 2023
3
HOLDERNESS, MICHAEL S. JR.
SELF EMPLOYEDHOTELIER
IndividualSARASOTA, FL
$3,300
Dec 27, 2023
4
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
NONERETIRED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 21, 2023
5
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
BLACKSTONECEO AND CHAIRMAN
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 20, 2023
6
MCGILLICUDDY, DENNIS J.
NONERETIRED
IndividualSARASOTA, FL
$3,300
Mar 21, 2023
7
MCGILLICUDDY, GRACIELA
NONERETIRED
IndividualSARASOTA, FL
$3,300
Mar 21, 2023
8
TWOHIG, STEPHEN
SELF EMPLOYEDINVESTOR
IndividualOSPREY, FL
$3,300
Feb 13, 2023
9
BATMASIAN, JAMES
INVESTMENTS LIMITEDCO-OWNER
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$3,300
Mar 5, 2024
10
LIGORI, CHRISTOPHER
CHRISTOPHER LIGORI ASSOCIATESATTORNEY
IndividualTAMPA, FL
$3,300
Mar 31, 2024

Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-9]

ID: G000565

Top Contributors

10

1
COLORADO RIVER INDIANS TRIBES
OrganizationPARKER, AZ
$2,000
Sep 21, 2023
2
COLORADO RIVER INDIANS TRIBES
OrganizationPARKER, AZ
$1,000
Jun 29, 2024
3
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$1,000
Jul 19, 2023
4
SCHIRMER, SCOTT
M3 COMPEXECUTIVE
IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ
$5,000
May 20, 2024
5
SMITH, RYAN
SELF EMPLOYEDENTREPRENEUR
IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ
$5,000
May 20, 2024
6
SCHIRMER, SCOTT
IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ
$5,000
Jun 5, 2024
7
SMITH, RYAN
IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ
$5,000
Jun 5, 2024
8
TAPIA, DONALD
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualPARADISE VALLEY, AZ
$5,000
Aug 29, 2024
9
TAPIA, DONALD
IndividualPARADISE VALLEY, AZ
$5,000
Sep 9, 2024
10
O'KEEFFE, WILLIAM
SAFTIPRESIDENT
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$5,000
Oct 23, 2024

Rep. Fine, Randy [R-FL-6]

ID: F000484

Top Contributors

0

No contribution data available

Rep. Kiley, Kevin [R-CA-3]

ID: K000401

Top Contributors

10

1
WINRED
COMARLINGTON, VA
$30
Oct 24, 2024
2
WINRED
COMARLINGTON, VA
$10
Oct 29, 2024
3
BENNETT WEST ROSEVILLE LLC
NOT INCORPORATED
OrganizationORANGEVALE, CA
$3,000
Oct 21, 2024
4
NICHOLSON & OLSON, CPAS
UNINCORPORATED PARTNERSHIP
OrganizationROSEVILLE, CA
$750
Jun 28, 2023
5
NASH, JILL
N/ANOT EMPLOYOED
IndividualLINCOLN, CA
$6,600
Jul 22, 2024
6
ROWE, SUSAN
N/ANOT EMPLOYED
IndividualBAKERSFIELD, CA
$6,600
May 20, 2024
7
BURKE, TIM
QUEST TECHNOLOGYBUSINESS OWNER
IndividualORANGEVALE, CA
$6,600
Oct 10, 2024
8
SMYTH, CHARLES
IndividualGRANITE BAY, CA
$6,600
Nov 3, 2024
9
FRANCK, KASI
SELFDENTIST
IndividualROCKLIN, CA
$6,600
Dec 28, 2023
10
BRADLEY, KATHERINE
CITYBRIDGE FOUNDATIONBOARD CHAIR
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$5,000
Sep 11, 2024

Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8]

ID: E000300

Top Contributors

10

1
WRIGHT, ELIZABETH
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO
$6,600
Jun 29, 2024
2
WOODWARD, JOHN
SPIERER WOODWARDATTORNEY
IndividualGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
$6,600
Sep 19, 2023
3
BERGSTROM, ROBERT
BT CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTION
IndividualFORT LUPTON, CO
$6,600
Oct 13, 2024
4
ERICKSON, GARY
EXECUTIVE CUSTOM CONSTRUCTIONGENERAL CONTRACTOR
IndividualCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
$6,600
Oct 15, 2024
5
HASELDEN, BYRON
HASELDEN CONSTRUCTIONCEO
IndividualCENTENNIAL, CO
$6,600
Oct 14, 2024
6
HASELDEN, EDDIE
HASELDEN CONSTRUCTIONCHAIRMAN
IndividualCENTENNIAL, CO
$6,600
Oct 14, 2024
7
HASELDEN, MIKE
HASELDEN CONSTRUCTIONCO-CHAIRMAN
IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO
$6,600
Oct 14, 2024
8
WAGNER, BRUCE
WAGNER EQUIPMENTPRES
IndividualLITTLETON, CO
$5,000
Sep 20, 2024
9
DUKE, D. A.
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO
$5,000
Oct 9, 2024
10
MCDONALD, BRUCE
MCDONALD INSURANCE GROUPOWNER
IndividualLITTLETON, CO
$3,868
Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Houchin, Erin [R-IN-9]

ID: H001093

Top Contributors

10

1
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Aug 3, 2023
2
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationRED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Aug 3, 2023
3
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF NORTH DAKOTA
OrganizationBELCOURT, ND
$3,300
Aug 3, 2023
4
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$2,500
Dec 19, 2023
5
BANKE, BARBARA
JACKSON FAMILY FOUNDATIONEXECUTIVE
IndividualGEYSERVILLE, CA
$6,600
Dec 7, 2023
6
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Mar 6, 2024
7
GRIFFIN, KENNETH
CITADEL LLCFOUNDER CEO
IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL
$6,600
Apr 10, 2023
8
ROWAN, CAROLYN
CAROLYN ROWAN COLLECTION LLCEXECUTIVE
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$6,600
Jun 28, 2023
9
ROWAN, MARC
APOLLO MANAGEMENT HOLDINGSEXECUTIVE
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$6,600
Jun 28, 2023
10
KIESLER, DOUGLAS M MR.
KIESLER POLICE SUPPLY, INC.CEO
IndividualGREENVILLE, IN
$6,600
Feb 22, 2023

Rep. McGuire, John J. [R-VA-5]

ID: M001239

Top Contributors

0

No contribution data available

Donor Network - Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 49 nodes and 32 connections (29 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $166,110

Top Donors - Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

20 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.

  • Section 2 of the bill amends the Higher Education Act to recognize home-schooled students as high school graduates, potentially reducing demand for for-profit education services by providing an alternative pathway to higher education.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate61.3%
Pages: 380-382

— 348 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise materials, private school tuition, transportation and more—accounts modeled after the accounts in Arizona, Florida, West Virginia, and seven other states. l Members of Congress should design the same account system for students in active-duty military families, including students attending schools that receive funding under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).18 Heritage Foundation research found that if even 10 percent of the students eli- gible for accounts under such a proposal transferred from an assigned school to an education savings account, the change for the sending district would be 0.1 percent of that school district’s K–12 budget. Even in heavily impacted districts (districts with a large number of students receiving Impact Aid), the budgetary effect would be less than 2 percent. Yet these children would then have the chance to receive a customized education that meets their unique needs. As with state ESA programs, families who are homeschooling are distinct in statute from families who use an ESA to customize an education at home. Furthermore, research from the Claremont Institute used documents pro- vided by a whistleblower demonstrating how educators at Department of Defense schools around the world are using radical gender theory and critical race theory in their lessons. This instructional material discards biology in favor of political indoctrination and applies critical race theory’s core tenets advocating for more racial discrimination. Such ideas are highly unpopular among parents, accord- ing to nationally representative surveys, and the course material attempts to indoctrinate students with radical ideas about race and the ambiguous concept of “gender.” Finally, schools on tribal lands and under the auspices of the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) are among the worst-performing public schools in the country. Research from Rep. Burgess Owens’ office reports that the graduation rate for BIE students is 53 percent, lower than the average for Native American students in public schools around the country, and nearly 30 percentage points lower than the national average for all students. In 2015, Arizona lawmakers expanded the state’s education savings account program to include children living on tribal lands, and by 2021, nearly 400 Native American children were using the accounts. l Federal officials should design a federal education savings account option for all children attending BIE schools. The next Administration should make the K–12 systems under federal juris- diction examples of quality learning opportunities and education freedom. — 349 — Department of Education Washington should convert some of the lowest-performing public school systems in the country into areas defined by choices, creating rigorous learning options for all children and from all backgrounds, income levels, and ethnicities. Expand Education Choice Through Portability of Existing Federal Funds Setting education policy on the right track long term would require sunsetting the U.S. Department of Education altogether. Doing so would not result in fewer resources and less assistance for children with special needs or from low-income families. Rather, closing the federal behemoth would better target existing taxpayer resources already set aside for these students by shifting oversight responsibilities to federal and state agencies that have more expertise in helping these populations. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is the federal law gov- erning taxpayer spending on K–12 students with special needs. The law stipulates that students have a right to a “free and appropriate education,” and 95 percent of children with special needs attend assigned public schools. The education is not always appropriate, however: Special education is fraught with legal battles. Some argue that the education of children with special needs is the most litigated area of K–12 education. Thus, despite a nearly 50-year-old federal law that sees regular revision and reauthorization and approximately $13.5 billion per year in federal taxpayer spending, parents still struggle to establish intervention plans for their students with public school district officials regarding the physical and educational requirements for their children with special needs. State-level education options often exclusively serve children with special needs for these very reasons. Florida, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Mississippi, South Carolina, and North Carolina, to name a few states, all have education savings accounts or K–12 private school scholarship options for children with special needs. l Federal lawmakers should move IDEA oversight and implementation to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. l Officials should then consider revising IDEA to require that a child’s portion of the federal taxpayer spending under the law be made available to families so parents can choose how and where a child learns. l IDEA already allows families to choose a private school under certain conditions, but federal officials should update the law so that families can use their child’s IDEA spending for textbooks, education therapies, personal tutors, and other learning expenses, similar to the way in which parents use education savings accounts in states such as Arizona and Florida. These micro-education savings accounts

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills