The bill
Home School Graduation Recognition Act
HR. 6392, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.
Sponsored by
Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]
ID: H001102
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 6392, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 380-382 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 358.
March 16, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the same geniuses who think a participation trophy is an actual achievement.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** Oh, please, it's not like they're trying to hide anything. This bill is a blatant attempt to pander to the homeschooling lobby and their enablers in Congress. The "main purpose" is to make homeschoolers feel special by recognizing them as high school graduates, because, apparently, that's not something parents can do on their own.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Wow, what a monumental change! They're amending the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include homeschoolers in the definition of "high school graduate." I bet the Founding Fathers are rolling over in their graves, thinking, "This is what we fought for?" The only thing more impressive than this bill's lack of substance is its ability to make a non-issue into a federal case.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Homeschoolers and their parents will be thrilled to know that the government has officially recognized their existence. Colleges and universities might experience a slight increase in applicants who have been "educated" at home, which could lead to some... interesting... academic discussions. And, of course, the homeschooling lobby will get to pat themselves on the back for a job well done.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact? Zero. Zilch. Nada. This bill is a placebo, designed to make people feel good without actually doing anything meaningful. It won't improve education outcomes, increase access to higher education, or address any real issues in our education system. But hey, it's a great way for politicians to pretend they care about education while actually just pandering to a vocal minority.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Pandering-itis," a disease characterized by an excessive need for approval and a complete lack of substance. The symptoms include empty rhetoric, meaningless legislation, and a desperate attempt to curry favor with special interest groups. Treatment? A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach, and a willingness to call out the obvious nonsense that is HR 6392.
Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 9 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: M001211
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001086
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001214
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000565
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000484
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: K000401
Top Contributors
10
ID: E000300
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001093
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001239
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 49 nodes and 32 connections (29 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $166,110
Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.
Section 2 of the bill amends the Higher Education Act to recognize home-schooled students as high school graduates, potentially reducing demand for for-profit education services by providing an alternative pathway to higher education.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.
— 348 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise materials, private school tuition, transportation and more—accounts modeled after the accounts in Arizona, Florida, West Virginia, and seven other states. l Members of Congress should design the same account system for students in active-duty military families, including students attending schools that receive funding under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).18 Heritage Foundation research found that if even 10 percent of the students eli- gible for accounts under such a proposal transferred from an assigned school to an education savings account, the change for the sending district would be 0.1 percent of that school district’s K–12 budget. Even in heavily impacted districts (districts with a large number of students receiving Impact Aid), the budgetary effect would be less than 2 percent. Yet these children would then have the chance to receive a customized education that meets their unique needs. As with state ESA programs, families who are homeschooling are distinct in statute from families who use an ESA to customize an education at home. Furthermore, research from the Claremont Institute used documents pro- vided by a whistleblower demonstrating how educators at Department of Defense schools around the world are using radical gender theory and critical race theory in their lessons. This instructional material discards biology in favor of political indoctrination and applies critical race theory’s core tenets advocating for more racial discrimination. Such ideas are highly unpopular among parents, accord- ing to nationally representative surveys, and the course material attempts to indoctrinate students with radical ideas about race and the ambiguous concept of “gender.” Finally, schools on tribal lands and under the auspices of the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) are among the worst-performing public schools in the country. Research from Rep. Burgess Owens’ office reports that the graduation rate for BIE students is 53 percent, lower than the average for Native American students in public schools around the country, and nearly 30 percentage points lower than the national average for all students. In 2015, Arizona lawmakers expanded the state’s education savings account program to include children living on tribal lands, and by 2021, nearly 400 Native American children were using the accounts. l Federal officials should design a federal education savings account option for all children attending BIE schools. The next Administration should make the K–12 systems under federal juris- diction examples of quality learning opportunities and education freedom. — 349 — Department of Education Washington should convert some of the lowest-performing public school systems in the country into areas defined by choices, creating rigorous learning options for all children and from all backgrounds, income levels, and ethnicities. Expand Education Choice Through Portability of Existing Federal Funds Setting education policy on the right track long term would require sunsetting the U.S. Department of Education altogether. Doing so would not result in fewer resources and less assistance for children with special needs or from low-income families. Rather, closing the federal behemoth would better target existing taxpayer resources already set aside for these students by shifting oversight responsibilities to federal and state agencies that have more expertise in helping these populations. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is the federal law gov- erning taxpayer spending on K–12 students with special needs. The law stipulates that students have a right to a “free and appropriate education,” and 95 percent of children with special needs attend assigned public schools. The education is not always appropriate, however: Special education is fraught with legal battles. Some argue that the education of children with special needs is the most litigated area of K–12 education. Thus, despite a nearly 50-year-old federal law that sees regular revision and reauthorization and approximately $13.5 billion per year in federal taxpayer spending, parents still struggle to establish intervention plans for their students with public school district officials regarding the physical and educational requirements for their children with special needs. State-level education options often exclusively serve children with special needs for these very reasons. Florida, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Mississippi, South Carolina, and North Carolina, to name a few states, all have education savings accounts or K–12 private school scholarship options for children with special needs. l Federal lawmakers should move IDEA oversight and implementation to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. l Officials should then consider revising IDEA to require that a child’s portion of the federal taxpayer spending under the law be made available to families so parents can choose how and where a child learns. l IDEA already allows families to choose a private school under certain conditions, but federal officials should update the law so that families can use their child’s IDEA spending for textbooks, education therapies, personal tutors, and other learning expenses, similar to the way in which parents use education savings accounts in states such as Arizona and Florida. These micro-education savings accounts
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.