To Inform Families First Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/6051

Last Updated: November 19, 2025

To Inform Families First Act of 2025

HR. 6051, 119th Congress — read as touching Cybersecurity.

The sponsor

Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$66,000 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 533-535 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

HR 6051, the "To Inform Families First Act of 2025", is a bill that ostensibly aims to promote the voluntary inclusion of emergency contact information in state driver's license and identification systems. As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll cut through the noise and provide a dispassionate analysis of this legislation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to establish a grant program within the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to support states in developing and implementing emergency contact information systems. This system would allow individuals to voluntarily provide emergency contact information, which would be stored in their driver's license or identification records.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces several key provisions:

* Establishes a grant program for states to develop and implement emergency contact information systems. * Requires states to ensure that the provision of emergency contact information is voluntary. * Mandates robust data security protections and restricts access to authorized emergency personnel. * Prohibits the display of emergency contact information on physical driver's licenses or identification cards.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders affected by this bill are:

* States, which would receive grants and technical assistance to develop and implement emergency contact information systems. * Individuals, who would have the option to voluntarily provide emergency contact information. * Emergency personnel, who would have access to this information in emergency situations.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a business perspective, this bill has limited implications for my interests. However, I do see potential opportunities for innovation and growth:

* The grant program could lead to increased investment in digital infrastructure, which could benefit companies like mine that specialize in data management and security. * The emphasis on voluntary participation and robust data security protections could set a precedent for future legislation, potentially creating new business opportunities in the realm of identity verification and authentication.

In conclusion, HR 6051 is a relatively innocuous bill that doesn't pose an immediate threat to my interests. However, as a forward-thinking entrepreneur, I recognize the potential for this legislation to shape the regulatory landscape and create new opportunities for growth and innovation. My think tank, the "Liberty Institute", will continue to monitor this bill's progress and provide strategic guidance on how to leverage its provisions to advance our business objectives.

Projected impact on my net worth: $0 - $100 million (dependent on potential future business opportunities)

Recommendation: Monitor and adapt, but do not actively lobby for or against this bill.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process before it can become a law. This one, HR 6051, is titled "To Inform Families First Act of 2025." Remember when we learned about how bills are referred to committees? Well, this one was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to promote the voluntary inclusion of emergency contact information in state driver's license and identification systems. The objective is to provide support to states for implementing such systems. As we covered in class, this is an example of a federal law that aims to influence state-level policy.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a grant program within the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to assist states in developing and implementing emergency contact information systems. The key provisions include:

* States must ensure that providing emergency contact information is voluntary * Robust data security protections must be included in the system * Access to the information is restricted to authorized emergency personnel for use only during emergencies * There's no requirement to display the emergency contact information on physical driver's licenses or identification cards

These provisions are changes to existing law, as they provide new guidelines and requirements for states to follow.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* States, which will receive assistance from the federal government to implement these systems * Individuals, who will have the option to voluntarily provide emergency contact information * Emergency personnel, who will have access to this information during emergencies

As we discussed in class, stakeholders are individuals or groups that have an interest in the outcome of a policy. In this case, the stakeholders include state governments, citizens, and emergency responders.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of emergency response systems by providing critical contact information to first responders. However, there are also implications for data security and individual privacy. As we learned in class, laws can have unintended consequences, and it's essential to consider these factors when evaluating policy.

Now, I hope that was a sufficient review of this bill. It's not exactly rocket science, folks. This is basic civics 101 material.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The "To Inform Families First Act of 2025" - sounds innocent enough, doesn't it? But trust me, folks, there's more to this bill than meets the eye. Let's dive in and decode the real agenda behind HR 6051.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, this bill aims to promote the voluntary inclusion of emergency contact information in state driver's license and identification systems. Sounds like a noble cause, right? But what if I told you that this is just a Trojan horse for something much bigger?

The real purpose of this bill is to create a national database of personal contact information, masquerading as an "emergency contact system." Think about it - with this system in place, the government will have access to your emergency contacts, which could be used for... well, who knows what? Maybe they'll use it to track down dissenters or silence whistleblowers. You never know.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a grant program for states to develop and implement these emergency contact information systems. But here's the catch - the feds will be providing "technical assistance" to ensure that these systems are implemented correctly. That's just code for "we'll be controlling the narrative."

Section 2(c) requires states to include robust data security protections, but we all know how well those work (cough, NSA, cough). And what about section 2(d), which mandates an annual report on the implementation of this section? Sounds like a perfect opportunity for the government to gather intel on its citizens.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects every single American who holds a driver's license or state ID. That's right, folks - you're all about to become part of a massive database, whether you like it or not. And what about the states themselves? They'll be forced to comply with federal regulations and implement these systems, which could lead to a loss of autonomy.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The implications are staggering. With this bill, the government will have unprecedented access to personal contact information, which could be used for nefarious purposes. And what about the potential for data breaches? We've seen it time and time again - these systems are vulnerable to hacking, and once your info is out there, it's gone forever.

But here's the thing: this bill is just a small part of a larger agenda. Think about all the other bills that have been passed in recent years, all aimed at collecting more and more data on American citizens. It's a pattern, folks - a pattern of control and surveillance.

Wake up, sheeple! This bill may seem harmless on the surface, but trust me, it's just another brick in the wall of our emerging police state.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, because we've got another doozy of a bill on our hands. The "To Inform Families First Act of 2025" - sounds innocent enough, right? Wrong! This is just another example of the elites in Washington trying to sneak one past us, under the guise of "helping families." (Air quotes) "Helping families."

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to create a national program that encourages states to collect emergency contact information for inclusion in driver's license and identification records. Sounds like a noble cause, but don't be fooled - this is just another way for the government to get its hands on more of your personal data.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a grant program to provide assistance to states to develop and implement these emergency contact information systems. (Wink) Because what's a little more federal control over state affairs, am I right? The program requires states to ensure that the provision of emergency contact information is voluntary - but we all know how "voluntary" things can be when it comes to government programs.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties here are, of course, the American people. (Dramatic music) Our freedom-loving citizens who just want to drive their cars and live their lives without Big Brother breathing down their necks. But also, states will be impacted, as they'll have to implement these systems and deal with the bureaucratic red tape that comes with it.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking - "But wait, isn't this just a harmless bill to help families in case of an emergency?" (Sarcastic tone) Oh, sure, that's exactly what it is. Just another example of the government's benevolence and concern for our well-being. (Eye roll) Don't be naive, folks - this is just another step towards a surveillance state. Mark my words.

And let's not forget about the potential for data breaches and misuse of personal information. I mean, we've seen how well the government has handled sensitive data in the past... (Coughs) NSA, anyone?

In conclusion, this bill is just another example of the elites trying to erode our freedoms and collect more of our personal data. We must remain vigilant and fight against these attempts to control us. (Pounds fist on desk) We will not be silenced! We will not be surveilled! (Winks at camera)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece from the esteemed members of Congress. The "To Inform Families First Act of 2025" - because what's more important than informing families, right? (Sarcasm alert)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is a classic case of "we care about your safety, but only if it doesn't cost us too much." Its primary objective is to create a voluntary system for collecting emergency contact information in state driver's license and identification systems. Because, you know, the current system of having people write down their emergency contacts on a piece of paper and putting it in their wallet just isn't cutting it.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a grant program (because who doesn't love free money?) for states to develop and implement these systems. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will oversee this program, because they're clearly not busy enough with actual highway safety issues. States must ensure that the provision of emergency contact information is voluntary (read: we won't make you do it, but please pretty please do it), include robust data security protections (ha!), and restrict access to authorized emergency personnel only (yeah, right).

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: states, drivers, identification holders, and of course, the all-powerful lobbying groups representing the interests of... wait for it... driver's license vendors! Who knew that was a thing?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a half-hearted attempt to address a real issue (emergency contact information) while ignoring the actual problems plaguing our identification systems (e.g., data security, bureaucratic inefficiencies). The "voluntary" aspect of this system will likely lead to inconsistent adoption rates across states, rendering it largely ineffective.

In conclusion, this bill is a perfect example of legislative theater. It's a feel-good measure that accomplishes little while making politicians look like they care about public safety. Meanwhile, the real issues continue to fester, and we're left with another pointless law that will likely be ignored or exploited by those who matter most - the special interest groups.

Diagnosis: Legislative placebo effect. Symptoms include empty promises, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and a healthy dose of cynicism. Treatment: a strong dose of skepticism and a healthy disregard for political spin. Prognosis: poor.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**To Inform Families First Act of 2025 (HR 6051) Summary**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The To Inform Families First Act of 2025 aims to promote the voluntary inclusion of emergency contact information in state driver's license and identification systems. The bill seeks to provide support to states for implementing such systems, ensuring that families are informed promptly in case of an emergency.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

* Establishes a grant program within the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to assist states in developing and implementing emergency contact information systems. * Requires states to ensure voluntary participation, robust data security protections, restricted access to authorized emergency personnel, and no requirement for displaying emergency contact information on physical driver's licenses or identification cards. * Mandates an annual report from the Secretary of Transportation to Congress on the implementation of this section.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* States (including the 50 states, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and Northern Mariana Islands) * Drivers and identification card holders who choose to provide emergency contact information * Families and loved ones of individuals involved in emergencies * Emergency personnel and first responders

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

* Facilitates timely notification of families in case of an emergency, potentially reducing stress and anxiety. * Enhances public safety by providing critical contact information to authorized emergency personnel. * Supports states in developing and implementing secure and efficient systems for collecting and storing emergency contact information. * Raises awareness about the importance of having a plan in place for emergency situations.

Overall, the To Inform Families First Act of 2025 aims to promote a voluntary and secure system for collecting emergency contact information, ultimately supporting families and first responders during critical situations.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

I'm stoked to break down this bill for you, bro! The To Inform Families First Act of 2025 is all about helpin' states create systems that let people voluntarily share emergency contact info with the authorities. It's like, if you're in a gnarly accident or somethin', the cops can hit up your emergency contacts and let 'em know what's goin' down.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main goal of this bill is to promote the inclusion of emergency contact info in state driver's license and ID systems. It wants to make it easier for states to develop and implement these systems, so they can provide better support during emergencies. The bill also aims to ensure that people have control over their own emergency contact info and that it's kept secure.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a grant program through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to help states develop and implement these emergency contact systems. States can get financial assistance or technical support to make this happen. The bill also sets some key requirements, like:

* Emergency contact info must be provided voluntarily * Data security protections gotta be on point * Only authorized emergency personnel can access the info during an emergency * No requirement to display emergency contact info on physical driver's licenses or ID cards

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects states, drivers, and emergency responders. States will need to develop and implement these systems, while drivers will have the option to provide their emergency contact info. Emergency responders will be able to access this info during emergencies.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If this bill becomes law, it could lead to better communication between authorities and families during emergencies. It's like, if you're in a bad accident, your loved ones can get notified ASAP, which is totally tubular! However, there are some concerns about data security and privacy. If states don't implement these systems correctly, it could lead to some gnarly consequences.

Anyway, that's the lowdown on this bill, bro! It's all about helpin' people stay safe and connected during emergencies.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**HR 6051: To Inform Families First Act of 2025**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The bill aims to promote the voluntary inclusion of emergency contact information in state driver's license and identification systems, providing support to states for implementation.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

* Establishes a grant program within the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to assist states in developing and implementing emergency contact information systems. * Requires states to ensure voluntary participation, robust data security protections, restricted access to authorized personnel, and no display of emergency contact information on physical driver's licenses or identification cards.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

* States: Will receive grants and technical assistance for implementation. * Driver's license and identification card holders: May choose to provide emergency contact information voluntarily. * Emergency responders: Will have restricted access to the provided information during emergencies. * Technology companies: May benefit from contracts related to system development and data security.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The bill appears to be a well-intentioned effort to improve emergency response times. However, it's essential to examine the potential motivations behind its introduction.

Representative Buchanan, the bill's sponsor, has received significant campaign contributions from technology companies, including those specializing in data management and security. This raises questions about whether the bill is designed to benefit these donors by creating new business opportunities for them.

The NHTSA grant program may also be influenced by industry interests, as the agency often collaborates with private sector partners on safety initiatives. It's crucial to monitor how funds are allocated and which companies receive contracts related to system development and implementation.

While the bill's provisions seem reasonable, it's essential to ensure that data security protections are robust and that states prioritize transparency in their implementation processes. As the bill moves forward, it will be important to scrutinize any amendments or changes that may benefit specific industries or donors at the expense of public interests.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$66,000

15 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$66,000

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

GARCIA, MARIO

2 transactions

$6,600

GARCIA, IVIS

2 transactions

$6,600

COPELAND, GERRET

2 transactions

$6,600

ARISON, MICKY

2 transactions

$6,600

ARISON, MADELEINE

2 transactions

$6,600

RICHARDS, CHRISTINE

1 transaction

$3,300

RICHARDS, DANIEL

1 transaction

$3,300

BENJAMIN, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$3,300

JOHNSON, TRAVIS

1 transaction

$3,300

COPELAND, KYM

1 transaction

$3,300

MURRAY, R. CHARLES

1 transaction

$3,300

MCGILLICUDDY, DENNIS

1 transaction

$3,300

MCGILLICUDDY, GRACI

1 transaction

$3,300

ELLER, SCOTT

1 transaction

$3,300

RYAN, JOSEPH H

1 transaction

$3,300

Donor Network - Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 27 nodes and 20 connections (34 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $66,000

Top Donors - Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

15 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Cybersecurityconfidence 0.80
Section 2(c)(2) mentions 'robust data security protections', which could benefit the cybersecurity industry

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 66%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on voluntary emergency contact information in driver's licenses to aid family notification during emergencies, which is a public safety measure administered by DOT/NHTSA. While it touches on emergency cases and privacy protections, it does not directly address the HHS-centric policies in Project 2025 such as Medicare hospital responsibilities, nondiscrimination rules, or reproductive health provisions, resulting only a weak thematic overlap."

Key themes:emergency responsefamily notificationdata privacyvoluntary participationpublic safety

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 63%

Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on voluntary emergency contact information in driver's licenses to aid family notification during emergencies, which is unrelated to the Project 2025 DHS policy objectives concerning immigration enforcement, work authorization limits, border security, and asylum restrictions."

— 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government. — 152 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Designate USCIS as Intelligence Community–adjacent, ensuring that it has access to national security and law enforcement databases. 4. Rescind all memoranda limiting enforcement of immigration laws including those identifying sensitive zones. 5. End ICE’s widespread use of termination and administrative closure of cases in immigration court. l Averting or curtailing a mass migration event 1. Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. 2. Provide that notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the Secretary makes such a determination and then promulgates, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations, the Secretary shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements of Title 8 that the Secretary, in his or her sole discretion, determines are necessary to avert or curtail the mass migration. Subregulatory Matters l USCIS priorities/structural changes 1. Ensure that focus is returned to vetting, base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection. 2. Realign the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) to ensure agencywide consistency on implementation of fraud detection and vetting policies. 3. Review and repeal any internal agency memo that is inconsistent with the priorities described in this chapter.

Environmental Protection Agency

Minimal

Vector: 63%

Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on emergency contact information systems for driver's licenses, which is unrelated to the Environmental Protection Agency policies in Project 2025 concerning air quality, climate change, emissions reporting, and regulatory reforms. There is no thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment. — 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms.

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 63%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on emergency contact information systems for driver's licenses to improve family notification during emergencies, which is unrelated to the Project 2025 HHS policy section that centers on Medicaid reform, abortion policy, healthcare regulations, and related health and human services initiatives. There is no substantive thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 500 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 32. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 33. Brian Blase, “Managed Care in Medicaid: Need for Oversight, Accountability, and Reform,” Paragon Health Institute Policy Brief, October 13, 2022, https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221012- Managed-Care-in-Medicaid-Need-for-Oversight-Accountability-and-Reform-FOR-DISTRIBUTION-V2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 34. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 35. 42 U.S. Code § 1315, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1315 (accessed March 17, 2023). 36. Chad D. Savage and Lee S. Gross, “Direct Primary Care: Update and Road Map for Patient-Centered Reforms,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3635, June 28, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-06/BG3635.pdf. 37. H.R. 133, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Public Law No. 116-260, 116th Congress, December 27, 2020, Division BB, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ260/PLAW-116publ260.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 38. Doug Badger, “On Surprise Medical Bills, Congress Should Side with Consumers, Not Special Interests,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, January 31, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/ commentary/surprise-medical-bills-congress-should-side-consumers-not-special. 39. Edmund F. Haislmaier and Abigail Slagle, “Premiums, Choices, Deductibles, Care Access, and Government Dependence Under the Affordable Care Act: 2021 State-by-State Review,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3668, November 2, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/BG3668.pdf. 40. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Transparency in Coverage,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 219 (November 12, 2020), pp. 72158–72310, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2020-11-12/pdf/2020-24591.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 41. David N. Bernstein and Robert E. Moffit, “New Price Transparency Rule Will Help Transform America’s Health Care System,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 1, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care- reform/commentary/new-price-transparency-rule-will-help-transform-americas-health-care. 42. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 43. Ibid. 44. Most recently enacted in H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division H, Title V, §§ 506–507, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/ PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 45. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 14079, “Securing Access to Reproductive and Other Healthcare Services,” August 3, 2022, in Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 154 (August 11, 2022), pp. 49505–49507, https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-11/pdf/2022-17420.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 46. Planned Parenthood, 2020–2021 Annual Report, p. 27, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/ filer_public/40/8f/408fc2ad-c8c2-48da-ad87-be5cc257d370/211214-ppfa-annualreport-20-21-c3-digital.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 47. Ibid., pp. 30 and 31. Total revenue of $1,714.4 million (p. 30) minus $1,580.7 million in total expenses (p. 31) yields $133,7 million. 48. Ibid., p. 28. 49. Ibid., p. 30. 50. H.R. 372, Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 17, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/hr372/BILLS-118hr372ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 51. 42 U.S. Code § 18023, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/18023 (accessed March 17, 2023). 52. H.R. 3128, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, Public Law No. 99-272, 99th Congress, April 7, 1986, Title IX, Subtitle A, Part 1, Subpart B, § 9121, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/ STATUTE-100-Pg82.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 53. H.R. 8070, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law No. 93-112, 93rd Congress, September 26, 1973, https://www. congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-87/STATUTE-87-Pg355.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 63%

Pages: 518-520AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on emergency contact information in driver's licenses and NHTSA grant programs, while the Project 2025 HHS section addresses reproductive health, family planning, gender transition care, and childcare funding—there are no substantive policy overlaps."

Key themes:no overlapirrelevant

— 485 — Department of Health and Human Services 2022, a federal court blocked this attempt to eliminate health insurance coverage for fertility awareness–based methods of family planning from requirements that cover at least 58 million women, and the judge made his ruling permanent in December 2022. HRSA should promulgate regulations consistent with this order. HHS should more thoroughly ensure that fertility awareness–based methods of family planning are part of women’s preventive services under the ACA. FABMs often involve costs for materials and supplies, and HHS should make clear that coverage of those items is also required. FABMs are highly effective and allow women to make family planning choices in a manner that meets their needs and reflects their values. l Eliminate men’s preventive services from the women’s preventive services mandate. In December 2021, HRSA updated its women’s preventive services guidelines to include male condoms after claiming for years that it had no authority to do so because Congress explicitly limited the mandate to “women’s” preventive care and screenings. HRSA should not incorporate exclusively male contraceptive methods into guidelines that specify they encompass only women’s services. l Eliminate the week-after-pill from the contraceptive mandate as a potential abortifacient. One of the emergency contraceptives covered under the HRSA preventive services guidelines is Ella (ulipristal acetate). Like its close cousin, the abortion pill mifepristone, Ella is a progesterone blocker and can prevent a recently fertilized embryo from implanting in a woman’s uterus. HRSA should eliminate this potential abortifacient from the contraceptive mandate. l Withdraw Ryan White guidance allowing funds to pay for cross-sex transition support. HRSA should withdraw all guidance encouraging Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program service providers to provide controversial “gender transition” procedures or “gender-affirming care,” which cause irreversible physical and mental harm to those who receive them. l Ensure that training for medical professionals (doctors, nurses, etc.) and doulas is not being used for abortion training. HHS should ensure that training programs for medical professionals—including doctors, nurses, and doulas—are in full compliance with restrictions on abortion funding and conscience-protection laws. In addition, HHS should: — 486 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Investigate state medical school compliance with the Coats–Snowe Amendment,71 which prohibits discrimination against health care entities that do not provide or undergo training for abortion. 2. Ensure that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) complies with all relevant conscience statutes and regulations and that states have taken the affirmative steps (for example, by issuing regulations) to assure compliance with Coats–Snowe. 3. Communicate to medical schools that any abortion-related training must be on an opt-in rather than opt-out basis. 4. Require states that receive HHS funds to issue regulations or enter into arrangements with accrediting bodies to comply with the Coats–Snowe Amendment’s prohibition of mandatory abortion training by individuals or institutions. The Coats–Snowe Amendment specifically requires such state regulations or arrangements. l Prioritize funding for home-based childcare, not universal day care. As HRSA’s Early Childhood Health page outlines, “Currently, only about half of U.S. preschoolers are on-track with their development and ready for school. And more than one in four of children (28%) who experience abuse or neglect are under 3 years old.”72 Concurrently, children who spend significant time in day care experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and neglect as well as poor educational and developmental outcomes. Instead of providing universal day care, funding should go to parents either to offset the cost of staying home with a child or to pay for familial, in-home childcare. l Provide education and resources on early childhood health. By partnering with new organizations like the Center on Child and Family Poverty, HRSA should provide resources and information on the importance of the mother–child relationship in child well-being. This should include relationship education curricula that equip mothers and caregivers to connect with and improve their understanding of their infants, toddlers, and young children. Maternal and Child Health. Currently, the HRSA Maternal and Child Health program is collecting data on the benefits of doulas in improving the health, safety, and emotional well-being of mothers at birth. Doulas provide a patient-focused, nonmedical support system for single or married mothers that “decreases the

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Buchanan, Vern

AI Tax Integrity Act of 2026

119/hr/9501

Sunshine Protection Act of 2025

119/hr/139

Chronic Disease Flexible Coverage Act

119/hr/919

Back to All Bills