Apex Area Technical Corrections Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/618
Last Updated: July 12, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4]

ID: H001066

Follow the money

The bill

Apex Area Technical Corrections Act

HR. 618, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.

The sponsor

Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$102,250 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Energy and Related Commissions" section, p. 449-451 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 119-24.

July 14, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

Passed Congress

Presidential Action

Became Law

📍 Current Status

This bill has become law!

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theatre, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the underlying disease.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Apex Area Technical Corrections Act (HR 618) is a bill that claims to make "technical corrections" to the Apex Project, Nevada Land Transfer and Authorization Act of 1989. How quaint. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to grease the wheels for land transfers, mineral sales, and other sweetheart deals in North Las Vegas.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several "technical corrections" that are anything but technical:

1. It adds the City of North Las Vegas and the Apex Industrial Park Owners Association as beneficiaries of the original act. 2. It expands the definition of "Apex Site" to include other lands conveyed in accordance with this Act (read: more land for development). 3. It grants the Secretary of the Interior authority to transfer lands, interests in lands, or rights-of-way to Clark County, North Las Vegas, and the Apex Industrial Park Owners Association. 4. It exempts certain mineral sales from competition requirements and quantity limitations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

1. The City of North Las Vegas: Gets a piece of the action in land transfers and development deals. 2. The Apex Industrial Park Owners Association: Benefits from expanded definitions and exemptions. 3. Clark County: Receives more authority to manage lands and interests within the Apex Site. 4. Mineral companies: Get a free pass on competition requirements and quantity limitations for mineral sales.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "regulatory capture," where special interest groups manipulate the system to their advantage. The real impact will be:

1. Increased development and land speculation in North Las Vegas, potentially leading to environmental degradation and displacement of local communities. 2. Unchecked exploitation of mineral resources, with little regard for environmental or social consequences. 3. Further concentration of power and wealth among a select few, at the expense of the general public.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "crony capitalism," where politicians and special interest groups collude to line their pockets at the expense of the public good. The symptoms are clear: regulatory capture, lack of transparency, and a blatant disregard for environmental and social consequences. Treatment? A healthy dose of skepticism, followed by a strong antidote of accountability and transparency.

Related Topics

Public Lands & Natural Resources
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$102,250
20 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$58,250
Committees
$0
Individuals
$44,000

No PAC contributions found

1
TUNICA- BILOXI TRIBE OF LA
5 transactions
$15,800
2
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
3 transactions
$9,900
3
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
4
GBS 2, LLC
2 transactions
$6,600
5
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
1 transaction
$3,300
6
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF NORTH DAKOTA
1 transaction
$3,300
7
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
8
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$3,300
9
CHEROKEE NATION
1 transaction
$2,500
10
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$1,650
11
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
12
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
HARRIS, WILLIAM JR
2 transactions
$13,200
2
ROBERTI, VINCENT
2 transactions
$10,000
3
BRADLEY, KATHERINE
1 transaction
$4,100
4
STEIN, THOMSON
1 transaction
$3,500
5
FISHER, CYNTHIA
1 transaction
$3,300
6
GIFFORD, BILLY
1 transaction
$3,300
7
KRAUSZ, STEVEN
1 transaction
$3,300
8
MOLASKY, CHRISTY
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Lee, Susie [D-NV-3]

ID: L000590

Top Contributors

10

1
EMILY'S LIST
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$250
Feb 13, 2024
2
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Jun 27, 2023
3
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Jun 27, 2023
4
TIGUA INDIAN RESERVATION YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO
OrganizationEL PASO, TX
$3,000
Dec 31, 2023
5
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Jun 5, 2023
6
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
May 9, 2024
7
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV
$1,500
Jun 30, 2024
8
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$1,000
Dec 28, 2023
9
RENO SPARKS INDIAN COLONY
OrganizationRENO, NV
$1,000
Jun 21, 2024
10
BRONZE CAFE
OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV
$550
Mar 30, 2023

Rep. Amodei, Mark E. [R-NV-2]

ID: A000369

Top Contributors

10

1
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024
2
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Dec 2, 2024
3
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$2,500
Dec 18, 2023
4
DUFURRENA SHEEP
OrganizationWINNEMUCCA, NV
$1,000
Nov 17, 2023
5
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY
OrganizationRENO, NV
$1,000
Apr 25, 2024
6
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY
OrganizationRENO, NV
$1,000
Sep 26, 2024
7
MERUELO, ALEX
MERUELO GROUP • CEO
IndividualDOWNEY, CA
$6,600
Dec 16, 2024
8
KEYES, HOWARD
KEYES MOTORS • AUTO DEALER
IndividualMALIBU, CA
$6,600
Dec 19, 2023
9
ROCKENFELLER, PAMELA
ROCKY FITNESS • OWNER
IndividualBOULDER CITY, NV
$6,600
Nov 17, 2023
10
ROCKENFELLER, UWE
ROCKY RESEARCH • PRESIDENT
IndividualBOULDER CITY, NV
$6,600
Nov 17, 2023

Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

ID: T000468

Top Contributors

10

1
LAS VEGAS PAIUTE TRIBE
OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
2
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Feb 1, 2024
3
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$2,500
Jun 30, 2024
4
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$1,500
Jun 30, 2023
5
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY
OrganizationRENO, NV
$1,000
Jun 11, 2024
6
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$1,000
Sep 8, 2023
7
NET2LINK, LLC
OrganizationPEMBROKE PINES, FL
$250
Oct 23, 2024
8
CHANG, RONIE
GOLDEN REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENTS • REALTOR
IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV
$3,300
Nov 2, 2024
9
PRITZKER, JAY
STATE OF ILLINOIS • GOVERNOR
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
10
SCHMIDT, ERIC
HILLSPIRE LLC • MANAGER
IndividualPALO ALTO, CA
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 73 nodes and 39 connections (77 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $127,300

Top Donors - Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

12 Orgs8 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.

  • Section 2(3) amends section 4(c) to allow the Secretary to grant Clark County, the City of North Las Vegas, and the Apex Industrial Owners Association certain rights, facilitating land transfers that likely enable construction and development projects in the Apex Industrial Park, benefiting construction and engineering firms involved in land grading, building, and infrastructure.

  • +Real Estateconfidence 0.85

    The bill expands land transfer authority to include the City of North Las Vegas and the Apex Industrial Park Owners Association (Section 2(1)(B), 2(2)(A), 2(3)), enabling development of industrial and potentially commercial real estate within the Apex Site, which benefits real estate developers and property managers.

  • +Chemicals & Plasticsconfidence 0.70

    Section 2(5) adds a mineral materials exemption for sales resulting from grading, land balancing, or surface activities on parcels where the U.S. retains mineral interest, allowing exempt sales under federal regulations. This could benefit companies involved in extracting or processing minerals, chemicals, or plastics derived from such land activities, though the connection is indirect.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Moderate
Vector: 56%
Pages: 449-451AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill emphasizes environmental compliance and fosters cooperation among local governments and stakeholders, which aligns with the Project 2025 EPA vision of cooperative federalism and supportive state/local partnerships, though it does not directly address broader energy or EPA regulatory reforms."

Key themes:environmental compliancecooperative federalismlocal stakeholder engagementland management transparency

— 416 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 119. During the deregulation-induced 230,000 MW combined cycle plant boom of 1999 to 2003 and beyond, developers were able to move ahead only with projects that were supported by adequate available gas transmission and near existing localized transmission hubs. Delinking transmission responsibility from power generation, coupled with the heavy incentivization of renewable over gas projects, has promoted the construction of a large class of partially usable and often partially stranded generation-only assets. 120. U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, “Grid Deployment Office Launches Transmission Siting and Economic Development Grants Program with $760M Inflation Reduction Act Investment,” January 13, 2023, https://www.energy.gov/gdo/articles/grid-deployment-office-launches-transmission-siting-and- economic-development-grants (accessed March 13, 2023). 121. H.R. 6586, Natural Gas Act, Public Law No. 75-688, § 7. 122. Ibid., §§ 4 and 5. 123. Ibid., § 7(c). 124. West Virginia v. EPA, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf (accessed March 2, 2022). 125. H.R. 6586, Natural Gas Act, Public Law No. 75-688, § 3. 126. U.S. Department of Energy U.S.-based operating export LNG terminals are located in Louisiana (3); Texas (2); Alaska (1); Georgia (1); and Maryland (1). Map, “North American LNG Export Terminals: Existing,” in U.S. Department of Energy, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, “North American LNG Export Terminals— Existing, Approved not Yet Built, and Proposed,” February 8, 2023, https://www.ferc.gov/natural-gas/lng (accessed February 14, 2023). 127. Niina H. Farah, Miranda Wilson, and Carlos Anchondo, “Jordan Cove Project Dies. What It Means for FERC, Gas,” Energywire, December 2, 2021, https://www.eenews.net/articles/jordan-cove-project-dies-what-it- means-for-ferc-gas/ (accessed February 14, 2023). 128. Carlos Anchondo, “Biden Admin Backs Contested Alaska LNG Project,” Energywire, October 25, 2022, https:// www.eenews.net/articles/biden-admin-backs-contested-alaska-lng-project/ (accessed February 14, 2023). 129. As discussed in the section on the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, infra, these automatic approvals should be extended to allies of the United States, not just to those with free trade agreements. 130. H.R. 11510, Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, Public Law No. 93-438, 93rd Congress, October 11, 1974, https:// www.congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-88/STATUTE-88-Pg1233.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 131. H.R. 9757, Atomic Energy Act of 1954, Public Law No. 83-703, 83rd Congress, August 30, 1954, §§ 21–28, https://www.congress.gov/83/statute/STATUTE-68/STATUTE-68-Pg919.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 132. S. 512, Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act, Public Law No. 115-439, January 14, 2019, § 103, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ439/PLAW-115publ439.pdf (accessed March 2, 2023). 133. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Congressional Budget Justification Fiscal Year 2022, June 2021, p. xii, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1100/v37/index.html (accessed March 2, 2023). — 417 — 13 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Mandy M. Gunasekara MISSION STATEMENT Creating a better environmental tomorrow with clean air, safe water, healthy soil, and thriving communities. A conservative U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will take a more supportive role toward local and state efforts, building them up so that they may lead in a meaningful fashion. This will include the sharing of federal resources and agency expertise. Creating environmental standards from the ground up is con- sistent with the concept of cooperative federalism embedded within many of the agency’s authorizing statutes and will create earnest relationships among local offi- cials and regulated stakeholders. This in turn will promote a culture of compliance. A conservative EPA will track success by measured progress as opposed to the current perpetual process and will convey this progress to the public in clear, con- cise terms. True transparency will be a defining characteristic of a conservative EPA. This will be reflected in all agency work, including the establishment of open- source science, to build not only transparency and awareness among the public, but also trust. The challenge of creating a conservative EPA will be to balance justified skep- ticism toward an agency that has long been amenable to being coopted by the Left for political ends against the need to implement the agency’s true function: pro- tecting public health and the environment in cooperation with states. Further, the EPA needs to be realigned away from attempts to make it an all-powerful energy and land use policymaker and returned to its congressionally sanctioned role as environmental regulator.

Environmental Protection Agency

Weak
Vector: 61%
Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill includes a generic requirement for environmental compliance in land transfers but does not address the specific EPA reforms targeted by Project 2025, such as NAAQS streamlining, GHG reporting changes, or air permitting reforms."

Key themes:environmental compliancefederal land lawsstreamlining processes

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment. — 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms.

Environmental Protection Agency

Weak
Vector: 59%
Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill includes generic environmental compliance language but does not address the specific EPA reforms, GHG reporting, NAAQS streamlining, or regulatory authority changes outlined in Project 2025's EPA section."

Key themes:environmental compliancefederal land lawsland management

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills