Commonsense Legislating Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/6039
Last Updated: November 18, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]

ID: M000312

Follow the money

The bill

Commonsense Legislating Act

HR. 6039, 119th Congress β€” read as touching Big Tech Platforms.

The sponsor

Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$85,400 raised

25 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

πŸ“ Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

πŸ›οΈ

Committee Review

πŸ—³οΈ

Floor Action

βœ…

Passed Senate

πŸ›οΈ

House Review

πŸŽ‰

Passed Congress

πŸ–ŠοΈ

Presidential Action

βš–οΈ

Became Law

πŸ“š How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this "Commonsense Legislating Act" (HR 6039) and expose its true nature.

**Total Funding Amounts and Budget Allocations**

The bill authorizes a whopping $35 million for Native American Tourism Grant Programs over five years (2026-2030). That's roughly $7 million per year. I'm sure this will make a significant dent in the grand scheme of things. Meanwhile, the extension of the FAST program and application assistance to broaden participation in SBIR/STTR programs are essentially unfunded mandates.

**Key Programs and Agencies Receiving Funds**

The Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Native Hawaiian Relations, and various other federal agencies will receive funding for tourism grants, outreach efforts, and mental health consultations. Because what's more pressing than boosting Native American tourism? I'm sure the country is just dying to know about the rich cultural heritage of our indigenous peoples.

**Notable Increases or Decreases from Previous Years**

There are no notable increases or decreases mentioned in the bill. It's a new allocation, so it's not like they're taking money away from something more important... oh wait, that's exactly what they're doing.

**Riders or Policy Provisions Attached to Funding**

The bill includes policy provisions aimed at increasing minority institution participation in SBIR/STTR programs and providing mental health consultations for veterans. Because who needs actual funding when you can just attach some feel-good riders?

**Fiscal Impact and Deficit Implications**

This bill is a drop in the bucket compared to the overall federal budget, but it's still a waste of taxpayer dollars. The $35 million allocation will likely be offset by cuts elsewhere or added to the national debt. Because who needs fiscal responsibility when you can just kick the can down the road?

In conclusion, this "Commonsense Legislating Act" is a joke. It's a collection of unfunded mandates, pork-barrel projects, and policy riders designed to make politicians look good while accomplishing nothing meaningful. The real disease here is the chronic inability of our elected officials to prioritize actual problems over pet projects and special interests.

Diagnosis: Terminal Stupidity Syndrome (TSS), characterized by an inability to distinguish between meaningful legislation and legislative theater. Prognosis: Poor, with a high likelihood of continued waste and inefficiency in government spending. Treatment: None, as the patient is too far gone to respond to reason or common sense.

Related Topics

State & Local Government AffairsPublic Lands & Natural ResourcesFederal Budget & Appropriations
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

πŸ’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]

Congress 119 β€’ 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$85,400
19 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$16,100
Committees
$0
Individuals
$69,300

No PAC contributions found

1
CHEROKEE NATION
2 transactions
$6,600
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$6,600
3
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
1 transaction
$2,900

No committee contributions found

1
HANEY, WILLIAM M III
2 transactions
$9,900
2
GURAL, JEFFREY
2 transactions
$6,600
3
HELM, NELSON JR
2 transactions
$6,600
4
KAPUR, RAMESH
2 transactions
$6,600
5
DEMPSEY, BRIAN S
1 transaction
$3,300
6
ESLER, JOHN K.
1 transaction
$3,300
7
TANG, KEVIN
1 transaction
$3,300
8
BARRON, MATT L
1 transaction
$3,300
9
KRASNIQI, DANUTA
1 transaction
$3,300
10
LINDEN, LAWRENCE
1 transaction
$3,300
11
CURTIS, LAWRENCE H
1 transaction
$3,300
12
CURTIS, MARLA G
1 transaction
$3,300
13
DICKSON, ERIC W
1 transaction
$3,300
14
ELDRIDGE, SEAN
1 transaction
$3,300
15
GUZMAN, LISETTE
1 transaction
$3,300
16
KRASNIQI, FLORIN
1 transaction
$3,300

Donor Network - Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 42 nodes and 25 connections (51 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $85,400

Top Donors - Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]

Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs16 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 25 harmed.

  • Title IX, Section 901 prohibits Members, Delegates, Resident Commissioners, officers, or employees of the House from serving as an officer or director of any public company, which includes big tech platforms like Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, etc., imposing a restriction that could limit their ability to employ or engage with House personnel, thus a potential cost.

  • Title IX, Section 901 prohibits House personnel from serving as officers or directors of any public company, which includes investment banks like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, etc., imposing a restriction that could limit their ability to engage with House personnel, thus a potential cost.

  • Title IX, Section 901 prohibits House personnel from serving as officers or directors of any public company, which includes insurance carriers like State Farm, Allstate, Berkshire Hathaway insurance, Prudential, MetLife, etc., imposing a restriction that could limit their ability to engage with House personnel, thus a potential cost.

  • βˆ’Real Estateconfidence 0.90

    Title IX, Section 901 prohibits House personnel from serving as officers or directors of any public company, which includes real estate developers, REITs, homebuilders, and property managers like Blackstone real estate, Lennar, D.R. Horton, NAR, etc., imposing a restriction that could limit their ability to engage with House personnel, thus a potential cost.

  • Title IX, Section 901 prohibits House personnel from serving as officers or directors of any public company, which includes private equity firms and hedge funds like Blackstone, KKR, Carlyle, Citadel, Bridgewater, etc., imposing a restriction that could limit their ability to engage with House personnel, thus a potential cost.

  • βˆ’Crypto & Fintechconfidence 0.90

    Title IX, Section 901 prohibits House personnel from serving as officers or directors of any public company, which includes cryptocurrency exchanges, blockchain firms, and fintech payment platforms like Coinbase, Ripple, Circle, Stripe, PayPal, Block, etc., imposing a restriction that could limit their ability to engage with House personnel, thus a potential cost.

+ 19 more industries not shown.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β€” they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Related Bills