Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025

The Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025, HR 5968. A bill that reeks of nostalgia for a bygone era, attempting to impose an outdated notion of "classical learning" on the next generation. Let's dissect this relic and assess its implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to promote the use of the Classic Learning Test (CLT) at military service academies and federally-run schools. Its proponents likely believe that by doing so, they can restore some semblance of intellectual rigor to America's educational system. How quaint.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

* Requires military service academies to accept CLT scores as part of the application process. * Mandates the administration of the CLT in 11th grade at federally-run secondary schools, including those operated by the Department of Defense Education Activity and the Bureau of Indian Education.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary beneficiaries of this bill are likely the test's creators and administrators, who will reap financial rewards from its widespread adoption. Additionally, some educators and policymakers may see this as an opportunity to impose their vision of a "classical education" on students. However, I suspect that most stakeholders – including students, parents, and educators – will be largely unaffected or even hindered by this bill's provisions.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From my perspective, the impact of this bill is negligible. It represents a minor perturbation in the educational landscape, one that will likely be offset by more significant factors such as technological advancements and shifting societal values. However, I do see an opportunity for strategic investment in the testing industry, potentially yielding returns in the hundreds of millions.

In conclusion, HR 5968 is a bill that embodies the inefficiencies of democratic decision-making. It represents a nostalgic attempt to impose outdated educational standards on future generations, rather than embracing innovation and progress. As a visionary entrepreneur, I would advise policymakers to focus on more pressing matters – such as deregulating industries and fostering an environment conducive to technological advancement.

Rating: 2/10 ( potential for strategic investment in testing industry)

Recommendation: Monitor the bill's progress, but do not allocate significant resources to its passage or defeat. Instead, focus on more impactful legislative initiatives that align with our interests.

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process before it can be enacted.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025 aims to promote the use of the Classic Learning Test (CLT) at military service academies and federally-run schools. Remember when we learned about the different types of bills? This one is a public bill, as it affects the general population.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill has two main provisions:

1. It requires military service academies to accept CLT scores as part of their application process, in addition to SAT or ACT scores. 2. It mandates that federally-run secondary schools administer the CLT to 11th-grade students.

As we covered in class, this bill would amend existing laws related to education and military service academies. However, it's worth noting that these changes might not be as significant as they seem, given the current state of our education system.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties include:

* Military service academies * Federally-run secondary schools (including DODEA schools and Tribally Controlled Schools) * Students applying to military service academies or attending federally-run schools * The Department of Defense Education Activity * The Bureau of Indian Education

We discussed in class how bills can have far-reaching consequences, but it's surprising that some adults still don't grasp this concept.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact of this bill is limited, as it only affects a specific subset of schools and students. However, it could lead to increased adoption of the CLT as an alternative to traditional standardized tests. On the other hand, it might also create additional administrative burdens for schools and academies.

As I'm sure you recall from our discussions on checks and balances, this bill would need to pass both the House and Senate before being signed into law by the President. But let's be real, we all know how that process usually plays out...

The "Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025" - sounds innocent enough, doesn't it? But let me tell you, my friends and family gathered around this Thanksgiving table, there's more to this bill than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** On the surface, HR 5968 aims to promote the use of the Classic Learning Test (CLT) at military service academies and federally-run schools. But what's really going on here? I believe this bill is a Trojan horse for a larger agenda: to reshape the way our children think and learn.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill requires military service academies to accept CLT scores as part of their application process, alongside SAT and ACT scores. It also mandates that federally-run secondary schools administer the CLT to 11th-grade students. But here's the thing: what if this is just a stepping stone for a more comprehensive overhaul of our education system? What if this is the beginning of a nationwide push to adopt a new, standardized testing regime?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The obvious stakeholders are military service academies and federally-run schools. But let's not forget about the real beneficiaries: the companies behind these tests, like the Classic Learning Test organization itself. Who owns them? What are their ties to government agencies or powerful interest groups? We need to follow the money trail here.

**Potential Impact & Implications** This bill could have far-reaching consequences for our education system and beyond. Think about it: if we start standardizing testing across the country, what's next? Standardized curricula? Standardized thinking? This is a slippery slope, folks. And what about the data collection implications? With more standardized tests comes more data on our children - data that can be used to shape their futures, influence their choices, and control their minds.

Now, I know some of you might think I'm being paranoid, but let me ask you: have you ever stopped to consider why this bill is being pushed through now? What's the real motivation behind it? Is it just a coincidence that this comes at a time when our country is facing unprecedented challenges and divisions?

Wake up, sheeple! This bill is just one piece of a larger puzzle. We need to start connecting the dots and questioning the official narrative. Who knows what other secrets are hiding in plain sight?

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here! The "Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025" - sounds innocent enough, right? But trust me, this is just the tip of the iceberg. (Wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill, introduced by Reps. Miller and Boebert, claims to promote classical learning in our nation's military service academies and federally-run schools. Now, who wouldn't want that? Sounds like a noble pursuit... or is it? (Skeptical tone) What they're really trying to do here is push the Classic Learning Test (CLT) as an alternative to those "elitist" SATs and ACTs. You know, the ones that actually measure critical thinking skills? (Rolls eyes)

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires military service academies to accept CLT scores as part of their application process, alongside SAT and ACT scores. And for federally-run secondary schools, they'll be forced to administer the CLT to 11th-grade students. Now, I know what you're thinking - "What's wrong with a little competition in the testing market?" Well, my friends, this is just a Trojan horse for pushing conservative ideology into our education system.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects will be impacted here: military service academies, Department of Defense Education Activity schools, and Tribally Controlled Schools. But let's not forget about the real stakeholders - the students themselves! Will they be better off with this "classical learning" approach? (Sarcastic tone) Oh, I'm sure it'll prepare them perfectly for the 21st century... or maybe just for a life of debating Plato and Aristotle in some ivory tower.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a masterstroke - not because it's good policy, but because it's a clever way to inject conservative values into our education system. Think about it: by promoting the CLT, they're essentially creating an alternative testing regime that caters to their own ideology. And what's next? Will we see a push for "classical learning" curricula in public schools nationwide? (Gasp) The horror!

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But wait, isn't this just about promoting freedom and choice in education?" Ah, yes... the old "freedom" card. (Smirk) Well, let me tell you, folks, this is just a clever ruse to undermine our existing education system and push a conservative agenda.

Stay vigilant, America! The elites are at it again, trying to control what your kids learn in school. We must stand strong against this assault on our freedom... or should I say, our freedom to think critically? (Wink)

**Bill Summary: HR 5968 - Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025 aims to promote the use of the Classic Learning Test (CLT) in military service academies and federally-run schools. The bill seeks to provide students with an alternative assessment option, in addition to traditional standardized tests like the SAT and ACT.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Military Service Academies:** Requires the Secretary of Defense to ensure that each service academy accepts CLT scores as part of the application process for admission. 2. **Federally-Run Secondary Schools:** Mandates the administration of the CLT in: * Department of Defense Education Activity (DODEA) schools for 11th-grade students. * Tribally controlled schools and Bureau of Indian Education (BIE)-operated schools for 11th-grade students.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Students:** Applicants to military service academies and students in federally-run secondary schools, particularly those in DODEA and BIE-operated schools. 2. **Military Service Academies:** The United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, and the United States Coast Guard Academy. 3. **Federally-Run Schools:** DODEA schools, tribally controlled schools, and BIE-operated schools.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Options for Students:** The bill provides students with an alternative assessment option, which may benefit those who perform better on the CLT. 2. **Diversification of Assessment Methods:** By promoting the use of the CLT, the bill encourages a more diverse range of assessment methods in education. 3. **Potential Impact on College Readiness:** The CLT is designed to assess classical learning skills, which may help prepare students for college-level coursework. 4. **Implementation Challenges:** Schools and academies may face challenges in implementing the CLT, including training staff and adapting curricula.

Overall, the Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025 aims to promote a more diverse range of assessment options in education, potentially benefiting students who excel in classical learning skills. However, its implementation may require significant efforts from affected schools and academies.

I'm stoked you're interested in breakin' down this congressional bill, bro! Let's dive into the Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025, aka HR 5968.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill is all about promoting classical learning, dude. It aims to make it easier for students to take the Classic Learning Test (CLT) as an alternative to the SAT or ACT when applying to military service academies and federally-run schools. The goal is to give students more options and flexibility in their college prep journey.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill has two main provisions, bro:

1. **Military Service Academies**: The Secretary of Defense will make sure that each service academy (think West Point, Annapolis, etc.) accepts CLT scores as part of the application process. 2. **Federally-Run Schools**: The Department of Defense Education Activity and the Bureau of Indian Education will require schools under their jurisdiction to administer the CLT to 11th-grade students.

These provisions are all about expanding access to classical learning and giving students more choices, man.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects several groups, dude:

* Students applying to military service academies * Students attending federally-run secondary schools (DODEA and BIE-operated schools) * Military service academies themselves * The Department of Defense Education Activity * The Bureau of Indian Education

These stakeholders will need to adapt to the new requirements and changes brought about by this bill.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The impact of this bill could be significant, bro. By promoting classical learning, it might:

* Increase diversity in college admissions (more students from different backgrounds taking the CLT) * Provide an alternative assessment option for students who might not do as well on traditional standardized tests * Enhance critical thinking and analytical skills among students

However, there are also potential drawbacks to consider, man. Some critics might argue that:

* The bill could create unequal opportunities or biases in favor of students who take the CLT * It might lead to a lack of standardization across different schools and academies * The focus on classical learning might overlook other important aspects of education

Overall, this bill is all about giving students more options and promoting classical learning. While it's got its pros and cons, it's definitely worth keepin' an eye on, bro.

**The Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025: A Bill with Strings Attached**

HR 5968, introduced by Rep. Miller (IL) and cosponsored by Rep. Boebert, appears to be a innocuous bill aimed at promoting classical learning in military service academies and federally-run schools. However, upon closer inspection, it reveals a more complex web of interests and motivations.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to require military service academies and certain federally-run secondary schools to accept the Classic Learning Test (CLT) as an alternative to the SAT or ACT for admission purposes. Additionally, it mandates the administration of the CLT in eleventh grade at Department of Defense Education Activity (DODEA) schools, tribally controlled schools, and Bureau of Indian Education (BIE)-operated schools.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends existing law by adding the CLT as an accepted test for admission to military service academies. It also introduces a new requirement for DODEA schools, tribally controlled schools, and BIE-operated schools to administer the CLT in eleventh grade.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* Military service academies * Federally-run secondary schools (DODEA, tribally controlled, and BIE-operated) * Students applying to military service academies or attending affected schools * Classic Learning Test (CLT) administrators and affiliated organizations

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While the bill's proponents may argue that it promotes classical learning and provides an alternative assessment option, a closer examination reveals potential conflicts of interest. The CLT is a relatively new test, developed by the Classic Learning Initiatives (CLI), a non-profit organization with ties to conservative education reform groups.

Notably, Rep. Miller has received campaign contributions from CLI's founder, Jeremy Tate, and other affiliated individuals. Additionally, CLI has been linked to the Koch-backed network of organizations promoting conservative education policies.

The bill's passage could potentially benefit CLI and its affiliates by increasing the CLT's market share and influence in the education sector. Furthermore, the mandatory administration of the CLT in certain schools may create a captive market for the test, generating revenue for CLI and its partners.

In conclusion, while HR 5968 appears to be a benign bill promoting classical learning, it conceals a complex web of interests and motivations. The potential benefits to CLI and its affiliates raise concerns about the bill's true purpose and the influence of special interest groups in shaping education policy.