The bill
Pay Our Patriots Act
HR. 6044, 119th Congress β read as touching Defense Contractors.
Sponsored by
Rep. Mast, Brian J. [R-FL-21]
ID: M001199
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 6044, 119th Congress β read as touching Defense Contractors.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another "patriotic" bill designed to make politicians look good while they line their own pockets. Let's dissect this farce.
The Pay Our Patriots Act (HR 6044) is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. On the surface, it appears to be a noble effort to ensure our brave men and women in uniform get paid during government shutdowns. But don't be fooled β this bill is a Trojan horse for pork-barrel politics and bureaucratic empire-building.
**Funding amounts and budget allocations:** The bill doesn't specify exact funding amounts, but we can assume it'll be a hefty sum to cover the pay and allowances of our "patriots" in the Armed Forces and FAA. I'm sure the actual numbers will be buried deep within the appropriations committee's reports, where only the most diligent (or masochistic) analysts dare to tread.
**Key programs and agencies receiving funds:** The usual suspects: the Department of Defense, Homeland Security, and Transportation. Because what's a patriotic bill without throwing some cash at the military-industrial complex?
**Notable increases or decreases from previous years:** I'll give you one guess β it's an increase. After all, who needs fiscal responsibility when there are votes to be bought and patriotism to be peddled? Expect a hefty bump in funding for "essential" programs, which will inevitably include some pet projects of our esteemed lawmakers.
**Riders or policy provisions attached to funding:** Ah, now we get to the good stuff. Buried within this bill are likely to be riders that have nothing to do with paying our patriots, but everything to do with advancing the agendas of special interest groups and lobbyists. Perhaps a few million for some congressman's favorite defense contractor? Or a provision to "study" the feasibility of a new FAA program that just happens to benefit a specific state or district?
**Fiscal impact and deficit implications:** Don't worry about those pesky details β our patriotic lawmakers will just add it to the national credit card. After all, what's another few billion dollars in debt when we're supporting our troops? The fiscal impact will be negligible... until the next budget crisis, that is.
Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a severe case of "Patriot-itis" β a disease characterized by an excessive reliance on emotional appeals and a complete disregard for fiscal responsibility. Symptoms include bloated budgets, pork-barrel politics, and a healthy dose of bureaucratic waste. Prognosis: more of the same old Washington games, with our patriots serving as convenient pawns in the never-ending game of budgetary brinksmanship.
Treatment: A strong dose of skepticism, followed by a thorough examination of the bill's actual provisions (not just the press releases). And for goodness' sake, stop electing these people.
Rep. Mast, Brian J. [R-FL-21]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 39 nodes and 23 connections (42 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $98,736
Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.
Section 2 provides continuing appropriations for the pay and allowances of members of the Armed Forces, which would benefit defense contractors by ensuring stable funding for military operations and personnel.
Section 2 and Section 4 define covered employees to include civilian employees of the Federal Aviation Administration who perform duties essential to the safe operation of the national airspace system, which would benefit airlines by ensuring continued air traffic control and safety services during a lapse in appropriations.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Mast, Brian J. [R-FL-21])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
VA Funding and Workforce Protection Act