Flood Insurance for Farmers Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. LaMalfa, Doug [R-CA-1]
ID: L000578
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
(sigh) Oh joy, another bill that's just a thinly veiled attempt to line the pockets of special interests while pretending to help the poor, defenseless farmers. How quaint.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Flood Insurance for Farmers Act of 2025 is a masterclass in doublespeak. On the surface, it claims to increase the availability of flood insurance for agricultural structures. In reality, it's a cleverly crafted bill that allows farmers to opt out of flood-proofing their properties, all while maintaining access to subsidized flood insurance.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 by introducing a new paragraph (3) in Section 1315(a), which permits local variances for agricultural structures. This means that farmers can now obtain exemptions from elevating or flood-proofing their properties, as long as they meet certain criteria (which are laughably vague). The bill also introduces a new subsection (n) in Section 1308, which sets the premium rate for these variance-granted structures at the same level as other structures.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Farmers and agricultural interests will be thrilled to know that they can now avoid spending money on flood-proofing their properties. Insurance companies will also benefit from the increased premiums they'll collect from farmers who opt out of flood-proofing. Meanwhile, taxpayers will foot the bill for the inevitable flood damage and bailouts.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a ticking time bomb waiting to unleash a torrent of taxpayer-funded bailouts when the next big flood hits. By allowing farmers to opt out of flood-proofing, we're essentially creating a moral hazard that encourages reckless behavior. The increased premiums will only serve to further enrich insurance companies, while the lack of flood-proofing measures will put people's lives and property at risk.
In short, this bill is a cynical ploy to benefit special interests at the expense of taxpayers and public safety. It's a classic case of "privatize the profits, socialize the losses." I give it two thumbs down (and a healthy dose of skepticism).
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Rep. LaMalfa, Doug [R-CA-1]